Relationships Among Caregiving, Income, Gender, and Health: A Cross-Sectional Examination of a Representative Sample of Older Americans

Habitual Sleep Duration and Health-Related Quality of Life in Family Caregivers: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

BACKGROUND

Insufficient sleep duration is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, this relationship has not been studied in family caregivers, a group at high risk of insufficient sleep duration and poor HRQoL.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associations between habitual sleep duration and HRQoL measures in family caregivers.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from 23,321 caregivers in the 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The HRQoL measures were health status and poor mental and physical health days. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the association between sleep duration (<7, 7-9, >9 hours) and health status (fair or poor versus good to excellent). Zero-inflated negative binomial models were used to analyze the association of sleep duration with poor mental and physical health days.

RESULTS

Fair or poor health status was significantly higher in caregivers with short (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.74) and long (OR, 2.07; 95% CI: 1.34, 3.21) sleep duration. Short sleep duration was associated with a higher number of poor mental health days (IRR [incident rate ratio], 1.17; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.31) and poor physical health days (IRR, 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.45). Long sleep duration was associated with more poor mental health days (IRR, 1.31; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.60).

CONCLUSION

Extremes in sleep duration were associated with lower HRQoL. These findings point to the need for interventions that promote adequate sleep and address factors underlying extremes in sleep duration in the context of family caregiving.

CancerSupportSource-Spanish: Development of a Distress Screening Measure for Spanish-Speaking Hispanic and Latino Individuals with Cancer

Introduction: CancerSupportSource (CSS), a distress screening and referral program, identifies unmet needs of people with cancer and links them to resources and support. We developed and validated a Spanish-language version (CSS-Spanish) to better serve Hispanic and Latino communities and promote health equity. Methods: The 25-item CSS-Spanish was created leveraging rigorous translation methods and cognitive interviews to ensure cultural relevance and topical breadth. A total of 210 Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino individuals completed CSS-Spanish and comparison measures. Psychometric analyses examined dimensionality and statistical validation, and determined scoring thresholds for depression and anxiety risk subscales. Results: CSS-Spanish represented key concerns across five factors and exhibited strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-groups validity. Risk subscales demonstrated adequate sensitivity. Conclusion: CSS-Spanish is a reliable, valid multidimensional distress screener that rapidly assesses needs of Hispanic and Latino individuals. Embedded depression and anxiety risk flags can support staff in identifying those with high-acuity needs.

CancerSupportSourceTM -Caregiver: Development of a distress screening measure for cancer caregivers

OBJECTIVE

Given the substantial demands of cancer caregiving, practical and psychometrically sound tools to evaluate distress among cancer caregivers are needed. CancerSupportSource^TM -Caregiver is a distress screening, referral, and support program designed to identify the unmet needs of cancer caregivers and link caregivers to desired resources and support. This study refined and finalized the CancerSupportSource-Caregiver screening measure and examined its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Using an analytic sample of 400 caregivers to people with cancer, we first performed item reduction by assessing exploratory factor analysis, external/internal item quality, and judging theoretical and practical implications of items. Confirmatory factor analysis along with reliability and validity analyses were then conducted to corroborate dimensionality and psychometric properties of the final measure. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve analyses determined scoring thresholds for depression and anxiety risk subscales.

RESULTS

Scale refinement resulted in an 18-item measure plus one screening item assessing tobacco and substance use. Items represented five domains of caregiver concerns: emotional well-being, patient well-being, caregiving tasks, finances, and healthy lifestyle. Our analyses showed strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability, a replicable factor structure, and adequate convergent, discriminant, and known groups validity. Sensitivity of 2-item depression and 2-item anxiety risk subscales were 0.95 and 0.87, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CancerSupportSource-Caregiver is a reliable and valid multidimensional measure of caregiver distress that also screens for risk for clinically significant depression and anxiety. It can be implemented within a distress screening, referral, and follow-up program to rapidly assess caregivers' unmet needs and enhance caregiver well-being across the care continuum.

Socioeconomic status and psychological stress: Examining intersection with race, sex and US geographic region in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a well-established determinant of health. Disparities in stress are thought to partially account for SES-health disparities. We tested whether multiple indicators of SES show similar associations with psychological stress and whether race, sex, and geographic region moderate associations. Participants (n = 26,451) are from a well-characterized national cohort of Black and White US adults aged 45 years or older. Psychological stress was measured using the 4-item perceived stress scale. Income was assessed as annual household income and education as highest level of education completed. Occupation was assessed during a structured interview and subsequently coded hierarchically. For all sex-race-region groups, the largest SES-stress associations were for income and the smallest were for occupation. Race moderated SES-stress associations, such that income and education were more closely associated with stress in Black adults than White adults. Additionally, education was more strongly associated with stress in individuals living in the stroke belt region. Black Americans with lower income and education reported greater psychological stress and may be at higher risk for disease through stress-related pathways. Thus, which SES indicator is examined and for whom may alter the magnitude of the association between SES and psychological stress.

A longitudinal study on public policy and the health of in-house caregivers in Europe

Caregiving has negative effects on the health of informal caregivers. The current aging of the population predicts an increase in the number of informal caregivers worldwide. The effect of available public policies that support informal caregivers in their self-perceived health is an understudied topic. We analyzed the differences in the effects of public support policies in 11 European countries using longitudinal data from waves 5 and 6 of the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe. In this cohort, 2303 respondents were in-house informal caregivers. Logistic regression models were fitted adjusting for the main determinants of caregiving. Respite care and caregiver allowances emerged as the most effective measures of support for caregivers' health maintenance (relative risk [RR] = 0.2; 95 % CI = 0.1-0.8 and RR = 0.5; 95 % CI = 0.3-0.9). Despite the differences in the welfare systems of Scandinavian and Mediterranean countries, informal caregivers in these countries were less likely than those living in Continental or Eastern countries to have declined health two years later. Our results indicate that public support policies are significantly related to caregivers' subsequent health, but the effects vary by country. Country-specific studies should be performed to take into account the determinants of caregiving linked to the social context of each country.