A way to lend objectivity to Bishop score

The Uterocervical Angle Combined with Bishop Score as a Predictor for Successful Induction of Labor in Term Vaginal Delivery

The objective of this study was to determine the value of uterocervical angle (UCA) in predicting successful induction of labor (IOL) in singleton pregnant women compared to the Bishop score and cervical length (CL). A total of 205 normal term, singleton labor-induction cases were analyzed. Successful IOL was defined as the onset of active labor of induction. A comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of UCA, Bishop score, and CL in predicting IOL. Compared to the non-successful IOL group, the women in the successful IOL group had significantly wider UCA (p = 0.012) and higher Bishop score (p = 0.001); however, the CL was not significantly different (p = 0.130). UCA alone did not perform better than the Bishop score when predicting successful IOL. However, UCA combined with the Bishop score showed higher performance in predicting IOL (combined UCA > 108.4° and favorable Bishop score as sensitivity of 44.6%, specificity of 96.0%, PPV of 96.2%, and NPV of 43.6; combined UCA > 108.4° or favorable Bishop score as sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 50.0%, PPV of 78.7%, and NPV of 61.9). In conclusion, UCA combined with Bishop score may be an effective sonographic method for predicting successful IOL.

Clinical and Sonographic Model to Predict Cesarean Delivery after Induction of Labor at Term

OBJECTIVE

To develop a model combining clinical and sonographic features to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after the induction of labor (IOL).

METHODS

We designed a prospective observational study involving women admitted for IOL. The main outcome was defined as cesarean delivery due to failed IOL or arrest of labor. Several clinical and ultrasonographic variables were collected. Seventy percent of the sample was used to build the predictive model, using stepwise logistic regression, while the remaining sample was used for validation. The final model was estimated and calibrated using all participants.

RESULTS

We analyzed 477 pregnancies. The main outcome occurred in 102/477 (21.4%) women. The final model included previous vaginal delivery (odds ratio [OR] 0.088; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.21), height (OR 0.904; 95% CI 0.87-0.94), body mass index before delivery (OR 1.084; 95% CI 1.02-1.15), ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (OR 3.965; 95% CI 2.18-7.22), and ultrasonographic cervical length (OR 1.065; 95% CI 1.04-1.09) as predictors. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.826 (95% CI 0.78-0.87). For a 5% false-positive rate, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 44.1%, 94.9%, 8.7, and 0.59, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our model combining clinical and ultrasonographic features might offer individualized counseling regarding risk of cesarean delivery to women who are candidates for IOL.

The role of sonographic cervical length in labor induction at term

The purpose of this study is to review the literature examining the role of ultrasound in the induction of labor. Databases including Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and UpToDate were searched and current guidelines from the SOGC, the ACOG, the RCOG, and the RANZCOG were reviewed. Although studies have not demonstrated the superiority of cervical sonography to the Bishop score, the evidence indicates that sonography could be useful in planning induction of labor, significantly reducing the need for cervical ripening agents. A more comprehensive method integrating both sonography and digital exam may be more appropriate.

Can measurement of cervical length, fetal head position and posterior cervical angle be an alternative method to Bishop score in the prediction of successful labor induction?

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate sonographic cervical length, posterior cervical angle and fetal head position in predicting successful induction of labor at term can be an alternative method to Bishop score.

METHODS

This prospective observational study recruited 223 women with singleton gestations scheduled for induction of labor at 37-42 weeks. Parity, body mass index, Bishop score, fetal head position, cervical angle measurement and cervical length was investigated to predict successful labor induction. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the parameters in the prediction of successful vaginal delivery within 24 hours.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were excluded because of cesarean section performed for other reasons than arrest of dilation or fetal head descent (43 fetal distress, 2 cord prolapsus). Remaining 178 patients were divided into two groups according to duration of delivery time. 139 patients delivered within 24 hours were classified as group I, 39 patients delivered after 24 hours were classified as group II. Percentage of multiparity was statistically significantly higher in group I than in group II [59 (42.4%), 9 (23.0%) respectively, p = 0.009]. Cervical length was statistically significantly shorter in group I than in group II [23.1 ± 7.42 mm, 31.3 ± 6.83 mm respectively, p < 0.001]. Bishop score was statistically significantly higher in group I than in group II [3 (1-4), 1 (1-4) respectively, p < 0.001]. Posterior cervical angle was statistically significantly higher in group I than in group II [100.1 ± 17.2, 92.7 ± 21.4 respectively, p = 0.007]. According to the fetal head position, there was no statistically significant difference in labor duration between the groups (p = 0.787). In the multivariate regression analysis of variables, multiparity, cervical length and Bishop score were statistically significantly predictive in successful labor induction.

CONCLUSION

Multiparity status, cervical length, posterior cervical angle and Bishop score can predict successful labor induction, but fetal head position is not predictive in successful labor induction.

Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the predictive capacity of transvaginal sonographic assessment of the cervix for the outcome of induction of labor.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library, and manually searched reference lists of review articles and eligible primary articles. Studies in all languages were eligible if published in full. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, quality and test accuracy. We then calculated pooled sensitivities and specificities (with 95% CIs) and summary receiver-operating characteristics (sROC) curves. Outcome measures were test accuracy of sonographically measured cervical length and cervical wedging for Cesarean section, not achieving vaginal delivery within 24 h and not achieving active labor.

RESULTS

We included 31 studies reporting on both cervical length and outcome of delivery. The quality of the included studies was mediocre. Sensitivity of cervical length in the prediction of Cesarean delivery ranged from 0.14 to 0.92 and specificity ranged from 0.35 to 1.00. The estimated sROC curve for cervical length indicated a limited predictive capacity in the prediction of Cesarean delivery. Summary estimates of sensitivity/specificity combinations of cervical length at different cut-offs for Cesarean delivery were 0.82/0.34, 0.64/0.74 and 0.13/0.95 for 20, 30 and 40 mm, respectively. For cervical wedging in the prediction of failed induction of labor summary point estimates of sensitivity/specificity were 0.37/0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical length and cervical wedging as measured sonographically at or near term have moderate capacity to predict the outcome of delivery after induction of labor.

The role of cervical Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in the prediction of the course and outcome of induced labour

Background

Previous work by us and others had suggested that cervical electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) may be predictive of the outcome of induced labour. We sought to determine which probe configuration of the EIS device is predictive of the outcome of induced labour and compare this to digital assessment by the Bishop score.

Methods

In a prospective cohort of 205 women admitted for induction of labour, we used four probes of diameter 3, 6, 9 and 12 mm connected to an impedance meter to measure cervical resistivity (CR) in Ohm.meters at 14 electrical frequencies and compared their values to digital assessment of the cervix by the Bishop score for the prediction of the outcome of induced labour. We tested the association of labour characteristics and outcomes with CR and Bishop score by stepwise multilinear regression analyses, and the accuracy of prediction of categorical clinical outcomes by analysis of the area under the curves (AUC) of derived Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

Of the four CR probe dimensions studied, only the 12 mm probe was predictive of any labour indices. In the frequency range 19 - 156 kHz, CR obtained with this probe was higher in women who delivered by caesarean section (CS) than those who delivered vaginally, and in labours lasting > 24 hrs. Cervical resistivity at 78.1 kHz best predicted vaginal delivery [optimal cut-off <2.25 Ohm.meter, AUC 0.66 (95% CI 0.59-0.72), sensitivity 71.0%, specificity 56.5%, LR+ 1.63, LR- 0.51, P < 0.01] and labour duration >24 hrs [optimal cut-off 2.27 Ω.m, AUC 0.65 (95% CI 0.58, 0.72), sensitivity 71%, specificity 59%, LR+ 1.72, LR- 0.50, P < 0.05]. In contrast digital assessment by the Bishop score neither predicted vaginal delivery nor the duration of labour. However, Bishop score predicted time to onset of labour > 12 hours and induction-delivery interval < 24 hrs [optimal cut-off ≤ 4, AUC 0.8 (95% CI 0.75, 0.86), sensitivity 77%, specificity 76%, LR+ 3.3, LR- 0.3, P < 0.05] whilst CR did not.

Conclusion

Cervical resistivity appears predictive of labour duration and delivery mode following induced labour. However the low predictive values obtained suggest that its current design proffers no immediate clinical utility.

Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to review the literature that evaluates sonographic cervical assessment to predict successful induction of labor.

STUDY DESIGN

Published prospective trials that measured sonographic cervical length before labor induction was initiated were evaluated. Trials were excluded if they contained data presented in later articles or did not contain extractable data. The total analysis included 20 trials with 3101 aggregate participants.

RESULTS

Cervical length predicted successful induction (likelihood ratio of positive test, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.31) and failed induction (likelihood ratio of negative test, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39-0.67). Cervical length did not predict any specific outcome (eg, mode of delivery). The assessment of cervical wedging proved to be a useful diagnostic test, with a likelihood ratio of a positive test result of 2.64 and a likelihood ratio of a negative test result of 0.64.

CONCLUSION

Sonographic cervical length was not an effective predictor of successful labor induction. Further evaluation of cervical wedging in the prediction of labor induction appears warranted.