Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Can Reduce C-Reactive Protein in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Integrative Oncology Approaches to Supporting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment of Solid Tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review was to examine the role and practical applications of integrative oncology strategies in supporting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment of adult solid tumours.

RECENT FINDINGS

Beyond tumour-intrinsic factors, several patient-associated factors affect ICI response, including germline genetics, systemic inflammation, the gut microbiota, and diet. Current promising supportive interventions include a Mediterranean-style diet with over 20 g of fibre, regular exercise, use of live biotherapeutics, minimisation of PPI and antibiotic use, and ensuring vitamin D repletion, with many other integrative oncology approaches under study. Caution around medical cannabis use in patients on ICIs is advised due to previously documented adverse impact on overall survival, while VAE (Viscum album extract) therapy studies have not highlighted any safety concerns so far. With expanding ICI use, it is important to investigate and apply low-cost integrative oncology strategies to support better treatment outcomes and minimise adverse events. Further research may lead to pre-treatment assessment of both tumour and patient-associated biomarkers and personalised multimodal prehabilitation care plans, as well as on-treatment support with targeted nutrition, physical activity, and supplementation regimes, including both systemic inflammation and gut microbiome modulating strategies. Given the emerging understanding of chronic stress impact on ICI treatment outcomes, mind-body approaches require further investigation.

The Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation on Inflammatory Factors in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Until now, no study evaluated the impact of optimum intake of omega-3 fatty acids on inflammatory factors. We aimed to investigate the dose-dependent effects of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on inflammatory factors in cancer patients. PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of Science were searched until July 2022 to find randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for examining the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids on inflammatory factors. Our primary outcomes were interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and albumin. The results of 33 trials (2068 participants) revealed that each 1 g/day omega-3 fatty acids (oral/enteral) significantly reduced IL-6 (SMD: -1.17 pg/ml; 95% CI: -1.78, -0.55; p < 0.001; GRADE = moderate), and TNF-α (SMD: -2.15 pg/ml; 95% CI: -3.14, -1.16; p < 0.001; GRADE = very low). Moreover, each 0.5 g/kg/day omega-3 fatty acids (parenteral) significantly reduced TNF-α (SMD: -1.11 pg/ml; 95% CI: -2.02, -0.19; p = 0.017; GRADE = low). With moderate and very low evidence certainty, each 1 g/day of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation (oral/enteral) has a beneficial effect on IL-6 and TNF-α. Each 0.5 g/kg/day omega-3 fatty acids (parenteral) could also exert a favorable impact on TNF-α, but the certainty of the evidence was low.

A predictive role of C-reactive protein in colorectal cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis from 780,985 participants and 11,289 cancer cases

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis is aimed at understanding the potential role of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) in the prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and the potential effect of relevant variables, with specific concern to determine the incorporation of CRP into a CRC risk prediction model.

METHODS

Relevant articles on the association between circulating CRP and CRC risk were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through August 2022. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) for the highest versus lowest CRP categories. Linear and non-linear trend analyses were conducted to explore the dose-response associations between CRP and CRC risk.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles including 780,985 participants and 11,289 cancer cases met the selection criteria. The overall result demonstrated a remarkable association between elevated CRP levels and CRC risk (RR, 1.259; 95% CI, 1.060-1.457), but not in dose-response analysis (RR, 1.002 (95% CI, 0.964-1.041) per natural log unit change in CRP). Subgroup analyses indicated a significant difference when grouped by study location, the length of follow-up, and gender composition. No evidence of publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSION

The predictive role of CRP in CRC incidence is limited to colon cancer and a period of 10 years after the initial discovery of CRP elevation. The result did not support the etiological role of CRP in CRC and the inclusion of CRP into the CRC risk prediction model.