Prevention of pleuropneumonia in pigs by in-feed medication with sulphadimethoxine and sulphamethoxazole in combination with trimethoprim

Maximum levels of cross-contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non-target feed. Part 13: Diaminopyrimidines: trimethoprim

The specific concentrations of trimethoprim in non-target feed for food-producing animals below which there would not be an effect on the emergence of, and/or selection for, resistance in bacteria relevant for human and animal health, as well as the specific antimicrobial concentrations in feed which have an effect in terms of growth promotion/increased yield were assessed by EFSA in collaboration with EMA. Details of the methodology used for this assessment, associated data gaps and uncertainties, are presented in a separate document. To address antimicrobial resistance, the Feed Antimicrobial Resistance Selection Concentration (FARSC) model developed specifically for the assessment was applied. The FARSC for trimethoprim was estimated. Uncertainties and data gaps associated to the levels reported were addressed. To address growth promotion, data from scientific publications obtained from an extensive literature review were used. No suitable data for the assessment were available. It was recommended to perform further studies to supply more diverse and complete data related to the requirements for calculation of the FARSC for trimethoprim.

Maximum levels of cross-contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non-target feed. Part 11: Sulfonamides

The specific concentrations of sulfonamides in non-target feed for food-producing animals, below which there would not be an effect on the emergence of, and/or selection for, resistance in bacteria relevant for human and animal health, as well as the specific antimicrobial concentrations in feed which have an effect in terms of growth promotion/increased yield were assessed by EFSA in collaboration with EMA. Details of the methodology used for this assessment, associated data gaps and uncertainties, are presented in a separate document. To address antimicrobial resistance, the Feed Antimicrobial Resistance Selection Concentration (FARSC) model developed specifically for the assessment was applied. However, due to the lack of data on the parameters required to calculate the FARSC, it was not possible to conclude the assessment until further experimental data are available. To address growth promotion, data from scientific publications obtained from an extensive literature review were used. Levels in feed that showed to have an effect on growth promotion/increased yield were identified for three sulfonamides: sulfamethazine, sulfathiazole and sulfamerazine. It was recommended to carry out studies to generate the data that are required to fill the gaps which prevented the calculation of the FARSC for these antimicrobials.

Efficacy of gamithromycin injection administered intramuscularly against bacterial swine respiratory disease

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gamithromycin (GAM) for the treatment of naturally occurring bacterial swine respiratory disease (SRD) administered IM. A total of 240 pigs (nine-weeks old) were selected from two sites in Heilongjiang Province of China. The pigs showed severe signs of respiratory disease. Among them, 120 pigs were randomly divided into 4 groups of low dose (3 mg/kg), middle dose (6 mg/kg), high dose (12 mg/kg) GAM IM injection and 2.5 mg/kg tulathromycin (TUL) IM injection (positive control group) for phase II clinical trial to screen effective therapeutic dose. The other 120 pigs were randomly divided into 2 groups of 6 mg/kg GAM IM injection and 2.5 mg/kg TUL IM injection (positive control group) for phase III clinical trial to further confirm the efficacy. Animals were clinically observed daily for 14 days after treatment initiation. The predominant pathogens present in pretreatment respiratory tract samples were Streptococcus suis (S. suis) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (A. pleuropneumoniae). Haemophilus parasuis (H. parasuis) and Pasteurella multocida (P. multocida) were also found in the respiratory tract. All isolates were subjected to in vitro sensitivity testing and the measured minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of GAM were from 0.0625 μg/mL to 8 μg/mL. In all treatment groups, rectal temperature dropped and clinical index (mental status and respiratory symptom) significantly improved after treatment (P ≤ .05). As a result, 82.76% animals treated with the 6 mg/kg GAM injection were cured. This was significantly higher than that of 3 mg/kg GAM injection (P ≤ .05) and similar to that of 12 mg/kg GAM injection and 2.5 mg/kg TUL injection (P > .05) in phase II clinical trial. In phase III clinical trial, 80.70% of animals treated with the 6 mg/kg GAM injection were cured and the cure rate was similar to that of 2.5 mg/kg TUL injection (P > .05). In conclusion, we recommended a single dose (6 mg/kg) of GAM IM injection for the treatment of bacterial SRD.

Efficacy of a one-shot marbofloxacin treatment on acute pleuropneumonia after experimental aerosol inoculation of nursery pigs

BACKGROUND

Porcine pleuropneumonia, caused by Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, is a bacterial respiratory disease of swine. Acute outbreaks of the disease are often accompanied by high mortality and economic losses. As severe cases of the disease frequently require parenteral antibiotic treatment of the animals, the efficacy of a single, high dose of marbofloxacin was compared to a three-time application of a dose of enrofloxacin under experimental conditions.

METHODS

A blinded, controlled, randomized and blocked dose confirmation study was conducted to test the efficacy and safety of a single dose of 8 mg/kg marbofloxacin (160 mg/ml, Forcyl® Swine, Vetoquinol SA, France) to treat acute porcine pleuropneumonia after experimental aerosol inoculation of pigs with A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 2. The results were compared to a three consecutive day treatment of 2.5 mg/kg enrofloxacin and a mock (saline) treatment. Criteria for the assessment of efficacy were severity of lung lesions, bacteriological cure and the course of clinical disease after treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty six nursery pigs were divided into three treatment groups: marbofloxacin (T1), enrofloxacin (T2) and mock (T3). Statistically significant superiority (p < 0.05) of marbofloxacin and enrofloxacin compared to the mock-treated group was demonstrated for all efficacy criteria. The need of rescue euthanasia due to severity of symptoms was significantly reduced in both treatment groups (T1: 1 pig; T2: 0 pigs; vs. T3: 8 pigs). On day 6 after treatment initiation, clinical cure was observed in 10 (T1), 10 (T2) but only 1 of the piglets in T3. Extent of lung lesions (mean of lung lesion score T1: 3.9, T2: 6.0, T3: 21.1) and bacteriological isolation from lung tissue (on day 6 after treatment initiation: T1 = 0 pigs; T2 = 1 pig; T3 = all pigs) were also significantly reduced within both treatment groups. There were no adverse events linked to the drug administration and no injection site reactions were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Both applied antimicrobial treatments were proven safe and efficacious for the treatment of acute porcine pleuropneumonia. No statistically significant differences were detected between the antibiotic treatments.

Pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of sulfadiazine and trimethoprim in broiler chickens

Sulfonamides and trimethoprim are chemotherapeutics that are extensively used in various animal species. Little information about the pharmacokinetics of these compounds in chickens exists in the literature. In this study, a new commercial formulation of sulfadiazine in combination with trimethoprim was administered both intravenously and orally, according to a crossover design, to healthy, 7-week-old broilers. The plasma concentrations of the drugs were determined by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic methods, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. After intravenous or oral administration of trimethoprim (6.67 mg/kg body weight) and sulfadiazine (33.34 mg/kg body weight), both active substances were rapidly eliminated from the plasma. There was a mean half-life of 1.61 h for trimethoprim and 3.2 h for sulfadiazine. The apparent volumes of distribution (2.2 and 0.43 L/kg, respectively, indicated that the tissue distribution of trimethoprim was more extensive than that of sulfadiazine. The oral bioavailability was approximately 80% for both components.

Pharmacokinetics of sulfadimethoxine and sulfamethoxazole in combination with trimethoprim after oral single- and multiple-dose administration to healthy pigs

The pharmacokinetics were studied of sulfadimethoxine (SDM) or sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in combination with trimethoprim (TMP) administered as a single oral dose (25 mg + 5 mg per kg body weight) to two groups of 6 healthy pigs. The elimination half-lives of SMX and TMP were quite similar (2-3 h); SDM had a relatively long half-life of 13 h. Both sulfonamides (S) were exclusively metabolized to N4-acetyl derivatives but to different extents. The main metabolic pathway for TMP was O-demethylation and subsequent conjugation. In addition, the plasma concentrations of these drugs and their main metabolites after medication with different in-feed concentrations were determined. The drug (S:TMP) concentrations in the feed were 250:50, 500:100, and 1000:200 mg per kg. Steady-state concentrations were achieved within 48 h of feed medication, twice daily (SDM+TMP) or three times a day (SMX+TMP). Protein binding of SDM and its metabolite was high (>93%), whereas SMX, TMP and their metabolites showed moderate binding (48-75%). Feed medication with 500 ppm sulfonamide combined with 100 ppm TMP provided minimum steady-state plasma concentrations (C(ss,min)) higher than the concentration required for inhibition of the growth of 90% of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae strains (n = 20).