|
1
|
Buckleton JS, Bright JA, Gittelson S, Moretti TR, Onorato AJ, Bieber FR, Budowle B, Taylor DA. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity. J Forensic Sci 2018; 64:393-405. [PMID: 30132900 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Revised: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Forensic DNA interpretation is transitioning from manual interpretation based usually on binary decision-making toward computer-based systems that model the probability of the profile given different explanations for it, termed probabilistic genotyping (PG). Decision-making by laboratories to implement probability-based interpretation should be based on scientific principles for validity and information that supports its utility, such as criteria to support admissibility. The principles behind STRmix™ are outlined in this study and include standard mathematics and modeling of peak heights and variability in those heights. All PG methods generate a likelihood ratio (LR) and require the formulation of propositions. Principles underpinning formulations of propositions include the identification of reasonably assumed contributors. Substantial data have been produced that support precision, error rate, and reliability of PG, and in particular, STRmix™. A current issue is access to the code and quality processes used while coding. There are substantial data that describe the performance, strengths, and limitations of STRmix™, one of the available PG software.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Buckleton
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.,Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jo-Anne Bright
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Simone Gittelson
- Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Tamyra R Moretti
- DNA Support Unit, Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA, 22135
| | - Anthony J Onorato
- DNA Support Unit, Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA, 22135
| | - Frederick R Bieber
- Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115
| | - Bruce Budowle
- Center for Human Identification, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX, 76107
| | - Duncan A Taylor
- Forensic Science South Australia, 21 Divett Place, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Flinders University - School of Biology, Stuart Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Hopwood AJ, Puch-Solis R, Tucker VC, Curran JM, Skerrett J, Pope S, Tully G. Consideration of the probative value of single donor 15-plex STR profiles in UK populations and its presentation in UK courts. Sci Justice 2012; 52:185-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2012.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2012] [Revised: 03/29/2012] [Accepted: 05/14/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
|
3
|
Gill P, Phillips C, McGovern C, Bright JA, Buckleton J. An evaluation of potential allelic association between the STRs vWA and D12S391: Implications in criminal casework and applications to short pedigrees. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2012; 6:477-86. [PMID: 22153980 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2011] [Revised: 11/02/2011] [Accepted: 11/03/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|