Poor value of surveillance cultures for prediction of septicaemia caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci in patients undergoing haemodialysis with central venous catheters

Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients on Emergent Hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

This study had 2 objectives: (1) to describe the epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who have no access to scheduled dialysis and (2) to evaluate whether a positive culture of the heparin-lock solution is associated with subsequent development of bacteremia.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort design for objective 1; and prospective cohort design for objective 2.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study was conducted in a 770-bed public academic tertiary hospital in Dallas, Texas. The participants were patients with ESRD undergoing scheduled or emergent hemodialysis.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 147 patients who received hemodialysis between January 2011 and May 2011 and evaluated the rate of CRBSI in the previous 5 years. For the prospective study, we cultured the catheter heparin-lock solution in 62 consecutive patients between June 2012 and August 2012 and evaluated the incidence of CRBSI at 6 months.

RESULTS

Of the 147 patients on emergent hemodialysis, 125 had a tunneled catheter, with a CRBSI rate of 2.61 per 1,000 catheter days. The predominant organisms were Gram-negative rods (GNR). In the prospective study, we found that the dialysis catheter was colonized more frequently in patients on emergent hemodialysis than in those on scheduled hemodialysis. Colonization with GNR or Staphylococcus aureus was associated with subsequent CRBSI at 6 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing emergent hemodialysis via tunneled catheter are predisposed to Gram-negative CRBSI. Culturing the heparin-lock solution may predict subsequent episodes of CRBSI if it shows colonization with GNR or Staphylococcus aureus. Prevention approaches in this population need to be studied further.

Microbial monitoring and methods of sample collection: a GITMO survey (Gruppo Trapianto di Midollo Osseo)

The collection of microbiological samples represents an important aspect of care both for doctors as well as nurses. It is important to recognise and identify some key points, to avoid performing ‘unnecessary’ or ‘incorrect’ sampling, which may give useless or even misleading results, these are: the moment at which the sample is collected, the collection method and timing (if indicated). The comparison between the various nursing members of the Italian National bone marrow transplant group (GITMO), showed diversity of practice across all fields. A formal survey was therefore conducted within GITMO centres looking at the methods of microbiological sample collection. These results were compared with the literature, and in addition to the lack of homogeneity of practice within the centres, a lack of compliance with the recommendations was also observed. To evaluate the effectiveness of this survey in highlighting awareness of this issue and the presence of relevant guidelines, the questionnaire was repeated (with the same centres responding), which demonstrated no major changes in care practices.

Identifying and classifying bloodstream infections among hemodialysis patients

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a prominent clinical problem in patients undergoing hemodialysis. These infections appear to be more common among patients who have a central line as their dialysis access and can be associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Accurately diagnosing BSIs clearly influences patient management, but is also an important part of an infection prevention program; particularly as facility BSI rates are becoming a recognized quality measure for which dialysis facilities might be held accountable. Blood cultures remain the gold standard for diagnosing BSIs and a number of practices can affect the sensitivity and specificity of this important laboratory test. Optimizing the collection of blood cultures can assist providers with interpretation of positive blood cultures and can help minimize the impact of false-positive and false-negative cultures. This review will describe differences between BSI definitions, examine the use of blood cultures to identify these infections including the use of recommended best practices to maximize culture yield, and highlight characteristics that can assist in the clinical interpretation of positive blood cultures.

Update on blood cultures: how to obtain, process, report, and interpret

The detection and identification of microorganisms circulating in the bloodstream of patients is arguably one of the most important functions of the clinical microbiology laboratory. Effective implementation of this function requires careful consideration of specimen collection and processing, culture techniques, result reporting, and, perhaps most importantly, result interpretation by the physician. The purpose of this review is to provide a synopsis of the current state of the art for each of these areas, with the intention of providing adequate information to enable clinical laboratory personnel and physicians to critically evaluate and, if required, improve their current blood culture practices.

Routine surveillance for bloodstream infections in a pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant cohort: Do patients benefit?

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at a high risk for late bloodstream infection (BSI). Controversy exists regarding the benefit of surveillance blood cultures in this immunosuppressed population. Despite the common use of this practice, the practical value is not well established in non-neutropenic children following HSCT.

METHODS

At the IWK Health Centre (Halifax, Nova Scotia), weekly surveillance blood cultures from central lines are drawn from children following HSCT until the line is removed. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the utility and cost of this practice. Eligible participants were non-neutropenic HSCT recipients with central venous access lines. The cost of laboratory investigations, nursing time, hospital stay and interventions for positive surveillance cultures was calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-three HSCTs were performed in 41 children. Donors were allogenic in 33 cases (77%) and autologous in 10 cases (23%). There were 316 patient contacts for surveillance cultures (mean seven per patient) and 577 central line lumens sampled. Three of 43 patients (7%) had clinically significant positive surveillance blood cultures. Bacteria isolated were Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=2) and Corynebacterium jeikeium (n=1). All follow-up cultures before initiation of antimicrobial therapy were sterile. All three patients were admitted for antimicrobial therapy if they were not already hospitalized and/or had an uncomplicated course. The estimated total cost of BSI surveillance and management of asymptomatic infection over six years was $27,989.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that BSI surveillance in children following HSCT engraftment has a very low yield and significant cost. It is unclear whether it contributes to improved patient outcomes.

Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management

Indwelling vascular catheters are a leading source of bloodstream infections in critically ill patients and cancer patients. Because clinical diagnostic criteria are either insensitive or non-specific, such infections are often overdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary and wasteful removal of the catheter. Catheter-sparing diagnostic methods, such as differential quantitative blood cultures and time to positivity have emerged as reliable diagnostic techniques. Novel preventive strategies include cutaneous antisepsis, maximum sterile barrier, use of antimicrobial catheters, and antimicrobial catheter lock solution. Management of catheter-related bloodstream infections involves deciding on catheter removal, antimicrobial catheter lock solution, and the type and duration of systemic antimicrobial therapy. Such decisions depend on the identity of the organism causing the bloodstream infection, the clinical and radiographical manifestations suggesting a complicated course, the underlying condition of the host (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), and the availability of other vascular access sites.

Surveillance cultures of tunneled cuffed catheter exit sites in chronic hemodialysis patients are of no benefit

Catheter-related infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study evaluated the utility of surveillance swab cultures (Ssc) of tunneled cuffed catheter (TCC) exit sites as a prediction and prevention strategy for infection. A 6-month prospective-controlled trial with 94 chronic HD patients with a TCC who received monthly Ssc and were stratified by dialysis day into topical therapy based on Ssc results (Group A) or no therapy (Group B). Outcomes were exit site infection (ESI) and catheter-associated bacteremia (CAB). The overall monthly prevalence of positive Ssc was 14.9%. There was no difference in the number of positive Ssc (17.7% vs. 11.6%, p > 0.05) or ESI (19.6% vs.16.3%, p > 0.05) between Groups A and B, respectively. Catheter-associated bacteremia was higher in Group A (17.7% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.05). There were significantly more ESI in the patients treated for a positive Ssc. In Group A, the incidence of ESI was significantly higher in those treated for a positive vs. negative Ssc (55% vs. 12%, p = 0.009) and CAB rates trended higher with positive Ssc (22.2% vs. 16.7%, p > 0.05). The strategy of treating positive surveillance cultures is not beneficial. Positive Ssc do not predict the occurrence of catheter-related infection, and treatment of these cultures may lead to increased infection rates.

Catheter-drawn blood cultures: is withdrawing the heparin lock beneficial?

AIMS

To assess the potential benefit of withdrawing or flushing away the heparin lock before collecting blood for culture from a central venous catheter.

METHODS

We compared the contamination rates of 152 pairs of blood samples aspirated from central venous catheters in afebrile renal dialysis or cancer patients. We also assessed the antimicrobial effect of 2000 U of heparin in Bactec Plus Aerobic/F culture bottles inoculated with a volunteer's blood plus one of six common bloodstream pathogens.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in contamination rates between first-drawn (26 of 152, 17.1%) and second-drawn (24 of 152, 15.8%) samples. There was no significance difference in yield (58 of 60 [97%] versus 52 of 53 [98%]) or time to flagging positive (16.6 versus 16.7 h) between the bottles with and without heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support the practice of withdrawing or flushing away the heparin lock before collecting blood for culture from a central venous catheter.