Isokinetic flexion strength recovery after ACL reconstruction: a comparison between all inside graft-link technique and full tibial tunnel technique

ACL Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus Versus Double-Stranded Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autograft: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

A disadvantage of using hamstring tendon autograft consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is pain from tendon harvesting and persistent hamstring weakness. In the tendon-sparing all-inside technique, a quadrupled semitendinosus graft and adjustable-loop cortical fixation are suggested to give less postoperative flexion deficits while displaying overall similar clinical results to the traditional hamstring technique. However, there are a limited number of high-quality studies comparing these techniques with inconsistent results.

PURPOSE

To investigate differences between the all-inside (quadrupled semitendinosus) and traditional hamstring (double-stranded semitendinosus and gracilis) technique regarding (1) self-reported function, (2) hamstring strength, and (3) knee laxity.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients were randomized to either the all-inside or the traditional hamstring technique. Perioperatively, duration of surgery and graft size were obtained. The International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 Subjective Knee Form score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner Activity Scale score, knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference and pivot shift), range of motion, isokinetic knee strength, and hop test score were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Return-to-sport readiness was evaluated 9 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients completed 2-year follow-up, 45 patients with the all-inside technique and 44 patients with the traditional hamstring technique. There were no significant differences between groups in any of the outcome measures 2 years after surgery, but there was a tendency in the all-inside group toward having increased anterior translation (mean, 3.6 mm vs 2.7 mm), a higher number of revision surgeries (5 patients vs 2 patients), and more patients having +1 and +2 pivot-shift values (29 vs 18 patients) when compared with the traditional group.

CONCLUSION

The all-inside technique yields equivalent results to the traditional hamstring technique 2 years after surgery and should be considered a reliable technique to use for ACL reconstruction. Sparing the gracilis tendon does not lead to less persistent hamstring weakness. Long-term follow-up is needed to further determine whether the tendency of increased anterior translation seen at 2 years postoperatively will lead to a higher risk of graft failure.

Comparison of the retear rate 2years after ACL reconstruction with the Tape Locking Screw short graft system and the STG technique: A case control study with propensity score matching

PURPOSE

Theoretically, short semitendinosus grafts result in less pain and morbidity while providing greater knee flexion strength and sparing the gracilis tendon. They often require the use of blind bone tunnels as well as fixation at both ends of the graft with suspensory cortical buttons. The "Tape Locking Screw" (TLS) system is another option. There are few studies comparing ACL reconstruction with a short graft using the 4-strand semitendinosus graft (ST4-TLS) technique with that of the semitendinosus-gracilis (STG) procedure. This study was designed: (1) to compare the retear rate following these two technics after 2years of follow-up, (2) to compare the clinical scores, complications and return to sport times between the two procedures Q1, Q2.

HYPOTHESIS

Our hypothesis was that there would be no differences in retear rates between the two techniques.

METHODS

This single center case control study included 290 patients who underwent STG reconstruction that were paired by propensity score matching to 299 patients who underwent ST4-TLS reconstruction. The main evaluation criterion was the retear rate 2years after surgery. Secondary criteria were the two-year postoperative complication rate, the time to return to sport, to pivot sports and to running, as well as the complication rates and clinical scores 6months, 1year and 2years after surgery.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the overall retear rate in our series of ACL ligament reconstruction was 6.0% (36/596). There was no difference in retear rates between the groups 2years after ligament reconstruction [ST4-TLS: 6.7% (20/299) vs. STG: 5.4% (16/297); p=0.47]. The postoperative KOOS symptom score and the Tegner score were found to be better in the STG group at 1year (81 vs. 78, p=0.008) and 2years (5.64 vs. 5.10, p=0.016), respectively, representing the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the latter. No difference was found in the other clinical scores 6months, 1year or 2years after surgery. There was no significant difference in the return to sport [TLS: 93.0% (164/299) vs. STG: 93.0% (158/297) p=0.99] or the complication rate [TLS: 8.7% (26/299) vs. STG: 7.4% (22/297) p=0.89] between the groups.

DISCUSSION

The ST4-TLS ACL ligament reconstruction technique was found to be as reliable as the standard STG procedure 2years after surgery for the retear rate and the return to sport, although the results of certain postoperative clinical scores seem to be lower.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case control study.

HM. Comparison of the Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction through the All-inside and Outside-in Techniques: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective  To compare the functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autograft (HA) through the all-inside (AI) technique with adjustable-loop cortical Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Watford, Hertfordshire, England) on the sides of the femur and tibia and through the outside-in (OI) technique using an interference screw on the tibial side and a cortical Endobutton on the femoral side. Materials and Methods  The present is a double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 44 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction from February 2019 to February 2022 in a tertiary care hospital. As per computer-based randomization, the patients were distributed into two groups: the AI and OI groups. Both groups were evaluated for 12 months using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, and part I (pain score) and part II (function score) of the Knee Society Score (KSS). Results  On postoperative day 2, the VAS score was significantly higher in the OI group ( p  = 0.0001), but insignificant ( p  = 0.807) at 6 weeks. At 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, the score on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale was significantly higher ( p  = 0.001) in the AI group. At 6 months, both parts of the KSS showed a significant difference, with the AI group presenting a better outcome ( p  = 0.04). However, at 12 months, the AI group presented a better score on part I of the KSS, but no differences were observed regarding part II. Conclusion  In a follow-up of 12 months, the patients submitted to the AI technique presented better outcome scores and pain relief than those submitted to the OI technique.

All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique: Tips and Tricks

The all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technique was developed to improve patient outcomes by reducing the procedure's invasiveness, minimizing complications and pain, and enabling faster postoperative recovery. This study presents a detailed description of the all-inside ACLR technique, which involves the use of quadrupled semitendinosus (ST) graft and suspension devices at both tibial and femoral sites, as well as valuable tips for avoiding complications that may arise during the procedure. The surgical procedure employs retrograde drills to create bony sockets for graft passage, which are then fixed with suspension devices at both the tibial and femoral sites. This technique has no specific restrictions and may be applied to all patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The literature reports the advantages, good clinical outcomes, and medium- to long-term graft survival achieved with the all-inside ACLR technique. However, the complications and disadvantages associated with the technique must be considered.

Short graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Current concepts

Short graft anterior cruciate igament reconstruction is increasing in popularity for performing a primary ACLR. The short graft coupled with the all-inside technique using closed sockets and suspensory fixation at both femoral and tibial ends are its defining features. The outcomes of this technique have been comparable to well established transportal ACLR techniques. It has the benefits of preserved hamstring strength and less pain attributed to transtibial drilling. However, there is a learning curve involved and will require time before mastery of the technique. Furthermore, in combined osteotomy or multiligament surgery, the use of short graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with sockets preserve bone stock and the single tendon harvest spares the other tendons for use in other ligament reconstruction.

Simultaneous Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Double Suspensory Technique and Medial Open-Wedge, High Tibial Osteotomy

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is generally performed regardless of knee malalignments. However, there are some indications for either staged or simultaneous ACL reconstruction and realignment procedures, such as high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Simultaneous HTO-ACL reconstruction has the apparent benefit of a single surgical procedure with a faster recovery than a staged procedure, and it produces good clinical outcomes. Several techniques have been described for simultaneous ACLR and medial open wedge HTO. The tibial tunnel preparation and graft fixation are the most challenging part of the procedure. Recent studies on comparison of fixation of tibial tunnel graft using suspensory fixation versus bioabsorbable screws have shown superior results of more bone preservation and less graft rupture. We assumed suspensory fixation on the tibial side with bone preservation might be more reliable in patients who received ACLR and open wedge HTO at the same time. Therefore, we described our technique of simultaneous open-wedge HTO and ACLR using double suspensory graft fixation.

Isometric Knee Muscle Strength and Patient-Reported Measures Five Years after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Single versus Dual Autograft Hamstring Tendon Harvesting

There is some controversy regarding the use of one or two hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). In this study, two cohorts of 22 male patients underwent an ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts. One cohort was reconstructed through an all-inside technique with the semitendinosus tendon (ST group) and the other with the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons (ST-G group). Anterior tibial translation (ATT), Lysholm, and IKDC scores were assessed preoperatively and five years postoperation. Additionally, isometric knee muscle strength was manually measured in both groups and in another cohort of 22 uninjured control male subjects five years after the operation. There were no significant differences in ATT and Lysholm scores between the operated groups. The IKDC score was lower in the ST-G group than in the ST group—9.57 (CI 14.89−4.25) (p < 0.001). No significant differences between injured and uninjured knees were detected in hamstring to quadriceps ratio strength and quadriceps limb symmetry index of the two operated groups, but the hamstring limb symmetry index was significantly lower in the ST-G group than in the ST and control groups. This study shows that using an ST-G autograft for ACLR yielded less flexor strength and worse results in some patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) than using an ST autograft five years after the operation. The observed results let us suggest that the use of one autograft hamstring tendon for ACLR is clinically preferable to the use of two hamstring tendons.

Effect of Exercise Intensity on the Healing of the Bone-Tendon Interface: A Mouse Rotator Cuff Injury Model Study

BACKGROUND

Injuries at the bone-tendon interface (BTI) are common findings in clinical practice. Rehabilitation procedures after BTI surgery are important but are controversial.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of different exercise intensities on BTI healing by means of an established mouse rotator cuff injury model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 150 specific pathogen free male C57BL/6 mice, with supraspinatus insertion injury, were randomly assigned to 1 of 5 groups according to postoperative rehabilitation of different exercise intensities: (1) control group, (2) low-intensity exercise group, (3) moderate-intensity exercise group, (4) high-intensity exercise group, and (5) increasing-intensity exercise group (IG). The specimens were harvested 4 or 8 weeks postoperatively for microarchitectural, histological, molecular biological, and mechanical evaluations.

RESULTS

Histological test results showed that the degrees of tissue fusion and polysaccharide protein distribution at the healing interface at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery were significantly better in the IG than in the other 4 groups. Synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography showed that the quantity of subchondral bone at the enthesis (bone volume/total volume fraction, trabecular thickness, trabecular number) was higher and trabecular separation was lower in the IG than in the other 4 groups. Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis revealed that the healing interface in the IG expressed more transcription factors, such as sox 9, runx 2, and scleraxis, than the interfaces in the other groups. Although no significant difference was seen in the cross-sectional area between the groups at postoperative weeks 4 and 8 (P > .05), the tensile load, ultimate strength, and stiffness of the specimens in the IG were significantly better than those in the other 4 groups (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The rehabilitation program with increasing-intensity exercise was beneficial for BTI healing.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this study provide evidence supporting the use of a simple and progressive exercise rehabilitation program after rotator cuff surgery.

Outcomes of retro-drilled all-inside tibial tunnel vs complete tibial tunnel techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a comparative study

PURPOSE

The all-inside tibial tunnel preparation technique of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction differs from traditional complete tibial tunnel technique in using closed tibial sockets, dual-cortical suspensory graft-fixation, quadrupled semitendinosus tendon graft and lesser bone removal. The study aims to find out if all-inside technique differs from complete tibial tunnel technique of single bundle ACL reconstruction in terms of graft dimensions, functional and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective comparative study was conducted including 80 patients with isolated ACL tears, divided into 2 groups of 40 patients each without any randomization. The two techniques differed in tibial tunnel preparation. Group 1 underwent ACL reconstruction with a complete tibial tunnel drilled from the anteromedial tibial cortex and group 2 underwent all-inside tibial socket preparation. Duration of the surgery, perioperative and midterm complications were noted. All patients had 24 month follow-up. Functional outcome scores (Tegner-Lysholm knee scoring scale and IKDC score) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months and 24 months. Hamstring and quadriceps muscle strength was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 months, 9 months and 24 months. Visual analogue score (VAS) for knee pain was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at day 2, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months and 24 months.

RESULTS

Quadrupled semitendinosus tendon graft was significantly thicker than doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons graft (8.17 ± 0.58 vs 8.71 ± 0.4, p < 0.0001). The VAS score for knee pain at 2 and 6 weeks were lower in group 2 (5.75 ± 0.6 and 1.78 ± 1.0) as compared to group 1 (6.50 ± 0.5 and 2.5 ± 0.8) and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0007 and p = 0.002 respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in functional outcome scores and quadriceps muscle strength between the two groups. However, there were significant difference in hamstring power in two groups.

CONCLUSION

The all-inside technique has the advantages of using a single tendon graft, lesser early postoperative pain with similar clinical and functional outcomes compared to the complete tibial tunnel technique. Level of Evidence IIProspective comparative study.

Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical results of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using suspensory cortical button fixation and full tibial tunnel drilling.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted of published literature up to November 2019 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing all-inside ACLR using suspensory cortical button fixation and full tibial tunnel ACLR. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted the outcome data, and assessed the risk of bias of the eligible studies. The clinical outcome and graft reruptures were pooled by using random effects with mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

RESULT

A total of nine studies (five randomized controlled trials and four comparative studies) involving 613 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The postoperative functional outcome, knee laxity measured with arthrometer, and graft reruptures were comparable between patients with all-inside ACLR using suspensory cortical button fixation and full tibial tunnel ACLR. However, a significantly greater thickness of autologous tendon was used and less change in drilling tunnel diameter was noted in patients with suspensory cortical button graft fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside ACLR with suspensory cortical button fixation was not clinically superior to full tibial tunnel ACLR with interference screw fixation in functional outcomes, knee laxity measured with arthrometer, or rerupture rate. However, the advantage of using suspensory cortical button fixation was that a thicker graft could be used for reconstruction, and brought less tibia tunnel widening compared with bioabsorbable interference screw fixation.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autograft Morbidity: Who Needs Strong Hamstrings in Greater Than 90° of Knee Flexion?

An understanding of expected morbidity of various anterior cruciate ligament graft options is important to inform patient expectations and facilitate successful return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hamstring harvest results in decreased hamstring strength. Gracilis preservation may mitigate the degree of strength loss, particularly in deep knee flexion. The extent to which knee flexion strength at high flexion angles is important to return to play and functional outcomes remains unknown and is likely sport-dependent.