Spine deformity surgery in the elderly: risk factors and 30-day outcomes are comparable in posterior versus combined approaches

Is fusion the most suitable treatment option for recurrent lumbar disc herniation? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) is a common issue after primary discectomy and can cause severe pain, morbidity, and reoperation. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the surgical management of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using Pubmed and Embase databases on 18^thAugust, 2019. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied according to study design, surgical approach, language, number of patients; and spinal level. Data extracted included patient demographics, and clinical outcomes (patients with excellent/good outcomes; VAS back and leg score improvement, complication and recurrence rates).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies, (comprising of seven prospective and nine retrospective) met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies evaluated discectomy only; four analysed fusion, and two analysed both discectomy only and fusion approaches. Fusion approaches recorded a superior success rate (8.3 % higher, p>0.05); postoperative VAS back score improvement (5 % higher, p>0.05) than discectomy alone.  However, discectomy alone approaches recorded a more favourable postoperative VAS leg score improvement (4.2 % higher p>0.05), and complication rate (3.2% lower, p>0.05) than fusion techniques.

CONCLUSION

There is significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes reported for studies after surgical intervention in rLDH patients. Neither discectomy nor fusion's superiority was statistically significant. Despite fusion yielding longer operative times, and length of stay (adding to the expense), it is superior in minimising mechanical instability and recurrence. Finally, we conclude that both approaches are equally efficacious in rLDH cases, and choice should be based on a case by case basis.

Surgical Risk Assessment and Prevention in Elderly Spinal Deformity Patients

Introduction:

Prevalence of adult deformity surgery in the elderly individuals continues to increase. These patients have additional considerations for the spine surgeon during surgical planning. We perform an informative review of the spinal and geriatric literature to assess preoperative and intraoperative factors that impact surgical complication occurrences in this population.

Significance:

There is a need to understand surgical risk assessment and prevention in geriatric patients who undergo thoracolumbar adult deformity surgery in order to prevent complications.

Methods:

Searches of relevant biomedical databases were conducted by a medical librarian. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, IPA, Cochrane, PQ Health and Medical, SocINDEX, and WHO’s Global Health Library. Search strategies utilized Medical Subject Headings plus text words for extensive coverage of scoliosis and surgical technique concepts.

Results:

Degenerative scoliosis affects 68% of the geriatric population, and the rate of surgical interventions for this pathology continues to increase. Complications following spinal deformity surgery in this patient population range from 37% to 62%. Factors that impact outcomes include age, comorbidities, blood loss, and bone quality. Using these data, we summarize multimodal risk prevention strategies that can be easily implemented by spine surgeons.

Conclusions:

After evaluation of the latest literature on the complications associated with adult deformity surgery in geriatric patients, comprehensive perioperative management is necessary for improved outcomes. Preoperative strategies include assessing physiological age via frailty score, nutritional status, bone quality, dementia/delirium risk, and social activity support. Intraoperative strategies include methods to reduce blood loss and procedural time. Postoperatively, development of a multidisciplinary team approach that encourages early ambulation, decreases opiate use, and ensures supportive discharge planning is imperative for better outcomes for this patient population.