Association between the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Prostate Cancer

Associations of systemic immune-inflammation index with high risk for prostate cancer in middle-aged and older US males: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) provides convincing evaluation of systemic immune and inflammatory condition in human body. Its correlation with prostate cancer (PCa) risk remains uncharted. The principal objective of this investigation was to elucidate the association between SII and the risk for PCa in middle-aged and elderly males.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis entailed multivariate linear and logistic regression, generalized additive model, and smoothing curve fitting using resource from 2007 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). To ascertain robustness and consistency of this association across different demographic strata, we conducted rigorous subgroup analyses and interaction tests.

RESULTS

Among 3359 participants, those with elevated SII displayed higher total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels, higher risk for PCa, and lower free/total PSA (f/t PSA) ratio. Specifically, each unit increase of log2 (SII) was associated with a 0.22 ng/mL increase in tPSA (β: 0.22, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.05-0.38), a 2.22% decline in f/t PSA ratio (β: -2.22, 95% CI -3.20 to -1.23), and a 52% increased odds of being at high risk for PCa (odds ratio [OR]: 1.52, 95% CI 1.13-2.04). People in the top quartile of log2 (SII) exhibited 0.55 ng/mL increased tPSA (β: 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-0.90), 4.39% reduced f/t PSA ratio (β: -4.39, 95% CI -6.50 to -2.27), and 168% increased odds of being at high risk for PCa (OR: 2.68, 95% CI 1.32-5.46) compared to those in the bottom quartile.

CONCLUSION

Systemic immune and inflammatory condition, as represented by SII, is independently and positively associated with tPSA levels and the risk for PCa, as well as independently and negatively associated with f/t PSA ratio among middle-aged and older US males. These findings may enhance the effectiveness of PCa screening in predicting positive biopsy results.

Association between monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and prostate cancer in the U.S. population: a population-based study

Introduction

Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) is a convenient and noninvasive inflammatory biomarker, and inflammation has been reported to be associated with prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to ascertain any possible correlation between PCa and MLR.

Methods

We utilized data from the 1999-2020 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) regarding MLR and PCa. The independent associations of MLR and other inflammatory biomarkers (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), system inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI)) with PCa was investigated using weighted multivariate logistic regression and generalized additive models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were conducted to evaluate and contrast their diagnostic capabilities.

Results

The analysis we conducted comprised 25,367 persons in total. The mean MLR was 0.31 ± 0.14. The prevalence of PCa was 3.1%. A positive association was found between MLR and PCa (OR = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.44, 3.62). According to the interaction tests, age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, and smoking status did not significantly impact the relationship between MLR and PCa (all p for interaction >0.05). ROC analysis showed that MLR had a stronger discriminative ability and accuracy in predicting PCa than other inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, SII, AISI, PLR, and SIRI).

Conclusion

MLR might be better than other inflammatory biomarkers (NLR, SIRI, AISI, PLR, and SII) in predicting PCa. American adults who have elevated levels of MLR, NLR, PLR, SII, and AISI should be aware that they have a greater risk of PCa.

Inflammatory markers are associated with infertility prevalence: a cross-sectional analysis of the NHANES 2013-2020

BACKGROUND

Inflammation exerts a critical role in the pathogenesis of infertility. The relationship between inflammatory parameters from peripheral blood and infertility remains unclear. Aim of this study was to investigate the association between inflammatory markers and infertility among women of reproductive age in the United States.

METHODS

Women aged 20-45 were included from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2020 for the present cross-sectional study. Data of reproductive status was collected from the Reproductive Health Questionnaire. Six inflammatory markers, systemic immune inflammation index (SII), lymphocyte count (LC), product of platelet and neutrophil count (PPN), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) were calculated from complete blood counts in mobile examination center. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess the association between inflammatory markers and infertility in four different models, then restricted cubic spline (RCS) plot was used to explore non-linearity association between inflammatory markers and infertility. Subgroup analyses were performed to further clarify effects of other covariates on association between inflammatory markers and infertility.

RESULTS

A total of 3,105 women aged 20-45 was included in the final analysis, with 431 (13.88%) self-reported infertility. A negative association was found between log2-SII, log2-PLR and infertility, with an OR of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.78,1.15; p = 0.60), 0.80 (95% CI:0.60,1.05; p = 0.10), respectively. The results were similar in model 1, model 2, and model 3. Compared with the lowest quartile (Q1), the third quartile (Q3) of log2-SII was negatively correlation with infertility, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.37,0.85; p = 0.01) in model 3. Similarly, the third quartile (Q3) of log2-PLR was negatively correlation with infertility, with an OR (95% CI) of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.43,0.88; p = 0.01) in model 3. No significant association was observed between log2-LC, log2-PPN, log2-NLR, log2-LMR and infertility in model 3. A similar U-shaped relationship between log2-SII and infertility was found (p for non-linear < 0.05). The results of subgroup analyses revealed that associations between the third quartile (Q3) of log2-SII, log2-PLR and infertility were nearly consistent.

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that SII and PLR were negatively associated with infertility. Further studies are needed to explore their association better and the underlying mechanisms.