Trans-septal suture retraction for endoscopic orbital surgery

Resection of orbital apex tumours in the medial orbit via four-handed endonasal and transcaruncular approaches

PURPOSE

To report the surgical outcomes of 4-handed endoscopic and transcaruncular approaches for orbital apex tumours located in the medial orbit.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 6 patients (2 males and 4 females; 3 right and 3 left; mean age, 49.5 years; age range, 38-60 years) who underwent excision of an orbital apex tumour in the medial orbit via 4-handed endonasal and transcaruncular approaches. Data on age, sex, affected side, surgical record and complications, and results of pathological examinations, imaging studies, and ophthalmologic examinations were collected.

RESULTS

Tumours pathologically corresponded to a cavernous haemangioma in 5 cases and a schwannoma in 1 case. The cavernous haemangioma was completely removed in all cases, while the schwannoma was only debulked because the tumour attached to the surrounding tissues. The medial orbital wall was reconstructed simultaneously in 1 case and 8 days after tumour resection in 1 case. Postoperatively, the visual acuity improved or was maintained in all patients. One patient without medial orbital wall reconstruction showed significant enophthalmos on the affected side after surgery. Another patient without medial orbital wall reconstruction did not obtain binocular single vision field in any direction of gaze after surgery due to severe esotropia.

CONCLUSIONS

This report indicates that 4-handed endoscopic and transcaruncular approaches are useful for removal of an orbital apex tumour located in the medial orbit. Medial orbital wall reconstruction after tumour resection may be a better option for reducing the risk of postoperative enophthalmos and esotropia.

Adjunctive transseptal corridor: Technique for endoscopic resection of orbital tumor

The transnasal endoscopic approach is increasingly used for resection of tumors that are located inferiorly and medially within the orbit. However, this usually requires multiple-handed manipulations, which demand a second corridor for an assistant. Here, we introduce a simple transseptal corridor from the contra-nare, to facilitate assistant instrument maneuverability. This simple, minimally invasive skill greatly improves operation efficiency and deserves greater attention in endoscopic orbital surgery.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

Combined Endonasal and Orbital Approach for Resection of Orbital Apical Tumors

PURPOSE

Tumors of the medial orbital apex can be challenging to resect. Primary endonasal resection can be limited by requirements for fat retraction and poor angulation for lateral orbital dissection. Orbital resection alone can have space limitations and a limited view for dissection of the posterior aspect of the tumor. The combined transorbital transnasal approach integrates the retraction and instrumentation advantages of the transorbital approach with the optical and space advantages of the transnasal approach.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional cohort study, patients who underwent surgical resection of an apical orbital tumor via a combined endoscopic and orbital approach from 2014 to 2019 were identified. Clinical history, examination findings, imaging, surgical technique, histopathology, and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

Six patients were included. Patients presented with proptosis (5), optic neuropathy (3), and motility restriction (2). Surgery involved a medial orbitotomy and endoscopic ethmoidectomy ± sphenoidotomy, medial wall removal, and periosteum opening. The lesion was prolapsed into the sinus, dissected at the apex via the orbital approach, and removed through the nasal cavity. Pathologic diagnoses were cavernous venous malformation (4), venolymphatic malformation (1), and metastatic carcinoid (1). Improvement in pain (2/2), optic neuropathy (2/3), and proptosis (5/5) were noted. Complications included ethmoid mucocele and nasal polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined endonasal and orbital approach involves prolapsing the lesion into the nasal cavity to aid in dissection on the lateral and posterior aspects, maximizing visibility of the tight intraconal space. This technique can be performed by a team of orbital surgeons experienced in both orbital and endonasal surgery.

The Endoscopic Transnasal Approach to Orbital Tumors: A Review

Historically, surgical access to orbital tumors has required a transcutaneous, transconjunctival or transcranial approach. Resection of orbital tumors is notoriously challenging due to the surrounding dense network of critical structures in a confined bony cavity. Advances in endoscopic endonasal surgery, initially used for sinonasal and skull base conditions, have allowed for expansion of its applications beyond the sinorbital interface. In the past decade, the evolution of techniques has enabled a purely endoscopic, minimally invasive approach to medially located orbital pathology with good outcomes. With experience and multidisciplinary collaboration between orbit and rhinologic surgeons, this has expanded to allow for a safe and effective transnasal approach to nearly all regions of the orbit with or without assistance from the orbital side. This review summarizes the relevant anatomy, variations of surgical approaches, and literature regarding outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal approach to orbital tumors.

Modern endoscopic skull base neurosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Since the early use of the endoscopic view for treating simple intrasellar pituitary adenomas, the skull base surgery has experienced an unprecedented revolution elevating the treatment of skull base lesions to the next level in proficiency and excellence of care.

METHODS

We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of the endoscope in the treatment of skull base lesions. In this article, we aim to discuss and provide a wide view of the current indications and future perspectives of the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and of the endoscopic transcranial approaches.

RESULTS

As in the development of any other technique, EEA have gone through a transformation process from theoretical anatomic models to a pragmatic clinical use. Along the way, EEA have required several modifications, as well as pushbacks in the application of this technique in some indications. This process has resulted in the provision of an additional tool to the current surgical armamentarium that allows the skull base surgeon to face most challenging lesions along the skull base.

CONCLUSIONS

The judicious combination of transcranial and endoscopic-transnasal approaches warrants highest chances of achieving satisfactory tumors resection with a reduced risk of complications.