Personality, Leadership Style, and Theoretical Orientation as Predictors of Group Co-Leadership Satisfaction

Ruptures and Repairs in Group Psychotherapy: From Theory to Practice

The group climate, cohesion, and alliance with the leaders are critical elements of effective group psychotherapy. Although there has been significant attention to these curative mechanisms, there has been less attention to ruptures in the group relationships or the repair of them. The current special issue is devoted to theory, research, training, and practice regarding ruptures and repairs in group treatment. Contemporary and more traditional theorists describe how ruptures facilitate change in group therapy. Researchers apply the empirical findings on ruptures in individual therapy to group therapy and describe how ruptures can be measured. Group therapists also address how group leaders can contribute to ruptures and their subsequent repair. This introduction to the special issue concludes with the implications for practice and a call for future research that will help us fully understand how ruptures affect group process and outcomes in group work.

A Psychoanalytical Perspective on the Co-therapeutic Relationship With a Group of Siblings of Children With Autism: An Observational Study of Communicative Behavior Patterns

A child diagnosed with autism may have a negative psychological and behavioral impact on their siblings, whose participation in a group with children in the same situation is a preventive measure. Our group study was conducted by two therapists (T1 and T2) assigned to co-therapy (CT) work. Both therapists shared the theoretical bases and understanding of the group and the needs of the individual subjects, and complemented each other in terms of the direction of their interventions, given that shared impressions and continuous exchanges that integrate countertransference aspects are essential to successful co-therapy. The objectives of this study were as follows: (a) to detect patterns of clarification, confrontation, and interpretation interventions by T1 and T2 in the group; and (b) to detect patterns of clarification, confrontation and interpretation interventions considering T1 and T2 as the only focal subject of the CT. Design was mixed-methods based on systematic observation, for which we developed a qualitative ad hoc instrument that combined a field format and a categorizing system. Interobserver agreement was analyzed quantitatively using Cohen's kappa and Krippendorf's canonical concordance. Once data reliability was confirmed, lag sequential analysis using GSEQ5 software was performed to search for behavior patterns. The results show (a) different behavior patterns in the clarification, confrontation, and interpretation interventions by T1 and T2; and (b) different behavior patterns when T1 and T2 are considered as the focal subject (CT). Our study offers a new perspective on the impact of therapist interventions on participants in this kind of group.

Coleadership Among Chief Residents: Exploration of Experiences Across Specialties

BACKGROUND

Many departments have multiple chief residents. How these coleaders relate to each other could affect their performance, the residency program, and the department.

OBJECTIVE

This article reports on how co-chiefs work together during the chief year, and what may allow them to be more effective coleaders.

METHODS

A phenomenological research design was used to investigate experiences of outgoing chief residents from 13 specialties at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics over a 2-year period from 2012 through 2013. Thematic analysis of semistructured interviews was conducted to investigate commonalities and recommendations.

RESULTS

Face-to-face interviews with 19 chief residents from 13 different specialties identified experiences that helped co-chiefs work effectively with each other in orienting new co-chiefs, setting goals and expectations, making decisions, managing interpersonal conflict, leadership styles, communicating, working with program directors, and providing evaluations and feedback. Although the interviewed chief residents received guidance on how to be an effective chief resident, none had been given advice on how to effectively work with a co-chief, and 26% (5 of 19) of the respondents reported having an ineffective working relationship with their co-chief.

CONCLUSIONS

Chief residents often colead in carrying out their multiple functions. To successfully function in a multichief environment, chief residents may benefit from a formal co-orientation in which they discuss goals and expectations, agree on a decision-making process, understand each other's leadership style, and receive feedback on their efficacy as leaders.

Therapist characteristics that predict the outcome of multipatient psychotherapy: systematic review of empirical studies

We defined multipatient psychotherapy as the set of psychotherapeutic techniques applied with more than one patient in the room. Assumptions of what makes a psychotherapist effective guide training programmes but may not be supported by evidence. We need to identify the empirical data on what makes a multipatient psychotherapist effective. We undertook the systematic review of empirical studies which correlate therapist characteristics with measurable patient outcome in multipatient psychotherapy. We found that the scientific literature on the topic is broad and heterogeneous in scope, studying demographic, professional and psychosocial characteristics of the therapists, but is poor in quality. The most solid results are that ethnic matching improves the outcome of family therapy with drug abusing adolescents in some ethnic minorities and that therapist knowledge patterns affect patient satisfaction. We concluded that the therapist characteristics that affect clinical outcome seem to be internal to the therapist and depend on the patient treated.