Key factors for successful cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to treat diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: results from specialized peritoneal cancer center in China

Perfusion Strategies for Cytoreductive Surgery With Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to improve survival for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). Presently, there is no standardized HIPEC protocol with respect to chemotherapeutic agent, dose, administration temperature, or duration and limited literature comparing outcomes in different regimens. In this study, we analyze common practices and outcomes of published HIPEC regimens to gain insight into current practice to inform future directions of study. We conducted a literature search for investigational studies of CRS and HIPEC for MPM treatment in adults and identified 35 such articles. These studies were analyzed for institution type and location, drug regimens, perfusion temperatures and time, and study outcomes including median survival, complication rates, and perioperative mortality rates. On review, there is significant heterogeneity in HIPEC regimens and outcome reporting metrics, suggesting a need for multi-institutional standardized study protocols to better determine the safest and most efficacious treatment regimen.

Drug sensitivity tumor cell clusters in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

To explore the most effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) through patient derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTC) drug sensitivity test.

METHODS

PTC were cultured in vitro with intraoperative specimens, and drug sensitivity test was performed to calculate the most effective chemotherapy regimen for MPM. The patients were divided into conventional and individualized chemotherapy group according to whether they received PTC drug testing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 186 MPM patients included, 63 underwent PTC culture and drug sensitivity test. The results showed that the most effective chemotherapy regimen was oxaliplatin + gemcitabine. After propensity score matching, a total of 64 patients were enrolled in the following study, including 32 patients receiving individualized chemotherapy guided by PTC drug results as group 1 and 32 patients receiving conventional chemotherapy as group 2. Survival analysis showed that the median OS of group 1 was not reached, significantly longer than that of group 2 (23.5 months) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional chemotherapy, individualized chemotherapy guided by PTC drug sensitivity tests can prolong patient survival, and oxaliplatin + gemcitabine + apatinib could be the optimal adjuvant treatment regimen for MPM.

Long-term survival in patients with PMP: a single-institutional retrospective study from China

BACKGROUND

As the standard treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can significantly prolong the survival of PMP patients, and some patients can even achieve long-term survival (LTS) or clinical cure. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological and treatment features of PMP patients with LTS and to explore the survival benefit factors of PMP patients.

METHODS

The clinicopathological and prognostic data of PMP patients who received CRS + HIPEC at our center from December 2004 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. PMP patients were divided into LTS group (≥ 10 years) and short-term survival (STS) group (< 5 years) according to the length of natural history. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the beneficial factors of PMP patients with LTS.

RESULTS

A total of 609 patients with PMP received CRS + HIPEC treatment at our center. Two-hundred one patients with PMP were included in the study after screening, including 39 patients (19.4%) in the LTS group and 162 patients (80.6%) in the STS group. In STS group and LTS group, median overall survival based on natural history was 29.2 (2.4-59.9) vs. 138.9 (120.3-416.7) months. Univariate analysis revealed 8 factors (P < 0.05) with statistically significant differences between the two groups: gender, chemotherapy history, previous surgical score, Karnofsky Performance Status score, pathological diagnosis, lymphatic metastasis, peritoneal cancer index, and completeness of cytoreduction (CC). Multivariate analysis identified only two factors independently associated with LTS of PMP patients: CC and pathological diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Complete CRS and pathological features are two key factors affecting LTS in PMP patients.

Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase and Breast Cancer 1 Protein-Associated Protein 1 as Biomarkers for the Peritoneal Mesothelioma

OBJECTIVES

Combination of Breast Cancer 1 protein-associated protein 1 (BAP1) and methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) in the peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) has yet to be explored. We aim to assess the diagnostic value of combined BAP1 and MTAP to distinguish biphasic mesothelioma (BM) from epithelioid mesothelioma (EM) with reactive stroma in peritoneum, as well as its prognostic value in PeM.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from June 2014 to December 2021. This study included 18 cases of BM and 27 cases of EM with reactive stroma, excluded sarcomatoid, and EM without reactive stroma cases, and clinicopathological information was collected. The associations between MTAP and BAP1 levels and clinicopathological features or prognosis were analyzed. Clinical follow-up data were reviewed to correlate with pathological prognostic factors using Kaplan-Meier estimator and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

Loss/decrease of BAP1/MTAP was observed in 6 (33.3%) BM cases and 12 (44.4%) EM cases. In 5 (27.8%) cases, loss of or decreased BAP1/MTAP expression was observed in both EC and SC of BM. BAP1/MTAP loss/decrease was observed in 12 (44.4%) cases of only EC of EM but not in reactive stroma. Compared with histology alone, a combination of BAP1 and MTAP immunohistochemistry (IHC) in spindled PeM provides a more objective mean to distinguish BM from EM with reactive stroma. Loss/decrease of BAP1/MTAP was associated with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score (P = 0.047) and completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (P = 0.038). BM patients have worse overall survival (OS) than EM with reactive stroma (P = 0 .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of BAP1/MTAP by IHC is helpful for differential diagnosis of peritoneal BM from EM with reactive stroma. Nevertheless, BAP1/MTAP may help to evaluate the biological behavior of PeM.

Loss of NPM2 expression is a potential immunohistochemical marker for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a single-center study of 92 cases

Background

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignant tumor with a high mortality rate and extremely poor prognosis. In-depth pathological analysis is essential to assess tumor biological behaviors and explore potential therapeutic targets of MPM. Nucleoplasmin 2 (NPM2) is a molecular chaperone that binds histones and may play a key role in the development and progression of tumors. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between the expression level of NPM2 and the main clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of MPM.

Methods

Ninety-two postoperative specimens from MPM patients following cytoreductive surgery were collected. Postoperative specimens were stained with immunohistochemistry. The expression level of NPM2 was quantitatively analyzed by QuPath-0.3.2 software. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the correlation between NPM2 expression and other conventional clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

Among the 92 MPM patients, there were 47 males (48.9%) and 45 females (51.1%), with a median age of 56 (range: 24–73). There were 70 (76.0%) cases with loss of NPM2 protein expression, 11 (12.0%) cases with low expression, and 11 (12.0%) cases with high expression. Univariate analysis showed that NPM2 protein expression level (negative vs. low expression vs. high expression) was negatively correlated with the following three clinicopathological factors: completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score, vascular tumor emboli, and serious adverse events (SAEs) (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that NPM2 protein expression level (negative vs. low expression vs. high expression) was independently negatively correlated with the following two clinicopathological factors: CC score [odds ratio (OR) = 0.317, 95% CI: 0.317–0.959, P = 0.042] and vascular tumor emboli (OR = 0.092, 95% CI = 0.011–0.770, P = 0.028). Survival analysis showed that loss of NPM2 protein expression (negative vs. positive) was associated with poor prognosis of MPM.

Conclusions

Loss of NPM2 expression is a potential immunohistochemical marker for MPM.