1
|
Liu Q, Zhang R, Shen W. Advancements in locoregional therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Emerging perspectives on combined treatment strategies. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:109502. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
2
|
Ortiz CB, Derrick K, Dang A, Borrego M, Yamaguchi S, Grosser D, Bunegin L, Walker J, Lopera J. Changes in Microwave Ablation Zone Dimensions after Transarterial Embolization in an Ex Vivo Human Kidney Perfusion Model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:1551-1557.e1. [PMID: 38901493 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To utilize a novel ex vivo perfused human renal model and quantify microwave ablation (MWA) size differences in renal tissue when combining MWA with transarterial embolization (TAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Human kidneys (n = 5) declined for transplantation were obtained and connected to a fluoroscopy-compatible ex vivo perfusion system. Two ablations-1 standard MWA and 1 TAE-MWA-were performed in each kidney for 2 minutes at 100 W using a MWA system (Solero Angiodynamics). MWA alone was performed in the upper pole. In the lower pole, MWA was performed after TAE with 40-90 μm radiopaque microspheres to achieve angiographic stasis. Ablation zones of coagulative necrosis were sectioned along the long axis and segmented for maximal short-axis diameter (SAD) and long-axis diameter (LAD) measurements. RESULTS A total of 10 ablations (5 MWAs and 5 TAE-MWAs) were performed in 5 human kidneys. TAE-MWA resulted in significantly increased SAD, LAD, volume, and sphericity compared with standard MWA ± SD, with mean measurements as follows (5 standard MWAs ± SD vs 5 TAE-MWAs ± SD, 2-tailed t-test): (a) SAD, 1.8 cm (SD ± 0.1) versus 2.5 cm (SD ± 0.1) (P < .001); (b) LAD, 2.9 cm (SD ± 0.3) versus 3.2 cm (SD ± 0.1) (P = .039); (c) volume, 5.0 mL (SD ± 0.5) versus 11.0 mL (SD ± 0.7) (P < .001); and (d) sphericity, 0.4 (SD ± 0.2) versus 0.6 (SD ± 0.1) (P = .049). Histology demonstrated no differences in TAE-MWA other than concentrated microspheres. CONCLUSIONS This ex vivo human kidney perfusion model confirmed that combined MWA-TAE significantly increased ablation size and spherical shape compared with MWA alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos B Ortiz
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
| | - Kade Derrick
- Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Annie Dang
- Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Marina Borrego
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Seiji Yamaguchi
- Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; University Transplant Center, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Daniel Grosser
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Leon Bunegin
- Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Vascular Perfusion Solutions, San Antonio, Texas
| | - John Walker
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Jorge Lopera
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vogl TJ, Stefan H, Gruber-Rouh T, Trojan J, Bechstein WO, Bielfeldt J, Adwan H. The combination of transarterial chemoembolization and microwave ablation is superior to microwave ablation alone for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:440. [PMID: 39354218 PMCID: PMC11445293 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05951-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) with MWA alone in treating liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, a total of 251 patients with unresectable and not to chemotherapy responding LMCRC were included. Group A consisted of 184 patients (104 male and 80 females; mean age: 64 ± 11.4 years) with 442 metastases who received a combination of TACE and MWA. A total of 67 patients (49 male and 18 females; mean age: 63.2 ± 11.8 years) with 173 metastases patients were included in group B, who received only MWA. Parameters assessed were local tumor progression (LTP), hepatic distant tumor progression (hDTP), hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The rate of LTP was 4.9% in group A and 4.5% in group B (p-value: 0.062). The rate of hDTP was 71.7% and 83.6% for groups A and B (p-value: 0.81), respectively. The mean hPFS was 13.8 months (95% CI 10.9-16.8) for group A and 8.1 months (95% CI 6.1-10.1) for group B (p-value: 0.03). The median OS time for group A was 30 months (95% CI 26-34), with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 84.2%, 61.1%, 40.8% and 31.3%, respectively. In group B however, the median OS time was 26 months (95% CI 18-34) with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates of 82.3%, 53.2%, 34.6% and 28.2%, respectively (p-value: 0.67). CONCLUSION The combination therapy of TACE and MWA is superior to the monotherapy of MWA for LMCRC, especially regarding hDTP, hPFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Vogl
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Hannah Stefan
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Tatjana Gruber-Rouh
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Wolf Otto Bechstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - John Bielfeldt
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Hamzah Adwan
- Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhonghao J, Fan Y. New advances in the treatment of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1430991. [PMID: 39376988 PMCID: PMC11456399 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1430991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer, affecting millions of people worldwide. Due to the complexity and variability of the disease, there are major challenges in the treatment of HCC in its intermediate and advanced stages; despite advances in various treatment modalities, there are still gaps in our understanding of effective therapeutic strategies. Key findings from several studies have shown that the combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy has a synergistic anti-tumor effect, which can significantly enhance efficacy with a favorable safety profile. In addition, other studies have identified potential biomarkers of therapeutic response, such as tumor protein 53 (TP53) and CTNNB1 (encoding β-conjugated proteins), thus providing personalized treatment options for patients with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this article is to review the recent advances in the treatment of intermediate and advanced HCC, especially targeted immune-combination therapy, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T cell therapy), and gene therapy for these therapeutic options that fill in the gaps in our knowledge of effective treatment strategies, providing important insights for further research and clinical practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Floridi C, Cacioppa LM, Rossini N, Macchini M, Bruno A, Agostini A, Consoli V, Inchingolo R, Acquafredda F, Nicolini D, Schiadà L, Svegliati Baroni G, Candelari R. Microwave ablation followed by cTACE in 5-cm HCC lesions: does a single-session approach affect liver function? LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:1252-1264. [PMID: 38958915 PMCID: PMC11322225 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01842-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microwave ablation (MWA) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) are locoregional treatments commonly performed in very early, early and intermediate stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite combined locoregional approaches have shown encouraging results in obtaining complete tumor necrosis, their application in a single session is poorly described. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-session MWA and cTACE treatment in 5-cm HCCs and its influence on liver function. MATERIALS AND METHODS All 5-cm HCCs treated by MWA and cTACE performed in a single-session in our Interventional Radiology unit between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively recorded and analyzed. Patients with poor or missing pre- and post-treatment imaging were excluded. Technical success, clinical success, and complications rate were examined as primary endpoints. Pre- and post-treatment liver function laboratory parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 15 lesions (mean lesion diameter, 5.0 ± 1.4 cm) in 15 patients (11 men; mean age, 67.1 ± 8.9 years) were retrospectively evaluated. Technical and clinical success were 100% and 73%, respectively. Four (27%) cases of partial response and no cases of progressive or stable disease were recorded. AST and ALT values have found to be significantly higher in post-treatment laboratory tests. No other significant differences between pre- and post-treatment laboratory values were registered. AST and ALT pre- and post-treatment higher differences (ΔAST and ΔALT) were significantly associated with a lower clinical success rate. CONCLUSION MWA and cTACE single-session approach is safe and effective for 5-cm HCCs, without significant liver function impairment. A post-treatment increase in AST and ALT values may be a predictor for clinical failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Floridi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
- Division of Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Delle Marche", 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Laura Maria Cacioppa
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Nicolò Rossini
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Macchini
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
- Division of Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Delle Marche", 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Valeria Consoli
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
- Division of Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Delle Marche", 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" Regional General Hospital, 70021, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Acquafredda
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" Regional General Hospital, 70021, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele Nicolini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Laura Schiadà
- "Transplant and Hepatic Damage" Unit, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Candelari
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Politecnica Delle Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tang L, Hou Y, Huang Z, Huang J. Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Sequential Microwave Ablation for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-to-Seven Criteria: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:2795-2806. [PMID: 38290885 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Lenvatinib plus sequential microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond up-to-seven criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study assessed the medical records of patients with large HCC who underwent TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus sequential MWA (TLM) or TACE plus sequential MWA (TM). Lenvatinib was administered to patients within 3-5 days after TACE and sequential MWA was performed once they met the criteria for curative ablation after TACE or the combination therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related complications were compared between two groups. RESULTS Of the 81 patients who underwent TLM or TM, 64 who met the eligibility criteria were included in this study. Among them, 28 patients underwent TLM and 36 underwent TM. The inverse probability weighting method (IPTW) was used to balance differences between two groups. The TLM group had longer PFS than the TM group (median, before IPTW: 18.53 vs. 5.62 months, p < 0.001; median, after IPTW: 28.27 vs. 5.30 months, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that TLM and the maximum tumor diameter were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The overall incidence rate of minor complications related to TACE or MWA was lower in the TLM group (32.1% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus sequential MWA can prolong the progression-free survival of patients with large HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Tang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.)
| | - Yingwen Hou
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.)
| | - Zhimei Huang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.)
| | - Jinhua Huang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.); Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China (L.T., Y.H., Z.H., J.H.).
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meine TC, Ringe KI. [Ablation of liver tumors : From pre-interventional imaging to post-interventional assessment]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 64:503-514. [PMID: 38780657 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-024-01308-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide an overview on the most frequently applied image-guided, percutaneous, local ablative techniques for treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors. The technical procedures of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are presented. The pre-interventional diagnostics, indications and feasibility are also discussed, taking the current national guidelines into consideration. Finally, treatment outcomes and recommendations on post-interventional imaging following local tumor ablation are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo C Meine
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Kristina I Ringe
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lin ZP, Huang DB, Zou XG, Chen Y, Li XQ, Zhang J. Percutaneous microwave ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for serum tumor markers and prognostics of middle-late primary hepatic carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2783-2791. [PMID: 38222024 PMCID: PMC10784823 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) has an insidious onset and is usually diagnosed in the middle and late stages. Although transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the preferred option for treating middle- and advanced-stage PHC, it has limited efficacy in killing tumor cells and poor long-term efficacy. TACE plus percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) is more effective than interventional therapy alone and can improve survival time. However, there are few reports on the effects of TACE and PMCT on serum marker levels and the prognosis of patients with advanced PHC. AIM To investigate the effect of PMCT + TACE on serum tumor markers and the prognosis of middle-late PHC. METHODS This retrospective study included 150 patients with middle-late PHC admitted to Zhongshan People's Hospital between March 2018 and February 2021. Patients were divided into a single group (treated with TACE, n = 75) and a combined group (treated with TACE + PMCT, n = 75). Before and after treatment, the clinical efficacy and serum tumor marker levels [carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] of both groups were observed. The 1-year survival rates and prognostic factors of the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS The combined group had 21 and 35 cases of complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR), respectively. The single group had 13 and 25 cases of CR and PR, respectively. After 4 wk of treatment, the serum CA19-9, CEA, and AFP levels in the single and combined groups decreased, with the decrease in the combined group being more significant (P < 0.05). The 1-year survival rate of the combined group (80.00%) was higher than that of the single group (60.00%) (P < 0.05). The average survival time within 1 year in the combined group was 299.38 ± 61.13 d, longer than that in the single group (214.41 ± 72.97 d, P < 0.05). COX analysis revealed that tumor diameter, tumor number, and the treatment method were prognostic factors for patients with middle-late PHC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION TACE + PMCT is effective in treating patients with mid-late PHC. It reduces the levels of tumor markers, prolongs survival, and improves prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Peng Lin
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Da-Bei Huang
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xu-Gong Zou
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xiao-Qun Li
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhou J, Sun H, Wang Z, Cong W, Zeng M, Zhou W, Bie P, Liu L, Wen T, Kuang M, Han G, Yan Z, Wang M, Liu R, Lu L, Ren Z, Zeng Z, Liang P, Liang C, Chen M, Yan F, Wang W, Hou J, Ji Y, Yun J, Bai X, Cai D, Chen W, Chen Y, Cheng W, Cheng S, Dai C, Guo W, Guo Y, Hua B, Huang X, Jia W, Li Q, Li T, Li X, Li Y, Li Y, Liang J, Ling C, Liu T, Liu X, Lu S, Lv G, Mao Y, Meng Z, Peng T, Ren W, Shi H, Shi G, Shi M, Song T, Tao K, Wang J, Wang K, Wang L, Wang W, Wang X, Wang Z, Xiang B, Xing B, Xu J, Yang J, Yang J, Yang Y, Yang Y, Ye S, Yin Z, Zeng Y, Zhang B, Zhang B, Zhang L, Zhang S, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhao M, Zhao Y, Zheng H, Zhou L, Zhu J, Zhu K, Liu R, Shi Y, Xiao Y, Zhang L, Yang C, Wu Z, Dai Z, Chen M, Cai J, Wang W, Cai X, Li Q, Shen F, Qin S, Teng G, Dong J, Fan J. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer (2022 Edition). Liver Cancer 2023; 12:405-444. [PMID: 37901768 PMCID: PMC10601883 DOI: 10.1159/000530495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Primary liver cancer, of which around 75-85% is hepatocellular carcinoma in China, is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of tumor-related death, thereby posing a significant threat to the life and health of the Chinese people. Summary Since the publication of Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer in China in June 2017, which were updated by the National Health Commission in December 2019, additional high-quality evidence has emerged from researchers worldwide regarding the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of liver cancer, that requires the guidelines to be updated again. The new edition (2022 Edition) was written by more than 100 experts in the field of liver cancer in China, which not only reflects the real-world situation in China but also may reshape the nationwide diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. Key Messages The new guideline aims to encourage the implementation of evidence-based practice and improve the national average 5-year survival rate for patients with liver cancer, as proposed in the "Health China 2030 Blueprint."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zhou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huichuan Sun
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenming Cong
- Department of Pathology, The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiping Zhou
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Bie
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lianxin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Tianfu Wen
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming Kuang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guohong Han
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zhiping Yan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Maoqiang Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruibao Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ligong Lu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenggang Ren
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changhong Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Chen
- Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery, Chongqing, China
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenping Wang
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinlin Hou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Ji
- Department of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingping Yun
- Department of Pathology, Tumor Prevention and Treatment Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dingfang Cai
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixia Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongjun Chen
- Department of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenwu Cheng
- Department of Integrated Therapy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuqun Cheng
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaoliu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Spleenary Surgery, The Affiliated Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wengzhi Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yabing Guo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Baojin Hua
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowu Huang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weidong Jia
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Qiu Li
- Department of Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xun Li
- The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yaming Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yexiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Changquan Ling
- Changhai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianshu Liu
- Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiufeng Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Shichun Lu
- Institute and Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA Medical School, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guoyue Lv
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Yilei Mao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital, PUMC and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiqiang Meng
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Weixin Ren
- Department of Interventional Radiology the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Hongcheng Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoming Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tianqiang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Kaishan Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kui Wang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiming Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Bangde Xiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Baocai Xing
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Affiliated Hospital Cancer Center, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jiamei Yang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianyong Yang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yefa Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunke Yang
- Department of Integrative Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shenglong Ye
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenyu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yong Zeng
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bixiang Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Boheng Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shuijun Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanqiao Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Ming Zhao
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Liver Cancer Group, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yongfu Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, China
| | - Honggang Zheng
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ledu Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Jiye Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kangshun Zhu
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinghong Shi
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongsheng Xiao
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lan Zhang
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chun Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhifeng Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi Dai
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weilin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiujun Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Feng Shen
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shukui Qin
- Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Gaojun Teng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital (BTCH), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Fan
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Podlasek A, Abdulla M, Broering D, Bzeizi K. Recent Advances in Locoregional Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3347. [PMID: 37444457 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for 90% of primary hepatic cancer cases, and its incidence with associated morbidity and mortality is growing worldwide. In recent decades, there has been a revolution in HCC treatment. There are three main types of locoregional therapy: radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolisation, and transarterial radioembolisation. This article summarises recent advances in locoregional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Podlasek
- Tayside Innovation MedTech Ecosystem (TIME), University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
- Precision Imaging Beacon, Radiological Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Maheeba Abdulla
- Salmaniya Medical Complex, Arabian Gulf University, Manama 323, Bahrain
| | - Dieter Broering
- Department of Liver Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Bzeizi
- Department of Liver Transplantation, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hao MZ, Hu YB, Chen QZ, Chen ZX, Lin HL. Efficacy and safety of computed tomography-guided microwave ablation with fine needle-assisted puncture positioning technique for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:1727-1738. [PMID: 36187402 PMCID: PMC9516651 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In microwave ablation (MWA), although computed tomography (CT) scanning can overcome gas interference, it cannot achieve real-time localization. Therefore, the puncture technique is more important in CT-guided ablation.
AIM To compare the fine needle-assisted puncture (FNP) positioning technique and the conventional puncture (CP) technique for the safety and efficacy of CT-guided MWA in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS This retrospective study included 124 patients with 166 tumor nodules from February 2018 and June 2021. Seventy patients received CT-guided MWA under the FNP technique (FNP group), and 54 patients received MWA under the CP technique (CP group). Intergroup comparisons were made regarding local tumor progression (LTP), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and complications. The influencing variables of LTP and RFS were analyzed through univariate and multivariate regressions.
RESULTS The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidences of LTP in the FNP group were significantly lower than those in the CP group (7.4%, 12.7%, 21.3% vs 13.7%, 32.9%, 36.4%; P = 0.038). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS rates in the FNP group were significantly higher than those in the CP group (80.6%, 73.3%, 64.0% vs 83.3%, 39.4%, and 32.5%, respectively; P = 0.008). The FNP technique independently predicted LTP and RFS. Minor complications in the FNP group were lower than those in the CP group (P < 0.001). The difference in median OS was insignificant between the FNP and CP groups (P = 0.229).
CONCLUSION The FNP technique used in CT-guided MWA may improve outcomes in terms of LTP, RFS, and procedure-related complications for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhi Hao
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
- Department of Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yu-Bin Hu
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Qi-Zhong Chen
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zhang-Xian Chen
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| | - Hai-Lan Lin
- Department of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kobe A, Tselikas L, Deschamps F, Roux C, Delpla A, Varin E, Hakime A, De Baère T. Single-session transarterial chemoembolization combined with percutaneous thermal ablation in liver metastases 3 cm or larger. Diagn Interv Imaging 2022; 103:516-523. [PMID: 35715327 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with percutaneous thermal ablation in patients with liver metastases 3 cm in diameter or larger. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 39 patients with a total of 46 liver metastases treated. There were 14 men and 25 women, with a mean age of 55 ± 13.3 (SD) (age range: 28-77 years). All patients were treated with a combination of TACE and thermal ablation in a single session. Primary outcome was local tumor progression. Secondary outcomes were procedure related complications and systemic disease progression. RESULTS Mean tumor size was 3.6 ± 0.6 (SD) cm (range: 3-5 cm). Conventional TACE was performed in 32 liver metastases (32/46; 70%) and drug-eluting beads-TACE in 14 liver metastases (14/46; 30%) followed by radiofrequency ablation in 34 (34/46; 74%), microwave ablation in 11 (11/46; 24%) and cryoablation in one (1/46; 2%) metastasis. Four grade 2 (4/39; 10%) complications were observed. After a mean follow up of 31.9 ± 26.1 (SD) months (range: 2-113 months) overall local tumor progression rate was 15% (7/46). Local tumor progression rate at 12 months was 13% (6/46). Overall systemic disease progression was seen in 29 patients (29/39; 74%) with a systemic disease progression rate at 12 months of 59% (23/39). CONCLUSION Treatment of large liver metastases with TACE and thermal ablation in a single session is safe and achieves high local control rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Kobe
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, 94805 Villejuif, France.
| | - Lambros Tselikas
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, 94805 Villejuif, France; University of Paris-Saclay, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
| | - Frédéric Deschamps
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, 94805 Villejuif, France; University of Paris-Saclay, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
| | - Charles Roux
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandre Delpla
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Eloi Varin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Antoine Hakime
- Centre Imagerie Medicale Bachaumont Paris Centre, 75002 Paris, France
| | - Thierry De Baère
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave Roussy-Cancer Center, 94805 Villejuif, France; University of Paris-Saclay, 91190 Saint-Aubin, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hatzidakis A, Müller L, Krokidis M, Kloeckner R. Local and Regional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Future Combinations. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102469. [PMID: 35626073 PMCID: PMC9139740 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Percutaneous interventional radiological techniques offer many alternatives for treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) using local anesthesia and sedation. These methods aim to destroy the malignant tumors locally without affecting the non-malignant liver. In this way, complications are kept low and patient recovery is quick. Indications depend on tumor size, type and stage, as well as patient’s condition, liver function and co-morbidities. In recent years, a lot of research has been made in combining such approaches with immune therapy, but there is still much work to be done. This manuscript tries to analyze where we stand today and explain, using a comprehensive algorithm, the treatment options for each different clinical condition. Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be treated by local and regional methods of percutaneous interventional radiological techniques. Indications depend on tumor size, type and stage, as well as patient’s condition, liver function and co-morbidities. According to international classification systems such as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, very early, early or intermediate staged tumors can be treated either with ablative methods or with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), depending on tumor characteristics. The combination of both allows for individualized forms of treatment with the ultimate goal of improving response and survival. In recent years, a lot of research has been carried out in combining locoregional approaches with immune therapy. Although recent developments in systemic treatment, especially immunotherapy, seem quite promising and have expanded possible combined treatment options, there is still not enough evidence in their favor. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive up-to-date overview of all these techniques, explaining indications, contraindications, technical problems, outcomes, results and complications. Moreover, combinations of percutaneous treatment with each other or with immunotherapy and future options will be discussed. Use of all those methods as down-staging or bridging solutions until surgery or transplantation are taken into consideration will also be reviewed. Conclusion: Local and regional therapies remain a mainstay of curative and palliative treatment of patients with HCC. Currently, evidence on potential combination of the local and regional treatment options with each other as well as with other treatment modalities is growing and has the potential to further individualize HCC therapy. To identify the most suitable treatment option out of these new various options, a repeated interdisciplinary discussion of each case by the tumor board is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Hatzidakis
- Department of Radiology, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Lukas Müller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (L.M.); (R.K.)
| | - Miltiadis Krokidis
- 1st Department of Radiology, Areteion Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (L.M.); (R.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yang Y, Yu H, Qi L, Liu C, Feng Y, Qi J, Li J, Zhu Q. Combined radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation with transarterial chemoembolization can increase efficiency in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma without more complication: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:455-465. [PMID: 35271786 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2048095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are widely used in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical practice. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with RFA or MWA versus TACE monotherapy for intermediate-stage HCC. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control (LTC) rate, and major complication. Subgroup analysis for different TACE combination therapies was performed. RESULTS Ten studies with 1799 patients with intermediate-stage HCC were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS was in favor of TACE combination therapy (HR, 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.62). Specifically, the TACE combination therapy was associated with higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates. Regarding tumor progression, the TACE combination therapy showed significantly better PFS (HR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.37-0.61) and higher 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates than TACE monotherapy. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the LTC was also in favor of TACE combination therapy (OR, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.24-0.53). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the major complication rate (OR, 1.26, 95% CI, 0.74-2.16). These results were consistent across subgroups of TACE + RFA versus TACE and TACE + MWA versus TACE. CONCLUSION TACE combined with RFA or MWA can provide significantly better OS, PFS and LTC than TACE monotherapy for patients with intermediate-stage HCC, without increasing the risk of major complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hongli Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Lingyu Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Chenxi Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yuemin Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Jianni Qi
- Department of Central Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Qiang Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Comparison of combined transarterial chemoembolization and ablations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1009-1023. [PMID: 34982183 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03368-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 11/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy of three combination therapies, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CRA) for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Online databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched. RESULTS Forty-two studies with 5468 pooled patients (TACE + RFA: 21 studies with 3398 patients, TACE + MWA:14 studies with 1477 patients, and TACE + CRA: 7 studies with 593 patients) reported combination therapy versus TACE alone. The TACE + MWA subcohort had the best odds of long-term overall survival (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.44, 16.08, P = 0.011) and objective response rate (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.34, 6.61, P < 0.001) compared with the other two combination subcohorts. The TACE + RFA and TACE + MWA subcohorts had approximately similar odds of 1-year recurrence-free survival (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13, 12.75, P < 0.001 and OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.70, 12.51, P = 0.003, respectively). The disease control rate was similar between the TACE + MWA and TACE + CRA subcohorts (OR 4.01, 95% CI 2.66, 6.04, P < 0.001 and OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.68, 9.74, P = 0.002) but greater than the TACE + RFA subcohort (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.14, 4.86, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Overall, the TACE + MWA subcohort had the best efficacy and outcomes, especially for younger patients (less than 60-year-old) with tumor size of ≤ 3 cm, compared with the TACE + RFA or TACE + CRA subcohorts.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kobe A, Tselikas L, Deschamps F, Roux C, Delpla A, Varin E, Hakime A, de Baère T. Thermal Ablation Combined with Selective Transarterial Embolization of Centrally Located Renal Cell Carcinomas Measuring 3 cm or Larger. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:371-379. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-03036-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
17
|
Drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation therapy vs. microwave ablation alone for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary investigation of clinical value. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 148:1781-1788. [PMID: 34405295 PMCID: PMC9189084 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03760-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the clinical value of drug-eluting bead trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) vs. MWA treatment alone for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and methods Consecutive data from 102 HCC patients at early stage who were referred to our hospital from December 2014 to May 2016 were retrospectively collected. Forty-seven patients underwent DEB-TACE combined with MWA treatment, whereas 55 patients underwent MWA alone. After 1 month of treatment, the tumour responses of the patients were assessed using the mRECIST criteria. Treatment-related complications and hepatic function were also analysed for the two groups. In addition, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and compared. Results Patients in the combined treatment group (DEB-TACE combined with MWA) presented a better objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) compared with those in the monotherapy group (MWA treatment). The median OS and PFS were longer in the combined treatment group compared with the monotherapy group. Multivariate Cox’s regression further illustrated that DEB-TACE + MWA vs. MWA was an independent protective factor for PFS and OS. No serious treatment-related complications were observed in any of the patients. Conclusion Combined treatment with DEB-TACE appeared to have advantages in prolonging OS and PFS compared to MWA. Therefore, combined treatment was efficient and should be strongly recommended to early stage HCC patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Kok HP, Cressman ENK, Ceelen W, Brace CL, Ivkov R, Grüll H, Ter Haar G, Wust P, Crezee J. Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 37:711-741. [PMID: 32579419 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1779357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Petra Kok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik N K Cressman
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christopher L Brace
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert Ivkov
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Holger Grüll
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gail Ter Haar
- Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Crezee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arellano RS. What's New in Percutaneous Ablative Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Colorectal Hepatic Metastases? 2020 Update. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:105. [PMID: 32725433 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-00967-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ablation techniques are now well-established treatment options available for the management of primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Currently available ablative techniques include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation, and irreversible electroporation (IRE). Along with advances in navigational devices and targeting technologies, ablation combined with other therapies may be the next therapeutic option in thermal ablation. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current status of ablative technologies in interventional and medical oncology for management of liver malignancies. RECENT FINDINGS With the use of combination techniques (i.e., ablation and transarterial embolization procedures), thermal ablation is now moving toward treating tumors larger than 3 cm in size or tumors with macrovascular invasion. Ongoing trials are examining the optimum timing of combination therapies. Thermal ablation combined with hepatic resection may increase the number of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver who qualify for curative surgery. Combination therapies of thermal ablation and transarterial embolization allow for promising treatment responses for larger HCC. Surgery combined with thermal ablation can potentially increase the number of patients with metastatic colon cancer to the liver who qualify for curative surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald S Arellano
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, GRB 293, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ke Q, Chen Y, Huang Q, Lin N, Wang L, Liu J. Does additional resection of a positive microscopic ductal margin benefit patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0232590. [PMID: 32379819 PMCID: PMC7205232 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of a positive microscopic ductal margin (R1) after surgical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) remains high, but the beneficial of additional resection has not been confirmed by any meta-analysis and randomized clinical trials (RCT), which also increased the risk of morbidity and mortality. Hence, a systematic review is warranted to evaluate the clinical value of additional resection of intraoperative R1 for pCCA. Methods Eligible studies were searched by PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, from Jan.1st 2000 to Nov.30th 2019, evaluating the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of additional resection of intraoperative pathologic R1 for pCCA. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size by a randomized-effect model. Results Eight studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 179 patients in the secondary R0 group, 843 patients in the primary R0 group and 253 patients in the R1 group. The pooled OR for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rate between secondary R0 group and primary R0 group were 1.03(95%CI 0.64~1.67, P = 0.90), 0.92(95%CI 0.52~1.64, P = 0.78), and 0.83(95%CI 0.37~1.84, P = 0.65), respectively. The pooled OR for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rate between secondary R0 group and R1 group were 2.14(95%CI 1.31~3.50, P = 0.002), 2.58(95%CI 1.28~5.21, P = 0.008), and 3.54(95%CI 1.67~7.50, P = 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of the West showed that the pooled OR for the 1-, and 3-year OS rate between secondary R0 group and R1 group were 2.05(95%CI 0.95~4.41, P = 0.07), 1.91(95%CI 0.96~3.81, P = 0.07), respectively. Conclusion With the current data, additional resection should be recommended in selected patients with intraoperative R1, but the conclusion is needed further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiao Ke
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Yuqing Chen
- The Graduate School of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Qizhen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Nanping Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Jingfeng Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| |
Collapse
|