Endoscopic resection is feasible for high-grade dysplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on colorectal surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain at increased risk for colorectal cancer and death from colorectal cancer compared with the general population despite improvements in inflammation control with advanced therapies, colonoscopic surveillance and reductions in environmental risk factors. This guideline update from 2010 for colorectal surveillance of patients over 16 years with colonic inflammatory bowel disease was developed by stakeholders representing UK physicians, endoscopists, surgeons, specialist nurses and patients with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodological support.An a priori protocol was published describing the approach to three levels of statement: GRADE recommendations, good practice statements or expert opinion statements. A systematic review of 7599 publications, with appraisal and GRADE analysis of trials and network meta-analysis, where appropriate, was performed. Risk thresholding guided GRADE judgements.We made 73 statements for the delivery of an IBD colorectal surveillance service, including outcome standards for service and endoscopist audit, and the importance of shared decision-making with patients.Core areas include: risk of colorectal cancer, IBD-related post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer; service organisation and supporting patient concordance; starting and stopping surveillance, who should or should not receive surveillance; risk stratification, including web-based multivariate risk calculation of surveillance intervals; colonoscopic modalities, bowel preparation, biomarkers and artificial intelligence aided detection; chemoprevention; the role of non-conventional dysplasia, serrated lesions and non-targeted biopsies; management of dysplasia, both endoscopic and surgical, and the structure and role of the multidisciplinary team in IBD dysplasia management; training in IBD colonoscopic surveillance, sustainability (green endoscopy), cost-effectiveness and patient experience. Sixteen research priorities are suggested.

Potential carcinogenic role of Reg IV in ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia

Background

Early detection of ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia (UC-N) remains a clinical challenge. Identification of molecular biomarkers for colorectal dysplasia and cancer may be extremely beneficial in early detection and managing cancer risk in long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) patients.

Objective

The aim of this work is to investigate the role of Reg IV in comparison to P53 and KRAS in UC-associated dysplasia and colorectal cancer (CRC) in order to evaluate the potential use of Reg IV for dysplasia and cancer screening in UC patients.

Methods

The study was conducted on 5 groups each 20 colonic endoscopic samples: 1) Normal colonic mucosa, 2) Active UC without dysplasia/carcinoma, 3) UC-associated dysplasia, 4) UC-associated CRC (UC-CRC), 5) Sporadic CRC. All included cases were subjected to Reg IV mRNA expression analysis by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and immunostaining for Reg IV, P53 and KRAS.

Results

Reg IV mRNA expression levels were found to be significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 (mean: 3.37 and 5.70, respectively). Reg IV immunostaining was highly expressed in groups 3 and 4 (mean: 45.80 and 62.35, respectively). While P53 and KRAS immunostaining was highly expressed in group 5 (mean: 64.57 and 62.90). Furthermore, Reg IV immunoexpression had shown a negative correlation with P53 and KRAS immunoexpression in groups 4 and 5.

Conclusion

Higher expression of Reg IV in patients with UC-dysplasia and UC-CRC versus KRAS and P53 expression in sporadic CRC, suggests a potential role of Reg IV in UC carcinogenesis pathway. This could advocate the use of Reg IV as a screening biomarker for UC-N among patients with long-standing UC as well as a promising targeted therapeutic strategy.

Risk of Cancer in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Keys for Patient Management

Chronic inflammation in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) leads to an increased risk of colorectal cancer, small bowel cancer, intestinal lymphoma and cholangiocarcinoma. However, treatments for IBD have also been associated with an increased risk of neoplasms. Patients receiving Thiopurines (TPs) have an increased risk of hematologic malignancies, non-melanoma skin cancer, urinary tract neoplasms and cervical cancer. Anti-TNFs have been associated with a higher risk of neoplasms, mainly lymphomas and melanomas; however, the data are controversial, and some recent studies do not confirm the association. Nevertheless, other biologic agents, such as ustekinumab and vedolizumab, have not shown an increased risk of any neoplasm to date. The risk of malignancies with tofacitinib exists, but its magnitude and relationship with previous treatment with TPs is not defined, so more studies from daily clinical practice are needed. Although biologic therapy seems to be safe for patients with current cancer or a prior history of cancer, as has been demonstrated in other chronic inflammatory conditions, prospective studies in this specific population are needed. Until that time, it is crucial to manage such conditions via the combined clinical expertise of the gastroenterologist and oncologist.