The Q-tip test of the vulva as a diagnostic aid for vulvodynia: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values

[Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.

METHODS

The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.

Vulvodynia and chronic pelvic pain in a gynecologic outpatient clinic

Introduction: Vulvodynia and chronic pelvic pain are common but underdiagnosed chronic gynecologic pain syndromes. Insufficient knowledge regarding prevalence, typical pain patterns and associated factors contribute to delayed diagnosis. The present study explored the symptoms and characteristics of women presenting with vulvodynia and/or chronic pelvic pain to a gynecologic outpatient clinic. Materials and methods: Electronic charts of women diagnosed with vulvodynia and/or chronic pelvic pain between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed. Type of pain, duration of symptoms, previous medical assessments and therapies, comorbidities and patient characteristics were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: One hundred and twenty-seven women (mean age 36, range 18-75 years) met the diagnostic criteria for chronic gynecologic pain syndromes. Sixty-five women were diagnosed with CPP only, 42 with vulvodynia and 20 with both conditions. Endometriosis was suspected or diagnosed in 35 (54%) women with CPP. History of pain ranged from 3 months to 20 years. Comorbidities were common, with 40% of women being diagnosed with depression or other mood disorders, 15% with urological and 9% with gastrointestinal conditions. Conclusions: There is a need for increased awareness regarding vulvodynia and CPP among health care providers. A comprehensive history is important for adequate diagnosis.