Advantages of magnetoencephalography, neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI in epilepsy surgery re-operations

Brain tumor-associated epilepsies in adulthood: Current state of diagnostic and individual treatment options

Brain tumors are one of the most frequent causes of structural epilepsy and set a major burden on treatment costs and the social integrity of patients. Although promising oncological treatment strategies are already available, epileptological treatment is often intractable and requires lifelong epileptological care. Therefore, treatment strategies must be adapted to age-related needs, and specific aspects of late-onset epilepsy (LOE) must be considered. The practical implementation of individual decisions from tumor boards and the current state of the art in scientific knowledge about pathological mechanisms, modern diagnostic procedures and biomarkers, and patient-individualized treatment options into practical epileptological disease management is a prerequisite. This narrative review focuses on the current work progress regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Exemplarily, interdisciplinary approaches for optimized individualized therapy will be discussed, emphasizing the combination of neurological-epileptological and oncological perspectives.

Comparing neuropsychological functioning in Turkish patients with right and left temporal lobe epilepsy

We compared neuropsychiatric evaluations in temporal lobe epilepsy according to the lateralized hemisphere. Forty-one (68.3%) left-sided temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE) were compared to 19 right-sided temporal lobe epilepsy (RTLE) (31.7%) (p < 0.001). RTLE mean age was 37 (22-46) years, and LTLE mean age 38 was (30-42). RTLE disease duration was 10 (6-20) years, and LTLE was 22 (10-33) (p < 0.013). Gender (man/woman) for RTLE was 7/12, and for LTLE was 18/23. LTLE scored poorer on the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS)-III's Mental Control Months-error, WMS-V's "Forward Number Range" and "Backward Number Range" than RTLE (p < 0.017, p < 0.023, p < 0.004). There were differences between hemispheres for "Number of Items Remembered with a Hint" and "Total number of Recalled Items" (WMS-IV) (p < 0.038, p < 0.045). LTLE had lower scores in the Verbal Fluency -K-A-S letters words and WAIS (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) similarity than RTLE (p < 0.019, p < 0.024, p < 0.033, p < 0.026). Oktem and Boston-number of Self-Named Items Tests were poorer in LTLE than RTLE (p < 0.05, p < 0.043). Mental Control Months-error (WMS-III), "Total Number of Recalled Items", "Number of Items Remembered with Hint" (WMS-IV), forward and backward number range (WMS-V), Oktem, Verbal Fluency -K,-A,-S letters words, WAIS similarity, and Boston-number of Self-Named Items tests, can help identify lateralization, particularly in LTLE.

Seizure-free outcome and safety of repeated epilepsy surgery for persistent or recurrent seizures

OBJECTIVE

Reoperation may be an option for select patients with unsatisfactory seizure control after their first epilepsy surgery. The aim of this study was to describe the seizure-free outcome and safety of repeated epilepsy surgery in our tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with focal refractory epilepsy, who underwent repeated epilepsy surgeries and had a minimum follow-up time of 12 months after reoperation, were included. Systematic reevaluation, including comprehensive neuroimaging and noninvasive (n = 38) and invasive (n = 25, 66%) video-electroencephalography monitoring, was performed. Multimodal 3D resection maps were created for individual patients to allow personalized reoperation.

RESULTS

The median time between the first operation and reoperation was 74 months (range 5-324 months). The median age at reoperation was 34 years (range 1-74 years), and the median follow-up was 38 months (range 13-142 months). Repeat MRI after the first epilepsy surgery showed an epileptogenic lesion in 24 patients (63%). The reoperation was temporal in 18 patients (47%), extratemporal in 9 (24%), and multilobar in 11 (29%). The reoperation was left hemispheric in 24 patients (63%), close to eloquent cortex in 19 (50%), and distant from the initial resection in 8 (21%). Following reoperation, 27 patients (71%) became seizure free (Engel class I), while 11 (29%) continued to have seizures. There were trends toward better outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy and for unilobar resections adjacent to the initial surgery, but there was no difference between MRI lesional and nonlesional patients. In all subgroups, Engel class I outcome was at least 50%. Perioperative complications occurred in 4 patients (11%), with no fatalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation for refractory focal epilepsy is an effective and safe option in patients with persistent or recurrent seizures after initial epilepsy surgery. A thorough presurgical reevaluation is essential for favorable outcome.

Practical Fundamentals of Clinical MEG Interpretation in Epilepsy

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a neurophysiologic test that offers a functional localization of epileptic sources in patients considered for epilepsy surgery. The understanding of clinical MEG concepts, and the interpretation of these clinical studies, are very involving processes that demand both clinical and procedural expertise. One of the major obstacles in acquiring necessary proficiency is the scarcity of fundamental clinical literature. To fill this knowledge gap, this review aims to explain the basic practical concepts of clinical MEG relevant to epilepsy with an emphasis on single equivalent dipole (sECD), which is one the most clinically validated and ubiquitously used source localization method, and illustrate and explain the regional topology and source dynamics relevant for clinical interpretation of MEG-EEG.