High Visceral Fat in Female Breast Cancer Patients Correlates with the Risk of Progression after Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Blood lipid metabolic biomarkers are emerging as significant prognostic indicators for survival in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Dyslipidemia is a common comorbidity in patients with cancer, yet the impact of abnormal lipid levels on tumor prognosis remains contentious. This study was conducted to synthesize the current evidence regarding the prognostic utility of blood lipid levels, including high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB), in predicting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in cancer patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed across electronic databases to assess the associations between blood lipid levels and OS or DFS in cancer patients. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to analyze the data. The research protocol was previously submitted to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42023458597.

RESULTS

Our study represents the largest and most extensive evaluation of the prognostic significance of blood lipid levels in cancer to date. It includes a meta-analysis of 156 eligible studies involving 85,173 cancer patients. The findings revealed a significant association between elevated levels of HDL-C, TC, and ApoA1 and improved OS and DFS in cancer patients. In contrast, no significant relationships were identified between LDL-C, TG, and ApoB levels and the OS or DFS of cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Blood lipids, particularly HDL-C, TC, and ApoA1, emerge as accessible and cost-effective biomarkers that may aid in assessing survival outcomes in cancer patients and potentially inform clinical decision-making.

Body composition as a novel biomarker of recurrence risk in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Background and Hypothesis

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients are at increased risk for recurrence compared to other subtypes of breast cancer. Previous evidence showed that adiposity may contribute to worsened cancer control. Current measures of obesity, such as body-mass index (BMI), are poor surrogates of adiposity, while visceral-to-subcutaneous adiposity ratio (VSR), which can be measured from routine computed tomography (CT) imaging, is a direct adiposity measure. We hypothesized that VSR is a stronger predictor of recurrence compared with BMI in patients with TNBC.

Materials and Methods

This study includes 162 women with stage I-III TNBC who completed standard of care therapy. Measures of body composition, including VSR, visceral adiposity (VA), and subcutaneous adiposity (SA), were estimated using a semi-automated quantitative imaging tool on CT images of the abdomen at the level of L2-L3. Anthropometric measures included BMI and waist circumference and were obtained from CT images. Associations of adiposity measures and recurrence risk were assessed using Fine and Gray competing risk models with death as a competing risk and age at diagnosis and clinical disease stage as covariates.

Results

During a median follow-up time of 3.6 years, 55 patients had recurrence. The median BMI at baseline was 30.2 [Quartiles: 26.3-35.2]. Body composition was not associated with overall or locoregional recurrence. VSR was significantly associated with an increased risk of distant recurrence, with a subdistribution hazard ratio of 4.25 (95% CI: 1.06-17.02), p = 0.041. By contrast, BMI was not associated with any recurrence risk.

Conclusion

Consistent with our hypothesis, VSR was associated with a significant risk of distant recurrence and therefore may be a prognostic biomarker. Future directions include interventions targeting VSR reduction among patients with TNBC and VSR-directed therapy modulation.

Feasibility study of a multimodal prehabilitation programme in women receiving neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in a major cancer hospital: a protocol

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant therapy has become a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer, and in well-selected patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable high risk, luminal B breast cancer. Side effects of neoadjuvant therapy, such as fatigue, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, anxiety, insomnia, vasomotor symptoms, gastrointestinal disturbance as well as a raft of immune-related adverse events, may impact treatment tolerance, long-term outcomes, and quality of life. Providing early supportive care prior to surgery (typically termed 'prehabilitation') may mitigate these side effects and improve quality of life.During our codesign of the intervention, consumers and healthcare professionals expressed desire for a programme that 'packaged' care, was easy to access, and was embedded in their care pathway. We hypothesise that a multimodal supportive care programme including exercise and complementary therapies, underpinned by behavioural change theory will improve self-efficacy, quality of life, readiness for surgery and any additional treatment for women with breast cancer. We seek to explore cardiometabolic, residual cancer burden and surgical outcomes, along with chemotherapy completion (relative dose intensity). This article describes the protocol for a feasibility study of a multimodal prehabilitation programme.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, mixed-method, feasibility study of a multi-modal programme in a hospital setting for 20-30 women with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Primary outcomes are recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence and acceptability. Secondary outcomes include patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), surgical outcomes, length of stay, satisfaction with surgery, chemotherapy completion rates, changes in metabolic markers and adverse events. Interviews and focus groups to understand the experience with prehabilitation and different factors that may affect feasibility of the intervention . The output of this study will be a codesigned, evidence-informed intervention assessed for feasibility and acceptability by women with breast cancer and the healthcare professionals that care for them.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study received ethics approval from the St Vincents Hospital HREC (HREC/2021/ETH12198). Trial results will be communicated to participants, healthcare professionals, and the public via publication and conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12622000584730.