Malignant granular cell tumors: the role of electron microscopy in the definitive diagnosis of an extremely aggressive soft tissue neoplasm

Expression of Melan-A in cutaneous granular cell tumours: a diagnostic pitfall

Morphological overlap exists between cutaneous granular cell tumours (GCT) and malignant melanoma, with the melanocyte-specific markers HMB45 and Melan-A commonly used to support the diagnosis of melanoma. We recently encountered several cases of GCT in our practice showing strong expression of Melan-A. The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of positive immunohistochemical staining for Melan-A and HMB45 in a series of unequivocal GCTs. We also aimed to assess the prevalence of staining for PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma), a marker expressed in >80% of primary melanomas as well as many non-melanocytic tumours. A total of 20 cutaneous/subcutaneous GCTs were evaluated using Melan-A, HMB45 and PRAME immunohistochemistry. Staining for Melan-A and HMB45 was scored using a semiquantitative scale from 0 (absent) to 3+ (staining present in >50% of tumour cells). PRAME expression was recorded as either positive (>75% of cell nuclei staining) or negative. Melan-A expression was observed in four GCTs (20%), with strong and diffuse (3+) staining seen in two cases (10%), both from anogenital areas. Weak patchy nuclear PRAME expression was seen in every case, interpreted to be negative. HMB45 was also negative in all cases (100%). Our study demonstrates that Melan-A expression can be strong and diffuse in a subset of otherwise unequivocal cutaneous GCTs, which may cause diagnostic confusion with malignant melanoma. HMB45 and PRAME did not stain any of the GCTs in our series.

Case report: Giant atypical granular cell tumor of the median nerve

Granular cell tumors are extremely uncommon soft tissue neoplasms that mostly occur in the head and neck regions. Granular cell tumors are generally benign, asymptomatic, and rarely involve the median nerve. Due to the lack of awareness about granular cell tumors, they are easily misdiagnosed and mistreated in primary hospitals. Here, we report a giant atypical granular cell tumor located on the median nerve, approximately 12 cm in size, with unusual symptoms of median nerve damage. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a fusiform mass that was hyperintense on T2-weighted images and iso-hypointense on T1-weighted images. The mass was subsequently biopsied and found to be a granular cell tumor. The tumor was resected, and a pathological examination was performed. Pathological examination revealed necrotic foci, abundant eosinophilic granules, pustular ovoid bodies, and multiple mitoses. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the tumor cells were positive for S-100, CD68, SMA, SOX-10, Calretinin, and TFE3. The integrated diagnosis was an atypical granular cell tumor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an atypical granular cell tumor involving the median nerve. Furthermore, we comprehensively reviewed the existing literature to provide a concise summary of the diagnostic criteria, imaging findings, and pathological features of granular cell tumors. Given the high recurrence and metastasis rates of this disease, granular cell tumors of the median nerve should be considered when a patient presents with symptoms of median nerve impairment. The diagnosis of atypical granular cell tumors relies on pathological examination. In addition, extensive resection and long-term follow-up are necessary to improve prognosis.

A Case of Synchronous Malignant and Benign Granular Cell Tumor of the Vulva

Granular cell tumors (GCT) are rare soft tissue neoplasms, which seldom occur in the vulva. They are more commonly benign, but malignant GCT do occur. We report a case of a 50-yr-old postmenopausal woman who presented with a vulvar lesion that was diagnosed as GCT on biopsy. Imaging and clinical examination revealed an enlarged, likely positive lymph node. Pathology of the subsequently resected total deep vulvectomy specimen showed 2 histologically distinct GCTs. The larger lesion met criteria for malignancy and histologically corresponded to metastatic deposits seen in the pelvic lymph nodes. The separate smaller lesion was histologically benign. This case illustrates a malignant GCT with a synchronous, likely benign GCT both occurring in the vulva. Our case demonstrates the application of histologic criteria in the diagnosis of malignant and benign GCT with discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of this rare tumor.