Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion for the treatment of gastric cancer: A single-centre retrospective study

Hyperthermia inhibits the progression of gastric cancer by downregulating PLEK2/PD-L1 and possibly participates in immunomodulation

BACKGROUND

Hyperthermia is used as an adjunctive treatment for gastric cancer; however, the corresponding antitumor mechanism remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the expression of PLEK2 in gastric cancer and the mechanism by which hyperthermia inhibits gastric cancer progression and participating in immunomodulation.

METHODS

PLEK2 was screened by combining microarray analysis with gene knockdown and proliferation assays. Analysis based on the TCGA database, GEPIA website, and detection of clinical samples was employed to investigate the expression and correlation of PLEK2 and PD-L1. Knockdown of the expression PLEK2, subsequent experiments including western blotting, RT-qPCR, cell functional assays, and flow cytometry were used to assess the effects on cell migration, invasion, viability, and apoptosis. Intervention with hyperthermia to explore its effects. To evaluate the impact on immunity by detecting T cell proliferation and the release of IFNγ, activated T cells were co-cultured with the target cells.

RESULTS

Hyperthermia significantly reduced the expression of PLEK2 and PD-L1, while both were increased in gastric cancer. Knockdown of PLEK2 inhibited PD-L1 expression and significantly inhibited the proliferation, invasion, migration, and viability of gastric cancer cells. A decrease in PLEK2 expression promotes cell apoptosis. Although it cannot affect the proliferation of activated T cells, it can partially reverse IFNγ suppression.

CONCLUSION

PLEK2 plays a promoting role in gastric cancer, and hyperthermia downregulates PLEK2/PD-L1, which further inhibits cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, promotes cell apoptosis, and possibly participates in immune regulation.

Impact of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite promising results, the effectiveness of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (GCPC) has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the survival, complications and risk of recurrence between CRS + HIPEC versus CRS alone in GCPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed in MEDLINE and Web of Science according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Primary studies with patients with GCPC older than 18 years were included. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to assess the quality of the studies. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of risk ratios (RR). We assessed heterogeneity using the I² statistic.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in the qualitative and four in the quantitative analysis. The overall survival (OS) rate after 1 year was 3.65 times higher for CRS + HIPEC than CRS alone [RR = 3.65, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.01-13.26, I² = 73%]. The OS rate after 5 years was more than three times higher for CRS + HIPEC than for CRS alone (RR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.28-8.26, I² = 8%). No significant differences between CRS + HIPEC and CRS alone related to complications were found (RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.83-1.33, I² = 0%). The risk of peritoneal recurrence was significantly lower for CRS + HIPEC than for CRS alone (RR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.11-0.48, I² = 40%). The results may be associated with some information or indication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Results should be analysed cautiously given the detected heterogeneity and limitations of included studies. However, treatment with CRS + HIPEC seems to increase the survival of patients with GCPC, more than treatment with CRS alone, decrease the risk of peritoneal recurrence and not be associated with more complications.

Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Tumor Markers in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei from Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm: a Study from the US HIPEC Collaborative

BACKGROUND

Tumor markers are commonly utilized in the diagnostic evaluation, treatment decision making, and surveillance of appendiceal tumors. In this study, we aimed to determine the prognostic significance of elevated preoperative tumor markers in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei secondary to low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

METHODS

Using a multi-institutional database, eligible patients with measured preoperative tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), or cancer antigen 125 (CA-125)] were identified. Univariate and multivariate Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis assessed relationships between normal and elevated serum tumor markers with progression-free and overall survival in the context of multiple clinicopathologic variables.

RESULTS

zTwo hundred and sixty-four patients met criteria. CEA was the most commonly measured tumor marker (97%). Patients who had any elevated tumor marker had a higher peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) as compared to those with normal range markers. Elevated CEA and CA 19-9 levels were individually associated with longer inpatient length of stay, requirement for intraoperative transfusion, and incomplete cytoreduction. Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, increased PCI score, elevated CA 19-9 (p = 0.007), and CA-125 levels (p = 0.01) were predictive of decreased progression-free survival on univariate analysis. However, in a multivariate model, only elevated PCI was a statistically significant predictor of progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Elevated preoperative tumor markers indicate a higher burden of disease but are not independently associated with survival in this retrospective multi-institutional cohort. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the utility of these markers in this patient population.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review

Gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis tend to achieve poor clinical outcomes. Until recently, the treatment options were limited mainly to either palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy in exceptional cases. Currently, these patients benefit from multimodal treatment, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite good overall results, this treatment modality is still widely debated. The following study is designed to assess the papers about the possible application and utility of HIPEC in GC. A search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed to assess the papers devoted to the role of HIPEC in GC treatment; a literature search was performed until March 21st; and, finally, 50 studies with a total number of 3946 patients were analyzed. According to the most recent data, it seems to be reasonable to limit the duration of HIPEC to the shortest effective time. Moreover, the drugs used in HIPEC need to have equal concentrations and the same solvent. Perioperative chemotherapy needs to be reported in detail and, furthermore, the term “morbidity” should be defined more clearly by the authors.

Hyperthermic intra-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy as an adjuvant to pancreatic cancer resection

Background

Even after potentially curative resection the long-term survival of pancreatic cancer is poor. The local-regional failures are frequent. Previous studies have shown that adjuvant treatment with hyperthermic intra-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may effectively control local disease. The objective of the study is to update the results of the prior publications by integrating data from recently accrued cases. Also, to revisit the clinical and pharmacological rationale for the intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing potentially curative resection.

Methods

This is a prospective study of pancreatic cancer patients that underwent R₀ resection in combination with HIPEC-gemcitabine. Morbidity and mortality were recorded. Survival was calculated and the sites for recurrent disease were recorded.

Results

The updated results for 33 patients that underwent treatment until 2016 and for 6 more patients that were included until 2018 were presented. The hospital mortality and morbidity rate were 5.1% (2 patients), and 28.2% (11 patients) respectively. The median and 5-year survival rate was 17 months and 24% respectively. With a median follow-up time of 13 months 23 patients (59%) were recorded with recurrence. Local regional failures were recorded in 4 patients (10.3%).

Conclusions

HIPEC following R₀ resection is a feasible and safe adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer. The local-regional failures appear to be significantly decreased and to result in an increased overall survival. Further studies with combined intraperitoneal and systemic perioperative chemotherapy may serve to supplement our data with an increased benefit for patients having pancreas cancer resection.

Intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: a narrative review

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) has long been regarded as the terminal disease, lacking of effective treatments. In recent 40 years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, including hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS), and early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), has been recommended as a preferred treatment option for some selected patients with GCPM. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells were recognized as the pathological cause of PM and the primary target for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There were a lot of evidence demonstrating that HIPEC could effectively eradiate intraperitoneal free cancer cells and prolong overall survival in GCPM. However, there are still no standard HIPEC protocols. This review summarized the current HIPEC regimens used in GCPM from a literature search, trying to conclude the optimal HIPEC in GCPM, and indicate the future direction of HIPEC study. Moreover, the new data on the exploration of HIPEC in GCPM at Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University was shared. In conclusion, there was not enough evidence from publications and our own experience to conclude a recommended HIPEC regimen for GCPM. There is urgent need for standardizing HIPEC protocols worldwide. Accordingly, more international collaborations focusing on pharmacology and HIPEC-related parameters to generate high level evidence are essential.

A Dose-Finding Trial for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Cisplatin in Gynecological Cancer Patients Receiving Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background: To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of hyperthermic intraperitoneal cisplatin at 43°C among gynecological cancer patients.

Methods: In this Phase I dose-finding trial, Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design was used. We sought to explore the MTD with a target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 20%, 4 prespecified doses (70 mg/m², 75 mg/m², 80 mg/m² and 85 mg/m²), and 30 patients.

Results: Between 2019 and 2020, 30 gynecologic cancer patients were enrolled. No patients received bevacizumab in subsequent treatment. The most common adverse events related to cisplatin were nausea and vomiting (100%), followed by tinnitus (26.7%) and kidney injury (23.3%). Of the seven patients with kidney injury, four had persistent renal impairment, and finally progressed into chronic kidney injury. DLTs were noted only in the dose level 4 group (85 mg/m²) and included acute kidney injury, pulmonary embolism, anemia, and neutropenia. When cisplatin was given at dose level four (85 mg/m²), the isotonic estimate of the DLT rate (22%) was closest to the target DLT rate of 20%. Therefore, 85 mg/m² was selected as the MTD, with a 51% probability that the toxicity probability was greater than the target DLT rate.

Conclusions: For gynecological cancer patients who received HIPEC for peritoneal metastases, the MTD of cisplatin in HIPEC at 43°C was 85 mg/m². Our findings apply to patients who do not receive bevacizumab (ChiCTR1900021555).

Preoperative CA125 value predicts Glisson capsule involvement in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Aim: The difficulty of detecting lesions smaller than 1 cm in the preoperative period is still a continuing problem in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Methods: The prospective data of 106 peritoneal carcinomatosis patients were included this study. Preoperative AFP, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19.9, CA125, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, mean platelet value, platelet distribution width, red cell distribution width and radiological findings compared according to Glisson capsule tumor involvement. Results: Preoperative radiological imaging methods have low accuracy in demonstrating Glisson capsule involvement. Inflammatory and serum tumor markers, except CA125, have been shown to be ineffective at detecting preoperative Glisson capsule involvement. CA125 levels higher than 52.4 were found to be significant in indicating Glisson's capsule involvement. Conclusion: CA125 is more sensitive than radiological and nuclear imaging methods in detecting tumors smaller than 1 cm.

Current status and future prospects of clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for gastric cancer peritoneal metastases

PURPOSE

There is no standard treatment for peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this review is to evaluate the clinical trials on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for GC PM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The published clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for GC PM are critically evaluated, and survival and safety are the primary endpoints. In addition, the registered ongoing clinical trials are summarised.

RESULTS

The natural course of GC PM is <5 months. CRS + HIPEC could improve the overall survival (OS). In prospective studies, the median OS was 11.0 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 5.4 months in the CRS alone group. In case-control studies, the median OS was 13.3 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 7.9 months in the CRS alone group. In cohort studies, the median OS after CRS + HIPEC was 13.3. The median 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates after CRS + HIPEC were 50.0%, 35.8% and 13.0%, respectively. There is no statistically significant increase in serious adverse events that are directly attributed to CRS + HIPEC.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CRS and HIPEC is a promising integrated treatment strategy for GC PM that has encouraging initial results, calling for urgent further evaluation of this strategy in randomised control trials (RCTs).

The effect of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as an adjuvant in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer

Background - aims: The long-term survival of pancreatic cancer is poor even after potentially curative resection. The incidence of local-regional failures is high. There is evidence that hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) is effective in controlling the local-regional failures. The purpose of the study is to identify the effect of HIPEC after surgical removal of pancreatic carcinoma. Patients - Methods: Prospective study including 33 patients with resectable pancreatic carcinomas. All patients underwent surgical resection (R0) and ΗIPEC as an adjuvant. Morbidity and hospital mortality were recorded. The patients were followed-up for 5 years. Survival was calculated. Recurrences and the sites of failure were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 67.8 ± 11.1 years (38-86). The hospital mortality was 6.1% (2 patients) and the morbidity 24.2% (8 patients). The overall 5-year survival was 24%. The mean and median survival was 33 and 13 months, respectively. The median follow-up time was 11 months. The recurrence rate was 60.6% (20 patients). Three patients were recorded with local-regional failures (9.1%) and the others with liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that HIPEC as an adjuvant following potentially curative resection (R0) of pancreatic carcinoma may effectively control the local-regional disease. Prospective randomised studies are required.