The outcome of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity ultrasound for clinically symptomatic submucosal uterine fibroid performed accidentally in very early pregnancy: a case report

Oxytocin and Misoprostol With Diclofenac in the Preparation for Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Ultrasound Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Prospective Cohort Study

Uterine fibroids (UFs) are very common benign tumors of the female reproductive tract. According to recent reports, magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity ultrasound (MR-HIFU) appears to be a well-tolerated and efficient treatment option for UFs. However, MR-HIFU still presents several limitations. The treatment is rarely associated with achieving complete non-perfused volume (NPV). Not all patients are qualified for a final procedure, and selected women obtain very good results in such treatment. The primary objective of this experimental study was to assess the effect of transvaginal misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin preparation on UF volume change, sonication time and NPV after MR-HIFU procedure in women of reproductive age with symptomatic UFs. Secondary outcomes included the effect on the peri-procedural effectiveness of misoprostol and oxytocin. This study enrolled 247 women with symptomatic UFs; based on gynecologic examinations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 128 women qualified for MR-HIFU without pharmacologic treatment, 57 women qualified for the misoprostol/diclofenac group and 62 women qualified for the oxytocin group. Pharmacologic pre-treatment improved NPV compared with non-pharmacologic treatment (average NPV: controls 61.9% ± 25.8%; oxytocin 76.8% ± 20.7%; misoprostol/diclofenac 85.2% ± 15.1%; average sonication time: controls 120 min ± 56.4%; oxytocin 111 min ± 45.4%; misoprostol/diclofenac 80 min ± 47.7%). Statistical analysis did not reveal significant intergroup differences in UF volume changes after 6 mo (controls: n = 40, 37.4% ± 27.5%; oxytocin n = 25, 45.8% ± 31%; misoprostol/diclofenac n = 19, 33.4% ± 23.2%). The misoprostol/diclofenac group, which achieved the highest NPV immediately after the MR-HIFU procedure, was characterized by the lowest UF volume change percentages 6 mo later. The administration of vasoconstrictor drugs (oxytocin and misoprostol/diclofenac) to support MR-HIFU in UF treatment is a new issue that may improve the total effectiveness of this method. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to estimate the real effect of vasoconstrictors on MR-HIFU.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids-Efficiency Assessment with the Use of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Potential Role of the Administration of Uterotonic Drugs

OBJECTIVE

The assessment of the usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) when qualifying patients with uterine fibroids (UFs) for magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity ultrasound (MR-HIFU).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective, single center study included 283 women who underwent DCE-MRI and were treated with MR-HIFU. The patients were divided according to non-perfused volume (NPV) as well as by the type of curve for patients with a washout curve in the DCE-MRI study and patients without a washout curve. The studied women were assessed in three groups according to the type of uterotonics administered. Group A (57 patients) received one dose of misoprostol/diclofenac transvaginally and group B (71 patients) received oxytocin intravenously prior to the MR-HIFU procedure. The remaining 155 women (group C) were treated with the traditional non-drug enhanced MR-HIFU procedure.

RESULTS

The average NPV value was higher in no washout group, and depended on the uterotonics used.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a correlation between dynamic contrast enhancement curve types and the therapeutic efficacy of MR-HIFU. Our results suggest that DCE-MRI has the potential to assess treatment outcomes among patients with UFs, and patients with UFs that present with a washout curve may benefit from the use of uterotonic drugs. More studies are required to draw final conclusions.

The role of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in fertility-sparing treatment of uterine fibroids-current perspectives

Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumours of the female reproductive system and the most frequent reason for hysterectomy worldwide. UFs are reported in 20%–70% of women of reproductive age depending on a study group. Although most women with UFs are asymptomatic, over 30% of them will present with different symptoms. Abnormal uterine bleeding, pain, pressure and infertility are the most common. Lesions that cause these kinds of symptoms may require medical intervention.

Trends in UF treatment change along with patient awareness and the introduction of new methods and techniques. Selecting an appropriate treatment option should be individualised and adjusted to the patient’s expectations as much as possible. This choice will mostly depend on the patient’s age, UF location, the size and number of lesions, severity of symptoms and, most importantly, the patient’s expectations concerning the preservation of fertility. Observations made for the past few years showed an increasing number of pre- and perimenopausal women who wish to preserve their uterus or decline surgery. In line with current trends and demands in medicine, great importance is attached to the development and upgrade of new minimally invasive or noninvasive procedures in UF therapy.

Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) is not associated with severe destruction of the uterine cavity and walls. For this reason, this method may be considered as a kind of hope in fertility-sparing UF therapy and the data about its use in this indication raises future hope. In this review, we summarise the available data on the use of MR-HIFU as a fertility-sparing method in the treatment of UFs. We also indicate how it could evolve in the future.

According to the available data, MR-HIFU is a relatively safe noninvasive method which seems not to deteriorate fertility compared to the pre-treatment status. MR-HIFU may constitute an alternative solution and be chosen in patients who meet the qualification criteria and deny other methods, which also facilitates the use of other treatment options in case the procedure is ineffective. Further randomised studies are necessary to confirm the above information.