Twelve tips on how to provide self-regulated learning (SRL) enhanced feedback on clinical performance

Self-regulated learning microanalysis feedback for developing clinical skills: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

The development of clinical skills requires the appropriate use of self-regulated learning (SRL). Students' use of key SRL processes as they perform a clinical skill can be identified by SRL microanalysis and used to provide feedback. SRL-microanalysis feedback only on students' key SRL processes has not been previously researched for developing clinical skills. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SRL-microanalysis feedback only on students' key SRL processes can improve both their use of SRL and their clinical skill performance.

METHODS

Twenty-three final year medical students with no experience in the clinical skill required for mechanical ventilation participated in this study. Key SRL processes and clinical skill performance were measured before and after SRL microanalysis feedback.

RESULTS

Overall, we found an improvement in the key SRL processes of planning and monitoring of performance, with a significant difference in monitoring. We also found an increase in students' clinical skill performance.

DISCUSSION

This study, which is the first in clinical skills, demonstrated that SRL microanalysis feedback only on key SRL processes can improve both students' SRL and their clinical skill performance. studies are recommended with a great number of students and across a variety of clinical skills.

Self-regulated learning processes across different physiotherapy clinical procedural skills and time intervals: A SRL microanalysis study

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The performance of a clinical procedural skill by an individual student is associated with their use of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) processes. However, previous research has not identified if an individual student has a similarity in their use of SRL processes across different clinical procedural skill tasks and at a time interval. The aim of this pilot study was to explore the similarity in the use of SRL processes by individual students across different clinical procedural skill tasks and at a time interval.

METHODS

SRL-microanalysis was used to collect within-subject data on undergraduate physiotherapy students' use of the two key SRL processes (planning and monitoring) during their performance of different goniometry clinical procedural skills tasks and also at a fourth month interval.

RESULTS

An individual student's use of key SRL processes across different clinical procedural skill tasks and at a time interval was similar. Also, this similarity was identified for students with initial successful and unsuccessful performances.

CONCLUSION

Our findings have implications for the future wider practical implementation of SRL microanalysis to inform personalised SRL feedback for developing the clinical procedural skills of individual students. Further research with a greater number of students and across a wider range of clinical procedural skills will be required to confirm our findings, and also its effectiveness on feedback and future performance.

Surgical Nursing Students' Perception of Feedback in Clinical Education: A Mixed-method Study

BACKGROUND

Feedback is a critical component of education but may not always be delivered in a useful manner. This study assessed surgical nursing students' perception of the feedback they received on a clinical rotation.

METHODS

This is a sequential mixed-method study. The first stage surveyed surgical nursing students in surgical units about the feedback they received. In the second stage, participants' experiences receiving feedback were explored in interviews, and analyzed by a conventional content analysis approach.

RESULTS

The majority of nurses found that feedback was not helpful, citing a lack of constructive feedback. Negative feedback was often delivered in a public setting. Comments were frequently based on secondary information rather than direct observation.

DISCUSSION

Feedback to nurses on the surgical unit is not perceived by students as constructive. Clinical teachers did not appear to be aware of the educational effect of the feedback on the learning process of students. In addition, the setting for feedback often undermined its effectiveness. Staff development on effective feedback for teachers on the surgical unit is recommended.

Twelve tips for mindful teaching and learning in medical education

Mindfulness practice has been shown to have many positive benefits for patients, clinicians, and trainees. Mindfulness fosters compassion, connection, and enhanced clinical reasoning and can reduce burnout among clinicians. A primary focus of mindfulness is present-moment awareness and may be achieved through openness, curiosity, perspective-taking, and letting go of judgment. We propose that the core principles of mindfulness can be harnessed by educators to enhance their teaching skills specifically around creating a supportive and safe learning environment, using questions effectively, providing feedback, and serving as role models. Mindful teaching promotes mindful learning, which focuses on context, openness to new possibilities, reflection, and critical thinking, as opposed to rote repetition and memorization. This article describes core mindfulness principles and strategies that can be used to become a more mindful teacher.

Clinical Skills Tutoring Program (CSTP): Developing a Curriculum for Medical Student Clinical Skills Peer Tutors

INTRODUCTION

There are few curriculum materials designed to provide training and support for peer tutors to become effective clinical skills teachers. We designed the Clinical Skills Tutoring Program (CSTP) curriculum to guide tutors to help their students reflect on clinical skills performance, create an individualized learning plan, and engage in improvement based on feedback to achieve clinical skills competencies.

METHODS

Curriculum content was delivered through an in-person training session, formal curriculum written content, online resources, and longitudinal support from faculty directors. Tutors (fourth-year medical students) received surveys to evaluate the in-person training session, curriculum resources, and overall program experience. Student participants (medical students of any year) completed a survey to rate their satisfaction in working with their tutors.

RESULTS

There were 12 tutors in cohort 1 and 18 tutors in cohort 2. Survey response rates ranged from 50% to 70% among tutors. The tutors were satisfied with the in-person training session, program experience, curriculum resources, support from directors, development of learning goals with the student, and clinical skills practice with the student (mean Likert ratings greater than 4 out of 5). Student participants were satisfied with their experience creating learning goals and receiving feedback from their tutors.

DISCUSSION

The tutor curriculum fills a gap by training and supporting tutors before and during their work with students needing further resources and remediation in one or more clinical skills domains. The curriculum can be implemented and further adapted by other tutoring programs locally and nationally.

Feedback in an Epidemic?

Undergraduates and postgraduates frequently receive feedback on their clinical and non-clinical performance and progression throughout their studies and career. Good quality feedback has been shown to improve trainees’ confidence and performance. This article discusses the benefits of feedback and reviews the communication, technical, financial, and networking barriers to feedback introduced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its impact on the quality of medical and dental education in the UK, followed by a critical reflection. In addition, it reviews the pros and cons of self-assessment of clinical learning, and it provides an overview of the most widely accepted feedback models: Pendleton’s rules, SET-GO method, agenda-led, outcome-based analysis (ALOBA) model and Prepare to Ask-Discuss-Ask-Plan Together (Prepare to ADAPT) on the quality of feedback received. The aim is to identify the most suitable feedback method to help trainees with their clinical and professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic and any possible pandemics in the future.

Putting self-regulated learning in context: Integrating self-, co-, and socially shared regulation of learning

Processes involved in the regulation of learning have been researched for decades, because of its impact on academic and workplace performance. In fact, self-regulated learning is the focus of countless studies in health professions education and higher education in general. While we will always need competent individuals who are able to regulate their own learning, developments in healthcare require a shift from a focus on the individual to the collective: collaboration within and between healthcare teams is at the heart of high-quality patient care. Concepts of collaborative learning and collective competence challenge commonly held conceptualisations of regulatory learning and call for a focus on the social embeddedness of regulatory learning and processes regulating the learning of the collective. Therefore, this article questions the alignment of current conceptualisations of regulation of learning with demands for collaboration in current healthcare. We explore different conceptualisations of regulation of learning (self-, co-, and socially shared regulation of learning), and elaborate on how the integration of these conceptualisations adds to our understanding of regulatory learning in healthcare settings. Building on these insights, we furthermore suggest ways forward for research and educational practice.

The challenge of understanding, evaluating and providing feedback on regulation during group learning

Learning in groups is commonly used in academic and clinical health professions education (HPE). There is growing recognition that regulation during learning is essential for both the individual learner and group learning. The authors in this article propose a practical approach for understanding, evaluating and providing feedback on regulation during group learning. The approach is informed by previous studies conducted in other areas of education. Three varieties of regulation during group learning are discussed: individual, co-regulation and shared regulation. Each variety of regulation has a focus on three essential activities during group learning: task, social and motivation. Illustrative scenarios are presented to describe how the approach can be practically used in HPE. The specific and additional focus on regulation can enhance current approaches for providing feedback on group learning and the authors discuss recommendations for practical implementation and future research.

A case for feedback and monitoring assessment in competency-based medical education

PURPOSE

Within competency-based medical education, self-regulated learning (SRL) requires residents to leverage self-assessment and faculty feedback. We sought to investigate the potential for competency-based assessments to foster SRL by quantifying the relationship between faculty feedback and entrustment ratings as well as the congruence between faculty assessment and resident self-assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected comments in (a) an emergency medicine objective structured clinical examination group (objective structured clinical examinations [OSCE] and emergency medicine OSCE group [EMOG]) and (b) a first-year resident multidisciplinary resuscitation "Nightmares" course assessment group (NCAG) and OSCE group (NOG). We assessed comments across five domains including Initial Assessment (IA), Diagnostic Action (DA), Therapeutic Action (TA), Communication (COM), and entrustment. Analyses included structured qualitative coding and (non)parametric and descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

In the EMOG, faculty's positive comments in the entrustment domain corresponded to lower entrustment score Mean Ranks (MRs) for IA (<11.1), DA (<11.2), and entrustment (<11.6). In NOG, faculty's negative comments resulted in lower entrustment score MRs for TA (<11.8 and <10) and DA (<12.4), and positive comments resulted in higher entrustment score MRs for IA (>15.4) and COM (>17.6). In the NCAG, faculty's positive IA comments were negatively correlated with entrustment scores (ρ = -.27, P = .04). Across programs, faculty and residents made similar domain-specific comments 13% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal and inconsistent associations were found between narrative and numerical feedback. Performance monitoring accuracy and feedback should be included in assessment validation.

Using a self-regulated learning-enhanced video feedback educational intervention to improve junior doctor prescribing

Introduction: Medical school graduates in the UK consistently report feeling underprepared for the task of prescribing when embarking on practice. The effective application of self-regulated learning (SRL) approaches and feedback on complex tasks are associated with improved outcomes in practice-based clinical skills.Aims: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an educational intervention using SRL-enhanced video feedback for improving the prescribing competency of junior doctors.Methods: A prospective cohort study was designed to compare intervention and control cohorts of junior doctors undertaking simulated clinical encounters at the beginning and end of their 4-month rotation through renal medicine.Results: The improvement in prescribing competency for the intervention cohort was significant (p < 0.001) with large effect size (d = 1.42). Self-efficacy improved in both cohorts with large (control cohort p = 0.026, r= 0.64) and medium (intervention cohort p = 0.083, d = 0.55) effect sizes. Goal setting and self-monitoring skills improved in the intervention cohort only with medium effect size (p = 0.096, d = 0.53).Conclusions: SRL-enhanced video feedback is effective for improving prescribing competency and developing SRL processes such as goal setting and self-monitoring skills in simulated clinical encounters. Further research is required to evaluate transferability to other clinical sub-speciality contexts and investigate the effectiveness of the intervention for improving prescribing in non-simulated settings.

Self-regulated learning microanalysis for the study of the performance of clinical examinations by physiotherapy students

BACKGROUND

Students require feedback on their self-regulated learning (SRL) processes to improve the performance of clinical examinations. The key SRL processes used by students can be identified by SRL-micro-analysis but, this method has not been previously applied to physiotherapy students. The aim of this pilot study was to test a research design that might allow the evaluation of the potential usefulness of SRL microanalysis for the identification of key SRL processes used by physiotherapy students during the performance of a clinical examination skill. The objectives of the pilot study were: 1) to evaluate whether SRL-microanalysis could identify differences in the use of SRL processes between successful and unsuccessful students; 2) to evaluate the reliability of SRL microanalysis ratings produced by different assessors.

METHODS

SRL-microanalysis was used with second year physiotherapy students of a Spanish university (n = 26) as they performed a goniometric task. The task required students to obtain a goniometric measurement of the shoulder joint of a peer. Two assessors evaluated student performance and conducted the SRL- microanalysis with all students. An analysis of inter-rater reliability was performed to evaluate the degree of agreement between assessors.

RESULTS

The SRL-microanalysis revealed differences in the use of key SRL processes between successful (n = 15: 57.0%) and unsuccessful performers (n = 11: 43.0%): The differences were particularly evident in strategic planning and self-monitoring skills. There was good inter-rater reliability for scoring of strategic planning (k = 0.792), self-monitoring (k = 0.946) and self-evaluation (k = 0.846).

CONCLUSION

The use of SRL microanalysis characterized the key SRL processes of physiotherapy students performing a clinical skill with reliability between the assessors. This pilot study supports the potential usefulness of SRL-microanalysis for the identification of key SRL processes in physiotherapy education. Therefore, this study paves the way to the development of a full study, with a larger number of students and more diverse clinical tasks, to evaluate the SRL processes in successful and unsuccessful students.

Using personalized teaching and learning to improve clinical performance

The intention of personalized teaching and learning to improve clinical performance is the optimization of individual performance across a variety of tasks in different environments. Educational interventions need to have a focus on the assessment and feedback of both outcome and process of performance. An essential component of the assessment and feedback on the process of performance is how ‘the will’ and ‘the skill’ are dynamically adapted by the individual through self-regulated learning processes. Microanalysis can identify the key self-regulated learning processes and the findings used to inform self-regulated learning enhanced feedback for personalized teaching and learning. The experience of the authors in using self-regulated learning enhanced feedback for optimizing performance in prescribing by junior doctors is discussed.