Radiofrequency ablation versus reoperation for benign thyroid nodules that developed after previous thyroid surgery

Effect of different retention doses of ultrasound-guided polidocanol chemical ablation for benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of varying retention doses of ultrasound-guided polidocanol chemical ablation for benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from December 2019 to January 2022, including 78 patients with benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules, of which 31 received polidocanol chemical ablation alone, 23 received polidocanol chemical plus thermal ablation, and 24 received open surgery. Patients who received polidocanol chemical ablation were assigned into groups based on the retention dose of polidocanol: 0 %, 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, and 50 %. Follow-ups were done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The volume of the nodules, postoperative complications, and recurrence of the nodules were examined before treatment and during follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Total operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume for patients who received ablation were substantially lower than those for patients who received open surgery (P < 0.001). Among patients in the polidocanol chemical ablation group, volume shrinkage rate of thyroid nodules in the 10 % retention dose group was significantly lower than that in the 0 % retention dose group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The 30 % retention dose group had the highest nodule shrinkage rate (98.46 ± 1.55 %) at 12 months postoperatively, which was significantly higher than that in the 50 % retention dose group (P < 0.05). Among patients in the polidocanol chemical and thermal ablation group, the volume shrinkage rate of thyroid nodules in the 10 % and 30 % retention dose groups at 1 month postoperatively was significantly lower than that in the 0 % retention dose group (P < 0.05). Although volume shrinkage rate in the 20 % retention dose group after thermal ablation was higher than that in the 0 % retention dose group, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In terms of adverse reactions, the incidence of hoarseness and coughing was higher in the open surgery group than in the polidocanol chemical ablation and polidocanol chemical and thermal ablation groups, but there was no significant difference (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Chemical ablation with polidocanol was safe and effective for therapy of benign cystic-solid thyroid nodules, and the optimal retention dose may be between 20 % and 30 %. Patients with poor efficacy from chemical ablation alone can receive safe and effective treatment through thermal ablation.

Five-year Outcome Between Radiofrequency Ablation vs Surgery for Unilateral Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

CONTEXT

Ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been considered as an alternative to surgery or active surveillance for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). However, little is known about the long-term outcomes of RFA in comparison with surgery for unilateral multifocal PTMC.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to report the comparison between RFA vs surgery for unilateral multifocal PTMC over a more than 5-year follow-up period.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study at a primary care center with a median follow-up period of 72.9 months. A total of 97 patients with unilateral multifocal PTMC were treated with RFA (RFA group, n = 44) or surgery (surgery group, n = 53). In the RFA group, patients were treated by a bipolar RFA generator and an 18-gauge bipolar RF electrode with a 0.9-cm active tip. In the surgery group, patients underwent thyroid lobectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, no statistically significant differences were found in disease progression (4.5% vs 3.8%; P = ≥.999), lymph node metastasis (2.3% vs 3.8%; P = ≥.999), persistent lesion (2.3% vs 0%; P = .272), and RFS rates (97.7% vs 96.2%; P = .673) in the RFA and surgery groups. Patients undergoing RFA had a shorter hospitalization (0 vs 8.0 [3.0] d; P < .001), shorter procedure time (3.5 [2.4] vs 80.0 [35.0] min; P < .001), lower estimated blood loss (0 vs 20.0 [15.0] mL; P < .001), and lower costs ($1768.3 [0.1] vs $2084.4 [1173.8]; P = .001) than those in the surgery group. The complication rate in the surgery group was 7.5%, whereas none of the RFA-treated patients experienced any complications (P = .111).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed 6-year comparable outcomes between RFA and surgery for unilateral multifocal PTMC. RFA may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery in selected patients with unilateral multifocal PTMC.

Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Thyroidectomy for the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules in Elderly Patients: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation has been recommended as an alternative to surgery for benign thyroid nodules. However, little is known about the benefit from the application of radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation versus thyroidectomy for elderly patients with benign thyroid nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 230 elderly patients (60 years of age or older) with benign thyroid nodules treated with radiofrequency ablation (R group, n = 49) or thyroidectomy (T group, n = 181). Complications, thyroid function, and treatment variables, including procedural time, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, and cost, were compared after propensity score matching. The volume, volume reduction rate, symptoms, and cosmetic score were also evaluated in the R group.

RESULTS

After 1:1 matching, each group had 49 elderly patients. The rate of overall complications and hypothyroidism was 26.5% and 20.4% in the T group, respectively, but these complications were totally absent from the R group (P < .001, P = .001). Patients in the R group had a significantly shorter procedural time (median, 4.8 versus 95.0 minutes, P < .001) and lower cost (US $1979.02 versus US $2208.80, P = .013) than those treated by thyroidectomy. After radiofrequency ablation, the volume reduction rate was 94.1%, and 12.2% of nodules had completely disappeared. The symptom and cosmetic scores were both significantly reduced at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation could be considered as a first-line treatment for elderly patients with benign thyroid nodules.

Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation for the Management of Patients With Benign Thyroid Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation has been shown to considerably reduce nodule-related discomfort and cosmetic problems. Hence, this review was done to determine the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency or microwave ablation in the management of benign thyroid nodules. Searches were done in EMBASE, SCOPUS, PubMed Central, Cochrane library, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Clinicaltrials.gov until August 2022. Meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects model. With 95% confidence intervals (CIs), pooled standardized mean differences, mean differences, and/or odds ratio reported. In total, we analyzed 16 studies, most of them had high risk of bias. The pooled standardized mean difference for symptom score was -1.01 (95% CI, -1.83 to -0.19; I2 = 94.2%), for cosmetic relief was -1.26 (95% CI, -2.27 to -0.24; I2 = 96%), for postoperative nodule volume was -1.77 (95% CI, -3.06 to -0.48; I2 = 94%), for hospital stay was -3.88 (95% CI, -4.58 to -3.18; I2 = 91.1%), for operation time was -3.30 (95% CI, -3.95 to -2.64; I2 = 93.4%). The pooled odds ratio for postoperative pain was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.00-0.35; I2 = 95.1%), for postoperative hypothyroidism was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.11; I2 = 0%), for postoperative hoarseness was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.22-1.47; I2 = 0%), for postoperative hematoma was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.15-2.22; I2 = 0%). Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency and microwave ablation had better efficacy and safety profile in terms of symptoms, cosmetic relief, complication rate, duration of stay, and operation time when compared with conventional surgery or observation without treatment for patients with benign thyroid nodules.