1
|
Fernandes B, Neelakantan L, Shah H, Sumant S, Collins PY, Velloza J, Bampton E, Ranganathan S, Sibisi R, Bashir T, Bowes J, David EL, Kaur H, Malik U, Shannon I, Gurumayum S, Burn AM, Sieberts SK, Fazel M. Evidencing the Impact of Web-Based Coproduction With Youth on Mental Health Research: Qualitative Findings From the MindKind Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023; 9:e42963. [PMID: 37335609 PMCID: PMC10365598 DOI: 10.2196/42963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public involvement in research is a growing phenomenon as well as a condition of research funding, and it is often referred to as coproduction. Coproduction involves stakeholder contributions at every stage of research, but different processes exist. However, the impact of coproduction on research is not well understood. Web-based young people's advisory groups (YPAGs) were established as part of the MindKind study at 3 sites (India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom) to coproduce the wider research study. Each group site, led by a professional youth advisor, conducted all youth coproduction activities collaboratively with other research staff. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the impact of youth coproduction in the MindKind study. METHODS To measure the impact of web-based youth coproduction on all stakeholders, the following methods were used: analysis of project documents, capturing the views of stakeholders using the Most Significant Change technique, and impact frameworks to assess the impact of youth coproduction on specific stakeholder outcomes. Data were analyzed in collaboration with researchers, advisors, and YPAG members to explore the impact of youth coproduction on research. RESULTS The impact was recorded on 5 levels. First, at the paradigmatic level, a novel method of conducting research allowed for a widely diverse group of YPAG representations, influencing study priorities, conceptualization, and design. Second, at the infrastructural level, the YPAG and youth advisors meaningfully contributed to the dissemination of materials; infrastructural constraints of undertaking coproduction were also identified. Third, at the organizational level, coproduction necessitated implementing new communication practices, such as a web-based shared platform. This meant that materials were easily accessible to the whole team and communication streams remained consistent. Fourth, at the group level, authentic relationships developed between the YPAG members, advisors, and the rest of the team, facilitated by regular web-based contact. Finally, at the individual level, participants reported enhanced insights into mental well-being and appreciation for the opportunity to engage in research. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed several factors that shape the creation of web-based coproduction, with clear positive outcomes for advisors, YPAG members, researchers, and other project staff. However, several challenges of coproduced research were also encountered in multiple contexts and amid pressing timelines. For systematic reporting of the impact of youth coproduction, we propose that monitoring, evaluation, and learning systems be designed and implemented early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blossom Fernandes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lakshmi Neelakantan
- Centre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Himani Shah
- Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Sushmita Sumant
- Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Pamela Y Collins
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Jennifer Velloza
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Emily Bampton
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Refiloe Sibisi
- Higher Health, Higher Education and Training: Health, Wellness, and Development Centre, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Toiba Bashir
- Mindkind Young People's Advisory Group, Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Joshua Bowes
- Mindkind Young People's Advisory Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Esther Larisa David
- Mindkind Young People's Advisory Group, Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Harsimar Kaur
- Mindkind Young People's Advisory Group, Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Umairah Malik
- Mindkind Young People's Advisory Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Issy Shannon
- Mindkind Young People's Advisory Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Suvlaxmi Gurumayum
- Mindkind Young People's Advisory Group, Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Anne-Marie Burn
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mina Fazel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fisher H, Chantler T, Finn A, Kesten J, Hickman M, Letley L, Mounier-Jack S, Thomas C, Worthington K, Yates J, Audrey S. Development of an educational package for the universal human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme: a co-production study with young people and key informants. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2022; 8:16. [PMID: 35468845 PMCID: PMC9035505 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-022-00349-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The English schools-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme is routinely offered to all young people aged 12-13 years, to prevent cancers affecting the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis, anus and mouth. Lower uptake among some population groups has been identified, in part, because of unmet information needs among young people. To address these unmet needs we report intervention planning and development processes to co-produce an educational package about the HPV vaccine. METHODS We used co-production research methodologies and the 'person-based approach' involving the following iterative stages: (i) collating and analysing primary and secondary evidence, including HPV vaccine communication materials, interviews and workshops; (ii) developing guiding principles; (iii) undertaking a behavioural analysis informed by the Behaviour Change Wheel and the Behaviour Change Technique taxonomy; (iv) development of a preliminary logic model; (v) co-production of resources, and; (vi) refinement of resources informed by feedback from young people and key informants. RESULTS We co-produced EDUCATE, a theory-based educational package, that is designed to be delivered to young people prior to being offered the HPV vaccine to support uptake. Young people and key informants identified the following key issues to include as content: (i) HPV-related information; (ii) how vaccines work; (iii) safety and side-effects of the HPV vaccine; (iii) eligibility for the HPV vaccination programme, and; (iv) preparation of young people to receive the HPV vaccine. A manual for professionals (e.g. immunisation nurses, school staff) delivering the intervention and a PowerPoint presentation, interspersed with five short films, were co-produced with young people and key informants. Following feedback, the content of the EDUCATE package was refined to increase acceptability, engagement, and persuasiveness to the target users. CONCLUSION Engagement with young people and key informants was integral to the development of our rigorously developed, theory-based intervention to address young people's information needs about the HPV vaccination programme. The acceptability and persuasiveness of the package has been maximised by working closely with young people and key informants to develop the content. An implementation study to examine how the EDUCATE package is implemented in practice and the impact on uptake of the HPV vaccination programme is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Fisher
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Tracey Chantler
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Adam Finn
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanna Kesten
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew Hickman
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Louise Letley
- Immunisation and Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Sandra Mounier-Jack
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Vaccines and Immunisation, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Clare Thomas
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Julie Yates
- Screening and Immunisation, NHS England and Improvement South West, Bristol, UK
| | - Suzanne Audrey
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|