Tao T, Lu S, Hu N, Xu D, Xu C, Li F, Wang Q, Peng Y. Prognosis of comatose patients with reduced EEG montage by combining quantitative EEG features in various domains.
Front Neurosci 2023;
17:1302318. [PMID:
38144206 PMCID:
PMC10748426 DOI:
10.3389/fnins.2023.1302318]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective
As the frontoparietal network underlies recovery from coma, a limited frontoparietal montage was used, and the prognostic values of EEG features for comatose patients were assessed.
Methods
Collected with a limited frontoparietal EEG montage, continuous EEG recordings of 81 comatose patients in ICU were used retrospectively. By the 60-day Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), the patients were dichotomized into favorable and unfavorable outcome groups. Temporal-, frequency-, and spatial-domain features were automatically extracted for comparison. Partial correlation analysis was applied to eliminate redundant factors, and multiple correspondence analysis was used to explore discrimination between groups. Prognostic characteristics were calculated to assess the performance of EEG feature-based predictors established by logistic regression. Analyses were performed on all-patients group, strokes subgroup, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) subgroup.
Results
By analysis of all patients, raised burst suppression ratio (BSR), suppressed root mean square (RMS), raised power ratio of β to α rhythm (β/α), and suppressed phase-lag index between F3 and P4 (PLI [F3, P4]) were associated with unfavorable outcome, and yielded AUC of 0.790, 0.811, 0.722, and 0.844, respectively. For the strokes subgroup, the significant variables were BSR, RMS, θ/total, θ/δ, and PLI (F3, P4), while for the TBI subgroup, only PLI (F3, P4) was significant. BSR combined with PLI (F3, P4) gave the best predictor by cross-validation analysis in the all-patients group (AUC = 0.889, 95% CI: 0.819-0.960).
Conclusion
Features extracted from limited frontoparietal montage EEG served as valuable coma prognostic tools, where PLI (F3, P4) was always significant. Combining PLI (F3, P4) with features in other domains may achieve better performance.
Significance
A limited-montage EEG coupled with an automated algorithm is valuable for coma prognosis.
Collapse