Patient Characteristics Associated with Inpatient Psychiatric Re-admissions and the Utility of the READMIT Clinical Risk Index

Independent Predictors of 30-Day Readmission to Acute Psychiatric Wards in Patients With Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Psychiatric readmissions have long been considered significant indicators for healthcare planning. The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing early (30-day) readmissions to acute psychiatric wards. A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted according to Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Comprehensive database searching was conducted using online databases, including PubMed and Google Scholar, to search for articles identifying factors associated with early (30-day) readmissions to acute psychiatric wards. Keywords used to search for relevant articles included "Mental illness," "readmission," and factors along with their synonyms and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The search included studies published between 2011 and June 2023. A total of 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rate of the 30-day readmission was 16% (95% confidence interval: 13%-20%). A pooled analysis showed that factors significantly associated with an unplanned hospital readmission included gender, length of stay, and insurance status as predictors of the unplanned hospital readmission among individuals with psychiatric illness. Additionally, we also found that the rate of 30-day unplanned admissions was greater in patients with schizophrenia, followed by personality disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, and substance use. This study highlights the importance of providing targeted interventions and support for individuals with these conditions to reduce the risk of readmissions.

Readmission and associated clinical factors among individuals admitted with bipolar affective disorder at a psychiatry facility in Uganda

BACKGROUND

Bipolar affective disorder (BAD) is a common severe mental health condition with a relapsing course that may include periods of hospital re-admissions. With recurrent relapses and admissions, the course, prognosis, and patient's overall quality of life can be affected negatively. This study aims to explore the rates and clinical factors associated with re-admission among individuals with BAD.

METHOD

This study used data from a retrospective chart review of all records of patients with BAD admitted in 2018 and followed up their hospital records for four years till 2021 at a large psychiatric unit in Uganda. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the clinical characteristics associated with readmission among patients diagnosed with BAD.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients living with BAD were admitted in 2018 and followed up for four years. The average number of months to readmission was 9.4 (standard deviation = 8.6). The incidence of readmission was 23.8% (n = 49/206). Of those readmitted during the study period, 46.9% (n = 23/49) and 28.6% (n = 14/49) individuals were readmitted twice and three times or more, respectively. The readmission rate in the first 12 months following discharge was 69.4% (n = 34/49) at first readmission, 78.3% (n = 18/23) at second readmission, and 87.5% (n = 12/14) at third or more times. For the next 12 months, the readmission rate was 22.5% (n = 11/49) for the first, 21.7% (n = 5/23) for the second, and 7.1% (n = 1/14) for more than two readmissions. Between 25 and 36 months, the readmission rate was 4.1% (n = 2/49) for the first readmission and 7.1% (n = 1/14) for the third or more times. Between 37 and 48 months, the readmission rate was 4.1% (n = 2/49) for those readmitted the first time. Patients who presented with poor appetite and undressed in public before admission were at increased risk of being readmitted with time. However, the following symptoms/clinical presentations, were protective against having a readmission with time, increased number of days with symptoms before admission, mood lability, and high energy levels.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of readmission among individuals living with BAD is high, and readmission was associated with patients' symptoms presentation on previous admission. Future studies looking at BAD using a prospective design, standardized scales, and robust explanatory model are warranted to understand causal factors for hospital re-admission and inform management strategies.

Association of homelessness and psychiatric hospital readmission-a retrospective cohort study 2016-2020

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of adult psychiatric inpatients experience homelessness and are often discharged to unstable accommodation or the street. It is unclear whether homelessness impacts psychiatric hospital readmission. Our primary objective was to examine the association between homelessness and risk for 30-day and 90-day readmission following discharge from a psychiatric unit at a single urban hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study involving health administrative data among individuals (n = 3907) in Vancouver, Canada with an acute psychiatric admission between January 2016 and December 2020. Participants were followed from the date of index admission until censoring (December 30, 2020). Homelessness was measured at index admission and treated as a time-varying exposure. Adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHRs) of acute readmission (30-day and 90-day) for psychiatric and substance use disorders were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 3907 individuals who were predominantly male (61.89%) with a severe mental illness (70.92%), substance use disorder (20.45%) and mean age of 40.66 (SD, 14.33). A total of 686 (17.56%) individuals were homeless at their index hospitalization averaging 19.13 (21.53) days in hospital. After adjusting for covariates, patients experiencing homelessness had a 2.04 (1.65, 2.51) increased rate of 30-day readmission and 1.65 (1.24, 2.19) increased rate of 90-day readmission during the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Homelessness was significantly associated with increased 30-day and 90-day readmission rates in a large comprehensive sample of adults with mental illness and substance use disorders. Interventions to reduce homelessness are urgently needed.

QUESTION

Is homelessness associated with risk for 30-day and 90-day psychiatric hospital readmission?

FINDINGS

In this retrospective cohort study of 3907 individuals, homelessness at discharge was associated with increased 30-day and 90-day psychiatric readmission.

MEANING

Housing status is an important risk factor for hospital readmission. High-quality interventions focused on housing supports have the potential to reduce psychiatric readmission.

Risk factors associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission for patients with mental illness

Unplanned hospital readmission rate is up to 43% in mental health settings, which is higher than in general health settings. Unplanned readmissions delay the recovery of patients with mental illness and add financial burden on families and healthcare services. There have been efforts to reduce readmissions with a particular interest in identifying patients at higher readmission risk after index admission; however, the results have been inconsistent. This systematic review synthesized risk factors associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions for patients with mental illness. Eleven electronic databases were searched from 2010 to 30 September 2021 using key terms of 'mental illness', 'readmission' and 'risk factors'. Sixteen studies met the selection criteria for this review. Data were synthesized using content analysis and presented in narrative and tabular form because the extracted risk factors could not be pooled statistically due to methodological heterogeneity of the included studies. Consistently cited readmission predictors were patients with lower educational background, unemployment, previous mental illness hospital admission and more than 7 days of the index hospitalization. Results revealed the complexity of identifying unplanned hospital readmission predictors for people with mental illness. Policymakers need to specify the expected standards that written discharge summary must reach general practitioners concurrently at discharge. Hospital clinicians should ensure that discharge summary summaries are distributed to general practitioners for effective ongoing patient care and management. Having an advanced mental health nurse for patients during their transition period needs to be explored to understand how this role could ensure referrals to the general practitioner are eventuated.

Utility of the READMIT Index to Identify Community Hospital 30-Day Psychiatric Readmissions

This case-controlled study determined the utility of the READMIT index to identify the risk for 30-day readmission of patients discharged from an urban community hospital psychiatric inpatient unit. Data was collected from 118 matched patient pairs from 2017 to 2018. Findings demonstrated the READMIT index did not effectively discriminate those patients who were likely to readmit within 30 days. However, the following factors were associated with likelihood of 30-day readmission: the inability to care for self, number of lifetime readmissions, the comorbidity of liver disease, as well as a history of substance abuse.

Clinical risk model to predict 28-day unplanned readmission via the accident and emergency department after discharge from acute psychiatric units for patients with psychotic spectrum disorders

BACKGROUND

Unplanned readmissions rates are an important indicator of the quality of care provided in a psychiatric unit. However, there is no validated risk model to predict this outcome in patients with psychotic spectrum disorders.

AIMS

This paper aims to establish a clinical risk prediction model to predict 28-day unplanned readmission via the accident and emergency department after discharge from acute psychiatric units for patients with psychotic spectrum disorders.

METHOD

Adult patients with psychotic spectrum disorders discharged within a 5-year period from all psychiatric units in Hong Kong were included in this study. Information on the socioeconomic background, past medical and psychiatric history, current discharge episode and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) scores were used in a logistic regression to derive the risk model and the predictive variables. The sample was randomly split into two to derive (n = 10 219) and validate (n = 10 643) the model.

RESULTS

The rate of unplanned readmission was 7.09%. The risk factors for unplanned readmission include higher number of previous admissions, comorbid substance misuse, history of violence and a score of one or more in the discharge HoNOS overactivity or aggression item. Protective factors include older age, prescribing clozapine, living with family and relatives after discharge and imposition of conditional discharge. The model had moderate discriminative power with a c-statistic of 0.705 and 0.684 on the derivation and validation data-set.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of readmission for each patient can be identified and adjustments in the treatment for those with a high risk may be implemented to prevent this undesirable outcome.

Nursing Advocacy and Long Acting Injectables to Reduce High Readmission Rates: Quality Initiative

INTRODUCTION: Nonadherence to medications for schizophrenia relates to frequent readmissions. Long-acting injectable (LAI) medications are shown to increase adherence and reduce admissions. AIMS: (1) Identify frequent readmissions to psychiatry. (2) Improve nursing advocacy for patients appropriate for LAIs through in-service. METHODS: Chart audits were employed for data collection. Academic detailing and dashboards were used for voluntary nursing education. The chart audit spanned 90 days pre and post in-service. All admissions to psychiatry were screened; patients with readmissions under 30 days (with the same admitting diagnosis), a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis, and nonadherent with oral antipsychotics were included. Results: Forty-four patients met criteria and amassed 49 frequent readmissions. For inclusion criteria, the admission rate decreased by 53% and LAI prescriptions increased by 9%. Three patients from the first audit group and one from the second were initiated on LAIs. CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes toward LAIs may be improving based on RN advocacy and collaboration.

Understanding Helpful Nursing Care From the Perspective of Mental Health Inpatients With a Dual Diagnosis: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND: An estimated 30% to 50% of people with a mental illness also have a substance use problem. Referred to as having a dual diagnosis, these patients experience high levels of unmet needs, poor health outcomes, and require specialized care during psychiatric hospitalization. Research on nursing inpatients with a dual diagnosis is limited and patient perceptions of helpful care during hospitalization are unknown. AIMS: What nursing interventions, attitudes, actions, and/or behaviors are perceived as helpful by patients with a dual diagnosis during psychiatric hospitalization? METHODS: A qualitative-descriptive design was used. Twelve adult inpatients with a dual diagnosis were recruited using purposive sampling. Individual, semistructured interviews were conducted, and interview data were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Helpful nursing occurred across three themes: (1) promoting health in everyday living, (2) managing substance use in tandem with mental illness, and (3) building therapeutic relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Specific examples of helpful interventions and their reported outcomes reinforce the critical role that nurses play in the health and recovery of inpatients with a dual diagnosis. The importance of collaborative, strengths-based approaches is highlighted, and expanding the nurse's role to include evidence-based responses to substance use is recommended.