University students' attributions for abstinence from synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic cathinones

Bath salts and polyconsumption: in search of drug-drug interactions

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

Polydrug use is a widespread phenomenon, especially among adolescents and young adults. Synthetic cathinones are frequently consumed in combination with other drugs of abuse. However, there is very little information regarding the consequences of this specific consumption pattern.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to introduce this topic and highlight the gaps in the existing literature. In three different sections, we focus on specific interactions of synthetic cathinones with alcohol, cannabinoids, and the stimulants nicotine and cocaine. We then dedicate a section to the existence of sex and gender differences in the effects of synthetic cathinones and the long-term psychophysiological consequences of adolescent and prenatal exposure to these drugs.

MAJOR FINDINGS

Epidemiological studies, case reports, and results obtained in animal models point to the existence of pharmacological and pharmacokinetic interactions between synthetic cathinones and other drugs of abuse. This pattern of polyconsumption can cause the potentiation of negative effects, and the dissociation between objective and subjective effects can increase the combined use of the drugs and the risk of toxicity leading to serious health problems. Certain animal studies indicate a higher vulnerability and effect of cathinones in females. In humans, most of the users are men and case reports show long-term psychotic symptoms after repeated use.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-use of synthetic cathinones and the other drugs of abuse analyzed indicates potentiation of diverse effects including dependence and addiction, neurotoxicity, and impaired cognition and emotional responses. The motivations for and effects of synthetic cathinone use appear to be influenced by sex/gender. The long-term consequences of their use by adolescents and pregnant women deserve further investigation.

University students' self-reported reasons for abstinence from prescription and non-prescription stimulants and depressants

BACKGROUND

No previous publication has evaluated whether the importance of university students' reasons for abstinence differs across prescription stimulants, prescription opioids, and two illicit forms of those medications (cocaine and heroin).

METHODS

In response to a recruitment email sent to all enrolled undergraduates at a large public university, 768 students who reported no prior recreational use of these four substances rated the importance of 17 reasons for lifelong abstention from each of the four drugs.

RESULTS

Based on factor analyses, 16 of the 17 reasons comprised four subscales (Negative Consequences, Difficult to Acquire, Not Enjoyable, Social Disapproval). With few exceptions, importance ratings for each of the four subscales and the single non-loading reason (Against My Beliefs) were highest for heroin, followed in descending order by cocaine and the two prescription medications. Female students rated three types of reasons as more important than did males, but previous use of other illicit drugs and past medical use of prescription stimulants or prescription opioids were not typically associated with importance of reasons for abstaining.

CONCLUSION

Each type of reason was rated a more important influence on abstention from street drugs than from comparable prescription drugs. Reasons reflecting harmful consequences were rated most important and reasons reflecting acquisition difficulties were rated least important for each drug. To the degree that importance ratings are associated with continued abstinence, education and prevention messages could emphasize negative consequences as one means to reinforce continued abstinence from these drugs.

Self-Reported Reasons for Abstinence from Illicit Drugs

OBJECTIVE

To provide a more balanced understanding of the initiation and restraint of substance use, educators, clinicians, and researchers would benefit from a review of research assessing the reasons nonusers report for having abstained from drugs.

METHOD

Based on searches of computerized databases and the reference sections of relevant articles, we identified 15 relevant studies that assessed and quantified participants' expressed reasons for having abstained from (a) one or more named substances or (b) drugs (or alcohol and drugs) with little or no further specification. We defined as more salient those 25% of reasons in each study that were endorsed most frequently, ranked highest, or rated most influential.

RESULTS

Five reasons - concerns about physical health, lack of interest, harmful psychological consequences, personal beliefs/morals, and peer/family disapproval - were most frequently identified as salient across studies and substances.

CONCLUSION

These salient reasons are consistent with outcome expectancy and social learning models that have been proposed to explain drug initiation. To enhance the value of future research, we recommend testing whether importance ratings differ across contexts; repeatedly assessing within-subject variability of reasons across time; evaluating the association of psychological characteristics with reasons for abstaining; and continuing to evaluate which reasons for abstaining vary by type of drug, gender, ethnicity, and religiosity. We also recommend additional research comparing which reasons predict continued abstinence and which predict initiation of use during follow-up.