Uninstrumented ventral surgery for subaxial cervical spine tuberculosis: Clinical and radiological outcome

Treatment for tuberculosis of the subaxial cervical spine: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of patients with subaxial cervical spinal tuberculosis (SCS-TB) and evaluate the current evidence for surgical or nonsurgical treatment.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Studies published in English from January 2000 to December 2018 were included in the search. A reference lists search of relevant articles was also conducted for other potential references. The risk of bias was assessed with the 13-item criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back and Neck Group and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were included with a total of 456 patients, of which only 1 study was randomized and fourteen were nonrandomized. The most common symptom reported was neck pain and stiffness, and the most common segment involved was C5. Of the 456 patients, 329 (72.1%) were treated surgically. Most experienced neurologic recovery after surgery. Instrumentation resulted in maintenance of the correction of alignment throughout the follow-up period. The use of radical debridement is still in debate.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TB therapy is necessary for all SCS-TB patients, including those underwent surgical management. For patients with neurological dysfunction, the surgical method with decompression and instrumentation could provide better cervical spinal alignment and stability. For adult, the radical debridement remains in debate, while for children, radical debridement may cause the development of progressive kyphosis during growth. Larger randomized comparative studies with longer follow-up times are needed.

Tuberculosis of the spine: a review

We analyzed 124 papers published in the English language literature to define the indications and timing of surgery in spinal TB and to evaluate the outcome of various surgical procedures for kyphosis and neural outcome. Surgery in spinal tuberculosis is indicated for diagnostic dilemma, neural complications, and prevention of kyphosis progression. Up to 76% canal encroachment is compatible with a normal neurologic state as the spinal cord tolerates gradually developing compression. Patients with relatively preserved cord size, but with edema/myelitis and predominantly fluid compression on MRI respond well to nonoperative treatment. We believe patients with extradural compression by granulation tissue with little fluid component compressing or constricting the cord circumferentially with cord edema/myelitis or myelomalacia need early surgical decompression. Transthoracic transpleural anterior decompression and extrapleural anterolateral decompression have similar results in the dorsal spine. Instrumented stabilization helps prevent graft-related complications when postdébridement defects exceed two disc spaces (4-5 cm). Progression of kyphosis may occur in a short-segment disease despite instrumented stabilization. Its outcome in a long-segment disease needs observation. The correction of healed kyphosis requires multistage surgery and is fraught with complications. Prospective studies are needed to define surgical approach, steps, stages, problems, and obstacles to correct severe kyphosis in spinal TB.