Effect of Disruption Methods on the Dead-End Microfiltration Behavior of Yeast Suspension

Potential use of yeast protein in terms of biorefinery, functionality, and sustainability in food industry

A growing demand for sustainable, alternative protein sources that are nutrient-dense, such as microorganisms, and insects, has gradually evolved. When paired with effective processing techniques, yeast cells contain substantial substances that could supply the population's needs for food, medicine, and fuel. This review article explores the potential of yeast proteins as a sustainable and viable alternative to animal and plant-based protein sources. It highlights the various yeast protein extraction methods including both mechanical and non-mechanical methods. The application of nanoparticles is one example of the fast-evolving technology used to damage microbial cells. SiO2 or Al2O3 nanoparticles break yeast cell walls and disrupt membranes, releasing intracellular bioactive compounds. Succinylation of yeast protein during extraction can increase yeast protein extraction rate, lower RNA concentration, raise yeast protein solubility, increase amino acid content, and improve yeast protein emulsification and foaming capabilities. Combining physical and enzymatic extraction methods generates the most representative pool of mannose proteins from yeast cell walls. Ethanol or isoelectric precipitation purifies mannose proteins. Mannoproteins can be used as foamy replacement for animal-derived components like egg whites due to their emulsification, stability, and foaming capabilities. Yeast bioactive peptide was separated by ultrafiltration after enzymatic hydrolysis of yeast protein and has shown hypoglycemic, hypotensive, and oxidative action in vitro studies. Additionally, the review delves into the physicochemical properties and stability of yeast-derived peptides as well as their applications in the food industry. The article infers that yeast proteins are among the promising sources of sustainable protein, with a wide range of potential applications in the food industry.

Comparison of Polypropylene and Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes Applied for Separation of 1,3-PD Fermentation Broths and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Suspensions

In recent years, microfiltration (MF) has gained great interest as an excellent technique for clarification of biological suspensions. This paper addresses a direct comparison of efficiency, performance and susceptibility to cleaning of the ceramic and polymeric MF membranes applied for purification of 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PD) fermentation broths and suspensions of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. For this purpose, ceramic, titanium dioxide (TiO₂) based membranes and polypropylene (PP) membranes were used. It has been found that both TiO₂ and PP membranes provide sterile permeate during filtration of 1,3-PD broths. However, the ceramic membrane, due to the smaller pore diameter, allowed obtaining a better quality permeate. All the membranes used were highly susceptible to fouling with the components of the clarified broths and yeast suspensions. The significant impact of the feed flow velocity and fermentation broth composition on the relative permeate flux has been demonstrated. Suitable cleaning agents with selected concentration and duration of action effectively cleaned the ceramic membrane. In turn, the use of aggressive cleaning solutions led to degradation of the PP membranes matrix. Findings of this study add to a growing body of literature on the use of ceramic and polypropylene MF membranes for the clarification of biological suspensions.