Survival benefit of thermal ablation combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis

Clinical efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of pulmonary carcinoid tumor: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of thermal ablation in the treatment of pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumor.

METHODS

Data of patients with inoperable PC diagnosed from 2000 to 2019 were obtained from the SEER database and analyzed according to different therapeutic modality: thermal ablation vs non-ablation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce intergroup differences. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to compare intergroup differences of overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). Cox proportional risk models were used to reveal prognostic factors.

RESULTS

After PSM, the thermal ablation group had better OS (p < .001) and LCSS (p < .001) than the non-ablation group. Subgroup analysis stratified by age, sex, histologic type and lymph node status subgroups showed similar survival profile. In the subgroup analysis stratified by tumor size, the thermal ablation group showed better OS and LCSS than those of the non-ablation group for tumors ≤3.0 cm, not statistically significant for tumors >3.0 cm. Subgroup analysis by M stage showed that thermal ablation was superior to non-ablation in OS and LCSS for patients with M0 stage, but no significant difference was found in subgroups with distant metastatic disease. Multivariate analysis showed that thermal ablation was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.25-0.46, p < .001) and LCSS (HR: 0.23, 95%CI: 0.12-0.43, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

For patients with inoperable PC, thermal ablation might be a potential treatment option, especially in M0-stage with tumor size ≤3 cm.

Thermal ablation versus radiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival benefits of thermal ablation (TA) and radiotherapy in inoperable patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance potential baseline confounding factors. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

The present study included 33,393 inoperable patients with stage III NSCLC, including 106 patients treated with TA and 33,287 patients treated with radiotherapy. No statistical difference in overall survival (OS) (p = .065) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p = .996) was found between the patients treated with TA and those treated with radiotherapy. Using 1:3 matching, a matched cohort of 420 patients (105 patients treated with TA, 315 patients treated with radiotherapy) was identified. The differences in OS (p = .177) and CSS (p = .605) were still not significant between the radiotherapy and TA groups after PSM. According to subgroup analyses, TA showed comparable survival benefits in almost all subgroups compared to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

For inoperable stage III NSCLC, the survival benefit of TA was comparable to radiotherapy. TA may be a potential therapeutic modality for inoperable stage III NSCLC.

Survival benefit of thermal ablation therapy for patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis

Background

Thermal ablation (TA) is considered a safe alternative to surgical resection for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While previous studies have shown that TA is beneficial for stage I NSCLC patients, however, few have reported on TA efficacy in patients with stage II-III NSCLC. The current study investigated the impact of TA on the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with stage II-III NSCLC.

Methods

Data on patients with stage II-III NSCLC who did not undergo surgical resection between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox regression were used for statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 57,959 stage II-III NSCLC patients who did not undergo surgical resection were included in this study, 261 of whom received TA. Overall, TA was associated with a longer OS (p = 0.035) and CSS (p = 0.005) than non-ablation. After 1:3 PSM, 252 patients receiving TA and 732 patients not receiving ablation were enrolled in the matched cohort. The OS (p = 0.047) and CSS (p = 0.029) remained higher in the TA group than in the non-ablation group after PSM. Cox regression analysis showed that age, sex, primary tumor site, pathological type, tumor size, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and thermal ablation were independently associated with OS and CSS (p <0.05). Subgroup analysis found that the advantages of TA were more pronounced among individuals ≥70 years of age, with tumor size ≤3.0 cm, or who did not receive radiotherapy.

Conclusion

TA could be an effective alternative treatment for stage II-III NSCLC patients unsuitable for surgical resection, particularly those ≥70 years of age, with tumor size ≤3.0 cm, or who have not received radiotherapy.