Retrospective analysis of 4761 cases who underwent amniocentesis in southeast China

Rapid prenatal aneuploidy detection of BACs-on-Beads assay in 4961 cases of amniotic fluid samples

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of the BACs-on-Beads (BoBs) assay for the rapid diagnosis of common aneuploidies and microdeletions.Methods: A total of 4961 pregnant women admitted to the Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2017 to March 2019 were enrolled. BoBs assay and conventional karyotyping were applied to detect amniotic fluid samples with various indications for prenatal diagnosis. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and maternal cell contamination (MCC) tests were used for further validation.Results: The overall abnormality detection rates (BoBs associated with karyotyping) were 4.25% (211/4961). The prenatal diagnosis success rate of karyotyping was 99.4% (4933/4961), compared to 100% (4961/4961) using the BoBs assays. The BoBs assay was similar to karyotyping for the detection of trisomy 21 (1.01%, 50/4961), trisomy 18 (0.40%, 20/4961), trisomy 13 (0.04%, 2/4961), and sex chromosomal aneuploidies (0.15%, 12/4961). The BoBs assay also identified sex chromosomal microduplications/microdeletions (1.73%, 86/4961), 22q11.2 microdeletions/microduplications (0.1%, 5/4961), and Cri du Chat syndrome (0.02%, 1/4961) which were missed by karyotyping. The sensitivity for the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities of the BoBs assay and karyotyping analysis was 100% (95/95, 95% CI: 1.0-1.0) and 98.9% (94/95, 95% CI: 0.969-1.010), respectively. The sensitivity of detecting structural chromosomal abnormalities in the BoBs assay was significantly higher than those of karyotyping (79.3%, 92/116, 95% CI: 0.718-0.868) versus 21.6% (25/116, 95% CI: 0.140-0.291) (p < .01).Conclusions: The BoBs assay is a reliable and rapid test for the detection of common aneuploidies and nine microdeletion syndromes with high sensitivity and accuracy in prenatal diagnosis. The assay can compensate for the limitations of karyotyping analysis.

A retrospective analysis of 237 Chinese families with Duchenne muscular dystrophy history and strategies of prenatal diagnosis

BACKGROUND

To offer 4-year clinical prenatal diagnosis experience of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

METHODS

Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and Sanger sequencing were used for molecular diagnosis of 237 DMD families.

RESULTS

In the study, deletions, duplications, complex rearrangement and small mutations accounted for 47.3%, 8.4%, 1.7% and 42.6% of 237 families, respectively. Sixty-six different deletion patterns were identified in 112 families. Fourteen different duplication patterns were identified in 20 families and 4 complex rearrangements were identified. About 87.1% different small mutation patterns were identified, including 37.6% different nonsense mutation patterns, 24.8% different frameshift mutation patterns, 7.9% different missense mutation patterns, and 16.8% different splice site mutation patterns. There was no significant difference in the age of onset and mutation patterns (P > .05). The follow-up examinations revealed that the pregnancies of 14 cases were interrupted. Two cases were preterm births, 151 cases were delivered at term, 63 cases continued to pregnancy, and 7 cases were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

DHPLC and Sanger sequencing technique are efficient, sensitive, and specific in screening for DMD gene mutations. And pre-pregnancy DMD gene examination is an important step to assess mutation type of family with suspected DMD and guides exactly prenatal diagnosis in high-risk families.