Validity of a self-administered questionnaire, with reference to a clinical stress urinary incontinence test

Evaluation of a Standardized Questionnaire for Initial Assessment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Premenopausal Women

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of a standardized questionnaire for premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) on clinical information collection and duration of consultation.

METHODS

We conducted a before and after study involving 100 premenopausal women undergoing consultation for AUB. During stage 1, 50 consultations were recorded on a consultation sheet with no specific template. During stage 2, 50 women completed a 26-item auto-administered standardized questionnaire before the consultation, which was then reviewed with the consultant and added to the medical record. The duration of consultation was assessed in subgroups of 27 women in each stage. Two independent evaluators assessed the quality and completeness of data collected in the medical records using a score sheet developed by experts. Outcomes from both stages were compared using the t test.

RESULTS

The descriptive characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean global scores of the quality and completeness of data collected improved significantly between stages 1 and 2, from 67% ± 12% to 95% ± 5% (P < 0.0001), as did medical background scores (54% ± 29% vs. 85% ± 13%; P < 0.0001) and AUB-related symptoms scores (69% ± 13% vs. 97% ± 5%; P < 0.0001). A mean reduction in duration of consultation of nearly 4 minutes was observed (24.6 ± 4.3 min vs. 20.7 ± 4.8 min; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The AUB-specific standardized questionnaire improves quality and completeness of data collected in medical records and reduces duration of consultation.

Screening for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Recommendation From the Women's Preventive Services Initiative

DESCRIPTION

Recommendation on screening for urinary incontinence in women by the Women's Preventive Services Initiative (WPSI), a national coalition of women's health professional organizations and patient representatives. The WPSI's recommendations are intended to guide clinical practice and coverage of services for the Health Resources and Services Administration and other stakeholders. The target audience for this recommendation includes all clinicians providing preventive health care for women, particularly in primary care settings. This recommendation applies to women of all ages, as well as adolescents.

METHODS

The WPSI developed this recommendation after evaluating evidence regarding the benefits and harms of screening for urinary incontinence in women. The evaluation included a systematic review of the accuracy of screening instruments and the benefits and harms of treatments. Indirect evidence was used to link screening and health outcomes in the chain of evidence that might support screening in the absence of direct evidence. The WPSI also considered the effect of screening on symptom progression and avoidance of costly and complex treatments, as well as implementation factors.

RECOMMENDATION

The WPSI recommends screening women for urinary incontinence annually. Screening ideally should assess whether women experience urinary incontinence and whether it affects their activities and quality of life. The WPSI recommends referring women for further evaluation and treatment if indicated.

Screening for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review for the Women's Preventive Services Initiative

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence is infrequently addressed during routine health care despite its high prevalence and adverse effects on health.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether screening for urinary incontinence in women not previously diagnosed improves outcomes (symptoms, quality of life, and function) and to evaluate the accuracy of screening methods and potential harms of screening.

DATA SOURCES

English-language searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1 January 1996 to 30 March 2018); ClinicalTrials.gov (April 2018); and reference lists of studies and reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews of studies that enrolled nonpregnant women without previously diagnosed urinary incontinence and compared clinical outcomes and adverse effects between women who were and were not screened, and diagnostic accuracy studies that reported performance measures of screening tests.

DATA EXTRACTION

Dual extraction and quality assessment of individual studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

No studies evaluated the overall effectiveness or harms of screening. Seventeen studies evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 18 screening questionnaires against a clinical diagnosis or results of diagnostic tests. Of these, 14 poor-quality studies were based in referral clinics, enrolled only symptomatic women, or had other limitations. One good-quality and 2 fair-quality studies (evaluating 4 methods) enrolled women not recruited on the basis of symptoms. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for stress, urge, and any type of incontinence in these studies were 0.79, 0.88, and 0.88 for the Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index; 0.85, 0.83, and 0.87 for the Bladder Control Self-Assessment Questionnaire; and 0.68, 0.82, and 0.75 for the Overactive Bladder Awareness Tool. The Incontinence Screening Questionnaire had a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 80% for any type of incontinence.

LIMITATION

Studies enrolled few participants, often from symptomatic referral populations; used various reference standards; and infrequently reported CIs.

CONCLUSION

Evidence is insufficient on the overall effectiveness and harms of screening for urinary incontinence in women. Limited evidence in general populations suggests fairly high accuracy for some screening methods.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Health Resources and Services Administration.