The persistence of antibodies againstBrucella ovisandBrucella abortusin rams following vaccination: A field study

A Brucella ovis antigenic complex bearing poly-epsilon-caprolactone microparticles confer protection against experimental brucellosis in mice

A hot saline antigenic extract (HS) from Brucella ovis was encapsulated in poly-epsilon-caprolactone microparticles (PEC), and tested as a vaccine against B. ovis and B. abortus infections in mice. Subcutaneous but not oral administration in BALB/c mice of the HS-PEC induced high amounts of IFN-gamma and IL-2 but low quantities of IL-4 suggesting a combined Th1/Th2 cellular immune response. The vaccine administered either subcutaneously or orally protected mice against B. ovis infection. Such protection was similar to that provided by the reference living attenuated B. melitensis Rev. 1 vaccine. By contrast, only the subcutaneous vaccination with HS-PEC was as effective as Rev. 1 in conferring protection against B. abortus infection. The use of free HS or empty PEC microparticles did not produce any protective effect.

Protective effect of Brucella outer membrane complex-bearing liposomes against experimental murine brucellosis

Liposomes of stable multilamellar type, which previously demonstrated great efficiency in antibiotic transport, were used in this study as transport vehicles of antigenic extracts of Brucella melitensis (HS: complex of lipopolysaccharide/phospholipids/outer membrane proteins). The incorporation of HS into positively charged liposomes produced a protective effect against experimental murine brucellosis when they were administered 1 day before or 2 days after infection, as the number of colony-forming units in the spleen was reduced in relation to the untreated control group (P < 0.01). On the other hand, the use of HS-free or bound in liposomes with negative net charge did not produce a significant effect. Moreover, the incorporation of HS into cationic liposomes eliminated the toxicity of the lipopolysaccharide.

Vaccination with Brucella abortus rough mutant RB51 protects BALB/c mice against virulent strains of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella ovis

Vaccination of BALB/c mice with live Brucella abortus RB51, a stable rough mutant, produced protection against challenge with virulent strains of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella ovis. Passive-transfer experiments indicated that vaccinated mice were protected against B. abortus 2308 through cell-mediated immunity, against B. ovis PA through humoral immunity, and against B. melitensis 16M through both forms of immunity. Live bacteria were required for the induction of protective cell-mediated immunity; vaccination with whole killed cells of strain RB51 failed to protect mice against B. abortus 2308 despite development of good delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Protective antibodies against the heterologous species were generated in vaccinated mice primarily through anamnestic responses following challenge infections. Growth of the antigenically unrelated bacterium Listeria monocytogenes in the spleens of vaccinated mice indicated that nonspecific killing by residual activated macrophages contributed minimally to protection. These results encourage the continued investigation of strain RB51 as an alternative vaccine against heterologous Brucella species. However, its usefulness against B. ovis would be limited if, as suggested here, epitopes critical for protective cell-mediated immunity are not shared between B. abortus and B. ovis.

Protective immunity to Brucella ovis in BALB/c mice following recovery from primary infection or immunization with subcellular vaccines

Experiments were performed with BALB/c mice to elucidate the roles of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in the acquisition of protective immunity to Brucella ovis and to compare infection immunity with immunity developed through vaccination with a hot saline extract (HS) of B. ovis. Mice convalescing from a primary infection with B. ovis displayed a high level of resistance to reinfection, as evidenced by splenic bacterial counts decreased over 10,000-fold from control groups at 2 weeks after challenge. Passive transfer assays revealed that protection was mediated by both T lymphocytes and antibodies but that antibodies had a substantially greater role on the basis of log units of protection that were transferred. Antibodies specific for HS proteins in sera from convalescent mice were predominantly of the immunoglobulin G 2a and 3 isotypes. Vaccination with HS conferred good protection against B. ovis, but protection was greatly enhanced by the incorporation of QS-21 or other adjuvants. Protection provided by the HS vaccine resulted largely from immune responses to its protein moieties. A critical evaluation of the protective efficacy of the rough lipopolysaccharide component of HS was precluded by its poor immunogenicity in BALB/c mice. HS-QS-21 afforded protection against challenge infection with B. ovis as good as that which developed after a primary infection and as good as or better than that provided by attenuated Brucella melitensis vaccine strain Rev 1. Passive transfer experiments confirmed that the magnitudes of both humoral and cell-mediated forms of protective immunity were equivalent in mice vaccinated with HS-QS-21 and those recovering from a primary infection. Protective immunity to B. ovis in mice therefore resembled that to Brucella abortus, except that the relative roles of humoral and cell-mediated immunity, rather than being equivalent, were shifted toward a greater role for antibodies.

Evaluation of whole cell and subcellular vaccines against Brucella ovis in rams

Five antigen preparations from Brucella ovis strain REO 198 were incorporated with the pluronic polymer L-121 and muramyl dipeptide and tested as vaccines against B. ovis infection of rams. The antigenic preparations were: (1) a fraction enriched in outer membrane proteins and rough lipopolysaccharide (hot saline extract, HS); (2) the proteins from HS substantially free of lipopolysaccharide; (3) outer membrane blebs; (4) outer membrane-peptidoglycan complexes extracted with detergent; (5) killed whole cells. The experimental vaccines were compared with two standard vaccines, rough Brucella abortus 45/20 whole killed cells in an oil based adjuvant, and live Brucella melitensis Rev 1. Immunizations with non-living vaccines were performed on two occasions, 18 weeks apart. The rams were challenged with a virulent strain of B. ovis 31 weeks after the second vaccination and slaughtered 15 weeks thereafter. Rates of infection in groups vaccinated with Rev 1 (33%), and HS (40%) were significantly lower (P < 0.005 and P < 0.025, respectively) than that in the non-vaccinated control group (87%). Strain 45/20 was the only other vaccine that conferred a significant level of protection (50%) (P < 0.05). The organ distribution of the infection and the level of colonization of infected organs did not differ significantly between infected animals in the various vaccine groups and those in the unvaccinated control group. No statistically significant relationship was detected between the magnitude of the antibody responses to the HS extract, to outer membrane proteins, or to the rough lipopolysaccharide, and freedom from infection. The results indicate that the HS extract of B. ovis may represent a useful alternative to B. melitensis Rev 1 or B. abortus 45/20 as a vaccine against B. ovis.