1
|
Deffieux X, Rousset-Jablonski C, Gantois A, Brillac T, Maruani J, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Mignot S, Gaucher L, Athiel Y, Baffet H, Bailleul A, Bernard V, Bourdon M, Cardaillac C, Carneiro Y, Chariot P, Corroenne R, Dabi Y, Dahlem L, Frank S, Freyens A, Grouthier V, Hernandez I, Iraola E, Lambert M, Lauchet N, Legendre G, Le Lous M, Louis-Vahdat C, Martinat Sainte-Beuve A, Masson M, Matteo C, Pinton A, Sabbagh E, Sallee C, Thubert T, Heron I, Pizzoferrato AC, Artzner F, Tavenet A, Le Ray C, Fauconnier A. [Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2023; 51:297-330. [PMID: 37258002 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Deffieux
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, 92140 Clamart, France.
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Département de chirurgie, Centre Léon Bérard, 28, rue Laënnec, 69008 Lyon, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Adrien Gantois
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | | | - Julia Maruani
- Cabinet médical, 6, rue Docteur-Albert-Schweitzer, 13006 Marseille, France
| | - Lorraine Maitrot-Mantelet
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | | | - Laurent Gaucher
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France, CNSF, 75010 Paris, France; Public Health Unit, hospices civils de Lyon, 69500 Bron, France; Inserm U1290, Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France; Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1206 Genève, Suisse
| | - Yoann Athiel
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Hortense Baffet
- Service de gynécologie médicale, orthogénie et sexologie, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Bailleul
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France; Équipe RISCQ « Risques cliniques et sécurité en santé des femmes et en santé périnatale », université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Valérie Bernard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Unité Inserm 1312, université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux Institute of Oncology, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Mathilde Bourdon
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction, université Paris cité, AP-HP, centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Port-Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Claire Cardaillac
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France
| | | | - Patrick Chariot
- Département de médecine légale et sociale, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 93140 Bondy, France; Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux, UMR 8156-997, UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 93000 Bobigny, France
| | - Romain Corroenne
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU d'Angers, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Yohann Dabi
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Sorbonne université-AP-HP-hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Dahlem
- Département universitaire de médecine générale, faculté de médecine, université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Service d'oncogénétique, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Anne Freyens
- Département universitaire de médecine générale (DUMG), université Paul-Sabatier, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Virginie Grouthier
- Service d'endocrinologie, diabétologie, nutrition et d'endocrinologie des gonades, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-universitaire régional de Bordeaux, 31000 Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, Inserm U1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pessac, France
| | - Isabelle Hernandez
- Collège national des sages-femmes de France hébergé au Réseau de santé périnatal parisien (RSPP), 75010 Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Iraola
- Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux sociaux (IRIS), UMR 8156-997, CNRS U997 Inserm EHESS UP13 UFR SMBH, université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Paris, France; Direction de la protection maternelle et infantile et promotion de la santé, conseil départemental du Val-de-Marne, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Marie Lambert
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, centre hospitalo-universitaire Pellegrin, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Nadege Lauchet
- Groupe médical François-Perrin, 9, rue François-Perrin, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Guillaume Legendre
- Service de gynécologue-obstétrique, CHU Angers, 49000 Angers, France; UMR_S1085, université d'Angers, CHU d'Angers, université de Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), Angers, France
| | - Maela Le Lous
- Université de Rennes 1, Inserm, LTSI - UMR 1099, 35000 Rennes, France; Département de gynécologie et obstétrique, CHU de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Christine Louis-Vahdat
- Cabinet de gynécologie et obstétrique, 126, boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006 Paris, France
| | | | - Marine Masson
- Département de médecine générale, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Caroline Matteo
- Ecole de maïeutique, Aix Marseille Université, 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Anne Pinton
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Trousseau, AP-HP, 26, avenue du Dr-Arnold-Netter, 75012 Paris, France; Sorbonne université, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Sabbagh
- Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), hôpital universitaire Paris centre (HUPC), 75014 Paris, France
| | - Camille Sallee
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU de Limoges, 87000 Limoges, France
| | - Thibault Thubert
- Service de gynecologie-obstétrique, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France; EA 4334, laboratoire mouvement, interactions, performance (MIP), Nantes université, 44322 Nantes, France
| | - Isabelle Heron
- Service d'endocrinologie, université de Rouen, hôpital Charles-Nicolle, 76000 Rouen, France; Cabinet médical, Clinique Mathilde, 76100 Rouen, France
| | - Anne-Cécile Pizzoferrato
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital universitaire de La Miletrie, 86000 Poitiers, France; Inserm CIC 1402, université de Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - France Artzner
- Ciane, Collectif interassociatif autour de la naissance, c/o Anne Evrard, 101, rue Pierre-Corneille, 69003 Lyon, France
| | - Arounie Tavenet
- Endofrance, Association de lutte contre l'endométriose, 3, rue de la Gare, 70190 Tresilley, France
| | - Camille Le Ray
- Maternité Port-Royal, groupe hospitalier Paris Centre, AP-HP, université Paris cité, FHU Prema, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 78300 Poissy, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Psychological predictors of sexual quality of life among women with vaginismus, Velayati A, Jahanian Sadatmahalleh S, Ziaei S, Kazemnejad A. Psychological Predictors of Sexual Quality of Life Among Iranian Women With Vaginismus: A Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR SEXUAL HEALTH 2021; 34:81-89. [PMID: 38595678 PMCID: PMC10903621 DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1954576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Background Vaginismus is an involuntary contraction of muscles around the vaginal and one of the most common sexual disorders among women. It is often associated with psychological problems, leading to poor sexual quality of life (SQOL). This study aimed to determine SQOL predictors in women with vaginismus. Methods In this cross-sectional study, convenience sampling was used to enroll 236 individuals with vaginismus among all women visiting sexual health clinics of Tehran, Iran in 2018. The data were collected using the Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQOL-F) Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM). Results The mean (SD) SQOL score of the participants was 56.82 (20.18). There was a significant direct correlation between the participants' self-esteem and their SQOL (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). However, the participants' SQOL had significant inverse correlations with the variables of anxiety (r = - 0.48, p < 0.001) and depression (r = -0.47, p < 0.001). Based on the GLM results, the variables of anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and duration of disorder predicted SQOL, and explained 42.3% of the variance of SQOL in the participants. Conclusion The results indicated that psychological factors such as anxiety, depression, and self-esteem are predictors of SQOL in women with vaginismus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atefeh Velayati
- Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Saeideh Ziaei
- Department of Reproductive Health and Midwifery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pérez-López FR, Vieira-Baptista P, Phillips N, Cohen-Sacher B, Fialho SCAV, Stockdale CK. Clinical manifestations and evaluation of postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 37:740-745. [PMID: 34036849 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1931100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is estimated that 50% of women will suffer a severe form of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) related to menopause. Equally, young women may temporarily present this clinical problem while receiving various pharmacological or endocrine treatments or radiotherapy. AIM To determine clinical and diagnostic exams required to confirm the presence of VVA (also referred to as atrophic vaginitis, urogenital atrophy, or genitourinary syndrome of menopause) and rule out other genital or pelvic clinical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature review searches were carried out on the main scientific article search engines (PubMed, SciELO, Cochrane) using different clinical terms, treatments or interventions and comorbidity related to VVA. RESULTS The development and severity of VVA depend mainly on the duration of hypoestrogenism. Hypoestrogenism causes changes in the urogenital tissue, generating signs and symptoms, such as dryness, burning, soreness, itching, and irritation of the genital skin. The diagnosis can be made through anamnesis (patient history), questionnaires, physical exam, and, sometimes, complementary exams. Objective vaginal assessment is essential and can be completed with the Vaginal Health Index, the Vaginal Maturation Index, or vaginal pH in the absence of infection or semen. The exclusion of other vulvovaginal organic pathology is essential to reach an accurate diagnosis and provide adequate treatment. CONCLUSIONS The specialist should be able to identify VVA, rule out other pathologies that make a differential diagnosis and conduct proper management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faustino R Pérez-López
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Zaragoza Faculty of Medicine, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Pedro Vieira-Baptista
- Hospital Lusíadas Porto, Porto, Portugal
- LAP, Unilabs, Porto, Portugal
- Lower Genital Tract Unit, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Nancy Phillips
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Bina Cohen-Sacher
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Susana C A V Fialho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal Fluminense Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Colleen K Stockdale
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bao C, Noga H, Allaire C, Williams C, Bedaiwy MA, Sadownik LA, Brotto LA, Smith KB, Yong PJ. Provoked Vestibulodynia in Women with Pelvic Pain. Sex Med 2019; 7:227-234. [PMID: 30954496 PMCID: PMC6523038 DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pelvic pain and vulvar pain are common conditions in women. In this study, we sought to characterize the clinical picture of patients with concurrent pelvic pain and provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). AIM To analyze the association between sexual/clinical characteristics and a diagnosis of PVD among women with pelvic pain. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of a prospective registry at a tertiary referral center for pelvic pain and endometriosis, involving consecutive non-menopausal sexually active patients 18-49 years-old seen by a single gynecologist from January 2016-December 2017. The sample was divided into 2 groups: pelvic pain with PVD; and pelvic pain alone (without PVD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Superficial dyspareunia and deep dyspareunia on a 11-point numeric rating scale, and the sexual quality-of-life subscale of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (0-100%). RESULTS There were 129 patients that met study criteria: one third with pelvic pain and PVD (n = 42) and two-thirds with pelvic pain alone (without PVD) (n = 87). Women with pelvic pain and PVD had significantly more severe superficial dyspareunia ≥7/10 (OR = 12.00 (4.48-32.16), P < .001), more severe deep dyspareunia ≥7/10 (OR = 4.08 (1.83-9.10), P = .001), and poorer sexual quality of life (Endometriosis Health Profile-30 ≥50%) (OR = 4.39 (1.67-11.57), P = .002), compared with the group with pelvic pain alone. Women with pelvic pain and PVD also had more anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing, more frequent tenderness of the bladder and pelvic floor, and more common diagnosis of painful bladder syndrome. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, abdominal wall allodynia, positive Carnett test for abdominal wall pain, functional quality of life, endometriosis, and irritable bowel syndrome. CONCLUSIONS In the pelvic pain population, PVD may be associated with more negative impact on dyspareunia, sexual quality of life, and bladder/pelvic floor function, but it may not significantly impact abdominopelvic pain or day-to-day function in general. Bao C, Noga H, Allaire C, et al. Provoked Vestibulodynia in Women with Pelvic Pain. Sex Med 2019;7:227-234.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Bao
- BC Women's Center for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Heather Noga
- Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Catherine Allaire
- BC Women's Center for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Christina Williams
- BC Women's Center for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mohamed A Bedaiwy
- BC Women's Center for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leslie A Sadownik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Centre for Vulvar Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lori A Brotto
- Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Centre for Vulvar Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kelly B Smith
- BC Centre for Vulvar Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul J Yong
- BC Women's Center for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; BC Centre for Vulvar Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|