Physiopathology and genetics in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

Aspirin Challenge-Induced Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Profile of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

Genetic variation and epigenetic factors are thought to contribute to the development of hypersensitivity to aspirin. DNA methylation fluctuates dynamically throughout the day. To discover new CpG methylation in lymphocytes associated with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), we evaluated changes in global CpG methylation profiles from before to after an oral aspirin challenge in patients with AERD and aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). Whole-genome CpG methylation levels of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were quantified with an Illumina 860K Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip array and then adjusted for inferred lymphocyte fraction (ILF) with GLINT and Tensor Composition Analysis. Among the 866,091 CpGs in the array, differentially methylated CpGs (DMCs) were found in 6 CpGs in samples from all 12 patients with asthma included in the study (AERD, n = 6; ATA, n = 6). DMCs were found in 3 CpGs in the 6 ATA samples and in 615 CpGs in the 6 AERD samples. A total of 663 DMCs in 415 genes and 214 intergenic regions differed significantly in the AERD compared with the ATA. In promoters, 126 CpG loci were predicted to bind to 38 transcription factors (TFs), many of which were factors already known to be involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and immune responses. In conclusion, we identified 615 new CpGs methylated in peripheral blood lymphocytes by oral aspirin challenge in AERD but not in ATA. These findings indicate that oral aspirin challenge induces epigenetic changes in ILFs, specifically in AERD patients, possibly via changes in TF binding, which may have epigenetic effects on the development of AERD.

Lung Function and Asthma Clinical Control in N-ERD Patients, Three-Year Follow-Up in the Context of Real-World Evidence

Purpose

To describe the lung function and clinical control of asthma in patients with N-ERD during three years of medical follow-up using GINA guidelines.

Methods

We evaluated 75 N-ERD and 68 asthma patients (AG). Clinical control, lung function, and asthma treatment were evaluated according to GINA-2014. We compared all variables at baseline and one, two, and three years after treatment.

Results

At baseline, the N-ERD group had better basal lung function (LF) than the AG group (p<0.01), and the AG group used higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids than the N-ERD group (52.4% vs 30.5%, p=0.01) and short-term oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (52.4% vs 30.5%, p<0.01). Instead, N-ERD patients needed more use of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) (29.3% vs 5.9%, p<0.01). This group had better clinical control than the AG group (62.1% vs 34.1%, p<0.01). During the medical follow-up, the LF of the N-ERD group remained at normal values; however, these parameters improved in AG from one year (p<0.01). Likewise, there was a diminished use of high doses of ICS (52.4% vs 33%, p<0.05) and short-term OCS (67.6% vs 20.6%, p<0.01) in asthma patients. However, N-ERD patients still needed more use of LTRAs (p<0.02) during the study. In this context, one-third of N-ERD patients had to use a combination of two drugs to maintain this control. From the second year on, clinical control of asthma was similar in both groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion

According to GINA guidelines, only one-third of patients with N-ERD can gradually achieve adequate lung function and good asthma control with a high ICS dosage. Only a very small portion of patients will require the continued use of a second medication as an LTRA to keep their asthma under control.

Main Polymorphisms in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a condition caused by increased bronchoconstriction in people with asthma after taking aspirin or another NSAID. Molecular analysis of the human genome has opened up new perspectives on human polymorphisms and disease. This study was conducted to identify the genetic factors that influence this disease due to its unknown genetic factors. We evaluated research studies, letters, comments, editorials, eBooks, and reviews. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched for information. We used the keywords polymorphisms, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, asthma, allergy as search terms. This study included 38 studies. AERD complications were associated with polymorphisms in ALOX15, EP2, ADRB2, SLC6A12, CCR3, CRTH2, CysLTs, DPCR1, DPP10, FPR2, HSP70, IL8, IL1B, IL5RA, IL-13, IL17RA, ILVBL, TBXA2R, TLR3, HLA-DRB and HLA-DQ, HLA-DR7, HLA-DP. AERD was associated with heterogeneity in gene polymorphisms, making it difficult to pinpoint specific gene changes. Therefore, diagnosing and treating AERD may be facilitated by examining common variants involving the disease.

Genome-wide DNA methylation profile of peripheral blood lymphocytes from subjects with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced respiratory diseases

BACKGROUND

Significant changes in CpG methylation have been identified in nasal polyps, which are the main targets of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD); however, these polyps are composed of various cellular components. In the present study, whole-genome CpG methylation in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) was analyzed to define the epigenetic changes in lymphocytes, which are the primary immune cells involved in NERD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genomic DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 27 NERD and 24 aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) was subjected to bisulfate conversion and a methylation array. Quantitative CpG methylation, the β-values as a quantitative measure of DNA methylation, in lymphocytes were calculated after adjustments for cellular composition.

RESULTS

Fifty-six hypermethylated and three hypomethylated differentially methylated CpGs (DMCs) in PBLs in the NERD compared with ATA. The top 10 CpG loci predicted the methylation risk score, with a positive predictive value of 91.3%, a negative predictive value of 81.5% and an accuracy of 84.3%. As demonstrated in the nasal polyps, 30 DMCs were predicted to bind to the following 10 transcription factors, ranked in descending order: AP-2alphaA, TFII-1, STAT4, FOXP3, GR, c-Est-1, E2F-1, XBP1, ENKTF-1 and NF-1. Gene ontology analysis identified 13 categories such as regulation of T-helper 17 cell differentiation, including SMAD7 and NFKBIZ. PBLs in NERD contained no DMCs in genes associated with the prostaglandin and leukotriene pathways, which were found in ATA.

CONCLUSION

PBLs in NERD form a unique pattern of DNA CpG methylation, and the combined analysis may provide predictive values for NERD.

Mechanisms of the antiangiogenic effects of aspirin in cancer

Aspirin is an old drug extracted from willow bark and is widely used for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Accumulating evidence has shown that aspirin use may significantly reduce the angiogenesis of cancer; however, the mechanism of the association between angiogenesis and aspirin is complex. Although COX-1 is widely known as a target of aspirin, several studies reveal other antiangiogenic targets of aspirin, such as angiotensin II, glucose transporter 1, heparanase, and matrix metalloproteinase. In addition, some data indicates that aspirin may produce antiangiogenic effects after acting in different cell types, such as endothelial cells, platelets, pericytes, and macrophages. In this review, we concentrate on research regarding the antiangiogenic effects of aspirin in cancer, and we discuss the molecular mechanisms of aspirin and its metabolites. Moreover, we discuss some mechanisms through which aspirin treatment may normalize existing blood vessels, including preventing the disintegration of endothelial adheres junctions and the recruitment of pericytes. We also address the antiangiogenic effects and the underlying mechanisms of aspirin derivatives, which are aimed at improving safety and efficacy.

NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (NERD): From Pathogenesis to Improved Care

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) is characterized by moderate-to-severe asthma and a higher prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis/nasal polyps, but is a highly heterogeneous disorder with various clinical manifestations. Two major pathogenic mechanisms are: (1) overproduction of cysteinyl leukotrienes with dysregulation of arachidonic acid metabolism and (2) increased type 2 eosinophilic inflammation affected by genetic mechanisms. Aspirin challenge is the gold standard to diagnose NERD, whereas reliable in vitro biomarkers have yet not been identified. Therapeutic approaches have been done on the basis of disease severity with the avoidance of culprit and cross-reacting NSAIDs, and when indicated, aspirin desensitization is an effective treatment option. Biologic approaches targeting Type 2 cytokines are emerging as potential therapeutic options. Here, we summarize the up-to-date evidence of pathophysiologic mechanisms and diagnosis/management approaches to the patients with NERD with its phenotypic classification.

Heterogeneity of NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: has the time come for subphenotyping?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

NSAID-Exacerbated Disease (N-ERD) is a chronic eosinophilic inflammatory disorder of the respiratory tract occurring in patients with asthma and/or rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, whose symptoms are exacerbated by NSAIDs. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of N-ERD, and to emphasize heterogeneity of this syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Growing evidence indicates that N-ERD, which has been considered a separate asthma phenotype, is heterogenous, and can be divided in several subphenotypes varying in clinical characteristics. Pathophysiology of N-ERD is complex and extends beyond abnormalities in the arachidonic acid metabolism. Heterogeneity of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying development of airway inflammation seems to be associated with variability in response to both anti-inflammatory and disease-specific treatments (e.g., with aspirin after desensitization).

SUMMARY

Progress in understanding of the pathophysiology of N-ERD leads to discovery and validation of new biomarkers facilitating diagnosis and predicting the response to treatment of the chronic inflammation underlying upper (CRSwNP) and lower airway (asthma) symptoms. Better characterization of the immunophysiopathological heterogeneity of N-ERD (identification of endotypes) may allow more personalized, endotype-driven approach to treatment in the future.

IL10 rs1800872 Is Associated with Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Exacerbated Respiratory Disease in Mexican-Mestizo Patients

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is a disease integrated by asthma, nasal polyps, and hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Genetic association studies have explored single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in theoretical pathophysiological mechanisms, but most of these lack replication of findings in second populations. Our objective was to evaluate the association of SNPs in candidate genomic regions described in Asian and European subjects with N-ERD in Mexican-mestizo patients. We designed a replicative study in two stages. We included 381 SNPs selected by fine mapping of associated genes in a microarray, which were tested in three groups: N-ERD (N), asthma (A), and control group (CG); by means of GoldenGate array, positive results by genetic models were validated in the second stage in another population through qPCR with the same methodology. In the allelic model, we identified 11 SNPs in N vs. CG comparison, and five in N vs. A and A vs. CG, respectively. By genetics models, all SNPs in PPARG, rs13239058 in TBXAS1, and rs1554286 and rs1800872 in IL10 were associated in both models. In the second stage, only rs1800872CC showed an association in the dominant model comparing N vs. GC, p = 0.004, OR = 0.44. In conclusion, rs1800872 in IL10 was the only associated with N-ERD in Mexican-mestizo patients.

Susceptibility to adverse drug reactions

The pharmacological effects of a drug depend on its concentration at the site of action, and therefore on the concentration in blood and on the dose. The relationship between the concentration or dose and the corresponding effect can usually be represented mathematically as a rectangular hyperbola; when effect is plotted against log concentration or log dose, the curve is sigmoidal. Inevitably, the effect size and the doses causing benefit and harm will differ among individuals, since they are biological phenomena: some individuals are more likely than others to suffer harm at any given dose. Some harmful effects can occur at much lower doses than those used in therapeutics; that is, the log dose-response curve for harm lies far to the left of the log dose-response curve for benefit. Those who suffer such reactions are hypersusceptible. When the dose-response curves for harm and therapeutic effect are in the same range, dose cannot separate the harmful effects from the therapeutic effects, and adverse reactions are collateral. Toxic effects occur when harmful doses are above the doses needed for benefit. In this review we consider factors that influence a subject's susceptibility to adverse drug reactions. Determinants of susceptibility include Immunological, Genetic, demographic (Age and Sex), Physiological and Exogenous factors (drug-drug interactions, for example), and Diseases and disorders such as renal failure, giving the mnemonic I GASPED. Some susceptibility factors are discrete (for example, all-or-none) and some are continuous; susceptibility can therefore be discrete or continuous; and the factors can interact to determine a person's overall susceptibility to harm.

The Effect of Antileukotrienes on the Results of Postoperative Treatment of Paranasal Sinuses in Patients with Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

BACKGROUND

Based on endoscopic examination, chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is divided into chronic inflammation with (CRSwNP) or without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). On the basis of the pathomechanism of inflammation, CRS is divided into endotypes. Eosinophilic CRSwNP with coexisting bronchial asthma and hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is a real therapeutic challenge.

AIM

Comparative analysis of the results of treatment of patients with CRSwNP, bronchial asthma, or hypersensitivity to NSAIDs (NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease, NERD), using antileukotrienes (leukotriene receptor antagonists, LTRAs) or intranasal glucocorticoids or both drugs together after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

33 patients (11 male, 33%) with NERD divided into three groups treated with LTRAs or intranasal glucocorticoids or both drugs together were assessed in terms of general well-being, state of pathological changes, and olfactory disorders using the following tools: Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, Visual Analogue Scale, Brief Identification Smell Test, and Lund-Kennedy score before and at 12 months after surgery. CT assessments were made prior to surgery using the Lund-MacKay scale.

RESULTS

Comparable efficacy of treatment with nasal steroids and antileukotrienes was found after 12 months of observation of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest comparable efficacy of treatment with nasal steroids and antileukotrienes in patients with NERD after ESS. Treatment with montelukast and mometasone has not been shown to be superior to both drugs administered separately.

Beyond a chemopreventive reagent, aspirin is a master regulator of the hallmarks of cancer

PURPOSE

Aspirin, one of the most commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NAIDS), not only shows cancer chemoprevention effects but also improves cancer therapeutic effects when combined with other therapies. Studies that focus on aspirin regulation of the hallmarks of cancer and the associated molecular mechanisms facilitate a more thorough understanding of aspirin in mediating chemoprevention and may supply additional information for the development of novel cancer therapeutic agents.

METHODS

The relevant literatures from PubMed have been reviewed in this article.

RESULTS

Current studies have revealed that aspirin regulates almost all the hallmarks of cancer. Within tumor tissue, aspirin suppresses the bioactivities of cancer cells themselves and deteriorates the tumor microenvironment that supports cancer progression. In addition to tumor tissues, blocking of platelet activation also contributes to the ability of aspirin to inhibit cancer progression. In terms of the molecular mechanism, aspirin targets oncogenes and cancer-related signaling pathways and activates certain tumor suppressors.

CONCLUSION

Beyond a chemopreventive agent, aspirin is a master regulator of the hallmarks of cancer.

MS4A2-rs573790 Is Associated With Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease: Replicative Study Using a Candidate Gene Strategy

Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a set of diseases of the unified airway, and its physiopathology is related to disruption of the metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA). Genetic association studies in AERD had explored single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in several genes related to many mechanisms (AA metabolism, inflammation, drug metabolism, etc.) but most lack validation stages in second populations. Our aim is to evaluated whether contribution to susceptibility of SNPs reported in other populations are associated with AERD in Mexican Mestizo patients. We developed a replicative study in two stages. In the first, 381 SNPs selected by fine mapping of associated genes, (previously reported in the literature), were integrated into a microarray and tested in three groups (AERD, asthma and healthy controls -HC-) using the GoldenGate array. Results associated to risk based on genetic models [comparing: AERD vs. HC (comparison 1, C1), AERD vs. asthma (C2), and asthma vs. HC (C3)] were validated in the second stage in other population groups using qPCR. In the first stage, we identified 11 SNPs associated with risk in C1.The top SNPs were ACE-rs4309C (p = 0.0001) and MS4A2-rs573790C (p = 0.0002). In C2, we detected 14 SNPs, including ACE-rs4309C (p = 0.0001). In C3, we found MS4A2-rs573790C (p = 0.001). Using genetic models, C1 MS4A2-rs57370 CC (p = 0.001), and ACE-rs4309 CC (p = 0.002) had associations. In C2 ACE-rs4309 CC (p = 0.0001) and C3 MS4A2-rs573790 CC (p = 0.001) were also associate with risk. In the second stage, only MS4A2-rs573790 CC had significance in C1 and C3 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.03). We concluded that rs573790 in the MS4A2 gene is the only SNP that supports an association with AERD in Mexican Mestizo patients in both stages of the study.

Complex roles of the old drug aspirin in cancer chemoprevention and therapy

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent aspirin is widely used for preventing and treating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. In addition, epidemiologic evidences reveal that aspirin may prevent a variety of human cancers, while data on the association between aspirin and some kinds of cancer are conflicting. Preclinical studies and clinical trials also reveal the therapeutic effect of aspirin on cancer. Although cyclooxygenase is a well-known target of aspirin, recent studies uncover other targets of aspirin and its metabolites, such as AMP-activated protein kinase, cyclin-dependent kinase, heparanase, and histone. Accumulating evidence demonstrate that aspirin may act in different cell types, such as epithelial cell, tumor cell, endothelial cell, platelet, and immune cell. Therefore, aspirin acts on diverse hallmarks of cancer, such as sustained tumor growth, metastasis, angiogenesis, inflammation, and immune evasion. In this review, we focus on recent progress in the use of aspirin for cancer chemoprevention and therapy, and integratively analyze the mechanisms underlying the anticancer effects of aspirin and its metabolites. We also discuss mechanisms of aspirin resistance and describe some derivatives of aspirin, which aim to overcome the adverse effects of aspirin.