Viral Hepatitis and a Hospital Infrastructure in Ruins in Cameroon

Infrastructures of epidemic response: Mpox and everyday repair work in southwestern Nigeria

Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) was declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) by the World Health Organization on 23rd July 2022, however cases of the disease have been detected in Nigeria since the 1970s and more recently since it began spreading in more urban areas of the country from 2017 onward. Nigeria has a strong track record of epidemic preparedness and response, spearheaded by the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control. Despite being somewhat separate architectures on paper, epidemic response (in particular, integrated disease surveillance and response) relies on a foundation of primary health care, which is inadequately funded not only in Nigeria, but globally. Situating mpox response within this wider landscape, we draw on ethnographic research from September 2022-March 2023 in southwestern Nigeria on lived experiences of mpox and mpox response, focusing on the perspectives of frontline health workers and community-based suspected or confirmed mpox cases. We aimed to understand how prioritization and resource constraints shape mpox response at a local level, including effects on the everyday work of frontline health workers in public health and clinical care who are left to "make do." We analyze their experiences interfacing with two intersecting infrastructures, community-based surveillance and primary health care. Health workers' improvisation and "repair work," which we detail, enables the surveillance system to function in some capacity. However, health workers must regularly contend with competing priorities and routine care that may be sidelined during an outbreak or epidemic. We argue that this reveals the limitations of a global health security agenda as it materializes at a local level and the need for strengthening primary health care for longer-term sustainability.

Relational Harm: On the Divisive Effects of Global Health Volunteering at a Hospital in Rural Zambia

Drawing on ethnographic research at a hospital in rural Zambia, I show how the presence of white Christian medical volunteers from the United States damaged relations between local health workers and patients. Working from a position of economic and racial privilege, medical volunteers received praise from many patients and residents. However, these positive attitudes incited resentment among many Zambian health workers who felt that their own efforts and expertise were being undervalued or ignored. Focusing on these disrupted relationships, I argue that it is crucial to understand how global health volunteering can produce enduring forms of "relational harm".

Introduction: medicine's shadowside: revisiting clinical iatrogenesis

Drawing on the work of Ivan Illich, our special issue reanimates iatrogenesis as a vital concept for the social sciences of medicine. It calls for medicine to expand its engagement of the injustices that unfold from clinical processes, practices, and protocols into patient lifeworlds and subjectivities beyond the clinic. The capacious view of iatrogenesis revealed by this special issue collection affords fuller and more heterogeneous insights on iatrogenesis that does not limit it to medical explanations alone, nor locate harm in singular points in time. These papers attend to iatrogenesis' immediate and lingering presences in socialities and structures within and beyond medicine, and the ways it reflects or reproduces the racism, sexism, and ableism built into medical logics.

Filtering Inequality: Screening and Knowledge in Senegal's Topography of Hepatitis B Care

Only a fraction of the estimated tenth or so of Senegalese who are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) have been diagnosed. Of these, few have been assessed for their risk of progressing to potentially fatal liver disease (indicating need for treatment), and fewer still are taking antiviral drugs. A massive gap between those needing and getting treatment is widely acknowledged among experts. But given that HBV and its biomedical treatment options are largely invisible in bodies, health data, care practices, public messaging, or mass media, how can we observe, ethnographically, the effects of constraints on and inequalities in treatment? What are the stakes of access to drugs, when this access is not being sought out, claimed, or enacted? This article tackles these questions by examining how HBV is being enacted in Senegal, but not necessarily in relation to antiviral treatment. I first describe the emergence, over the past decade and a half, of an exclusionary topography of HBV diagnosis and treatment. I introduce the notion of “filtration” to describe the effects of this topography on the formation of potential “subjects of access.” The diagnostic therapies and expertise required to determine need for treatment are expensive, urban, and largely privatized. Moreover, knowledge about HBV and its possibilities of care circulates in narrow and sparsely distributed channels. Only a tiny minority of persons are effectively “filtered into” care, while issues of access remain largely outside of public debate. I then move onto small-scale efforts, led by rural primary health workers and community associations, to raise awareness of and expand screening for HBV. Those driving information and screening either do not reveal that effective drugs exist or locate these beyond the reach of most of their audiences or patients. Why then do they do it? I examine the logics and effects of their work to identify the forms of inclusion, care, efficacy, and explanation these open up. At the same time, I seek to discern the indirect effects of unequal access to knowledge and resources in the ambivalence, uncertainties, and contradictions that pervade these efforts to inform, diagnose, and advise.

Limited Awareness of Hepatitis B but Widespread Recognition of Its Sequelae in Rural Senegal: A Qualitative Study

To achieve the WHO's global strategy of eliminating hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, it is essential to ensure adequate understanding of hepatitis B disease to facilitate uptake of screening, linkage to care, and adherence to antiviral therapy. Sub-Saharan Africa has the world's highest prevalence of HBV infection, yet less than 1% of HBV-infected people have been diagnosed. Lay populations do not widely recognize "hepatitis B." Hypothesizing that visible signs and symptoms of chronic HBV infection sequelae (jaundice, ascites, or cachexia) might be more easily recognizable, we conducted a qualitative study to determine how rural populations in Senegal understood these sequelae. We led six focus groups and 149 individual interviews with lay populations and formal and informal health workers in three rural study sites in Senegal. Only a third of lay populations (30/105) had ever heard of "hepatitis B," nor did they evoke local language diagnostic terms resembling this illness. Nevertheless, more than two-thirds (71/105) recognized signs and symptoms of end-stage liver disease but considered these physical manifestations to be a consequence of the manipulation of occult forces. Lay populations also contended that traditional healers, not formal medical structures, should treat such illnesses. Formal and informal health workers had limited knowledge about hepatitis B and difficulties identifying terms in local languages to explain the disease. Communication strategies based on the population's widespread recognition of the hepatitis sequelae may enhance awareness of hepatitis, which is a crucial element to increase screening uptake, linkage to care, and commitment to lifelong treatment in African communities.

40 years after Alma-Ata, is building new hospitals in low-income and lower-middle-income countries beneficial?

Public hospitals in low-income and lower-middle-income countries face acute material and financial constraints, and there is a trend towards building new hospitals to contend with growing population health needs. Three cases of new hospital construction are used to explore issues in relation to their funding, maintenance and sustainability. While hospitals are recognised as a key component of healthcare systems, their role, organisation, funding and other aspects have been largely neglected in health policies and debates since the Alma Ata Declaration. Building new hospitals is politically more attractive for both national decision-makers and donors because they symbolise progress, better services and nation-building. To avoid the ‘white elephant’ syndrome, the deepening of within-country socioeconomic and geographical inequalities (especially urban–rural), and the exacerbation of hospital-centrism, there is an urgent need to investigate in greater depth how these hospitals are integrated into health systems and to discuss their long-term economic, social and environmental sustainability.