Management of fetal alloimmune thrombocytopenia-a less invasive option?

Omission of fetal sampling in treatment of subsequent pregnancies in fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia affects approximately 1 of 1000 live births, most of which are not severely thrombocytopenic. Despite effective treatment with intravenous gammaglobulin and/or prednisone, antenatal management of a subsequent affected pregnancy is complicated by the risks associated with fetal blood sampling. Furthermore, there are no biomarker(s) of high risk other than the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage in a previous sibling. Management of these high-risk pregnancies requires intensive treatment initiated at 12 weeks of gestation.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether empiric escalation of therapy at 32 weeks allows the omission of fetal blood sampling in all fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia-affected patients. Specifically, we sought to determine whether intensive intravenous gammaglobulin-based regimens for the treatment of a subsequent fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia-affected pregnancy followed by empirically escalated intravenous gammaglobulin and prednisone treatment would increase the fetal platelet count and thus safely allow omission of fetal blood sampling in the antepartum management of these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study, 99 women with fetal-neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia whose prior affected child did not have an intracranial hemorrhage were randomized to receive an intensive intravenous gammaglobulin-based regimen: 2 g/kg per week or intravenous gammaglobulin 1 g/kg per week plus prednisone 0.5 mg/kg per day, starting at 20-30 weeks of gestation. Escalated therapy (intravenous gammaglobulin 2 g/kg per week plus prednisone 0.5 mg/kg per day) was recommended and usually initiated at 32 weeks when fetal counts were <50,000/mL(3) or when fetal blood sampling was not performed. The preliminary report of this study from 2007 demonstrated the efficacy of both intravenous gammaglobulin-based regimens in most patients. Most patients who underwent fetal sampling had adequate fetal counts and therefore did not have their treatment escalated. This post hoc analysis describes the 29 fetuses who had their treatment escalated either because they had low counts at 32 weeks or when sampling was not performed. This study explored whether the empiric escalation of treatment at 32 weeks was sufficiently effective in increasing fetal platelet counts in these patients.

RESULTS

Mean fetal and birth counts of fetuses randomized to each of the 2 initial treatment groups were all >100,000/mL(3). Three neonates had an intracranial hemorrhage; all 3 were grade 1 and all had birth platelet counts >130,000/mL(3). In a post hoc analysis, 19 fetuses undergoing fetal blood sampling at 32 weeks had fetal platelet counts <50,000/mL(3) despite their initial treatment. Of these 19, birth platelet counts were >50,000/mL(3) in 11 of 13 fetuses who received escalated treatment compared with only 1 of 6 of those who did not (P = .01); only 3 fetuses that received initial therapy followed by escalated treatment had birth platelet counts <50,000/mL(3) and none had an intracranial hemorrhage. The platelet counts of 14 of 15 fetuses that received empirically escalated treatment without sampling were >50,000/mL(3) at birth. In addition, none of these had an intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

The 2 recommended protocols of intensive initial treatment followed by empiric escalation of therapy at 32 weeks of gestation are reasonably safe, effective in increasing fetal platelet counts, and allow omission of fetal blood sampling by increasing the fetal platelet count in almost all cases.

Antenatal interventions for fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia results from the formation of antibodies by the mother which are directed against a fetal platelet alloantigen inherited from the father. The resulting fetal thrombocytopenia (reduced platelet numbers) may cause bleeding, particularly into the brain, before or shortly after birth. Antenatal treatment of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia includes the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and/or corticosteroids to the mother to prevent severe fetal thrombocytopenia. IVIG and corticosteroids both have short-term and possibly long-term side effects. IVIG is also costly and optimal regimens need to be identified.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal antenatal treatment of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia to prevent fetal and neonatal haemorrhage and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (28 February 2011) and bibliographies of relevant publications and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies comparing any intervention with no treatment, or comparing any two interventions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials involving 206 people. One trial involving 39 people compared a corticosteroid (prednisone) versus IVIG alone. In this trial, where analysable data were available, there was no statistically significant differences between the treatment arms for predefined outcomes. Three trials involving 167 people compared IVIG plus a corticosteroid (prednisone in two trials and dexamethasone in one trial) versus IVIG alone. In these trials there was no statistically significant difference in the findings between the treatment arms for predefined outcomes (intracranial haemorrhage; platelet count at birth and preterm birth). Lack of complete data sets and important differences in interventions precluded the pooling of data from these trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The optimal management of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia remains unclear. Lack of complete data sets for two trials and differences in interventions precluded the pooling of data from these trials which may have enabled a more developed analysis of the trial findings. Further trials would be required to determine optimal treatment (the specific medication and its dose and schedule). Such studies should include long-term follow up of all children and mothers.

Advances in the management of alloimmune thrombocytopenia

There have been considerable advances in the clinical and laboratory diagnosis of alloimmune thrombocytopenia (AIT), and its postnatal and antenatal management. The antenatal management of AIT has been particularly problematic, because severe haemorrhage occurs as early as 16 weeks gestation and there is no non-invasive investigation that reliably predicts the severity of AIT in utero. The strategies for antenatal treatment have included the use of serial platelet transfusions that, while effective, are invasive and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Maternal therapy involving the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and/or steroids is also effective and associated with fewer risks to the fetus. Significant recent progress has involved refinement of maternal treatment, stratifying it according to the likely severity of AIT based on the history in previous pregnancies. However, the ideal antenatal treatment, which is effective without causing significant side-effects to the mother or fetus, has yet to be determined, and further clinical trials are needed.

Prospective epidemiologic study of the outcome and cost-effectiveness of antenatal screening to detect neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia due to anti-HPA-1a

BACKGROUND

To assess the value of antenatal screening to detect neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) due to anti-HPA-1a, a prospective study was carried out to quantify the potential clinical benefits and determine whether screening would be cost-effective.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

An observational prospective controlled study was carried out on 26,506 pregnant women over 2 years. HPA-1a phenotyping was performed in the first trimester and women confirmed HPA-1a-negative were tested for anti-HPA-1a during pregnancy, at delivery, and 10 to 14 days after birth. Babies of HPA-1a-negative women were tested at delivery for thrombocytopenia and examined for signs of bleeding. Economic evaluation was undertaken on the basis of the data collected during the study.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 318 women (7.9%) had anti-HPA-1a detected for the first time. Eight women (43 per 100,000) gave birth to babies with NAIT, and 5 (27 per 100,000) had severe thrombocytopenia. Three babies had mild signs of bleeding, and no cases of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or fetal loss were detected. It is estimated that it would cost 60,596 pounds (98,771 US dollars) to detect a case of severe NAIT, where anti-HPA-1a has been identified for the first time, and 1,151,323 pounds (1,876,656 US dollars) to prevent a case of ICH, assuming that detection allowed successful intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that severe HPA-1a NAIT is underdiagnosed in the absence of routine antenatal screening. Serious bleeding complications and ICH, however, occur less frequently in first cases of NAIT than suspected from the literature, and the costs of screening and possible intervention must be balanced against the procedural risks.

Antenatal interventions for fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia occurs when the mother produces antibodies against a platelet alloantigen that the fetus has inherited from the father. A consequence of this can be a reduced number of platelets (thrombocytopenia) in the fetus, which can result in bleeding whilst in the womb or shortly after birth. In severe cases this bleeding may lead to long-lasting disability or death. Antenatal management of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia centres on preventing severe thrombocytopenia in the fetus. Available management options include administration of intravenous immunoglobulins or corticosteroids to the mother or intrauterine transfusion of antigen compatible platelets to the fetus. All options are costly and need to be assessed in terms of potential risk and benefit to both the mother and an individual fetus.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal antenatal treatment of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia to prevent fetal and neonatal haemorrhage and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (February 2004), EMBASE (1980 to February 2004) and bibliographies of relevant publications and review articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies comparing any intervention, including corticosteroids with no treatment, or comparing any two interventions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

One study met the inclusion criteria (54 pregnant women). This trial compared intravenous immunoglobulins plus corticosteroid (dexamethasone) with intravenous immunoglobulins alone. No significant differences were reported between the treatment and control groups, in any outcome measured: mean platelet count at birth (weighted mean difference (WMD) 14.10 x 10 9/l, 95% confidence interval (CI) -30.26 to 58.46), mean gestational age at birth (WMD -0.50 weeks, 95% CI -2.69 to 1.69), mean rise in platelet count from first to second fetal blood screen (WMD -3.50 x 10 9/l, 95% CI -24.62 to 17.62) and mean rise in platelet count from birth to first fetal blood screen (WMD 24.40 x 10 9/l (95% CI -14.17 to 62.97)). This trial had adequate methodological quality; however the method used to calculate sample size was inappropriate: therefore the power calculation was not sufficient to determine any significance in differences between the treatment groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are insufficient data from randomised controlled trials to determine the optimal antenatal management of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. Future trials should consider the dose of intravenous immunoglobulins, the timing of initial treatment, monitoring of response to treatment by fetal blood sampling, laboratory measures to define pregnancies with a high risk of intercranial haemorrhage, management of non-responders and long-term follow up of children.

Will it ever be possible to balance the risk of intracranial haemorrhage in fetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia against the risk of treatment strategies to prevent it?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) of the fetus or newborn is a severe complication of fetal or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). In order to attain management decisions to prevent ICH, the risk of ICH in successive pregnancies with thrombocytopenia, with or without a history of ICH, must be established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a search of medline for ICH cases in untreated FNAIT pregnancies. After exclusion of cases with confounding factors, 24 reports, describing 62 pregnancies of 27 mothers, were eligible. In addition, two mothers with five pregnancies were included from our own case records. Observational studies were examined to estimate the risk of ICH in subsequent FNAIT pregnancies without a history of ICH. Finally, medline was searched for complication rates in the treatment of FNAIT pregnancies.

RESULTS

In 52% of the ICH cases, a previous sibling suffered from ICH. The recurrence rate of ICH in the subsequent offspring of women with a history of FNAIT with ICH was 72%[confidence interval (CI): 46-98%] without inclusion of fetal deaths and 79% (CI: 61-97%) with inclusion of fetal deaths. In 48% of the ICH cases, the previous sibling had thrombocytopenia but not ICH. Population studies revealed an overall ICH risk in thrombocytopenic infants of 11% (CI: 0.8-23%) without inclusion of fetal deaths and 15% (CI: 1.5-19%) with inclusion of fetal deaths. Assuming occurrence in 48%, the risk of ICH in a subsequent pregnancy following a history of FNAIT without ICH, was estimated to be 7% (CI: 0.5-13%). Invasive treatment strategies carry a risk of 2.8% (CI: 1.2-4.4%) on complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of eligible publications on ICH in untreated FNAIT pregnancies is strikingly limited. The recurrence rate is high. As sufficient data on successive FNAIT cases without ICH are lacking, the occurrence of ICH in pregnancies with thrombocytopenia, but without ICH in a previous sibling, cannot be predicted. We estimate this risk to be 7%. This risk must be balanced against the risk of interventions in treatment strategies.

Fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenia is the second commonest haematological abnormality in the neonatal period after anaemia due to iatrogenic blood letting. One to four percent of all newborn babies have a platelet count < 150 x 10(9)/l at birth and approximately 20-40% of neonates in intensive care units are affected by neonatal thrombocytopenia. The most common cause of severe neonatal thrombocytopenia is fetomaternal platelet incompatibility and subsequent alloimmunisation. During the last decade recent advances in molecular techniques have led to rapid and efficient methods for diagnosis. Progress in fetal medicine has enabled accurate determination of fetal status, allowing improvements in fetal diagnosis and therapy. Human platelet antigen (HPA)-1a is by far the most frequently involved platelet antigen system in Caucasians accounting for 90% of cases, followed at a much lower frequency by HPA-5b (5-15%) and HPA-3a. The incidence is estimated to be 1 per 2000 to 1 per 5000 live births, but this is low in comparison to the incidence of fetomaternal platelet antigen incompatibility especially for the HPA-1 alloantigen system in the Caucasian population in whom the estimated frequency of HPA-1b1b individuals is 2%. Retrospective and prospective studies have reported that the immunogenetic background is important, and the chance of HPA-1a alloimmunisation is strongly associated with maternal HLA class II DRB3*0101 (DR52a) type. A significant association (p = 0.004) between severe thrombocytopenia and a third trimester antiHPA titre >1:32 has been observed. It is now possible to genotype the fetus or neonate and the parents, which provides confirmation as to which HPA systems are incompatible between the mother and father. Simultaneous genotyping of HPA-1, 2, 3 and 5 can be carried out using the polymerase chain reaction-sequence specific primers (PCR-SSP) protocol, which has been widely used for HLA class II determination. The platelet count may continue to fall during the first 48 h after birth and the risk of intracranial bleeding is highest during this period. The best option is transfusion of specially selected antigen negative compatible donor platelets or if unavailable, maternal washed platelets. Antenatal screening for the most common form of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAIT), due to antiHPA-1a is under consideration, but there is no established method at present. The Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service started a study in August 1999 on 25,000 pregnancies to carry out a cost benefit analysis of routine antenatal screening. The aims of the study are to determine the frequency of HPA-1b homozygosity; monitor antibody titres during pregnancy and confirm correlation of antibody emergence with HLA-DRB3*0101, and finally to access cost effectiveness of routine screening across Scotland. Of 26,509 women screened in three Scottish regions 501 (1.9%) are HPA-1b homozygous and about 9%, of the consented women are antibody positive.