Recovery-Oriented Network Meetings in Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study

Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review

AIM

This scoping review aims to synthesize findings from fourteen selected articles to provide a comprehensive understanding of patient participation in mental healthcare.

METHOD

The review analyzed articles employing various qualitative methodologies, including interviews and observations, to explore patient and healthcare professional perspectives. Articles were selected based on their relevance to the topic of patient participation in mental health care.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed diverse perspectives on patient participation. Patients' preferences varied, with some preferring shared decision-making while others preferred minimal involvement. Barriers to shared decision-making included fear of judgment and substance misuse concerns. Strategies to manage disagreements and foster trusting relationships were identified. Challenges in implementing patient and public involvement in mental health services were noted, including stigma and inadequate professional training. Interprofessional collaboration was deemed fundamental, although fragmented care pathways and communication breakdowns persisted. Structural conditions and professional expectations significantly influenced patient participation, with a paternalistic approach perpetuating power imbalances.

CONCLUSION

Despite challenges, the findings underscored the importance of empowering patients in treatment decision-making, promoting collaborative relationships, and addressing barriers to enhance patient-centered care in mental health settings. Insights from this review contribute to the discourse on patient-centered care, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches prioritizing patient dignity and well-being.

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences of Recovery-Oriented Collaboration Between Mental Health Centres and Municipalities: A Qualitative Study

Collaboration within mental health centres and with municipalities in Western European healthcare has presented challenges due to structural and cultural disparities. The Danish healthcare system faces obstacles that impact mental healthcare services, particularly in cross-sectorial cooperation. Our aim was to investigate healthcare professionals' experiences of recovery-oriented collaboration within a mental healthcare setting across hospitals and municipalities to gather a deeper understanding of this issue. Twenty-four employees were purposively sampled from mental health centres in Copenhagen and focus group interviews were conducted to explore their perceptions of working together. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse the data and identify themes and categories. The participants emphasised challenges in communication and coordination to improve collaboration within across the two sectors. This study can contribute to a greater understanding of collaboration between mental health centres and municipalities. It aims to inspire improvements in communication, coordination, and the optimisation of mental health service delivery across sectors.

Perspectives on Recovery-Oriented Care in Mental Health Practices: Health Professionals Experiences

In several Western countries, mental health professionals work in accordance with the principles of recovery-oriented practices, but there is little research into what opportunities there are for fostering recovery-oriented practices in mental health settings. To investigate how central elements of recovery-oriented practices are reflected in health professionals experiences of care and treatment in mental health. Four focus group interviews with nurses and other health professionals are conducted and analysed using manifest content analysis to carry out a low-level analysis of the participants' experiences in mental healthcare. The study was designed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration (1) and Danish law (2). The participants gave informed consent after verbal and written information. The main theme, 'recovery-oriented practices framed within institutional structural conditions', was based on three subthemes: 1) users need help to find meaning during hospitalisation and find hope, 2) health professionals experience it as an obligation that users achieve personal recovery, and 3) user perspectives versus the mental health practices' structural logic. This study sheds light on health professionals experiences with a recovery-oriented practice. The health professionals believe in this as a positive approach and see it as an important obligation to help the user find their own aims and hopes. On the other hand, it can be difficult to work in recovery-oriented practices. It requires an active commitment from users; for many, this can be difficult to live up to.

Recovery-Oriented Practices in a Mental Health Centre for Citizens Experiencing Serious Mental Issues and Substance Use: As Perceived by Healthcare Professionals

INTRODUCTION

Recovery-oriented practices have become a means of promoting user recovery during hospitalisation, but we do not know much about the concrete means of practicing recovery-orientation for the most vulnerable users with serious mental difficulty and substance use.

AIMS

We investigated the concrete means of practicing recovery-orientation in care work and the elements, dimensions, outcomes, or steps of it in a special department of mental health centres.

METHOD

Focus group interviews were conducted with 16 health professionals with experience with users with serious mental difficulty and substance use. Qualitative content analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

The main theme was "holistic recovery on structural terms" based on two themes and four subthemes. The first theme was "recovery based on an individual approach" with subthemes "detective-find hope" and "how to do recovery-oriented practice". The next theme was "recovery subject to structural framework" with subthemes "tension between different interests" and "symptoms as a barrier".

CONCLUSIONS

recovery-oriented practice is understood as an approach where health professionals emphasise forming relationships based on trust, being hopeful for the users' future, spending time with users, and respecting users' experiences and knowledge from their own life. There are cross-pressures between different interests. The desire to meet the users' perspectives and respect these perspectives but at the same time live up to mental health centre purposes to stabilise the users' health and achieve self-care.

Recovery-Oriented Cross-Sectoral Network Meetings between Mental Health Hospital Professionals and Community Mental Health Professionals: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Aims and objectives: In the medical field, we lack knowledge on how interprofessional collaboration across sectors is carried out. This paper explores how healthcare professionals and users perceive recovery-oriented cross-sectoral discharge network meetings between mental health hospital professionals and community mental health professionals and which discourses manifest themselves within the field of mental healthcare. Method: Ten professionals from a mental health hospital and eight community mental health professionals participated. In addition, five users with experience in mental health services in both sectors participated. Fairclough’s discourse analysis framework was used to explore their experiences. The study was designed following the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration and Danish law. Each study participant in the two intersectoral sectors gave their informed consent after verbal and written information was provided. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used as a guideline to secure accurate and complete reporting of the study). Results: The healthcare professionals in both sectors are governed by steering tools, legislation and a strong biomedical tradition to solve illness-related problems, such that users must be offered treatment and support to achieve self-care as soon as possible. This can be seen as a reflection of, and a driving force in, a change in the wider social practice that Fairclough terms the ‘marketisation of discourse’—a social development in late modernity, whereby market discourse colonises the discursive practices of public institutions. The user of psychiatric and social services experiences a structured system that does not offer the necessary time for deep conversations. Users do not consider recovery as something that is only seen in relation to the efforts of the professionals, as recovery largely takes place independently of professionals. Recovery depends on users’ internal resources and a strong network that can support them on the journey. Conclusion: Healthcare professionals perceive recovery-oriented cross-sectoral discharge network meetings to reflect paternalistic and biomedical discourses. Users want to be seen more as whole persons and did not experience sufficient involvement in the intersectoral care. Relevance to clinical practice: Healthcare professionals need to be supported to seek clarity in the understanding and operationalisation of a recovery-oriented approach, if the agenda is to be truly adopted and strengthened.