• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4640408)   Today's Articles (199)   Subscriber (50360)
For: Ommen DM, Saunders CP, Neumann C. The characterization of Monte Carlo errors for the quantification of the value of forensic evidence. J STAT COMPUT SIM 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2017.1280036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Williams JP, Ommen DM, Hannig J. Generalized fiducial factor: An alternative to the Bayes factor for forensic identification of source problems. Ann Appl Stat 2023. [DOI: 10.1214/22-aoas1632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
2
Lountain O, Tuke J, Brown H, Redman K, Wilczek S, Humphries MA. A multivariate extension to the standard 4σ criterion for comparison of forensic glass evidence. Forensic Sci Int 2022;338:111386. [PMID: 35901586 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
3
Reinders S, Guan Y, Ommen D, Newman J. Source‐anchored, trace‐anchored, and general match score‐based likelihood ratios for camera device identification. J Forensic Sci 2022;67:975-988. [PMID: 35128659 PMCID: PMC9302670 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
4
Ommen DM, Saunders CP. A Problem in Forensic Science Highlighting the Differences between the Bayes Factor and Likelihood Ratio. Stat Sci 2021. [DOI: 10.1214/20-sts805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
5
Vergeer P, van Schaik Y, Sjerps M. Measuring calibration of likelihood-ratio systems: A comparison of four metrics, including a new metric devPAV. Forensic Sci Int 2021;321:110722. [PMID: 33684845 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
6
Vergeer P, Leegwater AJ, Slooten K. Evaluation of glass evidence at activity level: A new distribution for the background population. Forensic Sci Int 2020;316:110431. [PMID: 32980719 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA