1
|
Martins G, Stilwell G. Comparative Study of the Healing Process of Disbudding Wounds in Calves Using Bepanthene ® or an Antibiotic Spray. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:2526. [PMID: 39272311 PMCID: PMC11393985 DOI: 10.3390/ani14172526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
The process of disbudding female calves is a common procedure in many dairy farms, avoiding injuries caused by horns and reducing feed bunk space requirements. The most common method for disbudding calves is by the use of a cautery iron, responsible for destroying the horn-generating tissue. After the procedure, wounds may be treated with an antibiotic-based spray. Nowadays, antimicrobial resistance is a worldwide concern in both human and veterinary medicine, highlighting the need to invest in the monitoring of antimicrobial use and in the development of alternative treatments in favour of One Health. The goal of this study is to promote a reduction in the use of antibiotics in farm animals by investigating an alternative treatment for disbudding wounds. Bepanthene® (dexpanthenol, a derivative of pantothenic acid, a component of the B vitamin complex) is a plausible option, since it is widely used in human medicine for the treatment of skin irritations and burns. The comparison of the healing process of disbudding wounds treated with Bepanthene® or a chlortetracycline-based spray was achieved through the presentation of a randomly-ordered sequence of images of the lesions to a panel of convenience-selected and blinded-to-treatment evaluators, composed of seven veterinarian practitioners, five veterinary medicine students, and five human medical field nurses. In order to classify the lesions, the panel applied an adapted format of a validated healing scale (Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool), incorporating seven parameters of evaluation, culminating in the values used for statistical analyses. In the practitioners' evaluation, a statistically significant effect for the factors of time and treatment in favour of Bepanthene® was found for the parameters "Edges", "Necrotic Tissue Type", and "Skin Colour Surrounding Wound", indicating that Bepanthene® is superior to the spray when considering these parameters of healing. The assessment by the veterinary students showed a significant effect for the factors of time and treatment for the parameters "Necrotic Tissue Type", in favour of the Bepanthene®, and "Granulation Tissue", in favour of the antibiotic spray, demonstrating no clear benefit for either treatment. Lastly, the evaluation performed by nurses showed a significant effect for the factors of time and treatment, in favour of the Bepanthene®, for the parameters "Necrotic Tissue Type" and "Skin Colour Surrounding Wound", leading to the conclusion that Bepanthene® is associated with better and faster healing when compared to the spray. Overall, these findings lead us to suggest that Bepanthene® presents a better healing index compared to a chlortetracycline-based spray, allowing it to be safely used as a substitute to an antimicrobial agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Martins
- Animal Behaviour and Welfare Research Lab, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Universidade Técnica, Alto da Ajuda, 1330-477 Lisboa, Portugal
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Universidade Técnica, Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - George Stilwell
- Animal Behaviour and Welfare Research Lab, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Universidade Técnica, Alto da Ajuda, 1330-477 Lisboa, Portugal
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Universidade Técnica, Alto da Ajuda, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ridgway R, Neary J, Turner A, Barrett DC, Gillespie A. Evaluation of Horn Bud Wound Healing Following Cautery Disbudding of Dairy Calves With and Without the Use of Oxytetracycline Aerosol Spray. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9:745632. [PMID: 35280149 PMCID: PMC8907515 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.745632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Oxytetracycline is commonly applied as a topical agent to burn lesions post cautery disbudding of calves. Judicial use of antibiotics dictates that they should only be used where necessary to reduce the development of resistance in target bacteria. The objective of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the efficacy of topical oxytetracycline spray on wound healing post cautery disbudding of dairy calves over a 6-week period. Dairy calves were disbudded by veterinarians, technicians, or veterinary surgeons, using a standard cautery disbudding protocol. Oxytetracycline spray was randomly applied to the right or left horn bud of each animal (OXY), while the other horn bud received no antibiotic spray (NA). The outcomes measured were wound diameter (WD) and lesion score (LS), either normal healing (NH) or abnormal healing (AH). These assessments were conducted every 14 days following disbudding, until 42 days. A total of 360 animals completed the study. There was a difference in wound diameter and lesion score on day 14 post disbudding between the two groups. Cautery lesions sprayed with oxytetracycline (OXY) were 0.5 ± 0.15 mm smaller than NA lesions (P = 0.001), and there were fewer abnormal healing lesions for OXY compared to the NA (2.5 vs. 11%, respectively; P ≤ 0.001). There were no differences at day 28 and day 42 post disbudding, and on day 42, 34% of wounds had healed in both groups.In summary, the authors were unable to demonstrate a difference in healing between the groups using the described methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Ridgway
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Livestock and One Health, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Rachel Ridgway
| | - Joseph Neary
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Livestock and One Health, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Turner
- School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - David C. Barrett
- School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Gillespie
- Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Livestock and One Health, University of Liverpool, Neston, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sheil M, De Benedictis GM, Scollo A, Metcalfe S, Innocent G, Polkinghorne A, Gottardo F. Efficacy of Intra-Operative Topical Wound Anaesthesia to Mitigate Piglet Castration Pain-A Large, Multi-Centred Field Trial. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11102763. [PMID: 34679785 PMCID: PMC8532673 DOI: 10.3390/ani11102763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Piglet castration causes pain and stress to the animal. Although desperately needed, there are complexities developing safe and effective methods of pain alleviation applicable for on-farm use. Topical anaesthesia, instilled to the wound during surgery, is a newly evolving on-farm method to mitigate castration pain. In the current study, we investigated the use of Tri-Solfen® (Animal Ethics Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia), a topical local anaesthetic and antiseptic formulation, instilled to the wound during the procedure, to alleviate subsequent castration-related pain experienced in piglets. We performed a large, blind, multi-centred trial comparing pain in piglets castrated with or without Tri-Solfen®. Piglets treated with wound instillation of Tri-Solfen®, 30 s prior to subsequent castration, showed significantly lower pain-induced motor and vocal responses during the procedure. Acute post-operative pain-related behaviours, evident in piglets in the first 30 min following castration, were also significantly reduced in treated piglets compared with untreated piglets. Using this method, Tri-Solfen® provides an effective on-farm method to mitigate acute castration-related pain in young piglets. Abstract Piglet castration results in acute pain and stress to the animal. There is a critical need for effective on-farm methods of pain mitigation. Local anaesthesia using Tri-Solfen® (Animal Ethics Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia), a topical local anaesthetic and antiseptic formulation instilled to the wound during surgery, is a newly evolving on-farm method to mitigate castration pain. To investigate the efficacy of Tri-Solfen®, instilled to the wound during the procedure, to alleviate subsequent castration-related pain in neonatal piglets, we performed a large, negatively controlled, randomised field trial in two commercial pig farms in Europe. Piglets (173) were enrolled and randomised to undergo castration with or without Tri-Solfen®, instilled to the wound immediately following skin incision. A 30 s wait period was then observed prior to completing castration. Efficacy was investigated by measuring pain-induced motor and vocal responses during the subsequent procedure and post-operative pain-related behaviour in treated versus untreated piglets. There was a significant reduction in nociceptive motor and vocal response during castration and in the post-operative pain-related behaviour response in Tri-Solfen®-treated compared to untreated piglets, in the first 30 min following castration. Although not addressing pain of skin incision, Tri-Solfen® is effective to mitigate subsequent acute castration-related pain in piglets under commercial production conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith Sheil
- Animal Ethics Pty. Ltd., Yarra Glen, VIC 3775, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Giulia Maria De Benedictis
- Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, Padova University, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; (G.M.D.B.); (F.G.)
| | - Annalisa Scollo
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy;
| | - Suzanne Metcalfe
- Knoell Animal Health Ltd., Bank Barn, How Mill, Brampton CA8 9JY, UK;
| | - Giles Innocent
- Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, Scotland, UK;
| | - Adam Polkinghorne
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, NSW Health Pathology, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia; or
- Major Mitchell Consulting, Buderim, QLD 4556, Australia
| | - Flaviana Gottardo
- Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, Padova University, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; (G.M.D.B.); (F.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sheil M, Chambers M, Polkinghorne A, Sharpe B. Topical Application of Lidocaine and Bupivacaine to Disbudding Wounds in Dairy Calves: Safety, Toxicology and Wound Healing. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11030869. [PMID: 33803728 PMCID: PMC8003238 DOI: 10.3390/ani11030869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Disbudding is a common, but painful procedure performed on calves to prevent horn growth. Tri-Solfen® is a combination local anaesthetic and antiseptic formulation which, applied topically to the disbudding wound, is reported to reduce calf pain. Applied in this manner, the local anaesthetics in Tri-Solfen®, lidocaine and bupivacaine, are reported to be poorly absorbed, resulting in low risk of neurological or cardiotoxic effects. The potential impacts on other blood, urine and tissue parameters and on wound healing when used in this manner, and/or accidental overdose situations are unknown, however. We performed experiments investigating (i) the safety of Tri-Solfen® (including overdose situations) and (ii) the impact of Tri-Solfen® on disbudding wound healing under field conditions. No adverse health effects were observed in Tri-Solfen®-treated animals, even those receiving 5× the recommended dose, with no clinically significant differences in measured parameters between placebo and Tri-Solfen® groups. No negative impacts on wound healing were noted. Conversely, lower levels of bacterial wound colonisation were evident, and there was reduced incidence of abnormal wounds at days 11–12 in Tri-Solfen®-treated animals. Abstract Tri-Solfen® is a combination topical anaesthetic and antiseptic solution containing lidocaine, bupivacaine, adrenaline and cetrimide. Applied to wounds, it is reported to reduce the pain experienced by calves following thermocautery disbudding. While lidocaine and bupivacaine are widely used in medicine, conflicting data exist on the impact of these compounds when applied directly to the surgical wound. To investigate the safety of Tri-Solfen® applied to thermocautery disbudding wounds of calves, experiments were performed to measure (i) the safety of Tri-Solfen® (including in overdose situations); and (ii) the impact of Tri-Solfen® application at recommended doses on disbudding wound healing under field conditions. Haematological, biochemical and urinalysis parameters did not show clinically significant differences between placebo and Tri-Solfen® groups (1×, 3× and 5× dose). No adverse health impacts were reported. Histopathological analysis of wounds noted a reduction in bacterial colonies in Tri-Solfen®-treated wounds. Under field conditions, no negative impacts on wound healing were noted. Conversely, there was reduced incidence of abnormal wounds, with an associated trend toward improved average daily gain at days 11–12 in Tri-Solfen®-treated animals. These data are considered to support the safety of topical anaesthesia, as formulated in Tri-Solfen®, to the thermocautery disbudding wound in calves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith Sheil
- Animal Ethics Pty. Ltd., Yarra Glen 3775, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Adam Polkinghorne
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, NSW Health Pathology, Nepean Blue Mountains Pathology Service, Penrith 2751, Australia;
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Kingswood 2747, Australia
| | - Brendan Sharpe
- Invetus Pty. Ltd., Armidale 2350, Australia; (M.C.); (B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|