The Drosophila foraging gene plays a vital role at the start of metamorphosis for subsequent adult emergence

Transcriptomic effects of the foraging gene shed light on pathways of pleiotropy and plasticity

Genes are often pleiotropic and plastic in their expression, features which increase and diversify the functionality of the genome. The foraging (for) gene in Drosophila melanogaster is highly pleiotropic and a long-standing model for studying individual differences in behavior and plasticity from ethological, evolutionary, and genetic perspectives. Its pleiotropy is known to be linked to its complex molecular structure; however, the downstream pathways and interactors remain mostly elusive. To uncover these pathways and interactors and gain a better understanding of how pleiotropy and plasticity are achieved at the molecular level, we explore the effects of different for alleles on gene expression at baseline and in response to 4 h of food deprivation, using RNA sequencing analysis in different Drosophila larval tissues. The results show tissue-specific transcriptomic dynamics influenced by for allelic variation and food deprivation, as well as genotype by treatment interactions. Differentially expressed genes yielded pathways linked to previously described for phenotypes and several potentially novel phenotypes. Together, these findings provide putative genes and pathways through which for might regulate its varied phenotypes in a pleiotropic, plastic, and gene-structure-dependent manner.

Characterizing the Protein Isoforms of foraging (for), the PKGI Ortholog in Drosophila melanogaster

The foraging (for) gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG), which is a major effector of the cGMP signaling pathway involved in the regulation of behaviour and metabolic traits. Despite being well studied at the transcript level, little is known about the for gene at the protein level. Here, we provide a detailed characterization of the for gene protein (FOR) products and present new tools for their study, including five isoform-specific antibodies and a transgenic strain that carries an HA-labelled for allele (for^BAC::HA). Our results showed that multiple FOR isoforms were expressed in the larval and adult stages of D. melanogaster and that the majority of whole-body FOR expression arises from three (P1, P1α, and P3) of eight putative protein isoforms. We found that FOR expression differed between the larval and adult stages and between the dissected larval organs we analyzed, which included the central nervous system (CNS), fat body, carcass, and intestine. Moreover, we showed that the FOR expression differed between two allelic variants of the for gene, namely, for^s (sitter) and for^R (rover), that are known to differ in many food-related traits. Together, our in vivo identification of FOR isoforms and the existence of temporal, spatial, and genetic differences in their expression lay the groundwork for determining their functional significance.

Expression of the foraging gene in adult Drosophila melanogaster

The foraging gene in Drosophila melanogaster, which encodes a cGMP-dependent protein kinase, is a highly conserved, complex gene with multiple pleiotropic behavioral and physiological functions in both the larval and adult fly. Adult foraging expression is less well characterized than in the larva. We characterized foraging expression in the brain, gastric system, and reproductive systems using a T2A-Gal4 gene-trap allele. In the brain, foraging expression appears to be restricted to multiple sub-types of glia. This glial-specific cellular localization of foraging was supported by single-cell transcriptomic atlases of the adult brain. foraging is extensively expressed in most cell types in the gastric and reproductive systems. We then mapped multiple cis-regulatory elements responsible for parts of the observed expression patterns by a nested cloned promoter-Gal4 analysis. The mapped cis-regulatory elements were consistently modular when comparing the larval and adult expression patterns. These new data using the T2A-Gal4 gene-trap and cloned foraging promoter fusion GAL4's are discussed with respect to previous work using an anti-FOR antibody, which we show here to be non-specific. Future studies of foraging's function will consider roles for glial subtypes and peripheral tissues (gastric and reproductive systems) in foraging's pleiotropic behavioral and physiological effects.

A cGMP-dependent protein kinase, encoded by the Drosophila foraging gene, regulates neurotransmission through changes in synaptic structure and function

A cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) encoded by the Drosophila foraging (for) gene regulates both synaptic structure (nerve terminal growth) and function (neurotransmission) through independent mechanisms at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction (nmj). Glial for is known to restrict nerve terminal growth, whereas presynaptic for inhibits synaptic vesicle (SV) exocytosis during low frequency stimulation. Presynaptic for also facilitates SV endocytosis during high frequency stimulation. for's effects on neurotransmission can occur independent of any changes in nerve terminal growth. However, it remains unclear if for's effects on neurotransmission affect nerve terminal growth. Furthermore, it's possible that for's effects on synaptic structure contribute to changes in neurotransmission. In the present study, we examined these questions using RNA interference to selectively knockdown for in presynaptic neurons or glia at the Drosophila larval nmj. Consistent with our previous findings, presynaptic knockdown of for impaired SV endocytosis, whereas knockdown of glial for had no effect on SV endocytosis. Surprisingly, we found that knockdown of either presynaptic or glial for increased neurotransmitter release in response to low frequency stimulation. Knockdown of presynaptic for did not affect nerve terminal growth, demonstrating that for's effects on neurotransmission does not alter nerve terminal growth. In contrast, knockdown of glial for enhanced nerve terminal growth. This enhanced nerve terminal growth was likely the cause of the enhanced neurotransmitter release seen following knockdown of glial for. Overall, we show that for can affect neurotransmitter release by regulating both synaptic structure and function.