Rehabilitation variability following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

Postoperative Access and Compliance Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Hispanic Adolescents Mirrors the Non-Hispanic Adolescent Population

BACKGROUND

Disparity in surgical care of patellar instability patients has not been fully investigated in the adolescent Hispanic population. This demographic has been shown to have differences in their care, including a lower rate of surgical treatment for patellar instability. Socioeconomic factors have been cited as a factor that influences patient outcomes and its relationship with ethnicity in context of patellar instability has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Review performed of patients <19 years of age who underwent MPFL reconstruction between September 2008 and December 2015. Demographics, patient median household income data, and clinical variables were collected. Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with subject as random effects factor was utilized to evaluate differences between ethnicity groups due to nonindependence of data. It was then expanded to incorporate interactions between ethnicity and income.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patellar dislocation events met criteria in 85 adolescents (mean age: 15.5 y). Thirty-four (40%) adolescents identified as Hispanic. In univariate analysis no differences were found between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. The multivariate GLMM demonstrated a significant interaction between ethnicity and income. The Hispanic group in the >100% State median income category had the highest rate of postoperative clinic appointments attended (P=0.019). The Hispanic group in the <100% State median income category had the lowest rate of physical therapy appointments attended (P=0.044). No differences were observed for duration of follow-up (P=0.57) or final Kujala score (P=0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Hispanic ethnicity alone is not associated with inferior postoperative management after MPFL reconstruction in adolescents. However, when socioeconomic status is considered, Hispanic patients of lower-income backgrounds are found to have lower compliance with postoperative rehab recommendations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A Case Report on Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation in a Cricket Player Through Targeted Agility Training

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) serves as a crucial stabilizer, preventing lateral dislocation of the patella. Surgery is usually advised after a second dislocation, with MPFL reconstruction being a common procedure. The primary objective of rehabilitation post-surgery is not just to relieve pain and restore range of motion (ROM), but also to combine proprioceptive neuromuscular training to help patients return to their prior functional level. Agility training is a crucial component in accomplishing this goal. The current case is of a 19-year-old male cricket player with a history of recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent surgery after the latest incident rendered him unable to bear weight. His rehabilitation program included standard protocols alongside the early implementation of agility drills, such as ladder exercises. Compared to traditional approaches, this case demonstrates significant improvement in the patient's functional ability following surgery. This report highlights the importance of comprehensive rehabilitation for patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction. It not only underscores the rationale behind the surgery but also lays the groundwork for comparing recovery times. Notably, this program incorporated early agility exercises from the very beginning, suggesting that such an approach might accelerate recovery compared to standard protocols. Further investigation is warranted to explore the potential benefits of early agility training in this patient population.

Postoperative Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

It is unclear if bracing is necessary after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) for recurrent patellar instability. We hypothesize that patients who did not use a brace will have similar outcomes to those who were braced postoperatively. A retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated MPFLr from January 2015 to September 2020 at a single institution was performed. Those with less than 6 weeks of follow-up were excluded. The braced group was provided a hinged-knee brace postoperatively until the return of quadriceps function, which was determined by the treating physical therapist (brace, "B"; no brace, "NB"). Time to straight leg raise (SLR) without lag, recurrent instability, and total re-operations were determined. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate outcomes (statistical significance, p < 0.05). Overall, 229 isolated MPFLr were included (B: 165 knees, 146 patients; NB: 64 knees, 58 patients). Baseline demographics were similar (all p > 0.05). Median time to SLR without lag was shorter in the NB group (41 days [interquartile range [IQR]: 20-47] vs. 44 days [IQR: 35.5-88.3], p = 0.01), while return to sport times were equivalent (B: 155 days [IQR: 127.3-193.8] vs. NB: 145 days [IQR: 124-162], p = 0.31). Recurrent instability rates were not significantly different (B: 12 knees [7.27%] vs. NB: 1 knee [1.56%], p = 0.09), but the re-operation rate was higher in the brace group (20 knees [12.1%] vs. 0 [0%], p = 0.001). Regression analysis identified brace use (odds ratio [OR]: 19.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-269.40, p = 0.026) and female patients (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.01-7.34, p = 0.049) to be associated with needing reoperation. Recurrent instability rates and return to sport times were similar between patients who did or did not use a hinged knee brace after isolated MPFLr. Re-operation rates were higher in the braced group. Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.

Active exercise therapy improves the recovery of knee joint function and reduction of muscle atrophy after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation

OBJECTIVES

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an important surgical therapy for recurrent patellar dislocation. However, few studies have focused on exercise therapy after MPFL reconstruction. Therefore, the first purpose was to compare the active and traditional postoperative exercise therapies on the recovery of knee joint function and reduction of muscle atrophy after MPFL reconstruction, and the second purpose was to compare the active and traditional postoperative exercise therapies on the patellar stability after MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

The cases of 31 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation treated with patella double semi-tunnel anatomical MPFL reconstruction from February 2016 and February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcomes, including the patellar tilt angle (PTA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA), thigh circumference reduction, Kujala score, and Lysholm score, were compared between two groups (i.e., active exercise and traditional exercise groups) preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 12 months postoperatively, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The Kujala score was significantly higher in the active exercise group than traditional exercise group 3 months postoperatively (80.06 vs. 74.80, P < 0.01), 6 months postoperatively (89.19 vs. 82.07, P < 0.01), 12 months postoperatively (91.43 vs. 86.60, P < 0.01), and 24 months postoperatively (92.50 vs. 90.27, P = 0.02). Similarly, there was a higher Lysholm score in the active exercise group compared with traditional exercise group 3 months postoperatively (81.25 vs. 76.53, P < 0.01), 6 months postoperatively (89.81 vs. 84.80, P < 0.01), 12 months postoperatively (93.25 vs. 88.40, P < 0.01), and 24 months postoperatively (93.69 vs. 90.67, P < 0.01). Significantly lower thigh circumference reduction was reported in the active exercise group compared with that in the traditional exercise group 3 months postoperatively (1.90 ± 0.57 vs. 2.45 ± 0.45, P < 0.01) and 6 months postoperatively (1.50 ± 0.31 vs. 1.83 ± 0.32, P < 0.01). No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in terms of PTA (P > 0.05) or LPFA postoperatively (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that active exercise therapy might benefit the early recovery of knee joint function and reduction of muscle atrophy in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation after MPFL reconstruction.

Rehabilitation Variability Following Osteochondral Autograft and Allograft Transplantation of the Knee

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) and osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) of the knee.

DESIGN

Online postoperative OAT and OCA rehabilitation protocols from US orthopedic programs and the scientific literature were reviewed. A custom scoring rubric was developed to analyze each protocol for the presence of discrete rehabilitation modalities and the timing of each intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 16 programs (10.3%) from 155 US academic orthopedic programs published online protocols and a total of 35 protocols were analyzed. Twenty-one protocols (88%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing following OAT and 17 protocols (100%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing following OCA. The average time protocols permitted weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) was 5.2 weeks (range = 0-8 weeks) following OAT and 6.2 weeks (range = 0-8 weeks) following OCA. There was considerable variation in the inclusion and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises. Following OAT, 2 protocols (8%) recommended functional testing as criteria for return to sport at an average time of 12.0 weeks (range = 12-24 weeks). Following OCA, 1 protocol (6%) recommended functional testing as criteria for return to sport at an average time of 12.0 weeks (range = 12-24 weeks).

CONCLUSION

A minority of US academic orthopedic programs publish OAT and OCA rehabilitation protocols online. Among the protocols currently available, there is significant variability in the inclusion of specific rehabilitation components and timing of many modalities. Evidence-based standardization of elements of postoperative rehabilitation may help improve patient care and subsequent outcomes.

Lateral Patellar Dislocation: A Critical Review and Update of Evidence-Based Rehabilitation Practice Guidelines and Expected Outcomes

»

Nonoperative treatment of a lateral patellar dislocation produces favorable functional results, but as high as 35% of individuals experience recurrent dislocations.

»

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is an effective treatment to prevent recurrent dislocations and yield excellent outcomes with a high rate of return to sport.

»

Both nonoperative and postoperative rehabilitation should center on resolving pain and edema, restoring motion, and incorporating isolated and multijoint progressive strengthening exercises targeting the hip and knee.

»

Prior to return to sports, both functional and isolated knee strength measurements should be used to determine leg symmetry strength and to utilize patient-reported outcome measures to assess the patient's perceived physical abilities and patellofemoral joint stability.

Rehabilitation Variability Following Femoral Condyle and Patellofemoral Microfracture Surgery of the Knee

OBJECTIVE

To assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for microfracture of femoral condyle and patellofemoral lesions of the knee.

DESIGN

Online postoperative microfracture rehabilitation protocols from US orthopedic programs and the scientific literature were reviewed. A custom scoring rubric was developed to analyze each protocol for the presence of discrete rehabilitation modalities and the timing of each intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 18 programs (11.6%) from 155 US academic orthopedic programs' published online protocols and a total of 44 protocols were analyzed. Seventeen protocols (56.7%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for femoral condyle lesions and 17 (89.5%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for patellofemoral lesions. The average time to permitting weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) was 6.1 weeks (range, 0-8) for femoral condyle lesions and 3.7 weeks (range, 0-8 weeks) for patellofemoral lesions. There was considerable variation in the inclusion and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises. For femoral condyle lesions, 10 protocols (33.3%) recommended functional testing prior to return to sport at an average of 23.3 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks). For patellofemoral lesions, 4 protocols (20.0%) recommended functional testing for return to sport at an average of 21.0 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks).

CONCLUSION

A minority of US academic orthopedic programs publish microfracture rehabilitation protocols online. Among the protocols currently available, there is significant variability in the inclusion of specific rehabilitation components and timing of many modalities. Evidence-based standardization of elements of postoperative rehabilitation may help improve patient care and subsequent outcomes.

Objectively quantified lower limb strength recovery in people treated surgically or non-surgically after patellar dislocation: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Synthesize evidence on objectively quantified lower limb strength recovery in people treated surgically or non-surgically after patellar dislocation.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, AMED and CINAHL databases were last searched on July 30th, 2020 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that objectively quantified lower limb strength in people (any age or sex) treated surgically or non-surgically after patellar dislocation.

RESULTS

24 studies were included (877 participants, median age 20.7). All assessed knee extension strength, 11 knee flexion strength, three hip abduction strength, two hip external rotation strength, and one hip flexion, extension, adduction, and internal rotation strength. One randomized controlled trial judged at high risk of bias and two cohort studies with methodological limitations compared lower limb strength recovery between surgically and non-surgically treated people, with conflicting findings. After surgery, median long-term (>8 months) knee extension strength was 82.5% (IQR 78.5-88.2; 13 studies) of the unaffected leg and knee flexion strength was 91.5% (IQR 90.7-96.9; five studies). After non-surgical treatment, median long-term knee extension strength was 86% (IQR 79.3-87.4; four studies) and mean flexion strength ranged from 95.2 to 96.7% (two studies). Mean hip strength was always >90% (two studies). Two redislocations during eccentric isokinetic knee testing and knee pain during isokinetic knee extension testing were reported as adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence indicates that after patellar dislocation, knee extension strength deficits in the affected limb are frequently observed and can persist long term, but this remains uncertain due to the limitations of relevant included studies. Whether lower limb strength recovery differs between people treated surgically and those treated non-surgically after patellar dislocation also remains uncertain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

(PROSPERO CRD42019139533).

Online Rehabilitation Protocols for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Are Variable Among Institutions

Purpose

To compare and contrast the various rehabilitation protocols for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and MPFL reconstruction plus tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) published online by academic orthopaedic surgery residency programs and private practice institutions throughout the United States.

Methods

We performed a systematic electronic search of MPFL reconstruction rehabilitation protocols in academic orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States using Google’s search engine (www.google.com) based on the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access System (FREIDA). Private practice organizations publishing MPFL reconstruction or MPFL reconstruction–TTO rehabilitation protocols that were found on the first page of search results were also included, but no comprehensive search for private practice protocols was performed. Protocols specifying an MPFL reconstruction with TTO were included for separate review because of altered weight-bearing status postoperatively. A list of comparative criteria was created to assess the protocols for the presence and timing of the various rehabilitation components.

Results

From the list of 189 U.S. academic residency programs, as well as additional private practice protocols found in the Google search, 38 protocols were included for review (31 protocols for isolated MPFL reconstruction and 7 protocols for MPFL reconstruction plus TTO). A return to full range of motion by week 6 was recommended by 15 (48.4%) of the isolated MPFL reconstruction protocols and 6 (85.7%) of the MPFL reconstruction–TTO protocols. Six weeks of knee brace wear was recommended by 13 isolated MPFL reconstruction protocols (43.3%) and 4 MPFL reconstruction–TTO protocols (57.1%). Moreover, 6 isolated MPFL reconstruction protocols (19.4%) and 3 MPFL reconstruction–TTO protocols (42.9%) recommended use of a patellar stabilizing brace postoperatively.

Conclusions

There is substantial variability among rehabilitation protocols after MPFL reconstruction, as well as MPFL reconstruction plus TTO, including postoperative range of motion, weight-bearing status, and time until return to sport. Furthermore, many online protocols from academic orthopaedic surgery residency programs and private practices in the United States fail to mention several of these parameters, most notably functional testing to allow patients to return to sport.

Clinical Relevance

Proper rehabilitation after MPFL reconstruction with or without TTO is an important factor to a patient’s postoperative outcome. This study outlines the variability in online rehabilitation protocols after MPFL reconstruction with or without TTO published online by academic residency programs and private practice institutions.

Variability in rehabilitation protocols following pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the variability of publicly available pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction rehabilitation protocols produced by academic orthopedic surgery departments and children's hospitals.Methods: A web-based search was performed to identify rehabilitation protocols. Protocol and literature review guided the development of a comprehensive scoring rubric that was used to assess protocols for the presence and timing of postoperative adjunctive therapy and physical therapy recommendations.Results: A search of 180 academic orthopedic surgery programs and 250 children's hospitals identified 21 rehabilitation protocols. A majority of these protocols (90%) recommended postoperative adjunctive therapies such as bracing (81%), cryotherapy (43%), electrical muscle stimulation (24%), and/or continuous passive motion (14%). Several protocols (57%) recommended a specific weight-bearing status in the immediate postoperative period, but there was minimal consensus on that status. Conversely, there was more agreement amongst protocols that recommended strength exercises (52%); a majority of protocols suggested quad sets (91%), ankle pumps (73%), leg press (64%), and/or double-leg squats (55%). Ten protocols (48%) recommended initiation of stretches in the first week following surgery, and most commonly suggested patella mobilizations start at an average of 1.9 weeks postop (range 0-8 weeks). Twelve protocols (57%) discussed return to play, with an average recommended return to play at 7.5 months (range 3-11 months) postoperatively. However, few protocols recommended that patients get approval from their surgeon (19%) or pass specific tests (24%) prior to return to play.Conclusion: Few academic departments of orthopedic surgery or children's hospitals publish pediatric ACL reconstruction protocols online. Given the substantial variability observed amongst these protocols and recent findings that patients increasingly turn to the internet for medical information, this study suggests that standardization of pediatric ACL reconstruction rehabilitation has the potential to further optimize patient care.