Swedish guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults

Guidelines to Manage Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Few guidelines have greater acceptance than that for management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Despite this, areas remain controversial, and new challenges continue to emerge. Current guidelines differ from those of northern European countries predominantly in need for macrolide combination with β-lactams for hospitalized, non-intensive care unit patients. A preponderance of evidence favors combination therapy. Challenges for current and future CAP guidelines include new antibiotic classes, emergence of viruses as major causes for CAP, new diagnostic modalities, alternative risk stratification for pathogens resistant to usual CAP antibiotics, and evidence-based management of severe CAP, including immunomodulatory therapy such as corticosteroids.

Management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults: updated Swedish guidelines 2017

Based on expert group work, Swedish recommendations for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults are here updated. The management of sepsis-induced hypotension is addressed in detail, including monitoring and parenteral therapy. The importance of respiratory support in cases of acute respiratory failure is emphasized. Treatment with high-flow oxygen and non-invasive ventilation is recommended. The use of statins or steroids in general therapy is not found to be fully supported by evidence. In the management of pleural infection, new data show favourable effects of tissue plasminogen activator and deoxyribonuclease installation. Detailed recommendations for the vaccination of risk groups are afforded.

Application of vibration response imaging technology in patients with community-acquired pneumonia before and after the treatment

The value of vibration response imaging (VRI) technology in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) was assessed. The VRI images of 62 cases of CAP patients with normal lung functions before and after treatment were observed and the changes in images before and after treatment were compared. The maximum vibration energy value of CAP patients was 1.64±0.32, patients with unsmoothed vibration energy curve accounted for 88.71%, 41 cases (66.12%) had unordered dynamic images, 56 cases (90.32%) jumping images, 54 cases (87.10%) desynchrony, 58 cases (93.55%) delay and 52 cases (83.87%) showed contrary events. The maximum vibration energy value after treatment was 1.59±0.29 and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.93). Patients with unsmoothed vibration energy curve accounted for 20.97%, 11 cases (17.74%) appeared as unordered dynamic images, 28 cases (45.16%) of jumping images, 21 cases (33.87%) desynchrony, 18 cases (29.03%) delay and 10 cases (16.13%) with contrary events. The differences of these symptoms before and after treatment were statistically significant. The image scores of CAP patients before treatment were 10.33±1.95, higher (P<0.001) than after treatment (3.49±2.29). In conclusion, the changes of VRI images of CAP patients are relatively obvious and this technology can be used for the evaluation of CAP curative effects.

Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients

BACKGROUND

Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is the third leading cause of death worldwide and the first leading cause of death in low-income countries. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common condition that causes a significant disease burden for the community, particularly in children younger than five years, the elderly and immunocompromised people. Antibiotics are the standard treatment for CAP. However, increasing antibiotic use is associated with the development of bacterial resistance and side effects for the patient. Several studies have been published regarding optimal antibiotic treatment for CAP but many of these data address treatments in hospitalised patients. This is an update of our 2009 Cochrane Review and addresses antibiotic therapies for CAP in outpatient settings.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of different antibiotic treatments for CAP in participants older than 12 years treated in outpatient settings with respect to clinical, radiological and bacteriological outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 1), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March week 3, 2014), EMBASE (January 1974 to March 2014), CINAHL (2009 to March 2014), Web of Science (2009 to March 2014) and LILACS (2009 to March 2014).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We looked for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), fully published in peer-reviewed journals, of antibiotics versus placebo as well as antibiotics versus another antibiotic for the treatment of CAP in outpatient settings in participants older than 12 years of age. However, we did not find any studies of antibiotics versus placebo. Therefore, this review includes RCTs of one or more antibiotics, which report the diagnostic criteria and describe the clinical outcomes considered for inclusion in this review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (LMB, TJMV) independently assessed study reports in the first publication. In the 2009 update, LMB performed study selection, which was checked by TJMV and MMK. In this 2014 update, two review authors (SP, SM) independently performed and checked study selection. We contacted trial authors to resolve any ambiguities in the study reports. We compiled and analysed the data. We resolved differences between review authors by discussion and consensus.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs in this review update (3352 participants older than 12 years with a diagnosis of CAP); 10 RCTs assessed nine antibiotic pairs (3321 participants) and one RCT assessed four antibiotics (31 participants) in people with CAP. The study quality was generally good, with some differences in the extent of the reporting. A variety of clinical, bacteriological and adverse events were reported. Overall, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of the various antibiotics. Studies evaluating clarithromycin and amoxicillin provided only descriptive data regarding the primary outcome. Though the majority of adverse events were similar between all antibiotics, nemonoxacin demonstrated higher gastrointestinal and nervous system adverse events when compared to levofloxacin, while cethromycin demonstrated significantly more nervous system side effects, especially dysgeusia, when compared to clarithromycin. Similarly, high-dose amoxicillin (1 g three times a day) was associated with higher incidence of gastritis and diarrhoea compared to clarithromycin, azithromycin and levofloxacin.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence from recent RCTs is insufficient to make new evidence-based recommendations for the choice of antibiotic to be used for the treatment of CAP in outpatient settings. Pooling of study data was limited by the very low number of studies assessing the same antibiotic pairs. Individual study results do not reveal significant differences in efficacy between various antibiotics and antibiotic groups. However, two studies did find significantly more adverse events with use of cethromycin as compared to clarithromycin and nemonoxacin when compared to levofloxacin. Multi-drug comparisons using similar administration schedules are needed to provide the evidence necessary for practice recommendations. Further studies focusing on diagnosis, management, cost-effectiveness and misuse of antibiotics in CAP and LRTI are warranted in high-, middle- and low-income countries.

The Binax NOW Streptococcus pneumoniae test applied on nasopharyngeal aspirates to support pneumococcal aetiology in community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

The use of nasopharyngeal secretions to enhance diagnostic yields of pneumococcal aetiology in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is of interest. We evaluated the Binax NOW Streptococcus pneumoniae immunochromatographic test (ICT) on nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) in order to support pneumococcal aetiology in CAP.

METHODS

The NPA ICT was applied on 180 adult CAP patients and 64 healthy controls. The rate of pneumococcal detection in the nasopharynx was compared to rates for lytA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture on NPA.

RESULTS

According to blood and sputum culture and urine ICT, the test sensitivity in 59 patients with a pneumococcal aetiology was 81%. The specificity was suboptimal, with 72% negative tests among CAP patients without a pneumococcal aetiology. However, the test was positive in only 11% of patients with atypical pneumonia and in 4.7% of healthy controls. The positivity rate was higher for NPA ICT compared to culture on NPA in all CAP patients, and to both PCR and culture on NPA in non-pneumococcal non-atypical CAP patients. In 113 (63%) patients with β-lactam monotherapy, cure without treatment alteration was noted more often in cases with positive compared to negative NPA ICT at admission (91% vs 69%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The high sensitivity and the low positivity rates in patients with atypical pneumonia and healthy controls, in combination with the correlation between positive test results and clinical cure with β-lactam therapy, may support a pneumococcal aetiology in CAP in populations with low pneumococcal carriage rates.

Severity of influenza A 2009 (H1N1) pneumonia is underestimated by routine prediction rules. Results from a prospective, population-based study

BACKGROUND

Characteristics of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to pandemic influenza A 2009 (H1N1) have been inadequately compared to CAP caused by other respiratory pathogens. The performance of prediction rules for CAP during an epidemic with a new infectious agent are unknown.

METHODS

Prospective, population-based study from November 2008-November 2009, in centers representing 70% of hospital beds in Iceland. Patients admitted with CAP underwent evaluation and etiologic testing, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for influenza. Data on influenza-like illness in the community and overall hospital admissions were collected. Clinical and laboratory data, including pneumonia severity index (PSI) and CURB-65 of patients with CAP due to H1N1 were compared to those caused by other agents.

RESULTS

Of 338 consecutive and eligible patients 313 (93%) were enrolled. During the pandemic peak, influenza A 2009 (H1N1) patients constituted 38% of admissions due to CAP. These patients were younger, more dyspnoeic and more frequently reported hemoptysis. They had significantly lower severity scores than other patients with CAP (1.23 vs. 1.61, P= .02 for CURB-65, 2.05 vs. 2.87 for PSI, P<.001) and were more likely to require intensive care admission (41% vs. 5%, P<.001) and receive mechanical ventilation (14% vs. 2%, P= .01). Bacterial co-infection was detected in 23% of influenza A 2009 (H1N1) patients with CAP.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical characteristics of CAP caused by influenza A 2009 (H1N1) differ markedly from CAP caused by other etiologic agents. Commonly used CAP prediction rules often failed to predict admissions to intensive care or need for assisted ventilation in CAP caused by the influenza A 2009 (H1N1) virus, underscoring the importance of clinical acumen under these circumstances.

Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is caused by various pathogens, traditionally divided into 'typical' and 'atypical'. Initial antibiotic treatment of CAP is usually empirical, customarily covering both typical and atypical pathogens. To date, no sufficient evidence exists to support this broad coverage, while limiting coverage is bound to reduce toxicity, resistance and expense.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to estimate the mortality and proportion with treatment failure using regimens containing atypical antibiotic coverage compared to those that had typical coverage only. Secondary objectives included the assessment of adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) Issue 3, 2012 which includes the Acute Respiratory Infection Group's Specialized Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to April week 1, 2012) and EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients hospitalized due to CAP, comparing antibiotic regimens with atypical coverage (quinolones, macrolides, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, streptogramins or ketolides) to a regimen without atypical antibiotic coverage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data from included trials. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed heterogeneity using a Chi(2) test.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 28 trials, encompassing 5939 randomized patients. The atypical antibiotic was administered as monotherapy in all but three studies. Only one study assessed a beta-lactam combined with a macrolide compared to the same beta-lactam. There was no difference in mortality between the atypical arm and the non-atypical arm (RR 1.14; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.55), RR < 1 favors the atypical arm. The atypical arm showed an insignificant trend toward clinical success and a significant advantage to bacteriological eradication, which disappeared when evaluating methodologically high quality studies alone. Clinical success for the atypical arm was significantly higher for Legionella pneumophilae (L. pneumophilae) and non-significantly lower for pneumococcal pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of (total) adverse events, or those requiring discontinuation of treatment. However, gastrointestinal events were less common in the atypical arm (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.92). Although the trials assessed different antibiotics, no significant heterogeneity was detected in the analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No benefit of survival or clinical efficacy was shown with empirical atypical coverage in hospitalized patients with CAP. This conclusion relates mostly to the comparison of quinolone monotherapy to beta-lactams. Further trials, comparing beta-lactam monotherapy to the same combined with a macrolide, should be performed.

Swedish guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults--Swedish Society of Infectious Diseases 2012

This document presents the 2012 evidence based guidelines of the Swedish Society of Infectious Diseases for the in- hospital management of adult immunocompetent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The prognostic score 'CRB-65' is recommended for the initial assessment of all CAP patients, and should be regarded as an aid for decision-making concerning the level of care required, microbiological investigation, and antibiotic treatment. Due to the favourable antibiotic resistance situation in Sweden, an initial narrow-spectrum antibiotic treatment primarily directed at Streptococcus pneumoniae is recommended in most situations. The recommended treatment for patients with severe CAP (CRB-65 score 2) is penicillin G in most situations. In critically ill patients (CRB-65 score 3-4), combination therapy with cefotaxime/macrolide or penicillin G/fluoroquinolone is recommended. A thorough microbiological investigation should be undertaken in all patients, including blood cultures, respiratory tract sampling, and urine antigens, with the addition of extensive sampling for more uncommon respiratory pathogens in the case of severe disease. Recommended measures for the prevention of CAP include vaccination for influenza and pneumococci, as well as smoking cessation.

Definite, probable, and possible bacterial aetiologies of community-acquired pneumonia at different CRB-65 scores

According to the recommendations of the Swedish Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) guidelines, the selection of empirical antibiotic therapy should be based on the CRB-65 rule. The guidelines recommend empirical therapy directed predominantly against Streptococcus pneumoniae for patients with low CRB-65 scores and broad-spectrum therapy for patients with high CRB-65 scores. In order to study the utility of the recommendations, we analyzed the data from an aetiological study previously performed on 235 hospitalized adult CAP patients at our medical centre. A definite, probable, or possible bacterial aetiology was noted in 194 cases (83%), including 112 cases (48%) with S. pneumoniae aetiology. The following frequencies of definite-probable aetiologies were noted in the patients with CRB-65 score 0-1 (n=155) and CRB-65 score 2-4 (n=80): S. pneumoniae 30% and 35%, Haemophilus influenzae 6.5% and 14% (p=0.063), Mycoplasma pneumoniae 15% and 5.0% (p=0.019), Chlamydophila species 2.6% and 1.2%, Legionella pneumophila 1.9% and 0%, and Staphylococcus aureus 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively. The high frequency of S. pneumoniae in the study supports the recommendations to predominantly cover this bacterium in the empirical therapy of patients with low CRB-65 scores. In the case of treatment failure in these patients, the study indicates that coverage against M. pneumoniae and H. influenzae should be considered.

Proposed changes to management of lower respiratory tract infections in response to the Clostridium difficile epidemic

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains a major healthcare problem associated with antibiotic use in hospitals. Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the incidence of CDI in the UK and internationally. Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are the leading indication for antibiotic prescription in hospitals and are therefore a critical battleground in the fight against inappropriate antibiotic use and healthcare-associated infections. This article reviews the evidence for interventions to reduce CDI in hospitalized patients with LRTIs. Reducing prescriptions of cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones in favour of penicillin-based regimens and increased use of tetracyclines have been proposed. Expanding outpatient management of LRTIs and reducing length of hospital stay will limit patient exposure to the healthcare environment in which C. difficile is most easily acquired. Intravenous (iv) broad-spectrum antibiotics are often prescribed when narrower spectrum, oral antimicrobials would be equally effective and, in a proportion of patients, antibiotic therapy is used unnecessarily. Shorter antibiotic regimes may be as effective as prolonged therapy and reduce antibiotic-related complications. Early switch from iv to oral therapy allows simpler antibiotic regimens and facilitates early discharge from hospital. Simple improvements in the management of LRTIs have the potential to reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infections.

Antibiotics for community acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the sixth most common cause of death worldwide, is a common condition representing a significant disease burden for the community, particularly in the elderly. Antibiotics are helpful in treating CAP and are the standard treatment. CAP contributes significantly to antibiotic use, which is associated with the development of bacterial resistance and side-effects. Several studies have been published concerning treatment for CAP. Available data arises mainly hospitalized patients studies. This is an update of our 2004 Cochrane Review.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize current evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the efficacy of different antibiotic treatments for CAP in participants older than 12.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2009, issue 1) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to February week 2, 2009), and EMBASE (January 1974 to February 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs in which one or more antibiotics were tested for the treatment of CAP in ambulatory adolescents or adults. Studies testing one or more antibiotics and reporting the diagnostic criteria as well as the clinical outcomes achieved, were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (LMB, TJMV) independently assessed study reports in the first publication. In this update, LMB performed study selection, which was checked by TJMV and MMK. Study authors were contacted to resolve any ambiguities in the study reports. Data were compiled and analyzed. Differences between review authors were resolved by discussion and consensus.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs assessing five antibiotic pairs (1857 participants aged 12 years and older diagnosed with CAP) were included. The study quality was generally good, with some differences in the extent of the reporting. A variety of clinical, radiological and bacteriological diagnostic criteria and outcomes were reported. Overall, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of the various antibiotics.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently available evidence from RCTs is insufficient to make evidence-based recommendations for the choice of antibiotic to be used for the treatment of CAP in ambulatory patients. Pooling of study data was limited by the very low number of studies assessing the same antibiotic pairs. Individual study results do not reveal significant differences in efficacy between various antibiotics and antibiotic groups. Multi-drug comparisons using similar administration schedules are needed to provide the evidence necessary for practice recommendations.

C-reactive protein in diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients in primary care

The usefulness of non-specific inflammatory parameters for the diagnosis of community- acquired pneumonia (CAP) in primary care is not settled. The aim of this study was to assess the value of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and white blood cell count (WBC) for this purpose. These inflammatory parameters, as well as the aetiological agents, were studied in 82 patients with radiologically confirmed CAP. CRP was elevated (>5 mg/l) in 76 patients, with a median value of 65 mg/l. 25 patients had a value of over 100 mg/l. In 32 patients the CRP levels were <50 mg/l and in 17 patients they were <20 mg/l. ESR varied from 5 to 100 mm/h, with a median value of 53 mm/h; in 21 patients the value was <30 mm/h. WBC varied from 4.4 to 21.4x10(9)/l, with a median value of 9.8x10(9)/l. No associations between the levels of the inflammatory parameters and the various aetiologies were found. It is concluded that the examined inflammatory parameters did not contribute notably in the routine diagnosis of CAP established by clinical measures.

Neutrophil and monocyte receptor expression in uncomplicated and complicated influenza A infection with pneumonia

Following influenza, the elderly and those with chronic heart/lung diseases are often affected by bacterial complications such as pneumonia. Whether neutrophil and monocyte functions are affected differently in patients with or without complications is less well known. Therefore, blood neutrophil and monocyte surface receptor expressions were measured in patients with influenza A, with or without complications, by means of flow cytometry. Neutrophil expressions of the adhesion molecules CD11b and CD66b were increased in influenza A, with the highest expression of CD11b in uncomplicated influenza. Monocyte expressions of CD11b and CD18 were also higher in influenza compared with bacterial infection and healthy controls. Neutrophil expressions of the phagocyte receptors CD64 and CD32 and the complement receptor CD35 were impaired in influenza with and without pneumonia compared with bacterial infection, whereas the expressions in monocytes were increased in all infected groups. The expression of the phagocyte receptor CD16 on neutrophils was impaired in all infected groups. Our results suggest increased recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes to infected areas by up-regulation of adhesion molecules in influenza that may be involved in the inflammatory response during infection. In contrast, depression of phagocyte receptor expression on neutrophils in patients with influenza pneumonia may contribute to increased susceptibility to bacterial infections and impaired clearance of encapsulated bacteria such as pneumococci.

Comparing the pneumonia severity index with CURB-65 in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia

Pneumonia severity assessment systems such as the pneumonia severity index (PSI) and CURB-65 were designed to direct appropriate site of care based on 30-d mortality. Increasingly they are being used to guide empirical antibiotic therapy and also possibly to detect patients who will require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients admitted to our institution with confirmed community acquired pneumonia (CAP) for the 12 months from January 2002. 408 episodes were studied with an overall 30-d mortality of 15.4% and ICU admission of 10.5%. PSI classes IV/V were significantly better than CURB-65 score > or = 3 for predicting patients who died within 30 d (94% vs 62%; p < 0.001), and those that needed ICU (86% vs 61%; p = 0.01). In addition, for the patients identified as 'low risk' by PSI (classes I/II), there was only 1 death and 1 admission to an ICU compared to 8 deaths and 7 ICU admissions with CURB-65 scores of 0-1. Although easier to use, CURB-65 is neither sensitive nor specific for predicting mortality in CAP patients. Neither rule was sufficiently accurate for predicting need for an ICU, even when patients with 'not for resuscitation' orders were excluded.

Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults

BACKGROUND

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is caused by various pathogens, traditionally divided to 'typical' and 'atypical'. Initial antibiotic treatment of CAP is usually empirical, customarily covering both typical and atypical pathogens. To date, no sufficient evidence exists to support this broad coverage, while limiting coverage is bound to reduce toxicity, resistance and expense.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and need of adding antibiotic coverage for atypical pathogens in hospitalized patients with CAP, in terms of mortality and successful treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1) which includes the Acute Respiratory Infection Group's specialized register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2007); and EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials of adult patients hospitalized due to CAP, comparing antibiotic regimens with atypical antibiotic coverage to a regimen without atypical antibiotic coverage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently appraised the quality of each trial and extracted the data from included trials. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated, assuming an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis for the outcome measures.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty five trials were included, encompassing 5244 randomized patients. There was no difference in mortality between the atypical arm and the non-atypical arm (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.56). The atypical arm showed an insignificant trend toward clinical success and a significant advantage to bacteriological eradication, which disappeared when evaluating methodologically high-quality studies alone. Clinical success for the atypical arm was significantly higher for Legionella pneumophilae (L. pneumophilae) and non-significantly lower for pneumococcal pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of (total) adverse events, or those requiring discontinuation of treatment. However, gastrointestinal events were more common in the non-atypical arm (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.99). All but two included trials compared a single atypical antibiotic to a beta-lactam, while no trials assessing the addition of an atypical antibiotic to a beta-lactam were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No benefit of survival or clinical efficacy was shown to empirical atypical coverage in hospitalized patients with CAP. This conclusion relates mostly to the comparison of quinolone monotherapy to beta-lactams (BL) or cephalosporins. Further trials, comparing BL or cephalosporins therapy to BL or cephalosporins combined with a macrolide in this population, using mortality as its primary outcome, should be performed.

Activity of garenoxacin, an investigational des-F(6)-quinolone, tested against pathogens from community-acquired respiratory tract infections, including those with elevated or resistant-level fluoroquinolone MIC values

Garenoxacin, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone, was tested against 40423 pathogenic isolates associated with community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CA-RTIs). The strains included Streptococcus pneumoniae (18887), Haemophilus influenzae (15555), and Moraxella catarrhalis (5981), each isolated from a significant infection monitored by the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1999-2005; North America, Latin America, and Europe). All tests were performed by reference broth microdilution methods for garenoxacin and 19 comparison agents. The garenoxacin MIC(90) and percentage (%) of strains inhibited at < or =1 microg/mL (proposed susceptible breakpoint) were S. pneumoniae (0.06 microg/mL, >99.9% susceptible), H. influenzae (< or =0.03 microg/mL, >99.9%), and M. catarrhalis (< or =0.03 microg/mL, 100.0%). The garenoxacin potency versus the pneumococci was 16- to 32-fold greater than levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin and 2-fold superior to moxifloxacin (MIC(90), 0.12 microg/mL). Resistances to other classes of antimicrobials did not adversely influence garenoxacin MIC results. Ciprofloxacin- or levofloxacin-resistant (MIC, > or =4 microg/mL) S. pneumoniae had higher garenoxacin MIC(90) values (1 microg/mL), but 90.6% to 97.5% of strains remained susceptible. Strains of all 3 monitored pathogens with mutations in the quinolone resistance determining region (QRDR) had higher garenoxacin MIC results, with > or =3 to 4 QRDR mutations required to elevate garenoxacin MIC values to > or =2 microg/mL. In conclusion, garenoxacin possesses a potent activity against pneumococci, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis strains worldwide, at a level significantly greater than the available tested agents in the fluoroquinolone class (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin). Only 13 and 4 isolates (0.07% and 0.03%) of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, respectively, had a garenoxacin MIC at > or =2 microg/mL, thus, making this new "respiratory antipneumococcal" quinolone an attractive candidate for the therapy of contemporary CA-RTI (bronchitis, pneumonia, and sinusitis).

New guidelines for the management of adult community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Community-acquired pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and is the leading cause of death from an infectious disease. International societies have published and revised guidelines aiming to improve the management of adult community-acquired pneumonia, based on the best available evidence. The aim of this review is to compare the current guideline recommendations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aspects of guidelines differ based on local factors including resources and antimicrobial factors, as well as the differences in interpretation of existing evidence.

SUMMARY

The lack of robust evidence behind aspects of guideline recommendations as well as the lack of adherence to published guidelines both need to be addressed if the management of community-acquired pneumonia is to be improved.