Physiological mechanisms underlying heat-induced radiosensitization

Quantitative analysis of radiosensitizing effect for magnetic hyperthermia-radiation combined therapy on prostate cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in the field of radiation oncology due to its superior precision in controlling temperature and managing the heating area compared to conventional hyperthermia. Recent studies have proposed solutions to address clinical safety concerns associated with MHT, which arise from the use of highly concentrated magnetic nanoparticles and the strong magnetic field needed to induce hyperthermic effects. Despite these efforts, challenges remain in quantifying therapeutic outcomes and developing treatment plan systems for combining MHT with radiation therapy (RT).

PURPOSE

This study aims to quantitatively measure the therapeutic effect, including radiation dose enhancement (RDE) in the magnetic hyperthermia-radiation combined therapy (MHRT), using the equivalent radiation dose (EQD) estimation method.

METHODS

To conduct EQD estimation for MHRT, we compared the therapeutic effects between the conventional hyperthermia-radiation combined therapy (HTRT) and MHRT in human prostate cancer cell lines, PC3 and LNCaP. We adopted a clonogenic assay to validate RDE and the radiosensitizing effect induced by MHT. The data on survival fractions were analyzed using both the linear-quadradic model and Arrhenius model to estimate the biological parameters describing RDE and radiosensitizing effect of MHRT for both cell lines through maximum likelihood estimation. Based on these parameters, a new survival fraction model was suggested for EQD estimation of MHRT.

RESULTS

The newly designed model describing the MHRT effect, effectively captures the variations in thermal and radiation dose for both cell lines (R2 > 0.95), and its suitability was confirmed through the normality test of residuals. This model appropriately describes the survival fractions up to 10 Gy for PC3 cells and 8 Gy for LNCaP cells under RT-only conditions. Furthermore, using the newly defined parameter r, the RDE effect was calculated as 29% in PC3 cells and 23% in LNCaP cells. EQDMHRT calculated through this model was 9.47 Gy for PC3 and 4.71 Gy for LNCaP when given 2 Gy and MHT for 30 min. Compared to EQDHTRT, EQDMHRT showed a 26% increase for PC3 and a 20% increase for LNCaP.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed model effectively describes the changes of the survival fraction induced by MHRT in both cell lines and adequately represents actual data values through residual analysis. Newly suggested parameter r for RDE effect shows potential for quantitative comparisons between HTRT and MHRT, and optimizing therapeutic outcomes in MHRT for prostate cancer.

Treatment of Pelvic and Spinal Bone Metastases: Radiotherapy and Hyperthermia Alone vs. in Combination

Painful pelvic and spinal bone metastases are a considerable challenge for doctors and patients. Conventional therapies include morphine-equivalent medication (MeM) and local radiotherapy (RT), but these interventions are not always successful. More recently, hyperthermia (HT) has been applied to complement RT and MeM, and this complex approach has shown promising synergistic results. The objective of our study was to present the results of RT combined with a special kind of HT (modulated electrohyperthermia, mEHT), in which some of the thermal effect is contributed by equivalent nonthermal components, drastically reducing the necessary power and energy. This retrospective study included 61 patients divided into three groups with pelvic and spinal bone metastases to compare the effects of RT and mEHT alone and in combination (RT + mEHT). A detailed evaluation of pain intensity, measured by the brief pain inventory score, MeM use, and breakthrough pain episodes, revealed no significant differences between RT and mEHT alone; thus, these individual methods were considered equivalent. However, RT + mEHT yielded significantly better results in terms of the above parameters. Clinically, mEHT has a lower risk of adverse thermal effects, and due to its efficacy, mEHT can be used to treat RT-resistant lesions.

Digoxin-Mediated Inhibition of Potential Hypoxia-Related Angiogenic Repair in Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia (mEHT)-Treated Murine Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Model

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive breast cancer type with no targeted therapy and hence limited treatment options. Modulated electrohyperthermia (mEHT) is a novel complementary therapy where a 13.56 MHz radiofrequency current targets cancer cells selectively, inducing tumor damage by thermal and electromagnetic effects. We observed severe vascular damage in mEHT-treated tumors and investigated the potential synergism between mEHT and inhibition of tumor vasculature recovery in our TNBC mouse model. 4T1/4T07 isografts were orthotopically inoculated and treated three to five times with mEHT. mEHT induced vascular damage 4-12 h after treatment, leading to tissue hypoxia detected at 24 h. Hypoxia in treated tumors induced an angiogenic recovery 24 h after the last treatment. Administration of the cardiac glycoside digoxin with the potential hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF1-α) and angiogenesis inhibitory effects could synergistically augment mEHT-mediated tumor damage and reduce tissue hypoxia signaling and consequent vascular recovery in mEHT-treated TNBC tumors. Conclusively, repeated mEHT induced vascular damage and hypoxic stress in TNBC that promoted vascular recovery. Inhibiting this hypoxic stress signaling enhanced the effectiveness of mEHT and may potentially enhance other forms of cancer treatment.

The Relevance of High Temperatures and Short Time Intervals Between Radiation Therapy and Hyperthermia: Insights in Terms of Predicted Equivalent Enhanced Radiation Dose

PURPOSE

The radiosensitization effect of hyperthermia can be considered and quantified as an enhanced equivalent radiation dose (EQD_RT), that is, the dose needed to achieve the same effect without hyperthermia. EQD_RT can be predicted using an extended linear quadratic model, with temperature-dependent parameters. Clinical data show that both the achieved temperature and time interval between radiation therapy and hyperthermia correlate with clinical outcome, but their effect on expected EQD_RT is unknown and was therefore evaluated in this study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Biological modeling was performed using our in-house developed software (X-Term), considering a 23- × 2-Gy external beam radiation scheme, as applied for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. First, the EQD_RT was calculated for homogeneous temperature levels, evaluating time intervals between 0 and 4 hours. Next, realistic heterogeneous hyperthermia treatment plans were combined with radiation therapy plans and the EQD_RT was calculated for 10 patients. Furthermore, the effect of achieving 0.5°C to 1°C lower or higher temperatures was evaluated.

RESULTS

EQD_RT increases substantially with both increasing temperature and decreasing time interval. The effect of the time interval is most pronounced at higher temperatures (>41°C). At a typical hyperthermic temperature level of 41.5°C, an enhancement of ∼10 Gy can be realized with a 0-hour time interval, which is decreased to only ∼4 Gy enhancement with a 4-hour time interval. Most enhancement is already lost after 1 hour. Evaluation in patients predicted an average additional EQD_RT (D95%) of 2.2 and 6.3 Gy for 4- and 0-hour time intervals, respectively. The effect of 0.5°C to 1°C lower or higher temperatures is most pronounced at high temperature levels and short time intervals. The additional EQD_RT (D95%) ranged between 1.5 and 3.3 Gy and between 4.5 and 8.5 Gy for 4- and 0-hour time intervals, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biological modeling provides relevant insight into the relationship between treatment parameters and expected EQD_RT. Both high temperatures and short time intervals are essential to maximize EQD_RT.

From Localized Mild Hyperthermia to Improved Tumor Oxygenation: Physiological Mechanisms Critically Involved in Oncologic Thermo-Radio-Immunotherapy

(1) Background: Mild hyperthermia (mHT, 39-42 °C) is a potent cancer treatment modality when delivered in conjunction with radiotherapy. mHT triggers a series of therapeutically relevant biological mechanisms, e.g., it can act as a radiosensitizer by improving tumor oxygenation, the latter generally believed to be the commensurate result of increased blood flow, and it can positively modulate protective anticancer immune responses. However, the extent and kinetics of tumor blood flow (TBF) changes and tumor oxygenation are variable during and after the application of mHT. The interpretation of these spatiotemporal heterogeneities is currently not yet fully clarified. (2) Aim and methods: We have undertaken a systematic literature review and herein provide a comprehensive insight into the potential impact of mHT on the clinical benefits of therapeutic modalities such as radio- and immuno-therapy. (3) Results: mHT-induced increases in TBF are multifactorial and differ both spatially and with time. In the short term, changes are preferentially caused by vasodilation of co-opted vessels and of upstream normal tissue vessels as well as by improved hemorheology. Sustained TBF increases are thought to result from a drastic reduction of interstitial pressure, thus restoring adequate perfusion pressures and/or HIF-1α- and VEGF-mediated activation of angiogenesis. The enhanced oxygenation is not only the result of mHT-increased TBF and, thus, oxygen availability but also of heat-induced higher O₂ diffusivities, acidosis- and heat-related enhanced O₂ unloading from red blood cells. (4) Conclusions: Enhancement of tumor oxygenation achieved by mHT cannot be fully explained by TBF changes alone. Instead, a series of additional, complexly linked physiological mechanisms are crucial for enhancing tumor oxygenation, almost doubling the initial O₂ tensions in tumors.

A Novel Concept of Transperineal Focused Ultrasound Transducer for Prostate Cancer Local Deep Hyperthermia Treatments

Design, embodiment, and experimental study of a novel concept of extracorporeal phased array ultrasound transducer for prostate cancer regional deep hyperthermia treatments using a transperineal acoustic window is presented. An optimized design of hyperthermia applicator was derived from a modelling software where acoustic and thermal fields were computed based on anatomical data. Performance tests have been experimentally conducted on gel phantoms and tissues, under 3T MRI guidance using PRFS thermometry. Feedback controlled hyperthermia (ΔT = 5 °C during 20min) was performed on two ex vivo lamb carcasses with prostate mimicking pelvic tissue, to demonstrate capability of spatio-temporal temperature control and to assess potential risks and side effects. Our optimization approach yielded a therapeutic ultrasound transducer consisting of 192 elements of variable shape and surface, pseudo randomly distributed on 6 columns, using a frequency of 700 kHz. Radius of curvature was 140 mm and active water circulation was included for cooling. The measured focusing capabilities covered a volume of 24 × 50 × 60 mm³. Acoustic coupling of excellent quality was achieved. No interference was detected between sonication and MR acquisitions. On ex vivo experiments the target temperature elevation of 5 °C was reached after 5 min and maintained during another 15 min with the predictive temperature controller showing 0.2 °C accuracy. No significant temperature rise was observed on skin and bonny structures. Reported results represent a promising step toward the implementation of transperineal ultrasound hyperthermia in a pilot study of reirradiation in prostate cancer patients.

Biological modeling in thermoradiotherapy: present status and ongoing developments toward routine clinical use

Biological modeling for anti-cancer treatments using mathematical models can be very supportive in gaining more insight into dynamic processes responsible for cellular response to treatment, and predicting, evaluating and optimizing therapeutic effects of treatment. This review presents an overview of the current status of biological modeling for hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy (thermoradiotherapy). Various distinct models have been proposed in the literature, with varying complexity; initially aiming to model the effect of hyperthermia alone, and later on to predict the effect of the combined thermoradiotherapy treatment. Most commonly used models are based on an extension of the linear-quadratic (LQ)-model enabling an easy translation to radiotherapy where the LQ model is widely used. Basic predictions of cell survival have further progressed toward 3 D equivalent dose predictions, i.e., the radiation dose that would be needed without hyperthermia to achieve the same biological effect as the combined thermoradiotherapy treatment. This approach, with the use of temperature-dependent model parameters, allows theoretical evaluation of the effectiveness of different treatment strategies in individual patients, as well as in patient cohorts. This review discusses the significant progress that has been made in biological modeling for hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy. In the future, when adequate temperature-dependent LQ-parameters will be available for a large number of tumor sites and normal tissues, biological modeling can be expected to be of great clinical importance to further optimize combined treatments, optimize clinical protocols and guide further clinical studies.

Metal-Based Nanostructured Therapeutic Strategies for Glioblastoma Treatment-An Update

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most commonly diagnosed and most lethal primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Standard treatments are ineffective, and despite promising results obtained in early phases of experimental clinical trials, the prognosis of GBM remains unfavorable. Therefore, there is need for exploration and development of innovative methods that aim to establish new therapies or increase the effectiveness of existing therapies. One of the most exciting new strategies enabling combinatory treatment is the usage of nanocarriers loaded with chemotherapeutics and/or other anticancer compounds. Nanocarriers exhibit unique properties in antitumor therapy, as they allow highly efficient drug transport into cells and sustained intracellular accumulation of the delivered cargo. They can be infused into and are retained by GBM tumors, and potentially can bypass the blood-brain barrier. One of the most promising and extensively studied groups of nanostructured therapeutics are metal-based nanoparticles. These theranostic nanocarriers demonstrate relatively low toxicity, thus they might be applied for both diagnosis and therapy. In this article, we provide an update on metal-based nanostructured constructs in the treatment of GBM. We focus on the interaction of metal nanoparticles with various forms of electromagnetic radiation for use in photothermal, photodynamic, magnetic hyperthermia and ionizing radiation sensitization applications.

Accurate Three-Dimensional Thermal Dosimetry and Assessment of Physiologic Response Are Essential for Optimizing Thermoradiotherapy

Numerous randomized trials have revealed that hyperthermia (HT) + radiotherapy or chemotherapy improves local tumor control, progression free and overall survival vs. radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Despite these successes, however, some individuals fail combination therapy; not every patient will obtain maximal benefit from HT. There are many potential reasons for failure. In this paper, we focus on how HT influences tumor hypoxia, since hypoxia negatively influences radiotherapy and chemotherapy response as well as immune surveillance. Pre-clinically, it is well established that reoxygenation of tumors in response to HT is related to the time and temperature of exposure. In most pre-clinical studies, reoxygenation occurs only during or shortly after a HT treatment. If this were the case clinically, then it would be challenging to take advantage of HT induced reoxygenation. An important question, therefore, is whether HT induced reoxygenation occurs in the clinic that is of radiobiological significance. In this review, we will discuss the influence of thermal history on reoxygenation in both human and canine cancers treated with thermoradiotherapy. Results of several clinical series show that reoxygenation is observed and persists for 24-48 h after HT. Further, reoxygenation is associated with treatment outcome in thermoradiotherapy trials as assessed by: (1) a doubling of pathologic complete response (pCR) in human soft tissue sarcomas, (2) a 14 mmHg increase in pO2 of locally advanced breast cancers achieving a clinical response vs. a 9 mmHg decrease in pO2 of locally advanced breast cancers that did not respond and (3) a significant correlation between extent of reoxygenation (as assessed by pO2 probes and hypoxia marker drug immunohistochemistry) and duration of local tumor control in canine soft tissue sarcomas. The persistence of reoxygenation out to 24-48 h post HT is distinctly different from most reported rodent studies. In these clinical series, comparison of thermal data with physiologic response shows that within the same tumor, temperatures at the higher end of the temperature distribution likely kill cells, resulting in reduced oxygen consumption rate, while lower temperatures in the same tumor improve perfusion. However, reoxygenation does not occur in all subjects, leading to significant uncertainty about the thermal-physiologic relationship. This uncertainty stems from limited knowledge about the spatiotemporal characteristics of temperature and physiologic response. We conclude with recommendations for future research with emphasis on retrieving co-registered thermal and physiologic data before and after HT in order to begin to unravel complex thermophysiologic interactions that appear to occur with thermoradiotherapy.

Heterogeneous Heat Absorption Is Complementary to Radiotherapy

Simple Summary

This review shows the advantages of heterogeneous heating of selected malignant cells in harmonic synergy with radiotherapy. The main clinical achievement of this complementary therapy is its extreme safety and minimal adverse effects. Combining the two methods opens a bright perspective, transforming the local radiotherapy to the antitumoral impact on the whole body, destroying the distant metastases by “teaching” the immune system about the overall danger of malignancy.

Abstract

(1) Background: Hyperthermia in oncology conventionally seeks the homogeneous heating of the tumor mass. The expected isothermal condition is the basis of the dose calculation in clinical practice. My objective is to study and apply a heterogenic temperature pattern during the heating process and show how it supports radiotherapy. (2) Methods: The targeted tissue’s natural electric and thermal heterogeneity is used for the selective heating of the cancer cells. The amplitude-modulated radiofrequency current focuses the energy absorption on the membrane rafts of the malignant cells. The energy partly “nonthermally” excites and partly heats the absorbing protein complexes. (3) Results: The excitation of the transmembrane proteins induces an extrinsic caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway, while the heat stress promotes the intrinsic caspase-dependent and independent apoptotic signals generated by mitochondria. The molecular changes synergize the method with radiotherapy and promote the abscopal effect. The mild average temperature (39–41 °C) intensifies the blood flow for promoting oxygenation in combination with radiotherapy. The preclinical experiences verify, and the clinical studies validate the method. (4) Conclusions: The heterogenic, molecular targeting has similarities with DNA strand-breaking in radiotherapy. The controlled energy absorption allows using a similar energy dose to radiotherapy (J/kg). The two therapies are synergistically combined.

Post-operative re-irradiation with hyperthermia in locoregional breast cancer recurrence: Temperature matters

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of hyperthermia thermal dose (TD) on locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity in locoregional recurrent breast cancer patients treated with postoperative re-irradiation and hyperthermia.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 112 women with resected locoregional recurrent breast cancer treated in 2010-2017 with postoperative re-irradiation 8frx4Gy (n = 34) or 23frx2Gy (n = 78), combined with 4-5 weekly hyperthermia sessions guided by invasive thermometry, were subdivided into 'low' (n = 56) and 'high' TD (n = 56) groups by the best session with highest median cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (Best CEM43T50) < 7.2 min and ≥7.2 min, respectively. Actuarial LRC, OS and late toxicity incidence were analyzed. Backward multivariable Cox regression and inverse probability weighting (IPW) analysis were performed.

RESULTS

TD subgroups showed no significant differences in patient/treatment characteristics. Median follow-up was 43 months (range 1-107 months). High vs. low TD was associated with LRC (p = 0.0013), but not with OS (p = 0.29) or late toxicity (p = 0.58). Three-year LRC was 74.0% vs. 92.3% in the low and high TD group, respectively (p = 0.008). After three years, 25.0% and 0.9% of the patients had late toxicity grade 3 and 4, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that distant metastasis (HR 17.6; 95%CI 5.2-60.2), lymph node involvement (HR 2.9; 95%CI 1.2-7.2), recurrence site (chest wall vs. breast; HR 4.6; 95%CI 1.8-11.6) and TD (low vs. high; HR 4.1; 95%CI 1.4-11.5) were associated with LRC. TD was associated with LRC in IPW analysis (p = 0.0018).

CONCLUSIONS

High thermal dose (best CEM43T50 ≥ 7.2 min) was associated with significantly higher LRC for patients with locoregional recurrent breast cancer treated with postoperative re-irradiation and hyperthermia, without augmenting toxicity.

Targeting Hypoxia: Revival of Old Remedies

Tumour hypoxia is significantly correlated with patient survival and treatment outcomes. At the molecular level, hypoxia is a major driving factor for tumour progression and aggressiveness. Despite the accumulative scientific and clinical efforts to target hypoxia, there is still a need to find specific treatments for tumour hypoxia. In this review, we discuss a variety of approaches to alter the low oxygen tumour microenvironment or hypoxia pathways including carbogen breathing, hyperthermia, hypoxia-activated prodrugs, tumour metabolism and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibitors. The recent advances in technology and biological understanding reveal the importance of revisiting old therapeutic regimens and repurposing their uses clinically.

Therapeutic Modification of Hypoxia

Regions of reduced oxygenation (hypoxia) are a characteristic feature of virtually all animal and human solid tumours. Numerous preclinical studies, both in vitro and in vivo, have shown that decreasing oxygen concentration induces resistance to radiation. Importantly, hypoxia in human tumours is a negative indicator of radiotherapy outcome. Hypoxia also contributes to resistance to other cancer therapeutics, including immunotherapy, and increases malignant progression as well as cancer cell dissemination. Consequently, substantial effort has been made to detect hypoxia in human tumours and identify realistic approaches to overcome hypoxia and improve cancer therapy outcomes. Hypoxia-targeting strategies include improving oxygen availability, sensitising hypoxic cells to radiation, preferentially killing these cells, locating the hypoxic regions in tumours and increasing the radiation dose to those areas, or applying high energy transfer radiation, which is less affected by hypoxia. Despite numerous clinical studies with each of these hypoxia-modifying approaches, many of which improved both local tumour control and overall survival, hypoxic modification has not been established in routine clinical practice. Here we review the background and significance of hypoxia, how it can be imaged clinically and focus on the various hypoxia-modifying techniques that have undergone, or are currently in, clinical evaluation.

Visualization of thermal washout due to spatiotemporally heterogenous perfusion in the application of a model-based control algorithm for MR-HIFU mediated hyperthermia

PURPOSE

This article will report results from the in-vivo application of a previously published model-predictive control algorithm for MR-HIFU hyperthermia. The purpose of the investigation was to test the controller's in-vivo performance and behavior in the presence of heterogeneous perfusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hyperthermia at 42°C was induced and maintained for up to 30 min in a circular section of a thermometry slice in the biceps femoris of German landrace pigs (n=5) using a commercial MR-HIFU system and a recently developed MPC algorithm. The heating power allocation was correlated with heat sink maps and contrast-enhanced MRI images. The temporal change in perfusion was estimated based on the power required to maintain hyperthermia.

RESULTS

The controller performed well throughout the treatments with an absolute average tracking error of 0.27 ± 0.15 °C and an average difference of 1.25 ± 0.22 °C between T10 and T90. The MPC algorithm allocates additional heating power to sub-volumes with elevated heat sink effects, which are colocalized with blood vessels visible on contrast-enhanced MRI. The perfusion appeared to have increased by at least a factor of ∼1.86 on average.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPC controller generates temperature distributions with a narrow spectrum of voxel temperatures inside the target ROI despite the presence of spatiotemporally heterogeneous perfusion due to the rapid thermometry feedback available with MR-HIFU and the flexible allocation of heating power. The visualization of spatiotemporally heterogeneous perfusion presents new research opportunities for the investigation of stimulated perfusion in hypoxic tumor regions.

Photodynamic Therapy and Hyperthermia in Combination Treatment-Neglected Forces in the Fight against Cancer

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in humans. Despite the progress in cancer treatment, and an increase in the effectiveness of diagnostic methods, cancer is still highly lethal and very difficult to treat in many cases. Combination therapy, in the context of cancer treatment, seems to be a promising option that may allow minimizing treatment side effects and may have a significant impact on the cure. It may also increase the effectiveness of anti-cancer therapies. Moreover, combination treatment can significantly increase delivery of drugs to cancerous tissues. Photodynamic therapy and hyperthermia seem to be ideal examples that prove the effectiveness of combination therapy. These two kinds of therapy can kill cancer cells through different mechanisms and activate various signaling pathways. Both PDT and hyperthermia play significant roles in the perfusion of a tumor and the network of blood vessels wrapped around it. The main goal of combination therapy is to combine separate mechanisms of action that will make cancer cells more sensitive to a given therapeutic agent. Such an approach in treatment may contribute toward increasing its effectiveness, optimizing the cancer treatment process in the future.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

Mathematical model for the thermal enhancement of radiation response: thermodynamic approach

Radiotherapy can effectively kill malignant cells, but the doses required to cure cancer patients may inflict severe collateral damage to adjacent healthy tissues. Recent technological advances in the clinical application has revitalized hyperthermia treatment (HT) as an option to improve radiotherapy (RT) outcomes. Understanding the synergistic effect of simultaneous thermoradiotherapy via mathematical modelling is essential for treatment planning. We here propose a theoretical model in which the thermal enhancement ratio (TER) relates to the cell fraction being radiosensitised by the infliction of sublethal damage through HT. Further damage finally kills the cell or abrogates its proliferative capacity in a non-reversible process. We suggest the TER to be proportional to the energy invested in the sensitisation, which is modelled as a simple rate process. Assuming protein denaturation as the main driver of HT-induced sublethal damage and considering the temperature dependence of the heat capacity of cellular proteins, the sensitisation rates were found to depend exponentially on temperature; in agreement with previous empirical observations. Our findings point towards an improved definition of thermal dose in concordance with the thermodynamics of protein denaturation. Our predictions well reproduce experimental in vitro and in vivo data, explaining the thermal modulation of cellular radioresponse for simultaneous thermoradiotherapy.

The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors

Nanomaterial (NM) delivery to solid tumors has been the focus of intense research for over a decade. Classically, scientists have tried to improve NM delivery by employing passive or active targeting strategies, making use of the so-called enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. This phenomenon is made possible due to the leaky tumor vasculature through which NMs can leave the bloodstream, traverse through the gaps in the endothelial lining of the vessels, and enter the tumor. Recent studies have shown that despite many efforts to employ the EPR effect, this process remains very poor. Furthermore, the role of the EPR effect has been called into question, where it has been suggested that NMs enter the tumor via active mechanisms and not through the endothelial gaps. In this review, we provide a short overview of the EPR and mechanisms to enhance it, after which we focus on alternative delivery strategies that do not solely rely on EPR in itself but can offer interesting pharmacological, physical, and biological solutions for enhanced delivery. We discuss the strengths and shortcomings of these different strategies and suggest combinatorial approaches as the ideal path forward.

Does the combination of hyperthermia with low LET (linear energy transfer) radiation induce anti-tumor effects equivalent to those seen with high LET radiation alone?

INTRODUCTION

The combination of hyperthermia with low LET (linear energy transfer) radiation may have similar anti-tumor effects as high LET radiation alone. This pre-clinical study determined the optimal heating temperature and time interval between radiation and heat to achieve this equivalent effect.

METHODS

C3H mammary carcinomas (200 mm³ in size) growing in the right rear foot of CDF1 mice was used in all experiments. Tumors were locally irradiated with graded doses of either 240 kV ortho- or 6 MV mega-voltage X-rays to produce full dose-response curves. Heating (41.0-43.5 °C; 60 min) was achieved by immersing the tumor bearing foot in a water-bath applied at the same time, or up to 4-hours after, irradiating. The endpoint was the percentage of mice showing local tumor control at 90 days, with enhancements calculated from the ratios of the radiation doses causing 50% tumor control (± 95% confidence intervals).

RESULTS

Previous published results in this tumor model reported that carbon ions were 1.3-1.7 times more effective than low LET radiation at inducing tumor control. Similar enhancements occurred with a temperature of only 41.0 °C with a simultaneous heat and radiation treatment. However, higher temperatures were needed with the introduction of any interval; at 42.5 °C, the enhancement was 2.5 with a simultaneous treatment, decreasing to a value within the carbon ion range with a 4-hour interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining hyperthermia with low LET radiation can be as effective as high LET at inducing tumor control, but the temperature needed depended on the time interval between the two modalities.

Systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical devices for magnetic resonance-guided radiofrequency hyperthermia

Clinical trials have demonstrated the therapeutic benefits of adding radiofrequency (RF) hyperthermia (HT) as an adjuvant to radio- and chemotherapy. However, maximum utilization of these benefits is hampered by the current inability to maintain the temperature within the desired range. RF HT treatment quality is usually monitored by invasive temperature sensors, which provide limited data sampling and are prone to infection risks. Magnetic resonance (MR) temperature imaging has been developed to overcome these hurdles by allowing noninvasive 3D temperature monitoring in the target and normal tissues. To exploit this feature, several approaches for inserting the RF heating devices into the MR scanner have been proposed over the years. In this review, we summarize the status quo in MR-guided RF HT devices and analyze trends in these hybrid hardware configurations. In addition, we discuss the various approaches, extract best practices and identify gaps regarding the experimental validation procedures for MR - RF HT, aimed at converging to a common standard in this process.

Enhancement of HIFU thermal therapy in perfused tissue models using micron-sized FTAC-stabilized PFOB-core endovascular sonosensitizers

BACKGROUND

High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is clinically accepted for the treatment of solid tumors but remains challenging in highly perfused tissue due to the heat sink effect. Endovascular liquid-core sonosensitizers have been previously suggested to enhance the thermal energy deposition at the focal area and to lower the near-/far-field heating. We are investigating the therapeutic potential of PFOB-FTAC micro-droplets in a perfused tissue-mimicking model and postmortem excised organs.

METHOD

A custom-made in vitro perfused tissue-mimicking model, freshly excised pig kidneys (n = 3) and liver (n = 1) were perfused and subjected to focused ultrasound generated by an MR-compatible HIFU transducer. PFOB-FTAC sonosensitizers were injected in the perfusion fluid up to 0.235% v/v ratio. Targeting and on-line PRFS thermometry were performed on a 3 T MR scanner. Assessment of the fluid perfusion was performed with pulsed color Doppler in vitro and with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI in excised organs.

RESULTS

Our in vitro model of perfused tissue demonstrated re-usability. Sonosensitizer concentration and perfusion rate were tunable in situ. Differential heating under equivalent HIFU sonications demonstrated a dramatic improvement in the thermal deposition due to the sonosensitizers activity. Typically, the energy deposition was multiplied by a factor between 2.5 and 3 in perfused organs after the administration of micro-droplets, while DCE-MRI indicated an effective perfusion.

CONCLUSION

The current PFOB-FTAC micro-droplet sonosensitizers provided a large and sustained enhancement of the HIFU thermal deposition at the focal area, suggesting solutions for less technological constraints, lower risk for the near-/far- field heating. We also report a suitable experimental model for other MRgHIFU studies.

Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses

Moderate hyperthermia at temperatures between 40 and 44°C is a multifaceted therapeutic modality. It is a potent radiosensitizer, interacts favorably with a host of chemotherapeutic agents, and, in combination with radiotherapy, enforces immunomodulation akin to “in situ tumor vaccination.” By sensitizing hypoxic tumor cells and inhibiting repair of radiotherapy-induced DNA damage, the properties of hyperthermia delivered together with photons might provide a tumor-selective therapeutic advantage analogous to high linear energy transfer (LET) neutrons, but with less normal tissue toxicity. Furthermore, the high LET attributes of hyperthermia thermoradiobiologically are likely to enhance low LET protons; thus, proton thermoradiotherapy would mimic ¹²C ion therapy. Hyperthermia with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy substantially improves therapeutic outcomes without enhancing normal tissue morbidities, yielding level I evidence reported in several randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various tumor sites. Technological advancements in hyperthermia delivery, advancements in hyperthermia treatment planning, online invasive and non-invasive MR-guided thermometry, and adherence to quality assurance guidelines have ensured safe and effective delivery of hyperthermia to the target region. Novel biological modeling permits integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment plans. Further, hyperthermia along with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA damage repair inhibitors could further augment the therapeutic efficacy resulting in synthetic lethality. Additionally, hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles coupled to selective payloads, namely, tumor-specific radiotheranostics (for both tumor imaging and radionuclide therapy), chemotherapeutic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and gene silencing, could provide a comprehensive tumor-specific theranostic modality akin to “magic (nano)bullets.” To get a realistic overview of the strength (S), weakness (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) of hyperthermia, a SWOT analysis has been undertaken. Additionally, a TOWS analysis categorizes future strategies to facilitate further integration of hyperthermia with the current treatment modalities. These could gainfully accomplish a safe, versatile, and cost-effective enhancement of the existing therapeutic armamentarium to improve outcomes in clinical oncology.

A moderate thermal dose is sufficient for effective free and TSL based thermochemotherapy

Hyperthermia, i.e. heating the tumor to a temperature of 40-43 °C is considered by many a valuable treatment to sensitize tumor cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In recent randomized trials the great potential of adding hyperthermia to chemotherapy was demonstrated for treatment of high risk soft tissue sarcoma: +11.4% 5 yrs. overall survival (OS) and for ovarian cancer with peritoneal involvement nearly +12 months OS gain. As a result interest in combining chemotherapy with hyperthermia, i.e. thermochemotherapy, is growing. Extensive biological research has revealed that hyperthermia causes multiple effects, from direct cell kill to improved oxygenation, whereby each effect has a specific temperature range. Thermal sensitization of the tumor cell for chemotherapy occurs for many drugs at temperatures ranging from 40 to 42 °C with little additional increase of sensitization at higher temperatures. Increasing perfusion/oxygenation and increased extravasation are two other important hyperthermia induced mechanisms. The combination of free drug and hyperthermia has not been found to increase tumor drug concentration. Hence, enhanced effectiveness of free drug will depend on the thermal sensitization of the tumor cells for the applied drug. In contrast to free drugs, experimental animal studies combining hyperthermia and thermo-sensitive liposomal (TSL) drugs delivery have demonstrated to result in a substantial increase of the drug concentration in the tumor. For TSL based chemotherapy, hyperthermia is critical to both increase perfusion and extravasation as well as to trigger TSL drug release, whereby the temperature controlled induction of a local high drug concentration in a highly permeable vessel is driving the enhanced drug uptake in the tumor. Increased drug concentrations up to 26 times have been reported in rodents. Good control of the tissue temperature is required to keep temperatures below 43 °C to prevent vascular stasis. Further, careful timing of the drug application relative to the start of heating is required to benefit optimal from the combined treatment. From the available experimental data it follows that irrespective whether chemotherapy is applied as free drug or using a thermal sensitive liposomal carrier, the optimal thermal dose for thermochemotherapy should be 40-42 °C for 30-60 min, i.e. equivalent to a CEM43 of 1-15 min. Timing is critical: most free drug should be applied simultaneous with heating, whereas TSL drugs should be applied 20-30 min after the start of hyperthermia.

Hyperthermia Treatment Planning Including Convective Flow in Cerebrospinal Fluid for Brain Tumour Hyperthermia Treatment Using a Novel Dedicated Paediatric Brain Applicator

Hyperthermia therapy (40-44 °C) is a promising option to increase efficacy of radiotherapy/chemotherapy for brain tumours, in particular paediatric brain tumours. The Chalmers Hyperthermia Helmet is developed for this purpose. Hyperthermia treatment planning is required for treatment optimisation, but current planning systems do not involve a physically correct model of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This study investigates the necessity of fluid modelling for treatment planning. We made treatments plans using the Helmet for both pre-operative and post-operative cases, comparing temperature distributions predicted with three CSF models: a convective "fluid" model, a non-convective "solid" CSF model, and CSF models with increased effective thermal conductivity ("high-k"). Treatment plans were evaluated by T90, T50 and T10 target temperatures and treatment-limiting hot spots. Adequate heating is possible with the helmet. In the pre-operative case, treatment plan quality was comparable for all three models. In the post-operative case, the high-k models were more accurate than the solid model. Predictions to within ±1 °C were obtained by a 10-20-fold increased effective thermal conductivity. Accurate modelling of the temperature in CSF requires fluid dynamics, but modelling CSF as a solid with enhanced effective thermal conductivity might be a practical alternative for a convective fluid model for many applications.

The Effect of the Time Interval Between Radiation and Hyperthermia on Clinical Outcome in 400 Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma Patients

Background: Addition of deep hyperthermia to radiotherapy results in improved local control (LC) and overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone in cervical carcinoma patients. Based on preclinical data, the time interval between radiotherapy, and hyperthermia is expected to influence treatment outcome. Clinical studies addressing the effect of time interval are sparse. The repercussions for clinical applications are substantial, as the time between radiotherapy and hyperthermia should be kept as short as possible. In this study, we therefore investigated the effect of the time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on treatment outcome. Methods: We analyzed all primary cervical carcinoma patients treated between 1996 and 2016 with thermoradiotherapy at our institute. Data on patients, tumors and treatments were collected, including the thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90. Follow-up data on tumor status and survival as well as late toxicity were collected. Data was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan Meier analysis. Results: 400 patients were included. Kaplan Meier and univariate Cox analysis showed no effect of the time interval (range 30-230 min) on any clinical outcome measure. Besides known prognostic factors, thermal dose parameters TRISE and CEM43T90 had a significant effect on LC. In multivariate analysis, the thermal dose parameter TRISE (HR 0.649; 95% CI 0.501-0.840) and the use of image guided brachytherapy (HR 0.432; 95% CI 0.214-0.972), but not the time interval, were significant predictors of LC and disease specific survival. Conclusions: The time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia, up to 4 h, has no effect on clinical outcome. These results are re-ensuring for our current practice of delivering hyperthermia within maximal 4 h after radiotherapy.

Hyperthermia: The Optimal Treatment to Overcome Radiation Resistant Hypoxia

Regions of low oxygenation (hypoxia) are a characteristic feature of solid tumors, and cells existing in these regions are a major factor influencing radiation resistance as well as playing a significant role in malignant progression. Consequently, numerous pre-clinical and clinical attempts have been made to try and overcome this hypoxia. These approaches involve improving oxygen availability, radio-sensitizing or killing the hypoxic cells, or utilizing high LET (linear energy transfer) radiation leading to a lower OER (oxygen enhancement ratio). Interestingly, hyperthermia (heat treatments of 39⁻45 °C) induces many of these effects. Specifically, it increases blood flow thereby improving tissue oxygenation, radio-sensitizes via DNA repair inhibition, and can kill cells either directly or indirectly by causing vascular damage. Combining hyperthermia with low LET radiation can even result in anti-tumor effects equivalent to those seen with high LET. The various mechanisms depend on the time and sequence between radiation and hyperthermia, the heating temperature, and the time of heating. We will discuss the role these factors play in influencing the interaction between hyperthermia and radiation, and summarize the randomized clinical trials showing a benefit of such a combination as well as suggest the potential future clinical application of this combination.

Hyperthermic chest wall re-irradiation in recurrent breast cancer: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE

To prospectively investigate the role of re-irradiation (re-RT) combined with hyperthermia (HT) in a contemporary cohort of patients affected by recurrent breast cancer (RBC).

METHODS

Within the prospective registry HT03, patients with resected RBC and previous irradiation were included. Re-RT was applied to the recurrence region with doses of 50-50.4 Gy, with a boost up to 60-60.4 Gy to the microscopically or macroscopically positive resection margins (R1/R2) region. Concurrent HT was performed at 40-42 ℃. Primary endpoint was LC. Acute and late toxicity, overall survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

20 patients and 21 RBC were analyzed. Median re-RT dose was 50.4 Gy and a median of 11 HT fractions were applied. Re-RT+HT was well tolerated, with three patients who experienced a grade (G) 3 acute skin toxicity and no cases of ≥G3 late toxicity. With a median follow up of 24.7 months, two local relapses occurred. Ten patients experienced regional and/or distant disease progression. Five patients died, four of them from breast cancer. PFS was favorable in patients treated with re-RT+HT for the first recurrence with doses of 60 Gy. A trend towards better CSS was found in patients with negative or close margins and after doses of 60 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Full-dose re-RT+HT for RBC is well tolerated, provides good LC, and seems to be more effective when applied at the time of the first relapse and after doses of 60 Gy. The registry will be continued for validation in a larger cohort and with longer follow-up.

Magnetic Hyperthermia and Radiation Therapy: Radiobiological Principles and Current Practice †

Hyperthermia, though by itself generally non-curative for cancer, can significantly increase the efficacy of radiation therapy, as demonstrated by in vitro, in vivo, and clinical results. Its limited use in the clinic is mainly due to various practical implementation difficulties, the most important being how to adequately heat the tumor, especially deep-seated ones. In this work, we first review the effects of hyperthermia on tissue, the limitations of radiation therapy and the radiobiological rationale for combining the two treatment modalities. Subsequently, we review the theory and evidence for magnetic hyperthermia that is based on magnetic nanoparticles, its advantages compared with other methods of hyperthermia, and how it can be used to overcome the problems associated with traditional techniques of hyperthermia.

The effect of time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on planned equivalent radiation dose

PURPOSE

Thermoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the optimal time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia, resulting in the highest therapeutic gain, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of time interval on the therapeutic gain using biological treatment planning.

METHODS

Radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment plans were created for 15 cervical cancer patients. Biological modeling was used to calculate the equivalent radiation dose, that is, the radiation dose that results in the same biological effect as the thermoradiotherapy treatment, for different time intervals ranging from 0-4 h. Subsequently, the thermal enhancement ratio (TER, i.e. the ratio of the dose for the thermoradiotherapy and the radiotherapy-only plan) was calculated for the gross tumor volume (GTV) and the organs at risk (OARs: bladder, rectum, bowel), for each time interval. Finally, the therapeutic gain factor (TGF, i.e. TER_GTV/TER_OAR) was calculated for each OAR.

RESULTS

The median TER_GTV ranged from 1.05 to 1.16 for 4 h and 0 h time interval, respectively. Similarly, for bladder, rectum and bowel, TER_OARs ranged from 1-1.03, 1-1.04 and 1-1.03, respectively. Radiosensitization in the OARs was much less than in the GTV, because temperatures were lower, fractionation sensitivity was higher (lower α/β) and direct cytotoxicity was assumed negligible in normal tissue. TGFs for the three OARs were similar, and were highest (around 1.12) at 0 h time interval.

CONCLUSION

This planning study indicates that the largest therapeutic gain for thermoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients can be obtained when hyperthermia is delivered immediately before or after radiotherapy.

The effect of modulated electro-hyperthermia on temperature and blood flow in human cervical carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Mild hyperthermia has been known to enhance the response of tumours to radiotherapy or chemotherapy by increasing tumour blood flow, thereby increasing tumour oxygenation or drug delivery. The purpose of this study was to assess the changes in temperature and blood flow in human cervical cancer in response to regional heating with modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT).

METHODS

The pelvic area of 20 patients with cervical carcinoma was heated with mEHT. The peri-tumour temperature was measured using an internal organ temperature probe. The tumour blood flow was measured using 3D colour Doppler ultrasound by determining the peak systolic velocity/end-diastolic velocity ratio (S/D ratio) and the resistance index (RI) within blood vessels.

RESULTS

The mean peri-tumour temperature was 36.7 ± 0.2 °C before heating and increased to 38.5 ± 0.8 °C at the end of heating for 60 min. The marked declines in RI and S/D values strongly demonstrated that heating significantly increased tumour blood perfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional heating of the pelvic area with mEHT significantly increased the peri-tumour temperature and improved the blood flow in cervical cancer. This is the first demonstration that the blood flow in cervical cancer is increased by regional hyperthermia. Such increases in temperature and blood flow may account for the clinical observations that hyperthermia improves the response of cervical cancer to radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

Re-irradiation and Hyperthermia in Breast Cancer

Half of locoregional recurrences after breast cancer treatment are isolated events. Restaging should be carried out to select patients for curative salvage treatment. The approach depends on the characteristics of the primary and recurrent cancer, previous locoregional and systemic treatments, site of recurrence, comorbidities and the patient's wishes. A multidisciplinary discussion should be associated with the shared decision-making process. In view of the potential long-term disease-free survival, meticulous target volume delineation and selection of the most appropriate techniques should be used to decrease the risk of toxicity. This overview aims to provide clinicians with tools to manage the different scenarios of breast cancer patients with locoregional recurrences in the context of re-irradiation.

Pharmacological and physical vessel modulation strategies to improve EPR-mediated drug targeting to tumors

The performance of nanomedicine formulations depends on the Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) effect. Prototypic nanomedicine-based drug delivery systems, such as liposomes, polymers and micelles, aim to exploit the EPR effect to accumulate at pathological sites, to thereby improve the balance between drug efficacy and toxicity. Thus far, however, tumor-targeted nanomedicines have not yet managed to achieve convincing therapeutic results, at least not in large cohorts of patients. This is likely mostly due to high inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity in EPR. Besides developing (imaging) biomarkers to monitor and predict EPR, another strategy to address this heterogeneity is the establishment of vessel modulation strategies to homogenize and improve EPR. Over the years, several pharmacological and physical co-treatments have been evaluated to improve EPR-mediated tumor targeting. These include pharmacological strategies, such as vessel permeabilization, normalization, disruption and promotion, as well as physical EPR enhancement via hyperthermia, radiotherapy, sonoporation and phototherapy. In the present manuscript, we summarize exemplary studies showing that pharmacological and physical vessel modulation strategies can be used to improve tumor-targeted drug delivery, and we discuss how these advanced combination regimens can be optimally employed to enhance the (pre-) clinical performance of tumor-targeted nanomedicines.

How gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) and αvβ3 integrin expression reflect reorganization features of tumors after hyperthermia treatments

The outcome of tumor treatment via hyperthermia in the clinic has been reported to be heterogeneous. Here, we assessed how the presence of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) and αvβ3 integrin together with the morphology of the vascularization reflects the growth behavior of tumors after hyperthermia treatment. MDA-MB-231 tumor bearing mice were treated either with high (46 °C) or low dose (42 °C) water hyperthermia for 60 min. Changes of GRPR and αvβ3 integrin expression were assessed via multiplexed optical imaging. Vascularization was reconstructed and quantified by µCT imaging after contrast agent injection. We found that high dose hyperthermia is capable of increasing the expression of GRPR, αvβ3 integrin, CD31, and Ki67 in tumors. Also the morphology of tumor vasculature changed (increased relative blood volume and small-diameter vessel density, decreased expression of α-SMA). Low dose hyperthermia induced comparatively moderate effects on the investigated protein expression pattern and vascular remodeling. We conclude that under defined circumstances, specific temperature doses affect the reorganization of tumor regrowth, which is triggered by residual "dormant" cells even though tumor volumes are transiently decreasing. Further on, GRPR, αvβ3 integrin expression are versatile tools to surveil potential tumor regrow during therapy, beyond the conventional determination of tumor volumes.

Heat-induced BRCA2 degradation in human tumours provides rationale for hyperthermia-PARP-inhibitor combination therapies

PURPOSE

Hyperthermia (40-44 °C) effectively sensitises tumours to radiotherapy by locally altering tumour biology. One of the effects of heat at the cellular level is inhibition of DNA repair by homologous recombination via degradation of the BRCA2-protein. This suggests that hyperthermia can expand the group of patients that benefit from PARP-inhibitors, a drug exploiting homologous recombination deficiency. Here, we explore whether the molecular mechanisms that cause heat-mediated degradation of BRCA2 are conserved in cell lines from various origins and, most importantly, whether, BRCA2 protein levels can be attenuated by heat in freshly biopted human tumours.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cells from four established cell lines and from freshly biopsied material of cervical (15), head- and neck (9) or bladder tumours (27) were heated to 42 °C for 60 min ex vivo. In vivo hyperthermia was studied by taking two biopsies of the same breast or cervical tumour: one before and one after treatment. BRCA2 protein levels were measured by immunoblotting.

RESULTS

We found decreased BRCA2-levels after hyperthermia in all established cell lines and in 91% of all tumours treated ex vivo. For tumours treated with hyperthermia in vivo, technical issues and intra-tumour heterogeneity prevented obtaining interpretable results.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that heat-mediated degradation of BRCA2 occurs in tumour material directly derived from patients. Although BRCA2-degradation may not be a practical biomarker for heat deposition in situ, it does suggest that application of hyperthermia could be an effective method to expand the patient group that could benefit from PARP-inhibitors.

Role of HIF-1α in response of tumors to a combination of hyperthermia and radiation in vivo

PURPOSE

Mild temperature hyperthermia (MTH) increases blood flow and oxygenation in tumours. On the other hand, high-dose-per-fraction irradiation damages blood vessels, decreases blood flow and increases hypoxia in tumours. The radiation-induced hypoxia in tumours activates hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and its target genes, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), promoting revascularization and recurrence. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that MTH inhibits radiation-induced upregulation of HIF-1α and its target genes by increasing tumour oxygenation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

FSaII fibrosarcoma tumours grown subcutaneously in the legs of C3H mice were used. Tumours were irradiated with 15 Gy using a ⁶⁰Co irradiator or heated at 41 °C for 30 min using an Oncothermia heating unit. Blood perfusion and hypoxia in tumours were assessed with Hoechst 33342 and pimonidazole staining, respectively. Expression levels of HIF-1α and VEGF were determined using immunohistochemical techniques. Apoptosis of tumour cells was quantitated via TUNEL staining and the effects of treatments on tumour growth rate were assessed by measuring tumour diameters.

RESULTS

Irradiation of FSaII tumours with a single dose of 15 Gy led to significantly decreased blood perfusion, increased hypoxia and upregulation of HIF-1α and VEGF. On the other hand, MTH at 41 °C for 30 min increased blood perfusion and tumour oxygenation, thereby suppressing radiation-induced HIF-1α and VEGF in tumours, leading to enhanced apoptosis of tumour cells and tumour growth delay.

CONCLUSION

MTH enhances the anti-tumour effect of high-dose irradiation, at least partly by inhibiting radiation-induced upregulation of HIF-1α.

Measurement and analysis of the impact of time-interval, temperature and radiation dose on tumour cell survival and its application in thermoradiotherapy plan evaluation

PURPOSE

Biological modelling of thermoradiotherapy may further improve patient selection and treatment plan optimisation, but requires a model that describes the biological effect as a function of variables that affect treatment outcome (e.g. temperature, radiation dose). This study aimed to establish such a model and its parameters. Additionally, a clinical example was presented to illustrate the application.

METHODS

Cell survival assays were performed at various combinations of radiation dose (0-8 Gy), temperature (37-42 °C), time interval (0-4 h) and treatment sequence (radiotherapy before/after hyperthermia) for two cervical cancer cell lines (SiHa and HeLa). An extended linear-quadratic model was fitted to the data using maximum likelihood estimation. As an example application, a thermoradiotherapy plan (23 × 2 Gy + weekly hyperthermia) was compared with a radiotherapy-only plan (23 × 2 Gy) for a cervical cancer patient. The equivalent uniform radiation dose (EUD) in the tumour, including confidence intervals, was estimated using the SiHa parameters. Additionally, the difference in tumour control probability (TCP) was estimated.

RESULTS

Our model described the dependency of cell survival on dose, temperature and time interval well for both SiHa and HeLa data (R²=0.90 and R²=0.91, respectively), making it suitable for biological modelling. In the patient example, the thermoradiotherapy plan showed an increase in EUD of 9.8 Gy that was robust (95% CI: 7.7-14.3 Gy) against propagation of the uncertainty in radiobiological parameters. This corresponded to a 20% (95% CI: 15-29%) increase in TCP.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a model that describes the cell survival as a function of radiation dose, temperature and time interval, which is essential for biological modelling of thermoradiotherapy treatments.

A short time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia reduces in-field recurrence and mortality in women with advanced cervical cancer

Background

Combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia is a well-established alternative to chemoradiotherapy for advanced stage cervical cancer patients with a contraindication for chemotherapy. Pre-clinical evidence suggests that the radiosensitizing effect of hyperthermia decreases substantially for time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia as short as 1–2 h, but clinical evidence is limited. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the time interval between external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and same-day hyperthermia on in-field recurrence rate, overall survival and late toxicity in women with advanced stage cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients with advanced stage cervical cancer who underwent a full-course of curative daily EBRT and (4–5) weekly hyperthermia sessions between 1999 and 2014 were included for retrospective analysis. The mean time interval between EBRT fractions and same-day hyperthermia was calculated for each patient; the median thereof was used to divide the cohort in a ‘short’ and ‘long’ time-interval group. Kaplan-Meier analysis and stepwise Cox regression were used to compare the in-field recurrence and overall survival. Finally, high-grade (≥3) late toxicity was compared across time-interval groups. DNA repair suppression is an important hyperthermia mechanism, DNA damage repair kinetics were therefore studied in patient biopsies to support clinical findings.

Results

Included were 58 patients. The 3-year in field recurrence rate was 18% and 53% in the short (≤79.2 min) and long (>79.2 min) time-interval group, respectively (p = 0.021); the 5-year overall survival was 52% and 17% respectively (p = 0.015). Differences between time-interval groups remained significant for both in-field recurrence (HR = 7.7, p = 0.007) and overall survival (HR = 2.3, p = 0.012) in multivariable Cox regression. No difference in toxicity was observed (p = 1.00), with only 6 and 5 events in the short and long group, respectively. The majority of DNA damage was repaired within 2 h, potentially explaining a reduced effectiveness of hyperthermia for long time intervals.

Conclusions

A short time interval between EBRT and hyperthermia is associated with a lower risk of in-field recurrence and a better overall survival. There was no evidence for difference in late toxicity.

Physical mechanism and modeling of heat generation and transfer in magnetic fluid hyperthermia through Néelian and Brownian relaxation: a review

Current clinically accepted technologies for cancer treatment still have limitations which lead to the exploration of new therapeutic methods. Since the past few decades, the hyperthermia treatment has attracted the attention of investigators owing to its strong biological rationales in applying hyperthermia as a cancer treatment modality. Advancement of nanotechnology offers a potential new heating method for hyperthermia by using nanoparticles which is termed as magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH). In MFH, superparamagnetic nanoparticles dissipate heat through Néelian and Brownian relaxation in the presence of an alternating magnetic field. The heating power of these particles is dependent on particle properties and treatment settings. A number of pre-clinical and clinical trials were performed to test the feasibility of this novel treatment modality. There are still issues yet to be solved for the successful transition of this technology from bench to bedside. These issues include the planning, execution, monitoring and optimization of treatment. The modeling and simulation play crucial roles in solving some of these issues. Thus, this review paper provides a basic understanding of the fundamental and rationales of hyperthermia and recent development in the modeling and simulation applied to depict the heat generation and transfer phenomena in the MFH.

3D radiobiological evaluation of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatments

PURPOSE

Currently, clinical decisions regarding thermoradiotherapy treatments are based on clinical experience. Quantification of the radiosensitising effect of hyperthermia allows comparison of different treatment strategies, and can support clinical decision-making regarding the optimal treatment. The software presented here enables biological evaluation of thermoradiotherapy plans through calculation of equivalent 3D dose distributions.

METHODS

Our in-house developed software (X-Term) uses an extended version of the linear-quadratic model to calculate equivalent radiation dose, i.e. the radiation dose yielding the same effect as the thermoradiotherapy treatment. Separate sets of model parameters can be assigned to each delineated structure, allowing tissue specific modelling of hyperthermic radiosensitisation. After calculation, the equivalent radiation dose can be evaluated according to conventional radiotherapy planning criteria. The procedure is illustrated using two realistic examples. First, for a previously irradiated patient, normal tissue dose for a radiotherapy and thermoradiotherapy plan (with equal predicted tumour control) is compared. Second, tumour control probability (TCP) is assessed for two (otherwise identical) thermoradiotherapy schedules with different time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia.

RESULTS

The examples demonstrate that our software can be used for individualised treatment decisions (first example) and treatment optimisation (second example) in thermoradiotherapy. In the first example, clinically acceptable doses to the bowel were exceeded for the conventional plan, and a substantial reduction of this excess was predicted for the thermoradiotherapy plan. In the second example, the thermoradiotherapy schedule with long time interval was shown to result in a substantially lower TCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Using biological modelling, our software can facilitate the evaluation of thermoradiotherapy plans and support individualised treatment decisions.

Combinations in multimodality treatments and clinical outcomes during cancer

Combination approach could be easily considered as the future of therapeutics in all pathological states including cancer. Scientists are trying different combinations in order to determine synergism among different therapeutics which ultimately helps in the improved and more efficient management of the affected patients. Combination of multi-chemotherapeutic agents, or multi-drug therapy, may be the most commonly used strategy for cancer treatment. Monotherapy causes drug resistance and loses its response in patients after several cycles of treatment. While combining different anticancer drugs together for cancer treatment, as in the case of the cocktail therapy for HIV, not only overcomes the drug resistance but also leads to a synergistic effect, therefore showing prolonged survival for patients. The present review article is focused on different combinations in use for better efficiency of therapeutics against cancer. We searched the electronic database PubMed for pre-clinical as well as clinical controlled trials reporting diagnostic as well as therapeutic advances of various combinations in cancer. It was observed clearly that combination approach is better in various aspects including increase in efficacy, specificity and decline in the unwanted side effects.

Improving efficacy of hyperthermia in oncology by exploiting biological mechanisms

It has long been established that hyperthermia increases the therapeutic benefit of radiation and chemotherapy in cancer treatment. During the last few years there have been substantial technical improvements in the sources used to apply and measure heat, which greatly increases enthusiasm for the clinical use of hyperthermia. These advances are converging with a better understanding of the physiological and molecular effects of hyperthermia. Therefore, we are now at a juncture where the parameters that will influence the efficacy of hyperthermia in cancer treatment can be optimised in a more systematic and rational manner. In addition, the novel insights in hyperthermia's many biological effects on tumour cells will ultimately result in new treatment regimes. For example, the molecular effects of hyperthermia on the essential cellular process of DNA repair suggest novel combination therapies, with DNA damage response targeting drugs that should now be clinically explored. Here, we provide an overview of recent studies on the various macroscopic and microscopic biological effects of hyperthermia. We indicate the significance of these effects on current treatments and suggest how they will help design novel future treatments.

Thermoradiotherapy planning: Integration in routine clinical practice

Planning of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatments should be performed taking the synergistic action between the two modalities into account. This work evaluates the available experimental data on cytotoxicity of combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia treatment and the requirements for integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment planning into a single planning platform. The underlying synergistic mechanisms of hyperthermia include inhibiting DNA repair, selective killing of radioresistant hypoxic tumour tissue and increased radiosensitivity by enhanced tissue perfusion. Each of these mechanisms displays different dose-effect relations, different optimal time intervals and different optimal sequences between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Radiosensitisation can be modelled using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model to account for DNA repair inhibition by hyperthermia. In a recent study, an LQ model-based thermoradiotherapy planning (TRTP) system was used to demonstrate that dose escalation by hyperthermia is equivalent to ∼10 Gy for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. The first step for more reliable TRTP is further expansion of the data set of LQ parameters for normally oxygenated normal and tumour tissue valid over the temperature range used clinically and for the relevant time intervals between radiotherapy and hyperthermia. The next step is to model the effect of hyperthermia in hypoxic tumour cells including the physiological response to hyperthermia and the resulting reoxygenation. Thermoradiotherapy planning is feasible and a necessity for an optimal clinical application of hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy in individual patients.

Can nanomedicines kill cancer stem cells?

Most tumors are heterogeneous and many cancers contain small population of highly tumorigenic and intrinsically drug resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs). Like normal stem cell, CSCs have the ability to self-renew and differentiate to other tumor cell types. They are believed to be a source for drug resistance, tumor recurrence and metastasis. CSCs often overexpress drug efflux transporters, spend most of their time in non-dividing G0 cell cycle state, and therefore, can escape the conventional chemotherapies. Thus, targeting CSCs is essential for developing novel therapies to prevent cancer relapse and emerging of drug resistance. Nanocarrier-based therapeutic agents (nanomedicines) have been used to achieve longer circulation times, better stability and bioavailability over current therapeutics. Recently, some groups have successfully applied nanomedicines to target CSCs to eliminate the tumor and prevent its recurrence. These approaches include 1) delivery of therapeutic agents (small molecules, siRNA, antibodies) that affect embryonic signaling pathways implicated in self-renewal and differentiation in CSCs, 2) inhibiting drug efflux transporters in an attempt to sensitize CSCs to therapy, 3) targeting metabolism in CSCs through nanoformulated chemicals and field-responsive magnetic nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes, and 4) disruption of multiple pathways in drug resistant cells using combination of chemotherapeutic drugs with amphiphilic Pluronic block copolymers. Despite clear progress of these studies the challenges of targeting CSCs by nanomedicines still exist and leave plenty of room for improvement and development. This review summarizes biological processes that are related to CSCs, overviews the current state of anti-CSCs therapies, and discusses state-of-the-art nanomedicine approaches developed to kill CSCs.

Hyperthermia as adjunct to intravesical chemotherapy for bladder cancer

Nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer remains a very costly cancer to manage because of high recurrence rates requiring long-term surveillance and treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that adjunct and concurrent use of hyperthermia with intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumor further reduces recurrence risk and progression to advanced disease. Hyperthermia has both direct and immune-mediated cytotoxic effect on tumor cells including tumor growth arrest and activation of antitumor immune system cells and pathways. Concurrent heat application also acts as a sensitizer to intravesical chemotherapy agents. As such the ability to deliver hyperthermia to the focus of tumor while minimizing damage to surrounding benign tissue is of utmost importance to optimize the benefit of hyperthermia treatment. Existing chemohyperthermia devices that allow for more localized heat delivery continue to pave the way in this effort. Current investigational methods involving heat-activated drug delivery selectively to tumor cells using temperature-sensitive liposomes also offer promising ways to improve chemohyperthermia efficacy in bladder cancer while minimizing toxicity to benign tissue. This will hopefully allow more widespread use of chemohyperthermia to all bladder cancer patients, including metastatic bladder cancer.

Multimodality treatment of cancer with herceptin conjugated, thermomagnetic iron oxides and docetaxel loaded nanoparticles of biodegradable polymers

We developed a system of nanoparticles of poly(lactide)-d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate (PLA-TPGS) and carboxyl group-terminated TPGS (TPGS-COOH) copolymer blend for multimodality treatment of cancer, which formulated docetaxel for chemotherapy, herceptin for biotherapy and targeting, and iron oxides (IOs) for hyperthermia therapy, which are denoted as MMNPs. It is demonstrated that the MMNPs achieved a significantly higher therapeutic effects than the various combination of the corresponding individual modality treatment NPs and the dual modality treatment NPs due to the synergistic effects among the chemo, bio, and thermo therapies. We further developed a method by employing the concept of NPs IC50, the concentration of the agent-, or agents-loaded nanoparticles that is needed to kill 50% of the cancer cells, to quantitatively access the synergistic effects of the multimodality treatment. It is shown by employing the SK-BR-3 cell line as an in vitro model of the HER2-positive breast cancer that the NPs IC50 is 0.42 mg/mL DCL-NPs plus 1.33 mg/mL Her-NPs plus 0.59 mg/mL IOs-NPs, a total NPs concentration of 2.34 mg/mL for the treatment of a physical mixture of the DCL-NPs, Her-NPs and IOs-NPs at the 1:2:7 weight ratio, while it is only 0.0011 mg/mL for the MMNPs for 24 h, which is 2130 fold more efficient than the physical mixture of the corresponding single modality treatments.