Scoping review of complications associated with epinephrine use in arthroscopy fluid

Portal-site epinephrine injections improve visualisation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate if portal-site injections of 1:200,000 epinephrine improve intraoperative visualisation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

Patients with partial-thickness supraspinatus tears were selected for the study. They were assigned consecutive numbers and were divided into two groups-control group and intervention group. The surgeries were done by a single surgeon. Every odd-numbered patient was injected. Johnson's visibility classification, surgeon 5-point ordinal Likert scale (LS), and other parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 221 participants (58.4 ​± ​6.1 years) were selected. Intraoperative visibility was better in the intervention group according to Johnson's classification-satisfactory visibility was achieved in 68 of 110 patients (62%, control group) compared to 89 of 111 patients (80%) (p ​= ​0.003). Surgeon LS was superior in the intervention group, with a notable decrease in worsened visibility cases. The operative time did not alter statistically significantly-82.2 ​± ​14.4 ​min for the control group, compared to 80.9 ​± ​10.8 ​min in the intervention group (p ​= ​0.056). No injection-associated complications were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal-site injection of diluted epinephrine solution is safe and improves intraoperative visualisation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This addition does not increase operative time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, case-control study.

Heuristics in sport: A scoping review

Judgement and decision-making under uncertainty often rely on simplistic" rules of thumb", known as "heuristics". The purpose of this scoping review is to explore the extant literature focussed on heuristics and sport. This study employed a five-stage scoping review methodology. The databases searched were Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and PsycInfo. The search terms were sport*, heuristic* (and its synonyms: cognitive shortcut, shortcut, rule of thumb, mental rule, cognitive rule) plus cognitive bias. The search identified 2019 studies, of which 38 were included in the analysis. Studies based in USA and Germany were most common. The use of heuristics by players were most common, while football (soccer) and basketball were the most frequently researched sport contexts. Both males and females were commonly included in most studies, but there were no studies with an explicit focus on females. The research was contextualized within several academic disciplines (e.g., psychology, forecasting, JDM, organization behavior, sports marketing and sponsorship, coaching science, risk analysis and sociology). Approximately 80 % of the studies were quantitative. Sixteen studies examined the fast and frugal heuristics approach (i.e., take-the-first heuristic (n = 8), recognition heuristic (n = 7), or gut instinct (n = 1), whereas eleven articles embraced the heuristics and biases approach. Future research should pursue a greater variety of heuristics, investigate the use of heuristics by selectors and boards of directors, and how best to design, implement, and evaluate heuristic education programs.

Tourniquet-less arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a technical guide & narrative review of the evidence

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often performed with the use of a thigh tourniquet. Surgeons believe this helps improve visualisation and reduce operative time. However, tourniquet use has been associated with many complications including increased pain, neurovascular injury, venous thromboembolism, haematoma formation, and others. In this article, we describe a method allowing comparable arthroscopic visualisation to be achieved without the aid of a tourniquet for ACLR procedures. The literature evidence relating to this technique as well as tourniquet use for ACLR is also reviewed. Tourniquet-less ACLR can be achieved through the combined application of hypotensive anaesthesia, intravenous tranexamic acid, and use of adrenaline-supplemented irrigation fluid and local anaesthetic. Performing ACLR without a tourniquet avoids the risks associated with its use and reduces the severity of post-operative haemarthrosis which may contribute to the patient's pain and limit their ability to perform their rehabilitation exercises.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair performed with intra-articular tranexamic acid: could it provide improved visual clarity and less postoperative pain? A prospective, double-blind, randomized study of 63 patients

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely used in orthopedic surgery with the aim of reducing intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, as well as bleeding-related complications. The purpose of this study was to assess whether intra-articular use of TXA during arthroscopic rotator cuff tear (RCT) repair could improve visual clarity, shorten the duration of the operation, and provide superior pain management as compared with placebo.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients aged ≥18 years with a magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed RCT and a history of failed conservative treatment for ≥6 months were included. Patients with a history of coagulopathy; a history of cardiac, renal, or hepatic disease; a history of conservative treatment for <6 months; and/or acute RCTs were excluded. Visual clarity as the primary outcome was assessed using an arthroscopic visual scale comprising 5 grades-ranging from grade 1, best visual clarity, to grade 5, worst visual clarity (requiring conversion to open surgery)-after the procedure by the operating surgeon every 10 minutes throughout the video of the operation. Secondary outcomes were operative duration and postoperative pain scores.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients with similar demographic data (age and sex) and intraoperative mean arterial pressure were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups: The TXA group comprised 32 patients with a mean age of 56.46 years, and the placebo group comprised 31 patients with a mean age of 57.83 years. The TXA group was reported to have significantly superior visual clarity (mean arthroscopic visual scale score, 1.5 ± 0.5 vs. 2.86 ± 1.7; P < .001), with a significantly higher percentage of grade 1 visual clarity (78.1% vs. 32.2%, P < .001) and a significantly lower percentage of grade 4 visual clarity (0% vs. 3.2%, P = .003). Grade 5 visual clarity was not recorded in any patient in either group. The TXA group showed a significantly shorter operative duration (55.73 minutes vs. 67.26 minutes, P = .001) and superior pain scores at 8 hours (2.3 vs. 3.6, P = .002) and 24 hours (1.6 vs. 2.4, P < .001) postoperatively. No complications were recorded in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures, intra-articular use of TXA was able to provide superior arthroscopic visual clarity while shortening the total operative duration significantly and providing significantly superior pain management in the first 8 and 24 hours postoperatively as compared with placebo. This study underlines the safety and efficacy of intra-articular TXA use in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.