Siogkas PK, Sakellarios AI, Papafaklis MI, Stefanou KA, Athanasiou LM, Exarchos TP, Naka KK, Michalis LK, Fotiadis DI. Assessing the hemodynamic influence between multiple lesions in a realistic right coronary artery segment: A computational study.
ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2015;
2014:5643-6. [PMID:
25571275 DOI:
10.1109/embc.2014.6944907]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Coronary artery disease is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Therefore, detailed assessment of lesions in the coronary vasculature is critical in current clinical practice. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been proven as an efficient method for assessing the hemodynamic severity of a coronary stenosis. However, functional assessment of a coronary segment with multiple stenoses (≥ 2) remains complex for guiding the strategy of percutaneous coronary intervention due to the hemodynamic interplay between adjacent stenoses. In this work, we created four 3-dimensional (3D) arterial models that derive from a healthy patient-specific right coronary artery segment. The initial healthy model was reconstructed using fusion of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and biplane angiographic patient data. The healthy 3D model presented a measured FFR value of 0.96 (pressure-wire) and a simulated FFR value of 0.98. We then created diseased models with two artificial sequential stenoses of 90% lumen area reduction or with the proximal and distal stenosis separately. We calculated the FFR value for each case: 0.65 for the case with the two stenoses, 0.73 for the case with the distal stenosis and 0.90 for the case with the proximal stenosis. This leads to the conclusion that although both stenoses had the same degree of lumen area stenosis, there was a large difference in hemodynamic severity, thereby indicating that angiographic lumen assessment by itself is often not adequate for accurate assessment of coronary lesions.
Collapse