Testing variance components in balanced linear growth curve models

Smoothed simulated pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation for nonlinear mixed effects models with censored responses

Nonlinear mixed effects models have been widely applied to analyses of data that arise from biological, agricultural, and environmental sciences. Estimation of and inference on parameters in nonlinear mixed effects models are often based on the specification of a likelihood function. Maximizing this likelihood function can be complicated by the specification of the random effects distribution, especially in the presence of multiple random effects. The implementation of nonlinear mixed effects models can be further complicated by left-censored responses, representing measurements from bioassays where the exact quantification below a certain threshold is not possible. Motivated by the need to characterize the nonlinear human immunodeficiency virus RNA viral load trajectories after the interruption of antiretroviral therapy, we propose a smoothed simulated pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation approach to fit nonlinear mixed effects models in the presence of left-censored observations. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting estimators. We develop testing procedures for the correlation among random effects and for testing the distributional assumptions on random effects against a specific alternative. In contrast to the existing variants of expectation-maximization approaches, the proposed methods offer flexibility in the specification of the random effects distribution and convenience in making inference about higher-order correlation parameters. We evaluate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods through extensive simulation studies and illustrate them on a combined dataset from six AIDS Clinical Trials Group treatment interruption studies.

Pearson's goodness-of-fit tests for sparse distributions

Pearson's chi-squared test is widely used to test the goodness of fit between categorical data and a given discrete distribution function. When the number of sets of the categorical data, say k, is a fixed integer, Pearson's chi-squared test statistic converges in distribution to a chi-squared distribution with k-1 degrees of freedom when the sample size n goes to infinity. In real applications, the number k often changes with n and may be even much larger than n. By using the martingale techniques, we prove that Pearson's chi-squared test statistic converges to the normal under quite general conditions. We also propose a new test statistic which is more powerful than chi-squared test statistic based on our simulation study. A real application to lottery data is provided to illustrate our methodology.

Permutation and Bayesian tests for testing random effects in linear mixed-effects models

In many applications of linear mixed-effects models to longitudinal and multilevel data especially from medical studies, it is of interest to test for the need of random effects in the model. It is known that classical tests such as the likelihood ratio, Wald, and score tests are not suitable for testing random effects because they suffer from testing on the boundary of the parameter space. Instead, permutation and bootstrap tests as well as Bayesian tests, which do not rely on the asymptotic distributions, avoid issues with the boundary of the parameter space. In this paper, we first develop a permutation test based on the likelihood ratio test statistic, which can be easily used for testing multiple random effects and any subset of them in linear mixed-effects models. The proposed permutation test would be an extension to two existing permutation tests. We then aim to compare permutation tests and Bayesian tests for random effects to find out which test is more powerful under which situation. Nothing is known about this in the literature, although this is an important practical problem due to the usefulness of both methods in tackling the challenges with testing random effects. For this, we consider a Bayesian test developed using Bayes factors, where we also propose a new alternative computation for this Bayesian test to avoid some computational issue it encounters in testing multiple random effects. Extensive simulations and a real data analysis are used for evaluation of the proposed permutation test and its comparison with the Bayesian test. We find that both tests perform well, albeit the permutation test with the likelihood ratio statistic tends to provide a relatively higher power when testing multiple random effects.

Testing random effects in linear mixed-effects models with serially correlated errors

In linear mixed-effects models, random effects are used to capture the heterogeneity and variability between individuals due to unmeasured covariates or unknown biological differences. Testing for the need of random effects is a nonstandard problem because it requires testing on the boundary of parameter space where the asymptotic chi-squared distribution of the classical tests such as likelihood ratio and score tests is incorrect. In the literature several tests have been proposed to overcome this difficulty, however all of these tests rely on the restrictive assumption of i.i.d. measurement errors. The presence of correlated errors, which often happens in practice, makes testing random effects much more difficult. In this paper, we propose a permutation test for random effects in the presence of serially correlated errors. The proposed test not only avoids issues with the boundary of parameter space, but also can be used for testing multiple random effects and any subset of them. Our permutation procedure includes the permutation procedure in Drikvandi, Verbeke, Khodadadi, and Partovi Nia (2013) as a special case when errors are i.i.d., though the test statistics are different. We use simulations and a real data analysis to evaluate the performance of the proposed permutation test. We have found that random slopes for linear and quadratic time effects may not be significant when measurement errors are serially correlated.