The Effect of Transurethral Needle Ablation on Symptoms of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome - A Pilot Study

Surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain in women

BACKGROUND

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common gynaecological condition accounting for 20% of all gynaecological referrals. There are wide ranges of causes with overlapping symptomatology, therefore the management of the condition is a formidable challenge for clinicians. The aetiology of CPP is heterogeneous and in many cases, no clear diagnosis can be reached. It is in this scenario that the label of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) can be applied. We defined women with CPPS as having a minimum duration of pain of at least 6 months, including with a diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome, but excluding pain caused by a condition such as endometriosis. Many surgical interventions have been tried in isolation or in conjunction with non-surgical interventions in the management with variable results. Surgical interventions are invasive and carry operative risks. Surgical interventions must be evaluated for their effectiveness prior to their prevalent use in the management of women with CPPS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness and safety of surgical interventions in the management of women with CPPS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGF) Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO, on 23 April 2021 for any randomised controlled trials (RCT) for surgical interventions in women with CPPS. We also searched the citation lists of relevant publications, two trial registries, relevant journals, abstracts, conference proceedings and several key grey literature sources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs with women who had CPPS. The review authors were prepared to consider studies of any surgical intervention used for the management of CPPS. Outcome measures were pain rating scales, adverse events, psychological outcomes, quality of life (QoL) measures and requirement for analgesia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently evaluated studies for inclusion and extracted data using the forms designed according to Cochrane guidelines. For each included trial, we collected information regarding the method of randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding, data reporting and analyses. We reported pooled results as mean difference (MDs) or odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by the Mantel-Haenszel method. If similar outcomes were reported on different scales, we calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD). We applied GRADE criteria to judge the overall certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies met our inclusion criteria involving 216 women with CPP and no identifiable cause. Adhesiolysis compared to no surgery or diagnostic laparoscopy We are uncertain of the effect of adhesiolysis on pelvic pain scores postoperatively at three months (MD -7.3, 95% CI -29.9 to 15.3; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence), six months (MD -14.3, 95% CI -35.9 to 7.3; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence) and 12 months postsurgery (MD 0.00, 95% CI -4.60; 1 study, 43 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Adhesiolysis may improve both the emotional wellbeing (MD 24.90, 95% CI 7.92 to 41.88; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence) and social support (MD 23.90, 95% CI -1.77 to 49.57; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence) components of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30, and both the emotional component (MD 32.30, 95% CI 13.16 to 51.44; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the physical component of the 12-item Short Form (MD 22.90, 95% CI 10.97 to 34.83; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence) when compared to diagnostic laparoscopy. We are uncertain of the safety of adhesiolysis compared to comparator groups due to low-certainty evidence and lack of structured adverse event reporting. No studies reported on psychological outcomes or requirements for analgesia. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament ablation or resection compared to diagnostic laparoscopy/other treatment We are uncertain of the effect of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament/nerve ablation (LUNA) or resection compared to other treatments postoperatively at three months (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.93; 1 study, 51 participants; low-certainty evidence) and six months (MD -2.10, 95% CI -4.38 to 0.18; 1 study, 74 participants; very low-certainty evidence). At 12 months post-surgery, we are uncertain of the effect of LUNA on the rate of successful treatment compared to diagnostic laparoscopy. One study of 56 participants found no difference in the effect of LUNA on non-cyclical pain (P = 0.854) or dyspareunia (P = 0.41); however, there was a difference favouring LUNA on dysmenorrhea (P = 0.045) and dyschezia (P = 0.05). We are also uncertain of the effect of LUNA compared to vaginal uterosacral ligament resection on pelvic pain at 12 months (MD 2.00, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.53; 1 study, 74 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the safety of LUNA or resection compared to comparator groups due to the lack of structured adverse event reporting. Women undergoing LUNA may require more analgesia postoperatively than those undergoing other treatments (P < 0.001; 1 study, 74 participants). No studies reported psychological outcomes or QoL.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain about the benefit of adhesiolysis or LUNA in management of pain in women with CPPS based on the current literature. There may be a QoL benefit to adhesiolysis in improving both emotional wellbeing and social support, as measured by the validated QoL tools. It was not possible to synthesis evidence on adverse events as these were only reported narratively in some studies, in which none were observed. With the inadequate objective assessment of adverse events, especially long-term adverse events, associated with adhesiolysis or LUNA for CPPS, there is currently little to support these interventions for CPPS.

Therapeutic efficacy of bipolar radiofrequency thermotherapy for patients with chronic prostatitis: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases

PURPOSE

Chronic prostatitis (CP) does not yet have a universally successful therapy. Alternative treatments including thermotherapy have been adopted in the multimodal management of pain and voiding dysfunction. We retrospectively analyzed the therapeutic efficacy of bipolar radiofrequency thermotherapy for patients who were unsatisfied with conventional medication for CP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study between October 2009 and September 2010 of 26 patients who were under 50 years old and diagnosed with CP (National Institutes of Health [NIH]-category III) was performed. Twenty patients were diagnosed with inflammatory CP (NIH-category IIIa) and the rest with noninflammatory CP (NIH-category IIIb). We used the Tempro system at an intraprostatic temperature of 55℃ for 50 minutes with a medium heating rate. All patients also completed the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (CPSI) before and after treatment.

RESULTS

In the patients diagnosed with CP, the mean serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 0.9±0.3 ng/ml, the prostate volume was 27.1±5.5 g, and the average score for all 3 domains on the NIH-CPSI significantly decreased. The total scores decreased from 19.8±7.1 to 11.1±7.0, the pain domain decreased from 8.6±3.1 to 4.8±3.1, the voiding symptom domain decreased from 5.1±1.8 to 2.9±1.8, and the effect on the quality of life decreased from 6.1±2.2 to 3.4±2.2 (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar radiofrequency thermotherapy for patients with CP intractable to conventional medication can provide significant improvement in the NIH-CPSI. Large, randomized controlled trials will also be required to confirm the efficacy of this therapy.

Update on minimally invasive therapy for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Once primary treatment fails, the diverse causes and symptoms of chronic pelvic pain syndrome require clinicians to consider several secondary approaches. Multimodal therapy addresses unique symptoms and targets illness origin. However, once medical modalities fail, minimally invasive therapies should be considered, including transurethral needle ablation hyperthermia, cooled thermotherapy, electromagnetic chair, prostatic massage, and intraprostatic botulinum toxin A injection. Low evidence levels exist for all approaches, but we anticipate promising results of larger trials for cooled thermotherapy and look forward to the emergence of experimental techniques using botulinum toxin A.

Therapeutic effect of transurethral needle ablation in non-bacterial prostatitis: chronic pelvic pain syndrome type IIIa

AIM

Non-bacterial prostatitis is difficult to manage with conventional treatment. This study was undertaken to evaluate the therapeutic effect of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) on men with chronic inflammatory non-bacterial prostatitis.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with non-bacterial prostatitis (type IIIa) were treated with TUNA. The TUNA procedure, which uses radiofrequency energy, heats the prostate tissue to approximately 90-110 degrees C over a 5-min period. Evaluation consisted of a prostatitis symptom severity score chart, the monitoring of the leukocyte count in the expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) and a subjective global assessment.

RESULTS

The decrease in the prostate symptom severity score chart at 3 and 6 months compared with the baseline assessment was statistically significant. Analysis of the leukocyte levels in the EPS in 14 patients was available. All 14 patients had a decrease in the EPS leukocyte count 3 months after treatment. However, six of these men (43%) still had EPS leukocyte levels above the normal indices (>10 white blood cells per high-power field). A second session of TUNA on these partial responders resulted in three of the six men obtaining a normal EPS leukocyte count. At 6 months following treatment, complete, partial and poor improvement in terms of subjective global assessment were noted in 60, 35 and 5% of patients, respectively. No major complications, including those of sexual dysfunction or retrograde ejaculation, were noted in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Transurethral needle ablation appears to be an easy, safe and effective treatment for men with chronic inflammatory non-bacterial prostatitis.

Transurethral needle ablation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (category III prostatitis): a randomized, sham-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effectiveness and durability of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) in the treatment of symptoms of chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) in a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms of CPPS were randomized to either TUNA (n = 25) or urethrocystoscopy as a sham treatment (n = 8). The response to therapy was evaluated 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment using the Prostatitis Symptom Severity Index (PSSI), the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), a visual analogue scale, and prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, urinary flow, and residual urine volume measurements.

RESULTS

The PSSI decreased in both groups (TUNA group, P <0.001; sham group, P not significant), but no statistically significant difference was detected between them. Similarly, the IPSS decreased in the two groups (TUNA group, P = 0.002; sham group, P = 0.05), but no difference was found between those treated with TUNA and those who underwent sham treatment. Also the quality of life (IPSS-8) was significantly better at 12 months in both groups, but no difference was detected between them. Changes in pain score (visual analogue scale) were not statistically significant. Peak urinary flow rate, residual urine volume, prostate-specific antigen, and prostate volume were not altered in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of TUNA in CPPS is comparable to sham treatment, and so cannot be recommended as routine treatment of CPPS.