POVIDONE-IODINE INSTILLATION FOR MANAGEMENT OF PELVIC LYMPHOCELE AFTER PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR STAGING PROSTATE CANCER

Increased risk of postoperative in-hospital complications after radical prostatectomy in patients with prior organ transplant

BACKGROUND

To analyze postoperative, in-hospital, complication rates in patients with organ transplantation before radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

From National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2000-2015) prostate cancer patients treated with RP were abstracted and stratified according to prior organ transplant versus nontransplant. Multivariable logistic regression models predicted in-hospital complications.

RESULTS

Of all eligible 202,419 RP patients, 216 (0.1%) underwent RP after prior organ transplantation. Transplant RP patients exhibited higher proportions of Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 (13.0% vs. 3.0%), obesity (9.3% vs. 5.6%, both p < 0.05), versus to nontransplant RP. Of transplant RP patients, 96 underwent kidney (44.4%), 44 heart (20.4%), 40 liver (18.5%), 30 (13.9%) bone marrow, <11 lung (<5%), and <11 pancreatic (<5%) transplantation before RP. Within transplant RP patients, rates of lymph node dissection ranged from 37.5% (kidney transplant) to 60.0% (bone marrow transplant, p < 0.01) versus 51% in nontransplant patients. Regarding in-hospital complications, transplant patients more frequently exhibited, diabetic (31.5% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001), major (7.9% vs. 2.9%) cardiac complications (3.2% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.01), and acute kidney failure (5.1% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001), versus nontransplant RP. In multivariable logistic regression models, transplant RP patients were at higher risk of acute kidney failure (odds ratio [OR]: 4.83), diabetic (OR: 2.81), major (OR: 2.39), intraoperative (OR: 2.38), cardiac (OR: 2.16), transfusion (OR: 1.37), and overall complications (1.36, all p < 0.001). No in-hospital mortalities were recorded in transplant patients after RP.

CONCLUSIONS

Of all transplants before RP, kidney ranks first. RP patients with prior transplantation have an increased risk of in-hospital complications. The highest risk, relative to nontransplant RP patients appears to acute kidney failure.

[Radiotherapeutic management of lymphatic fistulas : An effective but disregarded therapy option]

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic fistulas and lymphoceles are known complications after vascular surgery of the groin and after extended surgical interventions in the pelvic region. Unfortunately, conservative standard therapies are not always successful.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and related side effects of percutaneous low-dose irradiation in patients with lymphorrhea and definition of its importance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Current presentation of previously published case series, reviews and guidelines.

RESULTS

The use of low-dose irradiation therapy with single doses of 0.3-0.5 Gy leads to a cessation of the lymphatic flow in a high percentage of patients when standard therapies do not show a sufficient effect. With cessation of lymphorrhea irradiation should be terminated. Acute side effects have not been reported and the risk of tumor induction is almost negligible.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose irradiation is an effective and very well-tolerated therapeutic alternative in the treatment of lymphatic fistulas and lymphorrhea when conservative therapies are unsuccessful.

Laparoscopic Peritoneal Drainage of Symptomatic Lymphoceles after Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Using Methylene Blue Instillation

BACKGROUND

Lymphoceles are frequent complications of pelvic lymph node dissection. While small lymphoceles often remain undetected, larger ones can cause complications and require further treatment, e.g. percutaneous tube drainage alone or in combination with sclerotherapy. However, recurrence rates are considerable, and long-lasting drainage may lead to infection, prolonged hospitalization, and as a consequence, increased overall costs. We report the results of a simplified laparoscopic approach to drain lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy using methylene blue instillation.

METHODS

13 patients with large symptomatic pelvic/retroperitoneal lymphoceles refractory to percutaneous tube drainage and doxycycline sclerotherapy received a laparoscopic transperitoneal marsupialization following instillation of a sterile diluted methylene blue solution into the drained cavity to refill and mark the lymphocele.

RESULTS

All lymphoceles were sterile and ranged in size from 7 x 6 x 4 to 15 x 12 x 6 cm. Clinical symptoms included lower abdominal swelling, tenderness in the iliac fossa, ipsilateral lymphedema, deep venous thrombosis, wound fistula, and hydronephrosis due to ureteral obstruction. After methylene blue instillation, the lymphoceles were easily identified and opened. Median total operative time was 50 (range 25-70) min; blood loss was negligible. There was one complication in the form of a metachronous infection in the operating field and no relapses. Patients were discharged 1-5 (median 3) days after the surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic peritoneal drainage requires greater operative skill than percutaneous approaches. However, the instillation of a methylene blue solution simplifies this procedure as the extent and location of the lymphoceles can be precisely identified during laparoscopy. We recommend early application of laparoscopic peritoneal drainage following methylene blue instillation for patients with sterile lymphoceles after pelvic lymph node dissection in whom temporary percutaneous drainage and sclerotherapy failed to resolve the lymph fluid collection.