Combined radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection versus repeat hepatectomy for elderly patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after initial hepatic surgery

Liver resection versus microwave ablation for solitary and small (≤ 3 cm) HCC with early recurrence in different stages of liver cirrhosis: A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of liver resection (LR) and microwave ablation (MWA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with early recurrence and varying stages of cirrhosis.

METHOD

This study analyzed patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy and experienced early tumor recurrence (≤3 cm) between December 2002 and December 2020 at the Tongji Hospital. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 295 patients (106, LR; 189, MWA), 86 patients in each of the 2 groups were chosen for further comparison, after PSM. After PSM, both LR and MWA demonstrated similar recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates (p = 0.060 and p = 0.118, respectively). However, the LR group had more treatment-related complications. In patients with moderate or severe cirrhosis, no significant differences in RFS or OS rates were found between the LR and MWA groups (p = 0.779 and p = 0.772, respectively). In patients without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis, LR showed better RFS and OS rates than MWA (p = 0.024 and p = 0.047, respectively). Multivariate analysis after PSM identified moderate or severe cirrhosis and recurrence intervals ≤12 months as independent predictors of poor RFS and OS in patients with early recurrence of HCC.

CONCLUSION

LR is more effective than MWA for early recurrence of HCC in patients without cirrhosis or with mild cirrhosis, showing improved RFS and OS rates. In patients with moderate or severe cirrhosis, the OS and RFS were statistically equal between the two therapies. However, MWA may be preferred owing to its low complication rate.

The role of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization following repeated curative resection/ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma with early recurrence: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) following repeated resection/ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of adjuvant TACE following repeated resection or ablation in patients with early recurrent HCC.

METHODS

Information for patients who underwent repeated surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for early recurrent HCCs (< 2 years) at our institution from January 2017 to December 2020 were collected. Patients were divided into adjuvant TACE and observation groups according to whether they received adjuvant TACE or not. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Of the 225 patients enrolled, the median time of HCC recurrence was 11 months (IQR, 6-16 months). After repeated surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for recurrent tumors, 45 patients (20%) received adjuvant TACE while the remaining 180 (80%) didn't. There were no significant differences in RFS (P = 0.325) and OS (P = 0.072) between adjuvant TACE and observation groups before PSM. There were also no significant differences in RFS (P = 0.897) and OS (P = 0.090) between the two groups after PSM. Multivariable analysis suggested that multiple tumors, liver cirrhosis, and RFA were independent risk factors for the re-recurrence of HCC.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant TACE after repeated resection or ablation for early recurrent HCCs was not associated with a long-term survival benefit in this single-center cohort.

Repeat hepatectomy versus thermal ablation therapy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the survival benefits of repeat hepatectomy (RH) and thermal ablation therapy (TAT) in managing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, SinoMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science databases using relevant keywords to identify all studies published on this specific topic. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a fixed-effects model.

Results

This meta-analysis included a total of 21 studies, comprising 2580 patients with recurrent HCC, among whom 1189 underwent RH and 1394 underwent TAT. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that the RH group exhibited superior overall survival (OS) (HR=0.85, 95%CI 0.76∼0.95, P=0.004) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=0.79, 95%CI 0.7∼0.9, P<0.01) compared to the TAT group. Regarding postoperative complications, the TAT group experienced fewer complications than the RH group (OR=3.23, 95%CI 1.48∼7.07, P=0.003), while no significant difference in perioperative mortality was observed between the two groups (OR=2.11, 95%CI 0.54∼8.19, P=0.28).

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates that, in comparison to TAT, RH may confer superior survival benefits for patients with recurrent HCC.

Ablative strategies for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide and the third leading cause of all diseases worldwide. Liver transplantation, surgical resection and ablation are the three main curative treatments for HCC. Liver transplantation is the optimal treatment option for HCC, but its usage is limited by the shortage of liver sources. Surgical resection is considered the first choice for early-stage HCC, but it does not apply to patients with poor liver function. Therefore, more and more doctors choose ablation for HCC. However, intrahepatic recurrence occurs in up to 70% patients within 5 years after initial treatment. For patients with oligo recurrence after primary treatment, repeated resection and local ablation are both alternative. Only 20% patients with recurrent HCC (rHCC) indicate repeated surgical resection because of limitations in liver function, tumor location and intraperitoneal adhesions. Local ablation has become an option for the waiting period when liver transplantation is unavailable. For patients with intrahepatic recurrence after liver transplantation, local ablation can reduce the tumor burden and prepare them for liver transplantation. This review systematically describes the various ablation treatments for rHCC, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, laser ablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation, cryablation, irreversible electroporation, percutaneous ethanol injection, and the combination of ablation and other treatment modalities.

Single-center analysis of percutaneous ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcomes of a 7-year experience

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of ablative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 419 consecutive patients diagnosed with HCC, treated with percutaneous ablation at a tertiary academic medical center from June 2015 to June 2022, was conducted. Data evaluated included demographics, disease and tumor burden scores, and functional status. Procedural outcomes included procedural course, complication rates, biochemical and radiologic response, survival, and functional status.

RESULTS

A total of 419 patients, including 313 males (74.7%) and 106 females (25.3%) with a mean age of 63.8 ± 6.64 years, made up the study cohort. 120 patients (28.6%) presented with solitary lesions and 299 patients (71.4%) had multifocal involvement, with a mean tumor size of 2.3 ± 0.92 cm. A majority of the interventions performed were microwave ablations (n = 413, 98.3%), with 6 radiofrequency ablations (1.4%). Treatment response was radiographically assessed up to 6 months post-ablation and graded as complete response (96.2%), partial response (2.6%), stable disease (0%), and progressive disease (1.2%). 97 (23.2%) of the treated patients went on to receive liver transplant. The average progression-free survival in the study population was 24 months with a survival of 85.9% (n = 360), 67.8% (n = 284), and 63.2% (n = 265) at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years respectively. Functional outcomes, as defined by ECOG scores, were maintained or improved in 383 patients (91.4%) and 349 patients (83.3%) at 6 months and 12 months respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This large institutional experience demonstrated safety and efficacy of ablation therapies for treatment of HCC with promising tumor response rates and enduring clinical outcomes including prolonged survival and preserved functional status.

Current status and prospect of treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Owing to its heterogeneous and highly aggressive nature, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate, which is a non-negligible problem despite the increasing number of available treatment options. Recent clinical trials have attempted to reduce the recurrence and develop innovative treatment options for patients with recurrent HCC. In the event of liver remnant recurrence, the currently available treatment options include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, tumor ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, systemic therapies, and combination therapy. In this review, we summarize the strategies to reduce the recurrence of high-risk tumors and aggressive therapies for recurrent HCC. Additionally, we discuss methods to prevent HCC recurrence and prognostic models constructed based on predictors of recurrence to develop an appropriate surveillance program.

Application of ablative therapy for intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy

The post-hepatectomy recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is persistently high, affecting the prognosis of patients. An effective therapeutic option is crucial for achieving long-term survival in patients with postoperative recurrences. Local ablative therapy has been established as a treatment option for resectable and unresectable HCCs, and it is also a feasible approach for recurrent HCC (RHCC) due to less trauma, shorter operation times, fewer complications, and faster recovery. This review focused on ablation techniques, description of potential candidates, and therapeutic and prognostic implications of ablation for guiding its application in treating intrahepatic RHCC.

Comparison of Surgical Resection and Percutaneous Ultrasonographic Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Initial Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Early Stage following Curative Treatment

Background/Aim: The SURF trial showed that surgical resection (SR) and percutaneous ultrasonographic guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) had equal therapeutic effects for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, consensus regarding which treatment is appropriate for initial recurrent early-stage HCC remains lacking. This study aimed to elucidate therapeutic efficacy differences between SR and RFA for initial recurrent early-stage HCC. Materials/Methods: From 2000 to 2021, 371 patients with recurrent early-stage HCC (≤3 cm, ≤3 nodules) after undergoing initial curative treatment with SR or RFA were enrolled (median age 72 years; males 269; Child−Pugh A:B, n = 328:43; SR:RFA, n = 36:335). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Although the median albumin−bilirubin (ALBI) score was better in the SR than the RFA group (−2.90 vs. −2.50, p < 0.01), there were no significant differences between them in regard to RFS (median 28.1 months, 95% CI 23.4−50.0 vs. 22.1 months, 95% CI 19.3−26.2; p = 0.34), OS (78.9 months, 95% CI 49.3—not applicable vs. 71.2 months 95% CI, 61.8−84.7; p = 0.337), or complications (8.3% vs. 9.3%; p = 1.0). In sub-analysis for RFS and OS according to ALBI grade revealed no significant differences between the SR and RFA groups (ALBI 1/2 = 28.2/17.5 vs. 24.0/23.4 months; p = 0.881/0684 and ALBI 1/2 = 78.9/58.9 vs. 115.3/52.6 months, p = 0.651/0.578, respectively). Conclusion: This retrospective study found no significant differences in regard to RFS or OS between patients in the SR and the RFA groups for initial recurrence of early-stage HCC after undergoing curative treatment. These results showing equal therapeutic efficacy of SR and RFA confirm the findings of the SURF trial.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

The efficacy of repeat hepatic resection (rHR) in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma compared with radiofrequency or microwave ablation after resection of the primary tumour remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the safety and efficacy of these procedures.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify related studies published before 10 October 2021. Overall and recurrence-free survival after different treatments were compared based on pooled hazard ratios with a random-effects model.

Results

Two randomized clinical trials and 28 observational studies were included, involving 1961 and 2787 patients who underwent rHR and ablation respectively. Median perioperative mortality in both groups was zero but patients in the rHR group had higher median morbidity rates (17.0 per cent) than those in the ablation group (3.3 per cent). rHR achieved significantly longer recurrence-free survival than ablation (HR 0.79, 95 per cent c.i. 0.70 to 0.89, P < 0.001), while both groups had similar overall survival (HR 0.93, 95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.04, P = 0.18).

Conclusion

rHR and ablation based on radio- or microwaves are associated with similar overall survival in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after resection of the primary tumour.

Image-guided locoregional non-intravascular interventional treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most deadly and frequent cancers worldwide, although great advancement in the treatment of this malignancy have been made within the past few decades. It continues to be a major health issue due to an increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. The majority of patients have their HCC diagnosed at an intermediate or advanced stage in theUSA or China. Curative therapy such as surgical resection or liver transplantation is not considered anoption of treatment at these stages.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), the most widely used locoregional therapeutic approach, used to be the mainstay of treatment for cases with unresectable cancer entities. However, for those patients with hypovascular tumors or impaired liver function reserve, TACE is a suboptimal treatment option. For example, embolization does not result in complete coverage of a hypovascular tumor, and may rather promotes postoperative tumor recurrence, or leave residual tumor, in these TACE-resistance patients. In addition, TACE carries a higher risk of hepatic decompensation in patients with poor liver function or reserve.

Non-vascular interventional locoregional therapies for HCC include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT), cryosurgical ablation (CSA), irreversible Electroporation (IRE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), and brachytherapy. Recent advancements in these techniques have significantly improved the treatment efficacy of HCC and expanded the population of patients who qualify for treatment. This review embraces the current status of imaging-guided locoregional non-intravascular interventional treatments for HCCs, with a primary focus on the clinical evaluation and assessment of the efficacy of combined therapies using these interventional techniques.

The guiding value of microvascular invasion for treating early recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI) have worse survival. Whether the presence of MVI indicates the necessity of more aggressive locoregional treatments for recurrences remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for primary HCC in our institution, and 379 patients with recurrent HCC up to three nodules smaller than 3 cm were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier method was adopted to compare the secondary recurrence-free survival (sRFS) and post-recurrence survival (PRS) among patients undergoing hepatectomy, RFA and transarterial chemoembolization plus RFA (TACE-RFA). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Both the sRFS and PRS of the MVI (-) group were significantly longer than those of the MVI (+) group (p = 0.001 and 0.011). For patients with MVI (-), no significant difference was found in sRFS or PRS among recurrent HCC patients receiving hepatectomy, RFA or TACE-RFA (p = 0.149 and 0.821). A similar trend was found in patients with MVI (+) (p = 0.851 and 0.960). Further analysis found that TACE-RFA provided better sRFS than hepatectomy or RFA alone in patients with MVI (+) and early recurrence within two years (p = 0.036 and 0.044).

CONCLUSION

For HCC patients with MVI (+) and early small recurrence, TACE-RFA could achieve better prognosis than hepatectomy or RFA alone, while RFA alone provided comparable survival benefits compared with hepatectomy or TACE-RFA in other HCC patients with small recurrence.

Percutaneous ethanol injection enhanced the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of HCC: an insight into the mechanism of ethanol action

PURPOSE

To discuss the possible reasons why percutaneous intratumoral ethanol injection (PEI) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) reduced the recurrence and metastasis compared with RFA alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty VX2 tumor-bearing rabbits were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10): the PEI, RFA, PEI-RFA, and control groups. Five rabbits from each group were sacrificed on the 3rd and 7th days after ablation. The number of metastatic tumors in the lung was counted. The ablation volume was measured, and residual tumor specimens were prepared for hematoxylin and eosin staining and caspase-3, Ki-67, and VEGF immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

The volume of ablation in the PEI-RFA group was significantly larger than that in the RFA and PEI groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in the number of lung metastases after ablation were observed among the groups (p > 0.05). The number of microthrombi in the PEI-RFA group was greater than that in the control and RFA groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05). The Ki-67 labeling index (LI) and H-score of VEGF in the PEI-RFA group were lower than those in the RFA group, while the H-score of caspase-3 was higher than that in the RFA group on the 7th day after ablation (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PEI occluded blood vessels by inducing microthrombi formation, and thereby reducing heat dissipation and increasing the effect of RFA. More importantly, in comparison with an incomplete RFA, PEI-RFA inhibited the increase in the Ki-67 and VEGF expression levels and the decrease in the caspase-3 expression level to happen at some extent and therefore improved the prognosis.

Long-term Effects of Repeat Hepatectomy vs Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Among Patients With Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Repeat hepatectomy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) are most commonly used to treat early-stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after initial resection, but previous studies comparing the effectiveness of the 2 treatments have reported conflicting results.

Objective

To compare the long-term survival outcomes after repeat hepatectomy with those after PRFA among patients with early-stage RHCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and the National Center for Liver Cancer of China. A total of 240 patients with RHCC (with a solitary nodule diameter of ≤5 cm; 3 or fewer nodules, each ≤3 cm in diameter; and no macroscopic vascular invasion or distant metastasis) were randomized 1:1 to receive repeat hepatectomy or PRFA between June 3, 2010, and January 15, 2013. The median (range) follow-up time was 44.3 (4.3-90.6) months (last follow-up, January 15, 2018). Data analysis was conducted from June 15, 2018, to September 28, 2018.

Interventions

Repeat hepatectomy (n = 120) or PRFA (n = 120).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included repeat recurrence-free survival (rRFS), patterns of repeat recurrence, and therapeutic safety.

Results

Among the 240 randomized patients (216 men [90.0%]; median [range] age, 53.0 [24.0-59.0] years), 217 completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 87.9%-97.3%), 65.8% (95% CI, 57.8%-74.8%), and 43.6% (95% CI, 35.5%-53.5%), respectively, for the repeat hepatectomy group and 87.5% (95% CI, 81.8%-93.6%), 52.5% (95% CI, 44.2%-62.2%), and 38.5% (95% CI, 30.6%-48.4%), respectively, for the PRFA group (P = .17). The corresponding 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rRFS rates were 85.0% (95% CI, 78.8%-91.6%), 52.4% (95% CI, 44.2%-62.2%), and 36.2% (95% CI, 28.5%-46.0%), respectively, for the repeat hepatectomy group and 74.2% (95% CI, 66.7%-82.4%), 41.7% (95% CI, 33.7%-51.5%), and 30.2% (95% CI, 22.9%-39.8%), respectively, for the PRFA group (P = .09). Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was associated with a higher incidence of local repeat recurrence (37.8% vs 21.7%, P = .04) and early repeat recurrence than repeat hepatectomy (40.3% vs 23.3%, P = .04). In subgroup analyses, PRFA was associated with worse OS vs repeat hepatectomy among patients with an RHCC nodule diameter greater than 3 cm (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.05-2.84) or an α fetoprotein level greater than 200 ng/mL (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15-2.96). Surgery had a higher complication rate than did ablation (22.4% vs 7.3%, P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

No statistically significant difference was observed in survival outcomes after repeat hepatectomy vs PRFA for patients with early-stage RHCC. Repeat hepatectomy may be associated with better local disease control and long-term survival in patients with an RHCC diameter greater than 3 cm or an AFP level greater than 200 ng/mL.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00822562.

Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Thermal Ablation

PURPOSE

To develop an effective prognostic nomogram for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after thermal ablation.

METHODS

A total of 772 patients with intrahepatic primary or recurrent HCC who underwent radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation between March 2011 and October 2016 were included. 602 patients (mean age, 56.0 ± 11.9 years; 495 male/107 female) were included in the primary cohort to establish a prognostic nomogram. Significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) identified by Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to construct the nomogram. The remaining 170 patients (mean age, 55.9 ± 11.9 years; 145 male/25 female) were used to validate the predictive accuracy of the nomogram.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up period of 26 months (range 1-85 months), the median OS periods were 48.6 months and 44.0 months for the primary and validation cohorts. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 85.5%, 61.4%, and 43.3% in the primary cohort and 84.7%, 59.6%, and 43.3% in the prospective validation cohort, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that pre-ablation treatment, AFP, CEA, CA19-9, ALBI grade, tumor number, and tumor size (hazard ratio > 1, P < 0.05) were independent risk factors for OS. A nomogram was developed based on these seven variables. The calibration curve for predicting the probability of survival showed a good agreement between the nomogram and actual observation both in the primary (concrete index: 0.699) and validation cohorts (concrete index: 0.734).

CONCLUSIONS

This simple nomogram based on seven variables including ALBI grade offers personalized prognostic data for HCC patients after ablation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, case series.

Outcome of a second hepatectomy in octogenarians with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: single centre's experience

BACKGROUND

Physicians rarely select surgery a second time as the treatment for octogenarians with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence.

METHODS

We encountered eight male and three female octogenarians underwent surgery a second time as the treatment for HCC recurrence (octo group). We studied these cases clinically and compared them with 25 younger people underwent surgery a second time (young group). All patients of octo group have resectable HCC according to the Japanese guideline, that is HCC patients with Child-Pugh status A or B and who have solitary or only a few HCC nodules, in addition, no serious comorbidities, no serious dementia, a performance status of 0-1 and the will to receive hepatectomy.

RESULTS

The average maximum tumour size at the first hepatectomy was significantly larger than that at the second hepatectomy (P < 0.05). The extent of the first hepatectomy was significantly greater than that of the second one (P < 0.05). There were no mortalities at either hepatectomy. The morbidities of the first and the second hepatectomies were 9.1% and 18.2%, respectively. All complications were bile leakage. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the clinical features, including the prognosis, between the octo and young groups.

CONCLUSION

Selected octogenarians who received a second hepatectomy showed a relatively good post-operative course after the first and second hepatectomies. Repeated hepatectomy for octogenarians seems to have same positive influence on the prognosis in comparison to the young group. But on the data analysed, we have not shown repeated hepatectomy is superior to non-surgical treatments.