Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery: summary of a Swedish-Norwegian Consensus Conference

Antibiotic Prescribing in Connection to Childbirth: An Observational Study in Two Districts in Lao PDR

Overuse and misuse of antibiotics has frequently been reported for obstetric conditions and procedures, which may impact both the mother and the unborn baby and increase antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to investigate the antibiotic prescribing pattern in connection to childbirth in two districts in Lao PDR. It is a cross-sectional observational study. Antibiotic prescription data related to childbirth was collected via reviews of medical records in two district hospitals and five health centers in Lao PDR from September 2019 to November 2020. In total, antibiotic prescription data for 1777 women were extracted from their medical records. It was found that all women received antibiotics during in-patient care irrespective of delivery mode. When in hospital, 85.5% of the women who underwent a caesarean section got antibiotic treatment for 5 days and women who had a vaginal delivery usually had antibiotic treatment for one day or less. All the women got oral antibiotics for an additional 4–5 days upon discharge. Antibiotic prescription rate in connection to childbirth was very high in comparison with the WHO guidelines, and antibiotics were used extensively in the participating health facilities. Interventions to guide appropriate prescribing behavior in relation to childbirth are urgently needed in Lao PDR.

Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Knowledge and Practices of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) refers to the utilization of antibiotic agents for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI), to prevent SSI-associated morbidity and mortality, reduce duration and cost of healthcare, and cause minimal adverse drug effects. The adherence rate among surgeons for the available international and national guidelines and optimal practice remains considerably low in many hospitals, especially in developing countries. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and compliance rate for SAP guidelines among various surgical specialties and those involved in providing SAP. Methods: An institution-based exploratory, multi-specialty, collective, mixed method approach (qualitative and quantitative) was used to assess the knowledge and compliance rate for SAP guidelines among the consultants and residents of surgical specialties. Quantitative analysis was performed using a pre-tested questionnaire. For qualitative analysis, focus group discussions were conducted. Thematic analysis was conducted by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model. Results: Twenty-eight focus groups and 16 paired interviews were undertaken. On thematic analysis six significant themes were noted and mapped to the COM-B model, and subthemes mapped to the relevant TDF domains in a combined framework. Key themes recognized were: (1) solitary focus on surgical skills; (2) following the hierarchy is more important than guideline compliance; (3) doubts and overcautious attitude of surgeons hinders appropriate SAP prescribing; (4) non-availability in-hospital supply of antimicrobial agents; (5) patient characteristics and type of surgery play a role in prescribing SAP; and (6) lack of national and local guidelines. Conclusions: The knowledge and attitudes of surgeons toward appropriate SAP prescribing are crucial factors for execution of guidelines. Including them in policy making decisions can help in strong execution of the same.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis and the different strategies used to prevent infection in ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search using Pubmed, Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese CBM, CNKI and VIP databases was performed to find comparative studies on the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies in URL for preventing postoperative infections. The last search was conducted on 25 June 2017. Summarized unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the efficacy of different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies in 4 591 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. No significant difference was found in the risk of postoperative febrile urinary tract infections (fUTIs) between groups with and without antibiotic prophylaxis (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.40-1.67; P = 0.59). Patients receiving a single dose of preoperative antibiotics had a significantly lower risk of pyuria (OR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.25-0.69; P = 0.0007) and bacteriuria (OR: 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.58; P = 0.001) than those who did not. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis was not superior to single-dose oral antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing fUTI (OR: 1.00, 95% CI 0.26-3.88; P = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis did not lower the risk of postoperative fUTI, but a single dose could reduce the incidence of pyuria or bacteriuria. A single oral dose of preventive antibiotics is preferred because of its cost-effectiveness. The efficacy of different types of antibiotics and other strategies could not be assessed in our meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials with a larger sample size and more rigorous study design are needed to validate these conclusions.

Single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania: a randomized, equivalence, controlled trial

Background

Caesarean section(C/S) has been found to increase rates of maternal infectious morbidities five times more than vaginal delivery. The provision of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics 30 to 60 minutes prior to C/S has been found to substantially reduce post-caesarean infection. At Bugando Medical Centre, there is no consistent protocol for the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to patients who are undergoing emergency C/S. Providing repeated dosages of antibiotic prophylaxis after C/S is the common practice. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of a single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection.

Methods

From October 2011 to May 2012, a randomized, equivalence, non-blinding clinical trial was conducted at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania. A total of 500 eligible participants were enrolled in the study and were randomly allocated into two study arms -- “A” and “B”. Participants in “A” received a single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole 30 to 60 minutes prior to the operation, and participants in “B” received the same drugs prior to the operation but continued with for 24 hours. Both groups had 30 days of follow-up and were assessed for signs and symptoms of surgical-site infection as the primary outcome. The equivalence margin was set at 5%. The two-tailed equivalence was analyzed based on intention- to-treat analysis.

Results

The randomization was proper, as the distribution of various demographic and other baseline characteristics had a p-value of > 0.05. All 500 participants were included in our analysis; of these, no participants were lost to follow-up. Surgical-site infection occurred in 12 out of the 250 (4.8%) receiving single dose compared to 16 out of the 250 (6.4%) receiving multiple doses. There is an absolute proportion difference of 1.6% (95% Confidence interval: -2.4 – 5.6%) which lies outside the pre-specified 5% equivalence margin.

Conclusion

We recommend the administration of pre-operative single dose antibiotic prophylaxis for emergency caesarean as this intervention proved to be not equivalent to multiple doses antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical site infection. Single dose therapy also reduces staff workload along with medication costs.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44462542

Amoxicillin prophylaxis in oral surgery

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative infection is the most common postsurgical oral complication but no double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial has been made yet to assess amoxicillin prophylaxis for oral surgery. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic amoxicillin 3g per os versus placebo in the prevention of postoperative oral infections.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A 5-year, multicentric, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was made on healthy patients undergoing complex oral surgery. Final analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

The 286 patients were randomly assigned to the amoxicillin or placebo group. After a mean follow-up of two weeks, 11 patients in the control group and three patients in the amoxicillin prophylaxis group developed a postoperative infection (P=0.001 in unilateral test). The hazard ratio was 0.27 [95% CI: 0.07-0.94].

CONCLUSION

Amoxicillin prophylaxis seems to be effective in preventing postoperative infection in complex oral surgery, especially when mandibular third molars and multiple avulsions are involved.

Is there an increased risk of post-operative surgical site infection after orthopaedic surgery in HIV patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

There is dilemma as to whether patients infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) requiring implant orthopaedic surgery are at an increased risk for post-operative surgical site infection (SSI). We conducted a systematic review to determine the effect of HIV on the risk of post-operative SSI and sought to determine if this risk is altered by antibiotic use beyond 24 hours.

Methods

We searched electronic databases, manually searched citations from relevant articles, and reviewed conference proceedings. The risk of postoperative SSI was pooled using Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results

We identified 18 cohort studies with 16 mainly small studies, addressing the subject. The pooled risk ratio of infection in the HIV patients when compared to non-HIV patients was 1.8 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.3–2.4), in studies in Africa this was 2.3 (95% CI 1.5–3.5). In a sensitivity analysis the risk ratio was reduced to 1.4 (95% CI 0.5–3.8). The risk ratio of infection in patients receiving prolonged antibiotics compared to patients receiving antibiotics for up to 24 hours was 0.7 (95% CI 0.1–4.2).

Conclusions

The results may indicate an increased risk in HIV infected patients but these results are not robust and inconclusive after conducting the sensitivity analysis removing poor quality studies. There is need for larger good quality studies to provide conclusive evidence. To better develop surgical protocols, further studies should determine the effect of reduced CD4 counts, viral load suppression and prolonged antibiotics on the risk for infection.

Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis: adherence to guidelines and effects of educational intervention

BACKGROUND

This study was aimed to determine the propriety of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, to evaluate the effects of a training intervention on correction.

METHODS

This prospective educational intervention study was performed on clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated wounds in elective procedures. The accuracy of the antimicrobial prophylaxis was analyzed according to international guidelines. The outcome measures were appropriateness of prophylactic antibiotic indication, choice, dose and duration; and cost of inappropriate administration.

RESULTS

Before the intervention, 312 procedures were recorded compared with 322 after the intervention. Total compliance rate decreased from 34.3% to 28.5% after the intervention, though insignificantly (p=0.59). Educational training intervention did not change the rate of inappropriate antibiotic choice statistically, and prolonged antibiotic use was significantly higher after the intervention (p=0.01). The positive impact of the intervention was observed in decreased "not indicated but administered" rate (p=0.009) and absence of procedures with "indicated but not administered" and "inappropriate antibiotic dose" which also decreased significantly (both p<0.001). The total cost of irrational antibiotic use was US$26,230.20.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this educational intervention study achieved improvements in indications, choice, and dosing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, it failed to improve prolonged use and total compliance rate, and to lower the costs sufficiently. It will probably provide better results by means of compulsory measures for surgeons to comply with available protocols and guidelines, as well as education programs, in order to change the antibiotic utility habits on surgical prophylaxis and to achieve accurate prophylactic administrations.

Japanese guidelines for prevention of perioperative infections in urological field

For urologists, it is very important to master surgical indications and surgical techniques. On the other hand, the knowledge of the prevention of perioperative infections and the improvement of surgical techniques should always be considered. Although the prevention of perioperative infections in each surgical field is a very important issue, the evidence and the number of guidelines are limited. Among them, the preparation of guidelines has progressed, especially in gastrointestinal surgery. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) proposed guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections, which have been used worldwide. In urology, the original guidelines were different from those of general surgery, due to many endourological procedures and urine exposure in the surgical field. The Japanese Society of UTI Cooperative Study Group has thus framed these guidelines supported by The Japanese Urological Association. The guidelines consist of the following nine techniques: open surgeries, laparoscopic surgeries, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, ureterorenoscope and transurethral lithotripsy, transurethral resection of the prostate, prostate biopsy, cystourethroscope, pediatric surgeries in the urological field, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and febrile neutropenia. These are the first guidelines for the prevention of perioperative infections in the urological field in Japan. Although most of these guidelines were made using reliable evidence, there are parts without enough evidence. Therefore, if new reliable data is reported, it will be necessary for these guidelines to be revised in the future.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies: the effect of bile colonization on the postoperative outcome

OBJECTIVES

The presence of bacteria in the bile of patients undergoing biliary tract surgery has been proposed as associated to an increased incidence of postoperative complications. The present study was designed to determine whether colonization of the bile has an adverse effect in terms of postoperative infectious or noninfectious complications and mortality in a homogenous population of patients suffering from periampullary region malignancies, who all underwent resectional (curative) procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1997 and December 2002, 115 patients (n = 115) suffering from periampullary region malignancies underwent resectional procedures. Fifty-two of the above patients were referred having undergone preoperative internal biliary drainage. During the operation, bile was routinely isolated from the common bile duct and was sent for culture and sensitivity. Based on the bile culture results, the patients were divided in sterile and colonized group and were retrospectively compared in terms of postoperative outcome and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 115 bile cultures, 67 were colonized with bacteria and 48 were sterile. Postoperatively, 40 patients developed 35 noninfectious and 21 infectious complications. Univariate analysis did not disclose statistically significant differences in overall, noninfectious or infectious morbidity and mortality between the two groups of patients. Although not statistically significant, a higher incidence (22 vs 10%) of postoperative leaks in the colonized group of patients was noticed. Multiple regression analysis disclosed that colonized bile was independently related to the advanced age, preoperative biliary drainage presence, elevated preoperative serum bilirubin levels and low preoperative serum albumin levels but did not predispose to an increased postoperative morbidity, mortality, or reoperation rate.

CONCLUSION

The present study did not conclude in any statistically significant differences in the postoperative infectious and noninfectious morbidity as well as mortality, between colonized and sterile groups of patients who underwent resectional procedures for malignancies of the periampullary region. Although internal biliary drainage introduces microorganisms into the biliary tree, this colonization does not increase the risk of either infectious or noninfectious complications or postoperative death. Thus, the likelihood of bacterobilia should not contraindicate the procedure in selected cases.

Rational antibiotic use in China: lessons learnt through introducing surgeons to Australian guidelines

BACKGROUND

World-wide concern about increasing antibiotic resistance has focused attention on strategies to improve antibiotic use. This research adapted Australian best-practice guidelines on the prophylactic use of antibiotics in surgery to a Beijing teaching hospital and then used them as a quality assessment and improvement tool, supplemented by educational interventions. Qualitative data about factors influencing antibiotic use was also obtained.

METHODS

Australian and international guideline materials were amalgamated with the help of Chinese experts. Antibiotics prescribed for surgical prophylaxis in 60 consecutive patients undergoing clean or clean-contaminated surgery (120 total) were then compared with guideline recommendations in three phases; a pre-intervention period from June to August, 2002, an intervention period from June to August 2003 and post-intervention period from September to November 2003. During the intervention phase, feedback about prescriptions not in accord with the guideline was discussed with around 25 prescribers every two weeks. In addition, local factors influencing antibiotic use were explored with 13 junior surgeons and 8 high level informants.

RESULTS

While agreement was reached on the principles of antibiotic surgical prophylaxis there was no consensus on detail. Of 180 patients undergoing clean surgery throughout all phases of the study, antibiotic prophylaxis was administered to 78% compared to 98% of the 180 patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgery. Second and third generation cephalosporin antibiotics predominated in both low-risk clean and clean-contaminated operations. The timing of prophylaxis was correct in virtually all patients. The duration of prophylaxis was less than 24 hours in 96% of patients undergoing clean surgery compared to only 62% of patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgery. The intervention produced no improvement in the duration of prophylaxis nor the overuse and inappropriate choice of unnecessary broad-spectrum and expensive drugs. Interviews and focus groups revealed that an important explanation for the latter problem was Chinese government policy which expected hospitals to support themselves largely through the sale of drugs.

CONCLUSION

Improving antibiotic use in China will require hospital funding reform, more authoritative best-practice guidelines, and hospital authorities embracing quality improvement.

Audit of the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in nasal surgery at a specialist Australian hospital

BACKGROUND

In 2002-03 a retrospective audit of the use of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for elective nasal surgery was undertaken at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH). The RVEEH is a publicly funded teaching hospital that provides specialist eye, nose and throat medicine in Victoria, Australia. The aim of the audit was to determine the extent to which the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in the hospital was consistent with Australian and international evidence-based guidelines and if there was a need for the hospital to develop internal guidelines for the use of AMP.

METHODS

The histories of 500 consecutive patients who had undergone nasal surgery within the study period of August 2001 and July 2002 were examined. The data collected from these histories included information such as the patients' age, gender, diagnosis, surgical procedure performed, antimicrobial agents used, and the length of follow up and a range of factors shown in previous studies to increase the risk of surgical site infection.

RESULTS

A total of 306 (72.86%) patients were found to have received antimicrobial agents either prior to admission, during admission or on discharge. Only 24 patients (5.71%) were administered antimicrobials immediately prior to surgery and at no other time.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study support the need for further research to examine the appropriateness of the use of AMP at the RVEEH and the need for internal guidelines for its use.

Perioperative antibiotics and practice

Perioperative antibiotic administration and anesthetic practice have major impacts on infectious complications. Anesthesiologists need to place high importance on perioperative antibiotic administration to allow patients to receive optimal benefit from this therapy and to minimize risk. Many aspects of perioperative care ranging from thermoregulation to glycemic control may have profound longterm affects on infection rate and thereby patient outcome.

Evaluation of current practices in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in primary total hip prosthesis—a multicentre survey in private and public French hospitals

Deep wound infection is a rare but dreaded postoperative complication after total hip prosthesis (THP) procedures but its incidence can be reduced by systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether antimicrobial prophylaxis for elective primary THP in patients without any history of hip infection, in orthopaedic wards, participating on a voluntary basis, in French public hospitals and private institutions, complies with published guidelines. Three types of data were collected from anaesthetic and surgical records (November 2000-January 2001) in participating hospitals: (1) administrative data on the hospitals and orthopaedic wards, (2) data on patients, (3) data on compliance of practices with five critical criteria derived from published French guidelines. These criteria concerned administration of prophylaxis, choice of antimicrobial agent, dose of first injection, timing of administration and total length of prophylaxis. Thirty institutions sent data files on 1257 THPs to the coordination centre. Compliance exceeded 80% for all criteria except one (interval between first and second injection). Cumulative compliance with the five criteria was 66.9%. Major compliance failures were an inappropriate interval between the first injection and incision, and total antimicrobial prophylaxis exceeding 48 h. Cumulative compliance was 87.9% in teaching hospitals, 61.8% in general hospitals and 67.7% in private institutions (P<1 x 10(-6)). It was slightly higher when the annual number of interventions was > or =100 (69.4 versus 62.3%; P<0.02). Although the protocol for antimicrobial prophylaxis in THP was clear and easy, one-third of practices did not conform with all five standards. Knowledge of the results by the participating institutions should encourage them to set up working groups to draft care protocols for THP and other surgical interventions, in order to improve practice and perhaps reduce costs.

Choice of antibiotics for infection prophylaxis in emergency cesarean sections in low-income countries: a cost-benefit study in Mozambique

BACKGROUND

There is a need to assess the cost-benefit of different models of antibiotic administration for the prevention of post cesarean infection, particularly in resource-scarce settings.

DESIGN

Randomized, nonblinded comparative study of a single combined preoperative dose of gentamicin and metronidazole vs. a post cesarean scheme for infection prophylaxis.

METHODS

Pregnant women (n = 288) with indication for emergency cesarean section were randomly allotted to two groups. Group 1 (n = 143) received the single, combined dose of prophylactic antibiotics and group 2 (n = 145) received, over 7 days, the postoperative standard scheme of antibiotics followed in the department. Both groups were followed up during 7 days for detection of signs of wound infection, endometritis, peritonitis and urinary tract infection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of postoperative infection, mean hospital stay and costs of antibiotics used.

RESULTS

Women completing the study (n = 241) were distributed into group 1 (n = 116) and group 2 (n = 125). No significant difference was found neither in the prevalence of postoperative infection nor in the mean hospital stay. No death occurred. The cost of the single dose of prophylactic antibiotics was less than one-tenth of the cost of the standard postoperative scheme.

CONCLUSION

In our setting, the administration of a single dose of 160 mg of gentamicin in combination with 500 mg of metronidazole before emergency cesarean section for prevention of infection is clinically equivalent to existing conventional week-long postoperative therapy, but at approximately one-tenth of the cost.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in the surgical patient

The primary prophylactic measure against postoperative infection is antiseptic technique in patient preparation, during surgery, and in postoperative patient care. Antimicrobial prophylaxis against postoperative infection is not indicated for procedures with a low infection rate because the expected benefit of antimicrobial treatment is less than the risk of an adverse medication reaction. Antimicrobial prophylaxis has been demonstrated to be of greater benefit than risk in some procedures with higher infection rates; however, because the problem is complex and the data are limited, extra-polating these findings to the practitioner's setting and the individual patient remains a challenge (Table 1). Although antimicrobial prophylaxis for bacterial endocarditis is not effective for most patients, the seriousness of the potential infection has driven the creation of guidelines recommending prophylaxis for at-risk patients undergoing at-risk procedures. Applying these guidelines appropriately could help to reduce unwarranted use of antimicrobials. In the prophylactic use of antimicrobials, as in many medical interventions, the difficulty is balancing the risks of the intervention with the potential benefits. Although we do not have either the randomized, controlled trials or the detailed, patient-specific information to estimate this balance precisely, there are general guidelines to help the clinician choose treatment for most patients.

Prophylactic antibiotic prescription for cesarean section

OBJECTIVES

To assess the use of prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section, and to identify factors associated with a doctor's intraoperative prescription.

DESIGN

A hospital-based, cross-sectional study.

STUDY PARTICIPANTS

All 967 medical records of women undergoing cesarean section from January 1998 to February 1999 in a university hospital, Southern Thailand.

MAIN MEASURES

Independent variables consisted of patient and doctor factors. The outcome variable was whether any antibiotics were given intraoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression with random effects was used to identify factors associated with the doctor's prescription.

RESULTS

Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in 82% of all patients. One hundred and eighty-eight patients (21%) received antibiotics postoperatively. Of the patients receiving intraoperative antibiotics after cord clamping, 8% received only a single dose and 53% received an additional postoperative prescription. The most commonly used antibiotic was ampicillin. Intraoperative prescription was significantly associated with longer duration of ruptured membranes, higher number of vaginal examinations and doctors' age. Doctors aged 30-39 years had three and seven times the likelihood of prescribing intraoperative antibiotics compared with their younger and older colleagues, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of single-dose prescriptions was still an uncommon practice. Prophylaxis was given more commonly to patients with well known risks for infection, and was given by doctors aged 30-39 years.

Antibacterial susceptibility of intestinal lactobacilli of healthy children

We investigated the antibacterial susceptibility of intestinal lactobacilli of Estonian and Swedish children aged 1-2 y. Sixty isolates (10 species) of lactobacilli (29 Estonian and 31 Swedish strains) were tested against ampicillin, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, vancomycin, metronidazole and erythromycin. We observed that intestinal lactobacilli do not display uniform susceptibility to antibiotics. None of the tested lactobacilli was resistant to ampicillin, gentamicin and erythromycin. Single strains were resistant to cefuroxime and tetracycline, about half of the strains to cefoxitin and ciprofloxacin and 73% of the strains to vancomycin. All studied strains were resistant to metronidazole. Most of the strains investigated were resistant to two or three antibiotics out of nine. Some differences in susceptibility were noted between strains belonging to different fermentation types. No differences in susceptibility were found between Estonian and Swedish isolates. Metronidazole, cefoxitin, vancomycin and ciprofloxacin seem to be safer for gastrointestinal lactoflora than other tested antibiotics in both countries.

Prophylactic Antibiotics in Surgery and Surgical Wound Infections

Wound infection remains a considerable cause of morbidity and mortality among surgical patients, despite the relative success of prophylactic antibiotics. In modern efforts to control healthcare costs while improving the quality of patient care, we must not overlook the basic principles of wound infections and their appropriate treatment. Predisposing factors for the development of surgical wound infection include the creation of a surgical wound, the presence of bacteria, and a susceptible host. The selection of an appropriate antimicrobial drug depends on the identification of the most likely pathogens associated with a given procedure, as well as the expected antibiotic susceptibility of those pathogens. Ideally, a prophylactic antibiotic should achieve high peak tissue concentration at the site of the wound before the first incision and should be maintained until the time of closure. Currently, the administration of prophylactic antibiotics is indicated for contaminated and clean-contaminated wounds. Despite the proven effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis, many researchers would argue that contemporary dosing regimens should be reevaluated. The debates concerning the dosage and timing of ideal prophylactic administration are likely to continue.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in adults

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is used by clinicians for the prevention of numerous infections, including sexually transmitted diseases, human immunodeficiency virus infection, tuberculosis, rheumatic fever, recurrent cellulitis, meningococcal disease, recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis, influenza, malaria, infective endocarditis, pertussis, plague, anthrax, early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates, and animal bite wounds. Certain opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in immunocompromised patients also can be effectively prevented with primary antimicrobial prophylaxis. Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended for various surgical procedures to prevent surgical site infection. Optimal antimicrobial agents for prophylaxis are bactericidal, nontoxic, inexpensive, and active against the typical pathogens that cause surgical site infection postoperatively. To maximize its effectiveness, intravenous perioperative prophylaxis should be given within 30 to 60 minutes before the time of surgical incision. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be of short duration to decrease toxicity, antimicrobial resistance, and excess cost.